Conflicts:
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmmii.c
drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
Almost entirely overlapping changes.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Currently, there are two different methods to store an u16 integer to
the u32 data register. For example:
u32 *dest = ®s->data[priv->dreg];
1. *dest = 0; *(u16 *) dest = val_u16;
2. *dest = val_u16;
For method 1, the u16 value will be stored like this, either in
big-endian or little-endian system:
0 15 31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Value | 0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
For method 2, in little-endian system, the u16 value will be the same
as listed above. But in big-endian system, the u16 value will be stored
like this:
0 15 31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0 | Value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
So later we use "memcmp(®s->data[priv->sreg], data, 2);" to do
compare in nft_cmp, nft_lookup expr ..., method 2 will get the wrong
result in big-endian system, as 0~15 bits will always be zero.
For the similar reason, when loading an u16 value from the u32 data
register, we should use "*(u16 *) sreg;" instead of "(u16)*sreg;",
the 2nd method will get the wrong value in the big-endian system.
So introduce some wrapper functions to store/load an u8 or u16
integer to/from the u32 data register, and use them in the right
place.
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
When we want to validate the expr's dependency or hooks, we must do two
things to accomplish it. First, write a X_validate callback function
and point ->validate to it. Second, call X_validate in init routine.
This is very common, such as fib, nat, reject expr and so on ...
It is a little ugly, since we will call X_validate in the expr's init
routine, it's better to do it in nf_tables_newexpr. So we can avoid to
do this again and again. After doing this, the second step listed above
is not useful anymore, remove them now.
Patch was tested by nftables/tests/py/nft-test.py and
nftables/tests/shell/run-tests.sh.
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
so that conntrack core will add the needed hooks in this namespace.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Switch the nf_tables registers from 128 bit addressing to 32 bit
addressing to support so called concatenations, where multiple values
can be concatenated over multiple registers for O(1) exact matches of
multiple dimensions using sets.
The old register values are mapped to areas of 128 bits for compatibility.
When dumping register numbers, values are expressed using the old values
if they refer to the beginning of a 128 bit area for compatibility.
To support concatenations, register loads of less than a full 32 bit
value need to be padded. This mainly affects the payload and exthdr
expressions, which both unconditionally zero the last word before
copying the data.
Userspace fully passes the testsuite using both old and new register
addressing.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Add helper functions to parse and dump register values in netlink attributes.
These helpers will later be changed to take care of translation between the
old 128 bit and the new 32 bit register numbers.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Replace the array of registers passed to expressions by a struct nft_regs,
containing the verdict as a seperate member, which aliases to the
NFT_REG_VERDICT register.
This is needed to seperate the verdict from the data registers completely,
so their size can be changed.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Change nft_validate_input_register() to not only validate the input
register number, but also the length of the load, and rename it to
nft_validate_register_load() to reflect that change.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
The user can crash the kernel if it uses any of the existing NAT
expressions from the wrong hook, so add some code to validate this
when loading the rule.
This patch introduces nft_chain_validate_hooks() which is based on
an existing function in the bridge version of the reject expression.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Make sure this fetches 16-bits port data from the register.
Remove casting to make sparse happy, not needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: leroy christophe <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Interpret NFTA_NAT_REG_ADDR_MAX if NFTA_NAT_REG_ADDR_MIN is present,
otherwise, skip it. Same thing with NFTA_NAT_REG_PROTO_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
We have to validate that we at least get an NFTA_NAT_REG_ADDR_MIN or
NFTA_NFT_REG_PROTO_MIN attribute. Reject the configuration if none
of them are present.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
This adds the missing validation code to avoid the use of nat/masq from
non-nat chains. The validation assumes two possible configuration
scenarios:
1) Use of nat from base chain that is not of nat type. Reject this
configuration from the nft_*_init() path of the expression.
2) Use of nat from non-base chain. In this case, we have to wait until
the non-base chain is referenced by at least one base chain via
jump/goto. This is resolved from the nft_*_validate() path which is
called from nf_tables_check_loops().
The user gets an -EOPNOTSUPP in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Both SNAT and DNAT (and the upcoming masquerade) can have additional
configuration parameters, such as port randomization and NAT addressing
persistence. We can cover these scenarios by simply adding a flag
attribute for userspace to fill when needed.
The flags to use are defined in include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_nat.h:
NF_NAT_RANGE_MAP_IPS
NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED
NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM
NF_NAT_RANGE_PERSISTENT
NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM_FULLY
NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM_ALL
The caller must take care of not messing up with the flags, as they are
added unconditionally to the final resulting nf_nat_range.
Signed-off-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Don't include port information attributes if they are unset.
Reported-by: Ana Rey <anarey@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
The family in the NAT expression is basically completely useless since
we have it available during runtime anyway. Nevertheless it is used to
decide the NAT family, so at least validate it properly. As we don't
support cross-family NAT, it needs to match the family of the table the
expression exists in.
Unfortunately we can't remove it completely since we need to dump it for
userspace (*sigh*), so at least reduce the memory waste.
Additionally clean up the module init function by removing useless
temporary variables.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
This patch fixes this:
CHECK net/netfilter/nft_nat.c
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:50:43: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:50:43: expected restricted __be32 [addressable] [usertype] ip
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:50:43: got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident>
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:51:43: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:51:43: expected restricted __be32 [addressable] [usertype] ip
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:51:43: got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] <noident>
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:65:37: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:65:37: expected restricted __be16 [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] all
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:65:37: got unsigned int [unsigned] <noident>
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:66:37: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:66:37: expected restricted __be16 [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] all
net/netfilter/nft_nat.c:66:37: got unsigned int [unsigned] <noident>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Bursztyka <tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
This patch generalizes the NAT expression to support both IPv4 and IPv6
using the existing IPv4/IPv6 NAT infrastructure. This also adds the
NAT chain type for IPv6.
This patch collapses the following patches that were posted to the
netfilter-devel mailing list, from Tomasz:
* nf_tables: Change NFTA_NAT_ attributes to better semantic significance
* nf_tables: Split IPv4 NAT into NAT expression and IPv4 NAT chain
* nf_tables: Add support for IPv6 NAT expression
* nf_tables: Add support for IPv6 NAT chain
* nf_tables: Fix up build issue on IPv6 NAT support
And, from Pablo Neira Ayuso:
* fix missing dependencies in nft_chain_nat
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Bursztyka <tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
David S. Miller