this patch introduces a port object, separates out ports and phys,
with ports becoming the primary objects of the tree.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
This is a hold over from the end device/expander conversion. Apparently
the rphy list pointer is never initialised, so list_del() on the
uninitialised pointer can panic the system
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Use ARRAY_SIZE macro instead of sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0]) and remove
duplicates of the macro.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@nuerscht.ch>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
A couple write attributes in sas transport layer have a small
bug that prevents them from being written to. Those
attributes are the link_reset and write_reset. This is due
the store field being set to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Eric Moore <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
the user_scan() callback currently has the potential to identify the
wrong device in the presence of expanders. This is because it finds
the first device with a matching target_id, which might be an
expander. Fix this by making it look specifically for end devices.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Any end device that can't support any of the scanning protocols
shouldn't be scanned, so set its id to -1 to prevent
scsi_scan_target() being called for it.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Fix puts so that release functions will be called.
Signed-off-by: Mike Anderson <andmike@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
This allows the removal of the contained flag and also does a bit of
class renaming (sas_rphy->sas_device).
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
This patch makes expanders appear as labelled objects with properties in
the SAS tree.
I've also modified the phy code to make expander phys appear labelled by
host number, expander number and phy index.
So, for my current config, you see something like this in sysfs:
/sys/class/scsi_host/host1/device/phy-1:4/expander-1:0/phy-1-0:12/rphy-1:0-12/target1:0:1
And the expander properties are:
jejb@sparkweed> cd /sys/class/sas_expander/expander-1\:0/
jejb@sparkweed> for f in *; do echo -n $f ": "; cat $f; done
component_id : 29024
component_revision_id : 4
component_vendor_id : VITESSE
device : cat: device: Is a directory
level : 0
product_id : VSC7160 Eval Brd
product_rev : 4
uevent : cat: uevent: Permission denied
vendor_id : VITESSE
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Begin introducing the concept of sas remote devices that have an rphy
embedded. The first one (this) is a simple end device. All that an
end device really does is have port mode page parameters contained.
The next and more complex piece will be expander remote devices.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
aic94xx doesn't have a use for the bay or enclosure identifiers.
Also, I think it's not going to need a get_linkerrors(), so wire up
all of these exported properties as conditional on the underlying
function support.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
I don't think these exist in silicon yet, but the aic94xx driver has a
register setting for them.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Change the core SCSI code to use kzalloc rather than kmalloc+memset
where possible.
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
This patch displays the port identifier on
the folder attribute; located in the middle digit.
/sys/class/sas_rphy/rphy-%x:%x:%x
The port identifier is basically the unique identifier
for each sas domain.
Signed-off-by: Eric Moore <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
We will be mapping the RAID volumes in mptsas to a reserved
channel that
is one larger than the anticapated number of ports on the direct
attached host
adapter.
Signed-off-by: Eric Moore <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
When James Smart fixed the issue of the userspace scan atributes
crashing the system with the FC transport class he added a patch to
let the transport class check if the parent is valid for a given
transport class.
When adding support for the integrated raid of fusion sas devices
we ran into a problem with that, as it didn't allow adding virtual
raid volumes without the transport class knowing about it.
So this patch adds a user_scan attribute instead, that takes over from
scsi_scan_host_selected if the transport class sets it and thus lets
the transport class control the user-initiated scanning. As this
plugs the hole about user-initiated scanning the target_parent hook
goes away and we rely on callers of the scanning routines to do
something sensible.
For SAS this meant I had to switch from a spinlock to a mutex to
synchronize the topology linked lists, in FC they were completely
unsynchronized which seems wrong.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
We need to iterate over all children when removing and expander, else
stale objects will be around after host removal. This fixes the oops
Eric Moore saw when removing and reloading mptsas.
Also don't try the scsi_remove_target call unless operating on an end
device. The current unconditional call is harmless but confusing.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
We need to clear the backpointer on rphy removal, else we'll run into
problems with host removal after a device has been hot unplugged.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Fix more include file problems that surfaced since I submitted the previous
fix-missing-includes.patch. This should now allow not to include sched.h
from module.h, which is done by a followup patch.
Signed-off-by: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Add a flag to mark a PHY as attached to the HBA as opposed to beeing on
an expander. This is needed because various features are only supported
on those. This is a crude hack, the proper fix would be to use
different classes for host-attached vs expander phys. I'm looking into
that.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
For now supporting the ->get_linkerrors method is mandatory. I'll
probably be beaten to implement the .show_foo variables and different
types of attributes soon..
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Brown paperbag bug: sas_rphy_delete was ordered completely
wrong. Fix it up to be the same order as sas_phy_delete or
fc_rport_terminate and fix rphy objects that leaked after module
removal.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
The SAS transport class contains common code to deal with SAS HBAs, an
aproximated representation of SAS topologies in the driver model,
and various sysfs attributes to expose these topologies and managment
interfaces to userspace.
In addition to the basic SCSI core objects this transport class introduces
two additional intermediate objects: The SAS PHY as represented by struct
sas_phy defines an "outgoing" PHY on a SAS HBA or Expander, and the SAS
remote PHY represented by struct sas_rphy defines an "incoming" PHY on a
SAS Expander or end device. Note that this is purely a software concept, the
underlying hardware for a PHY and a remote PHY is the exactly the same.
There is no concept of a SAS port in this code, users can see what PHYs
form a wide port based on the port_identifier attribute, which is the same
for all PHYs in a port.
This submission doesn't handle hot-plug addition or removal of SAS devices
and thus doesn't do scanning in a workqueue yet, that will be added in
phase2 after this submission. In a third phase I will add additional
managment infrastructure.
I think this submission is ready for 2.6.14, but additional comments are
of course very welcome.
I'd like to thanks James Smart a lot for his very useful input on the
design.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
James Bottomley