remarkable-linux/security
Kees Cook 2cc8a71641 Yama: replace capable() with ns_capable()
When checking capabilities, the question we want to be asking is "does
current() have the capability in the child's namespace?"

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
2012-05-15 10:27:57 +10:00
..
apparmor Fix execve behavior apparmor for PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS 2012-04-14 11:13:18 +10:00
integrity security: fix ima kconfig warning 2012-02-28 11:01:15 +11:00
keys KEYS: Add invalidation support 2012-05-11 10:56:56 +01:00
selinux Add PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS to prevent execve from granting privs 2012-04-14 11:13:18 +10:00
smack Smack: move label list initialization 2012-04-18 12:02:28 +10:00
tomoyo TOMOYO: Accept manager programs which do not start with / . 2012-05-15 10:24:29 +10:00
yama Yama: replace capable() with ns_capable() 2012-05-15 10:27:57 +10:00
capability.c security: create task_free security callback 2012-02-10 09:14:51 +11:00
commoncap.c Linux 3.4-rc5 2012-05-04 12:46:40 +10:00
device_cgroup.c cgroup: remove cgroup_subsys argument from callbacks 2012-02-02 09:20:22 -08:00
inode.c securityfs: fix object creation races 2012-01-10 10:20:35 -05:00
Kconfig KEYS: Move the key config into security/keys/Kconfig 2012-05-11 10:56:56 +01:00
lsm_audit.c lsm_audit: don't specify the audit pre/post callbacks in 'struct common_audit_data' 2012-04-03 09:49:59 -07:00
Makefile security: Yama LSM 2012-02-10 09:18:52 +11:00
min_addr.c
security.c security: trim security.h 2012-02-14 10:45:42 +11:00