Ingo Molnar 3da297a60f perf record: Fall back to cpu-clock-ticks if no PMU ... On architectures/CPUs without PMU support but with perfcounters enabled 'perf record' currently fails because it cannot create a cycle based hw-perfcounter. Fall back to the cpu-clock-tick sw-perfcounter in this case, which is hrtimer based and will always work (as long as perfcounters are enabled). Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <new-submission> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>		2009-06-07 17:39:02 +02:00
..
Documentation
util	perf top: Fall back to cpu-clock-tick hrtimer sampling if no cycle counter available	2009-06-07 17:31:52 +02:00
.gitignore
builtin-annotate.c	perf annotate: Fix command line help text	2009-06-06 21:25:29 +02:00
builtin-help.c
builtin-list.c
builtin-record.c	perf record: Fall back to cpu-clock-ticks if no PMU	2009-06-07 17:39:02 +02:00
builtin-report.c
builtin-stat.c	perf stat: Continue even on counter creation error	2009-06-07 17:08:59 +02:00
builtin-top.c	perf record: Fall back to cpu-clock-ticks if no PMU	2009-06-07 17:39:02 +02:00
builtin.h
command-list.txt
design.txt
Makefile
perf.c
perf.h