remarkable-linux/fs/proc/interrupts.c
Paul Gortmaker abaf3787ac fs/proc: don't use module_init for non-modular core code
PROC_FS is a bool, so this code is either present or absent.  It will
never be modular, so using module_init as an alias for __initcall is
rather misleading.

Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from init.h into
module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd have to add module.h to
obviously non-modular code, and that would be ugly at best.

Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs.  one of the
priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets mapped onto
device_initcall, our use of fs_initcall (which makes sense for fs code)
will thus change these registrations from level 6-device to level 5-fs
(i.e.  slightly earlier).  However no observable impact of that small
difference has been observed during testing, or is expected.

Also note that this change uncovers a missing semicolon bug in the
registration of vmcore_init as an initcall.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-01-23 16:37:02 -08:00

54 lines
1.1 KiB
C

#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/irqnr.h>
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
/*
* /proc/interrupts
*/
static void *int_seq_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos)
{
return (*pos <= nr_irqs) ? pos : NULL;
}
static void *int_seq_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
(*pos)++;
if (*pos > nr_irqs)
return NULL;
return pos;
}
static void int_seq_stop(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
{
/* Nothing to do */
}
static const struct seq_operations int_seq_ops = {
.start = int_seq_start,
.next = int_seq_next,
.stop = int_seq_stop,
.show = show_interrupts
};
static int interrupts_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
return seq_open(filp, &int_seq_ops);
}
static const struct file_operations proc_interrupts_operations = {
.open = interrupts_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release,
};
static int __init proc_interrupts_init(void)
{
proc_create("interrupts", 0, NULL, &proc_interrupts_operations);
return 0;
}
fs_initcall(proc_interrupts_init);