Driver authors seem to get the ordering of irq_set_chained_handler()
and irq_set_handler_data() wrong - ordering the former before the
latter. This opens a race window where, if there is an interrupt
pending, the handler will be called between these two calls,
potentially resulting in an oops.
Provide a single interface to set both of these together, especially
as that's commonly what is required.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@googlemail.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/E1Z4yzs-0002Rw-4B@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
3b0f95be14