![]() For performance, replace the iint spinlock with rwlock/read_lock. Eric Paris questioned this change, from spinlocks to rwlocks, saying "rwlocks have been shown to actually be slower on multi processor systems in a number of cases due to the cache line bouncing required." Based on performance measurements compiling the kernel on a cold boot with multiple jobs with/without this patch, Dmitry Kasatkin and I found that rwlocks performed better than spinlocks, but very insignificantly. For example with total compilation time around 6 minutes, with rwlocks time was 1 - 3 seconds shorter... but always like that. Changelog v2: - new patch taken from the 'allocating iint improvements' patch Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
apparmor | ||
integrity | ||
keys | ||
selinux | ||
smack | ||
tomoyo | ||
yama | ||
capability.c | ||
commoncap.c | ||
device_cgroup.c | ||
inode.c | ||
Kconfig | ||
lsm_audit.c | ||
Makefile | ||
min_addr.c | ||
security.c |