1
0
Fork 0
alistair23-linux/fs/btrfs/send.c

7584 lines
184 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* Copyright (C) 2012 Alexander Block. All rights reserved.
*/
#include <linux/bsearch.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/xattr.h>
#include <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h>
#include <linux/radix-tree.h>
Btrfs: using vmalloc and friends needs vmalloc.h On powerpc, we don't get the implicit vmalloc.h include, and as a result the build fails noisily: fs/btrfs/send.c: In function 'fs_path_free': fs/btrfs/send.c:185:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/btrfs/send.c: In function 'fs_path_ensure_buf': fs/btrfs/send.c:215:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'vmalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/btrfs/send.c:215:12: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] fs/btrfs/send.c:225:12: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] fs/btrfs/send.c:233:13: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] fs/btrfs/send.c: In function 'iterate_dir_item': fs/btrfs/send.c:900:10: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] fs/btrfs/send.c:909:11: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] fs/btrfs/send.c: In function 'btrfs_ioctl_send': fs/btrfs/send.c:4463:17: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] fs/btrfs/send.c:4469:17: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] fs/btrfs/send.c:4475:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/btrfs/send.c:4475:20: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] fs/btrfs/send.c:4483:21: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-07-26 18:11:13 -06:00
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
btrfs: Remove custom crc32c init code The custom crc32 init code was introduced in 14a958e678cd ("Btrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in") to enable using btrfs as a built-in. However, later as pointed out by 60efa5eb2e88 ("Btrfs: use late_initcall instead of module_init") this wasn't enough and finally btrfs was switched to late_initcall which comes after the generic crc32c implementation is initiliased. The latter commit superseeded the former. Now that we don't have to maintain our own code let's just remove it and switch to using the generic implementation. Despite touching a lot of files the patch is really simple. Here is the gist of the changes: 1. Select LIBCRC32C rather than the low-level modules. 2. s/btrfs_crc32c/crc32c/g 3. replace hash.h with linux/crc32c.h 4. Move the btrfs namehash funcs to ctree.h and change the tree accordingly. I've tested this with btrfs being both a module and a built-in and xfstest doesn't complain. Does seem to fix the longstanding problem of not automatically selectiong the crc32c module when btrfs is used. Possibly there is a workaround in dracut. The modinfo confirms that now all the module dependencies are there: before: depends: zstd_compress,zstd_decompress,raid6_pq,xor,zlib_deflate after: depends: libcrc32c,zstd_compress,zstd_decompress,raid6_pq,xor,zlib_deflate Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add more info to changelog from mails ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-01-08 02:45:05 -07:00
#include <linux/crc32c.h>
#include "send.h"
#include "backref.h"
#include "locking.h"
#include "disk-io.h"
#include "btrfs_inode.h"
#include "transaction.h"
#include "compression.h"
btrfs: send: emit file capabilities after chown commit 89efda52e6b6930f80f5adda9c3c9edfb1397191 upstream. Whenever a chown is executed, all capabilities of the file being touched are lost. When doing incremental send with a file with capabilities, there is a situation where the capability can be lost on the receiving side. The sequence of actions bellow shows the problem: $ mount /dev/sda fs1 $ mount /dev/sdb fs2 $ touch fs1/foo.bar $ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_init $ btrfs send fs1/snap_init | btrfs receive fs2 $ chgrp adm fs1/foo.bar $ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_complete $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_incremental $ btrfs send fs1/snap_complete | btrfs receive fs2 $ btrfs send -p fs1/snap_init fs1/snap_incremental | btrfs receive fs2 At this point, only a chown was emitted by "btrfs send" since only the group was changed. This makes the cap_sys_nice capability to be dropped from fs2/snap_incremental/foo.bar To fix that, only emit capabilities after chown is emitted. The current code first checks for xattrs that are new/changed, emits them, and later emit the chown. Now, __process_new_xattr skips capabilities, letting only finish_inode_if_needed to emit them, if they exist, for the inode being processed. This behavior was being worked around in "btrfs receive" side by caching the capability and only applying it after chown. Now, xattrs are only emmited _after_ chown, making that workaround not needed anymore. Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/202 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Suggested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-10 20:15:07 -06:00
#include "xattr.h"
/*
* Maximum number of references an extent can have in order for us to attempt to
* issue clone operations instead of write operations. This currently exists to
* avoid hitting limitations of the backreference walking code (taking a lot of
* time and using too much memory for extents with large number of references).
*/
#define SEND_MAX_EXTENT_REFS 64
/*
* A fs_path is a helper to dynamically build path names with unknown size.
* It reallocates the internal buffer on demand.
* It allows fast adding of path elements on the right side (normal path) and
* fast adding to the left side (reversed path). A reversed path can also be
* unreversed if needed.
*/
struct fs_path {
union {
struct {
char *start;
char *end;
char *buf;
unsigned short buf_len:15;
unsigned short reversed:1;
char inline_buf[];
};
/*
* Average path length does not exceed 200 bytes, we'll have
* better packing in the slab and higher chance to satisfy
* a allocation later during send.
*/
char pad[256];
};
};
#define FS_PATH_INLINE_SIZE \
(sizeof(struct fs_path) - offsetof(struct fs_path, inline_buf))
/* reused for each extent */
struct clone_root {
struct btrfs_root *root;
u64 ino;
u64 offset;
u64 found_refs;
};
#define SEND_CTX_MAX_NAME_CACHE_SIZE 128
#define SEND_CTX_NAME_CACHE_CLEAN_SIZE (SEND_CTX_MAX_NAME_CACHE_SIZE * 2)
struct send_ctx {
struct file *send_filp;
loff_t send_off;
char *send_buf;
u32 send_size;
u32 send_max_size;
u64 total_send_size;
u64 cmd_send_size[BTRFS_SEND_C_MAX + 1];
u64 flags; /* 'flags' member of btrfs_ioctl_send_args is u64 */
struct btrfs_root *send_root;
struct btrfs_root *parent_root;
struct clone_root *clone_roots;
int clone_roots_cnt;
/* current state of the compare_tree call */
struct btrfs_path *left_path;
struct btrfs_path *right_path;
struct btrfs_key *cmp_key;
/*
* infos of the currently processed inode. In case of deleted inodes,
* these are the values from the deleted inode.
*/
u64 cur_ino;
u64 cur_inode_gen;
int cur_inode_new;
int cur_inode_new_gen;
int cur_inode_deleted;
u64 cur_inode_size;
u64 cur_inode_mode;
u64 cur_inode_rdev;
u64 cur_inode_last_extent;
Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-02-06 13:40:40 -07:00
u64 cur_inode_next_write_offset;
Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item) since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then fail with errno ENOENT. Example using a full send with a subvolume: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar # keep an open file descriptor on file bar $ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar $ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar # Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while # holding the open file descriptor. $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1 At subvol /mnt/sv1 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory Example using an incremental send with snapshots: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1 $ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2 # Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while # holding an open file descriptor on it. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false $ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo $ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo # Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode items, such as xattrs and extents). A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reported-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-07-24 04:54:04 -06:00
bool ignore_cur_inode;
u64 send_progress;
struct list_head new_refs;
struct list_head deleted_refs;
struct radix_tree_root name_cache;
struct list_head name_cache_list;
int name_cache_size;
struct file_ra_state ra;
char *read_buf;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
/*
* We process inodes by their increasing order, so if before an
* incremental send we reverse the parent/child relationship of
* directories such that a directory with a lower inode number was
* the parent of a directory with a higher inode number, and the one
* becoming the new parent got renamed too, we can't rename/move the
* directory with lower inode number when we finish processing it - we
* must process the directory with higher inode number first, then
* rename/move it and then rename/move the directory with lower inode
* number. Example follows.
*
* Tree state when the first send was performed:
*
* .
* |-- a (ino 257)
* |-- b (ino 258)
* |
* |
* |-- c (ino 259)
* | |-- d (ino 260)
* |
* |-- c2 (ino 261)
*
* Tree state when the second (incremental) send is performed:
*
* .
* |-- a (ino 257)
* |-- b (ino 258)
* |-- c2 (ino 261)
* |-- d2 (ino 260)
* |-- cc (ino 259)
*
* The sequence of steps that lead to the second state was:
*
* mv /a/b/c/d /a/b/c2/d2
* mv /a/b/c /a/b/c2/d2/cc
*
* "c" has lower inode number, but we can't move it (2nd mv operation)
* before we move "d", which has higher inode number.
*
* So we just memorize which move/rename operations must be performed
* later when their respective parent is processed and moved/renamed.
*/
/* Indexed by parent directory inode number. */
struct rb_root pending_dir_moves;
/*
* Reverse index, indexed by the inode number of a directory that
* is waiting for the move/rename of its immediate parent before its
* own move/rename can be performed.
*/
struct rb_root waiting_dir_moves;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
/*
* A directory that is going to be rm'ed might have a child directory
* which is in the pending directory moves index above. In this case,
* the directory can only be removed after the move/rename of its child
* is performed. Example:
*
* Parent snapshot:
*
* . (ino 256)
* |-- a/ (ino 257)
* |-- b/ (ino 258)
* |-- c/ (ino 259)
* | |-- x/ (ino 260)
* |
* |-- y/ (ino 261)
*
* Send snapshot:
*
* . (ino 256)
* |-- a/ (ino 257)
* |-- b/ (ino 258)
* |-- YY/ (ino 261)
* |-- x/ (ino 260)
*
* Sequence of steps that lead to the send snapshot:
* rm -f /a/b/c/foo.txt
* mv /a/b/y /a/b/YY
* mv /a/b/c/x /a/b/YY
* rmdir /a/b/c
*
* When the child is processed, its move/rename is delayed until its
* parent is processed (as explained above), but all other operations
* like update utimes, chown, chgrp, etc, are performed and the paths
* that it uses for those operations must use the orphanized name of
* its parent (the directory we're going to rm later), so we need to
* memorize that name.
*
* Indexed by the inode number of the directory to be deleted.
*/
struct rb_root orphan_dirs;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
};
struct pending_dir_move {
struct rb_node node;
struct list_head list;
u64 parent_ino;
u64 ino;
u64 gen;
struct list_head update_refs;
};
struct waiting_dir_move {
struct rb_node node;
u64 ino;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
/*
* There might be some directory that could not be removed because it
* was waiting for this directory inode to be moved first. Therefore
* after this directory is moved, we can try to rmdir the ino rmdir_ino.
*/
u64 rmdir_ino;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
u64 rmdir_gen;
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
bool orphanized;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
};
struct orphan_dir_info {
struct rb_node node;
u64 ino;
u64 gen;
u64 last_dir_index_offset;
};
struct name_cache_entry {
struct list_head list;
/*
* radix_tree has only 32bit entries but we need to handle 64bit inums.
* We use the lower 32bit of the 64bit inum to store it in the tree. If
* more then one inum would fall into the same entry, we use radix_list
* to store the additional entries. radix_list is also used to store
* entries where two entries have the same inum but different
* generations.
*/
struct list_head radix_list;
u64 ino;
u64 gen;
u64 parent_ino;
u64 parent_gen;
int ret;
int need_later_update;
int name_len;
char name[];
};
#define ADVANCE 1
#define ADVANCE_ONLY_NEXT -1
enum btrfs_compare_tree_result {
BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW,
BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_DELETED,
BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED,
BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME,
};
typedef int (*btrfs_changed_cb_t)(struct btrfs_path *left_path,
struct btrfs_path *right_path,
struct btrfs_key *key,
enum btrfs_compare_tree_result result,
void *ctx);
__cold
static void inconsistent_snapshot_error(struct send_ctx *sctx,
enum btrfs_compare_tree_result result,
const char *what)
{
const char *result_string;
switch (result) {
case BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW:
result_string = "new";
break;
case BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_DELETED:
result_string = "deleted";
break;
case BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED:
result_string = "updated";
break;
case BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME:
ASSERT(0);
result_string = "unchanged";
break;
default:
ASSERT(0);
result_string = "unexpected";
}
btrfs_err(sctx->send_root->fs_info,
"Send: inconsistent snapshot, found %s %s for inode %llu without updated inode item, send root is %llu, parent root is %llu",
result_string, what, sctx->cmp_key->objectid,
sctx->send_root->root_key.objectid,
(sctx->parent_root ?
sctx->parent_root->root_key.objectid : 0));
}
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
static int is_waiting_for_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino);
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
static struct waiting_dir_move *
get_waiting_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino);
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
static int is_waiting_for_rm(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 dir_ino, u64 gen);
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
static int need_send_hole(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
return (sctx->parent_root && !sctx->cur_inode_new &&
!sctx->cur_inode_new_gen && !sctx->cur_inode_deleted &&
S_ISREG(sctx->cur_inode_mode));
}
static void fs_path_reset(struct fs_path *p)
{
if (p->reversed) {
p->start = p->buf + p->buf_len - 1;
p->end = p->start;
*p->start = 0;
} else {
p->start = p->buf;
p->end = p->start;
*p->start = 0;
}
}
static struct fs_path *fs_path_alloc(void)
{
struct fs_path *p;
p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!p)
return NULL;
p->reversed = 0;
p->buf = p->inline_buf;
p->buf_len = FS_PATH_INLINE_SIZE;
fs_path_reset(p);
return p;
}
static struct fs_path *fs_path_alloc_reversed(void)
{
struct fs_path *p;
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return NULL;
p->reversed = 1;
fs_path_reset(p);
return p;
}
static void fs_path_free(struct fs_path *p)
{
if (!p)
return;
if (p->buf != p->inline_buf)
kfree(p->buf);
kfree(p);
}
static int fs_path_len(struct fs_path *p)
{
return p->end - p->start;
}
static int fs_path_ensure_buf(struct fs_path *p, int len)
{
char *tmp_buf;
int path_len;
int old_buf_len;
len++;
if (p->buf_len >= len)
return 0;
if (len > PATH_MAX) {
WARN_ON(1);
return -ENOMEM;
}
path_len = p->end - p->start;
old_buf_len = p->buf_len;
/*
* First time the inline_buf does not suffice
*/
if (p->buf == p->inline_buf) {
tmp_buf = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (tmp_buf)
memcpy(tmp_buf, p->buf, old_buf_len);
} else {
tmp_buf = krealloc(p->buf, len, GFP_KERNEL);
}
if (!tmp_buf)
return -ENOMEM;
p->buf = tmp_buf;
/*
* The real size of the buffer is bigger, this will let the fast path
* happen most of the time
*/
p->buf_len = ksize(p->buf);
if (p->reversed) {
tmp_buf = p->buf + old_buf_len - path_len - 1;
p->end = p->buf + p->buf_len - 1;
p->start = p->end - path_len;
memmove(p->start, tmp_buf, path_len + 1);
} else {
p->start = p->buf;
p->end = p->start + path_len;
}
return 0;
}
static int fs_path_prepare_for_add(struct fs_path *p, int name_len,
char **prepared)
{
int ret;
int new_len;
new_len = p->end - p->start + name_len;
if (p->start != p->end)
new_len++;
ret = fs_path_ensure_buf(p, new_len);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (p->reversed) {
if (p->start != p->end)
*--p->start = '/';
p->start -= name_len;
*prepared = p->start;
} else {
if (p->start != p->end)
*p->end++ = '/';
*prepared = p->end;
p->end += name_len;
*p->end = 0;
}
out:
return ret;
}
static int fs_path_add(struct fs_path *p, const char *name, int name_len)
{
int ret;
char *prepared;
ret = fs_path_prepare_for_add(p, name_len, &prepared);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
memcpy(prepared, name, name_len);
out:
return ret;
}
static int fs_path_add_path(struct fs_path *p, struct fs_path *p2)
{
int ret;
char *prepared;
ret = fs_path_prepare_for_add(p, p2->end - p2->start, &prepared);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
memcpy(prepared, p2->start, p2->end - p2->start);
out:
return ret;
}
static int fs_path_add_from_extent_buffer(struct fs_path *p,
struct extent_buffer *eb,
unsigned long off, int len)
{
int ret;
char *prepared;
ret = fs_path_prepare_for_add(p, len, &prepared);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
read_extent_buffer(eb, prepared, off, len);
out:
return ret;
}
static int fs_path_copy(struct fs_path *p, struct fs_path *from)
{
int ret;
p->reversed = from->reversed;
fs_path_reset(p);
ret = fs_path_add_path(p, from);
return ret;
}
static void fs_path_unreverse(struct fs_path *p)
{
char *tmp;
int len;
if (!p->reversed)
return;
tmp = p->start;
len = p->end - p->start;
p->start = p->buf;
p->end = p->start + len;
memmove(p->start, tmp, len + 1);
p->reversed = 0;
}
static struct btrfs_path *alloc_path_for_send(void)
{
struct btrfs_path *path;
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
return NULL;
path->search_commit_root = 1;
path->skip_locking = 1;
path->need_commit_sem = 1;
return path;
}
static int write_buf(struct file *filp, const void *buf, u32 len, loff_t *off)
{
int ret;
u32 pos = 0;
while (pos < len) {
ret = kernel_write(filp, buf + pos, len - pos, off);
/* TODO handle that correctly */
/*if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS) {
continue;
}*/
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (ret == 0) {
return -EIO;
}
pos += ret;
}
return 0;
}
static int tlv_put(struct send_ctx *sctx, u16 attr, const void *data, int len)
{
struct btrfs_tlv_header *hdr;
int total_len = sizeof(*hdr) + len;
int left = sctx->send_max_size - sctx->send_size;
if (unlikely(left < total_len))
return -EOVERFLOW;
hdr = (struct btrfs_tlv_header *) (sctx->send_buf + sctx->send_size);
hdr->tlv_type = cpu_to_le16(attr);
hdr->tlv_len = cpu_to_le16(len);
memcpy(hdr + 1, data, len);
sctx->send_size += total_len;
return 0;
}
#define TLV_PUT_DEFINE_INT(bits) \
static int tlv_put_u##bits(struct send_ctx *sctx, \
u##bits attr, u##bits value) \
{ \
__le##bits __tmp = cpu_to_le##bits(value); \
return tlv_put(sctx, attr, &__tmp, sizeof(__tmp)); \
}
TLV_PUT_DEFINE_INT(64)
static int tlv_put_string(struct send_ctx *sctx, u16 attr,
const char *str, int len)
{
if (len == -1)
len = strlen(str);
return tlv_put(sctx, attr, str, len);
}
static int tlv_put_uuid(struct send_ctx *sctx, u16 attr,
const u8 *uuid)
{
return tlv_put(sctx, attr, uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE);
}
static int tlv_put_btrfs_timespec(struct send_ctx *sctx, u16 attr,
struct extent_buffer *eb,
struct btrfs_timespec *ts)
{
struct btrfs_timespec bts;
read_extent_buffer(eb, &bts, (unsigned long)ts, sizeof(bts));
return tlv_put(sctx, attr, &bts, sizeof(bts));
}
#define TLV_PUT(sctx, attrtype, data, attrlen) \
do { \
ret = tlv_put(sctx, attrtype, data, attrlen); \
if (ret < 0) \
goto tlv_put_failure; \
} while (0)
#define TLV_PUT_INT(sctx, attrtype, bits, value) \
do { \
ret = tlv_put_u##bits(sctx, attrtype, value); \
if (ret < 0) \
goto tlv_put_failure; \
} while (0)
#define TLV_PUT_U8(sctx, attrtype, data) TLV_PUT_INT(sctx, attrtype, 8, data)
#define TLV_PUT_U16(sctx, attrtype, data) TLV_PUT_INT(sctx, attrtype, 16, data)
#define TLV_PUT_U32(sctx, attrtype, data) TLV_PUT_INT(sctx, attrtype, 32, data)
#define TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, attrtype, data) TLV_PUT_INT(sctx, attrtype, 64, data)
#define TLV_PUT_STRING(sctx, attrtype, str, len) \
do { \
ret = tlv_put_string(sctx, attrtype, str, len); \
if (ret < 0) \
goto tlv_put_failure; \
} while (0)
#define TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, attrtype, p) \
do { \
ret = tlv_put_string(sctx, attrtype, p->start, \
p->end - p->start); \
if (ret < 0) \
goto tlv_put_failure; \
} while(0)
#define TLV_PUT_UUID(sctx, attrtype, uuid) \
do { \
ret = tlv_put_uuid(sctx, attrtype, uuid); \
if (ret < 0) \
goto tlv_put_failure; \
} while (0)
#define TLV_PUT_BTRFS_TIMESPEC(sctx, attrtype, eb, ts) \
do { \
ret = tlv_put_btrfs_timespec(sctx, attrtype, eb, ts); \
if (ret < 0) \
goto tlv_put_failure; \
} while (0)
static int send_header(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
struct btrfs_stream_header hdr;
strcpy(hdr.magic, BTRFS_SEND_STREAM_MAGIC);
hdr.version = cpu_to_le32(BTRFS_SEND_STREAM_VERSION);
return write_buf(sctx->send_filp, &hdr, sizeof(hdr),
&sctx->send_off);
}
/*
* For each command/item we want to send to userspace, we call this function.
*/
static int begin_cmd(struct send_ctx *sctx, int cmd)
{
struct btrfs_cmd_header *hdr;
if (WARN_ON(!sctx->send_buf))
return -EINVAL;
BUG_ON(sctx->send_size);
sctx->send_size += sizeof(*hdr);
hdr = (struct btrfs_cmd_header *)sctx->send_buf;
hdr->cmd = cpu_to_le16(cmd);
return 0;
}
static int send_cmd(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret;
struct btrfs_cmd_header *hdr;
u32 crc;
hdr = (struct btrfs_cmd_header *)sctx->send_buf;
hdr->len = cpu_to_le32(sctx->send_size - sizeof(*hdr));
hdr->crc = 0;
crc = btrfs_crc32c(0, (unsigned char *)sctx->send_buf, sctx->send_size);
hdr->crc = cpu_to_le32(crc);
ret = write_buf(sctx->send_filp, sctx->send_buf, sctx->send_size,
&sctx->send_off);
sctx->total_send_size += sctx->send_size;
sctx->cmd_send_size[le16_to_cpu(hdr->cmd)] += sctx->send_size;
sctx->send_size = 0;
return ret;
}
/*
* Sends a move instruction to user space
*/
static int send_rename(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct fs_path *from, struct fs_path *to)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "send_rename %s -> %s", from->start, to->start);
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_RENAME);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, from);
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH_TO, to);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* Sends a link instruction to user space
*/
static int send_link(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct fs_path *path, struct fs_path *lnk)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "send_link %s -> %s", path->start, lnk->start);
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_LINK);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, path);
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH_LINK, lnk);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* Sends an unlink instruction to user space
*/
static int send_unlink(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct fs_path *path)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "send_unlink %s", path->start);
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_UNLINK);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, path);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* Sends a rmdir instruction to user space
*/
static int send_rmdir(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct fs_path *path)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "send_rmdir %s", path->start);
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_RMDIR);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, path);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* Helper function to retrieve some fields from an inode item.
*/
static int __get_inode_info(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
u64 ino, u64 *size, u64 *gen, u64 *mode, u64 *uid,
u64 *gid, u64 *rdev)
{
int ret;
struct btrfs_inode_item *ii;
struct btrfs_key key;
key.objectid = ino;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret) {
if (ret > 0)
ret = -ENOENT;
return ret;
}
ii = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_inode_item);
if (size)
*size = btrfs_inode_size(path->nodes[0], ii);
if (gen)
*gen = btrfs_inode_generation(path->nodes[0], ii);
if (mode)
*mode = btrfs_inode_mode(path->nodes[0], ii);
if (uid)
*uid = btrfs_inode_uid(path->nodes[0], ii);
if (gid)
*gid = btrfs_inode_gid(path->nodes[0], ii);
if (rdev)
*rdev = btrfs_inode_rdev(path->nodes[0], ii);
return ret;
}
static int get_inode_info(struct btrfs_root *root,
u64 ino, u64 *size, u64 *gen,
u64 *mode, u64 *uid, u64 *gid,
u64 *rdev)
{
struct btrfs_path *path;
int ret;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = __get_inode_info(root, path, ino, size, gen, mode, uid, gid,
rdev);
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
typedef int (*iterate_inode_ref_t)(int num, u64 dir, int index,
struct fs_path *p,
void *ctx);
/*
* Helper function to iterate the entries in ONE btrfs_inode_ref or
* btrfs_inode_extref.
* The iterate callback may return a non zero value to stop iteration. This can
* be a negative value for error codes or 1 to simply stop it.
*
* path must point to the INODE_REF or INODE_EXTREF when called.
*/
static int iterate_inode_ref(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_key *found_key, int resolve,
iterate_inode_ref_t iterate, void *ctx)
{
struct extent_buffer *eb = path->nodes[0];
struct btrfs_item *item;
struct btrfs_inode_ref *iref;
struct btrfs_inode_extref *extref;
struct btrfs_path *tmp_path;
struct fs_path *p;
u32 cur = 0;
u32 total;
int slot = path->slots[0];
u32 name_len;
char *start;
int ret = 0;
int num = 0;
int index;
u64 dir;
unsigned long name_off;
unsigned long elem_size;
unsigned long ptr;
p = fs_path_alloc_reversed();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
tmp_path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!tmp_path) {
fs_path_free(p);
return -ENOMEM;
}
if (found_key->type == BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY) {
ptr = (unsigned long)btrfs_item_ptr(eb, slot,
struct btrfs_inode_ref);
item = btrfs_item_nr(slot);
total = btrfs_item_size(eb, item);
elem_size = sizeof(*iref);
} else {
ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, slot);
total = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, slot);
elem_size = sizeof(*extref);
}
while (cur < total) {
fs_path_reset(p);
if (found_key->type == BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY) {
iref = (struct btrfs_inode_ref *)(ptr + cur);
name_len = btrfs_inode_ref_name_len(eb, iref);
name_off = (unsigned long)(iref + 1);
index = btrfs_inode_ref_index(eb, iref);
dir = found_key->offset;
} else {
extref = (struct btrfs_inode_extref *)(ptr + cur);
name_len = btrfs_inode_extref_name_len(eb, extref);
name_off = (unsigned long)&extref->name;
index = btrfs_inode_extref_index(eb, extref);
dir = btrfs_inode_extref_parent(eb, extref);
}
if (resolve) {
start = btrfs_ref_to_path(root, tmp_path, name_len,
name_off, eb, dir,
p->buf, p->buf_len);
if (IS_ERR(start)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(start);
goto out;
}
if (start < p->buf) {
/* overflow , try again with larger buffer */
ret = fs_path_ensure_buf(p,
p->buf_len + p->buf - start);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
start = btrfs_ref_to_path(root, tmp_path,
name_len, name_off,
eb, dir,
p->buf, p->buf_len);
if (IS_ERR(start)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(start);
goto out;
}
BUG_ON(start < p->buf);
}
p->start = start;
} else {
ret = fs_path_add_from_extent_buffer(p, eb, name_off,
name_len);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
cur += elem_size + name_len;
ret = iterate(num, dir, index, p, ctx);
if (ret)
goto out;
num++;
}
out:
btrfs_free_path(tmp_path);
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
typedef int (*iterate_dir_item_t)(int num, struct btrfs_key *di_key,
const char *name, int name_len,
const char *data, int data_len,
u8 type, void *ctx);
/*
* Helper function to iterate the entries in ONE btrfs_dir_item.
* The iterate callback may return a non zero value to stop iteration. This can
* be a negative value for error codes or 1 to simply stop it.
*
* path must point to the dir item when called.
*/
static int iterate_dir_item(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path,
iterate_dir_item_t iterate, void *ctx)
{
int ret = 0;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
struct btrfs_item *item;
struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
struct btrfs_key di_key;
char *buf = NULL;
int buf_len;
u32 name_len;
u32 data_len;
u32 cur;
u32 len;
u32 total;
int slot;
int num;
u8 type;
/*
* Start with a small buffer (1 page). If later we end up needing more
* space, which can happen for xattrs on a fs with a leaf size greater
* then the page size, attempt to increase the buffer. Typically xattr
* values are small.
*/
buf_len = PATH_MAX;
buf = kmalloc(buf_len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
eb = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
item = btrfs_item_nr(slot);
di = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, slot, struct btrfs_dir_item);
cur = 0;
len = 0;
total = btrfs_item_size(eb, item);
num = 0;
while (cur < total) {
name_len = btrfs_dir_name_len(eb, di);
data_len = btrfs_dir_data_len(eb, di);
type = btrfs_dir_type(eb, di);
btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(eb, di, &di_key);
if (type == BTRFS_FT_XATTR) {
if (name_len > XATTR_NAME_MAX) {
ret = -ENAMETOOLONG;
goto out;
}
if (name_len + data_len >
BTRFS_MAX_XATTR_SIZE(root->fs_info)) {
ret = -E2BIG;
goto out;
}
} else {
/*
* Path too long
*/
if (name_len + data_len > PATH_MAX) {
ret = -ENAMETOOLONG;
goto out;
}
}
if (name_len + data_len > buf_len) {
buf_len = name_len + data_len;
if (is_vmalloc_addr(buf)) {
vfree(buf);
buf = NULL;
} else {
char *tmp = krealloc(buf, buf_len,
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (!tmp)
kfree(buf);
buf = tmp;
}
if (!buf) {
buf = kvmalloc(buf_len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
}
}
read_extent_buffer(eb, buf, (unsigned long)(di + 1),
name_len + data_len);
len = sizeof(*di) + name_len + data_len;
di = (struct btrfs_dir_item *)((char *)di + len);
cur += len;
ret = iterate(num, &di_key, buf, name_len, buf + name_len,
data_len, type, ctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
num++;
}
out:
kvfree(buf);
return ret;
}
static int __copy_first_ref(int num, u64 dir, int index,
struct fs_path *p, void *ctx)
{
int ret;
struct fs_path *pt = ctx;
ret = fs_path_copy(pt, p);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
/* we want the first only */
return 1;
}
/*
* Retrieve the first path of an inode. If an inode has more then one
* ref/hardlink, this is ignored.
*/
static int get_inode_path(struct btrfs_root *root,
u64 ino, struct fs_path *path)
{
int ret;
struct btrfs_key key, found_key;
struct btrfs_path *p;
p = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
fs_path_reset(path);
key.objectid = ino;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot_for_read(root, &key, p, 1, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = 1;
goto out;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(p->nodes[0], &found_key, p->slots[0]);
if (found_key.objectid != ino ||
(found_key.type != BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY &&
found_key.type != BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY)) {
ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
}
ret = iterate_inode_ref(root, p, &found_key, 1,
__copy_first_ref, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = 0;
out:
btrfs_free_path(p);
return ret;
}
struct backref_ctx {
struct send_ctx *sctx;
/* number of total found references */
u64 found;
/*
* used for clones found in send_root. clones found behind cur_objectid
* and cur_offset are not considered as allowed clones.
*/
u64 cur_objectid;
u64 cur_offset;
/* may be truncated in case it's the last extent in a file */
u64 extent_len;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix clone operations for compressed extents Marc reported a problem where the receiving end of an incremental send was performing clone operations that failed with -EINVAL. This happened because, unlike for uncompressed extents, we were not checking if the source clone offset and length, after summing the data offset, falls within the source file's boundaries. So make sure we do such checks when attempting to issue clone operations for compressed extents. Problem reproducible with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount -o compress /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount -o compress /dev/sdc /mnt2 # Create the file with a single extent of 128K. This creates a metadata file # extent item with a data start offset of 0 and a logical length of 128K. $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 64K 128K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo # Now rewrite the range 64K to 112K of our file. This will make the inode's # metadata continue to point to the 128K extent we created before, but now # with an extent item that points to the extent with a data start offset of # 112K and a logical length of 16K. # That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset # at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 192K. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 64K 112K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo # Now rewrite the range 180K to 12K. This will make the inode's metadata # continue to point the the 128K extent we created earlier, with a single # extent item that points to it with a start offset of 112K and a logical # length of 4K. # That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset # at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 180K. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 180K 12K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ touch /mnt/bar # Calls the btrfs clone ioctl. $ ~/xfstests/src/cloner -s $((176 * 1024)) -d $((176 * 1024)) \ -l $((4 * 1024)) /mnt/foo /mnt/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 At subvol /mnt/snap1 At subvol snap1 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: failed to clone extents to bar Invalid argument A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> Tested-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Tested-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <jan.steffens@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-05-02 18:56:00 -06:00
/* data offset in the file extent item */
u64 data_offset;
/* Just to check for bugs in backref resolving */
int found_itself;
};
static int __clone_root_cmp_bsearch(const void *key, const void *elt)
{
u64 root = (u64)(uintptr_t)key;
struct clone_root *cr = (struct clone_root *)elt;
if (root < cr->root->root_key.objectid)
return -1;
if (root > cr->root->root_key.objectid)
return 1;
return 0;
}
static int __clone_root_cmp_sort(const void *e1, const void *e2)
{
struct clone_root *cr1 = (struct clone_root *)e1;
struct clone_root *cr2 = (struct clone_root *)e2;
if (cr1->root->root_key.objectid < cr2->root->root_key.objectid)
return -1;
if (cr1->root->root_key.objectid > cr2->root->root_key.objectid)
return 1;
return 0;
}
/*
* Called for every backref that is found for the current extent.
* Results are collected in sctx->clone_roots->ino/offset/found_refs
*/
static int __iterate_backrefs(u64 ino, u64 offset, u64 root, void *ctx_)
{
struct backref_ctx *bctx = ctx_;
struct clone_root *found;
/* First check if the root is in the list of accepted clone sources */
found = bsearch((void *)(uintptr_t)root, bctx->sctx->clone_roots,
bctx->sctx->clone_roots_cnt,
sizeof(struct clone_root),
__clone_root_cmp_bsearch);
if (!found)
return 0;
if (found->root == bctx->sctx->send_root &&
ino == bctx->cur_objectid &&
offset == bctx->cur_offset) {
bctx->found_itself = 1;
}
/*
* Make sure we don't consider clones from send_root that are
* behind the current inode/offset.
*/
if (found->root == bctx->sctx->send_root) {
/*
Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file commit 11f2069c113e02971b8db6fda62f9b9cd31a030f upstream. For send we currently skip clone operations when the source and destination files are the same. This is so because clone didn't support this case in its early days, but support for it was added back in May 2013 by commit a96fbc72884fcb ("Btrfs: allow file data clone within a file"). This change adds support for it. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 64K 0 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdd/foobar 0 64K 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdd /mnt/sdd/snap $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sde $ mount /dev/sde /mnt/sde $ btrfs send /mnt/sdd/snap | btrfs receive /mnt/sde Without this change file foobar at the destination has a single 128Kb extent: $ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar Filesystem type is: 9123683e File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes) ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags: 0: 0.. 31: 0.. 31: 32: last,unknown_loc,delalloc,eof /mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 1 extent found With this we get a single 64Kb extent that is shared at file offsets 0 and 64K, just like in the source filesystem: $ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar Filesystem type is: 9123683e File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes) ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags: 0: 0.. 15: 3328.. 3343: 16: shared 1: 16.. 31: 3328.. 3343: 16: 3344: last,shared,eof /mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 2 extents found Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-10-30 06:23:11 -06:00
* If the source inode was not yet processed we can't issue a
* clone operation, as the source extent does not exist yet at
* the destination of the stream.
*/
Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file commit 11f2069c113e02971b8db6fda62f9b9cd31a030f upstream. For send we currently skip clone operations when the source and destination files are the same. This is so because clone didn't support this case in its early days, but support for it was added back in May 2013 by commit a96fbc72884fcb ("Btrfs: allow file data clone within a file"). This change adds support for it. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 64K 0 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdd/foobar 0 64K 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdd /mnt/sdd/snap $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sde $ mount /dev/sde /mnt/sde $ btrfs send /mnt/sdd/snap | btrfs receive /mnt/sde Without this change file foobar at the destination has a single 128Kb extent: $ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar Filesystem type is: 9123683e File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes) ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags: 0: 0.. 31: 0.. 31: 32: last,unknown_loc,delalloc,eof /mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 1 extent found With this we get a single 64Kb extent that is shared at file offsets 0 and 64K, just like in the source filesystem: $ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar Filesystem type is: 9123683e File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes) ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags: 0: 0.. 15: 3328.. 3343: 16: shared 1: 16.. 31: 3328.. 3343: 16: 3344: last,shared,eof /mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 2 extents found Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-10-30 06:23:11 -06:00
if (ino > bctx->cur_objectid)
return 0;
/*
* We clone from the inode currently being sent as long as the
* source extent is already processed, otherwise we could try
* to clone from an extent that does not exist yet at the
* destination of the stream.
*/
if (ino == bctx->cur_objectid &&
Btrfs: send, fix emission of invalid clone operations within the same file commit 9722b10148504c4153a74a9c89725af271e490fc upstream. When doing an incremental send and a file has extents shared with itself at different file offsets, it's possible for send to emit clone operations that will fail at the destination because the source range goes beyond the file's current size. This happens when the file size has increased in the send snapshot, there is a hole between the shared extents and both shared extents are at file offsets which are greater the file's size in the parent snapshot. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xf1 0 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/sdb/base # Create a 320K extent at file offset 512K. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 512K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 576K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xef 640K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x64 704K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x73 768K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar # Clone part of that 320K extent into a lower file offset (192K). # This file offset is greater than the file's size in the parent # snapshot (64K). Also the clone range is a bit behind the offset of # the 320K extent so that we leave a hole between the shared extents. $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/foobar 448K 192K 192K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr $ btrfs send -p /mnt/sdb/base -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/sdb/incr $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/sdc ERROR: failed to clone extents to foobar: Invalid argument The problem is that after processing the extent at file offset 256K, which refers to the first 128K of the 320K extent created by the buffered write operations, we have 'cur_inode_next_write_offset' set to 384K, which corresponds to the end offset of the partially shared extent (256K + 128K) and to the current file size in the receiver. Then when we process the extent at offset 512K, we do extent backreference iteration to figure out if we can clone the extent from some other inode or from the same inode, and we consider the extent at offset 256K of the same inode as a valid source for a clone operation, which is not correct because at that point the current file size in the receiver is 384K, which corresponds to the end of last processed extent (at file offset 256K), so using a clone source range from 256K to 256K + 320K is invalid because that goes past the current size of the file (384K) - this makes the receiver get an -EINVAL error when attempting the clone operation. So fix this by excluding clone sources that have a range that goes beyond the current file size in the receiver when iterating extent backreferences. A test case for fstests follows soon. Fixes: 11f2069c113e02 ("Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-01-29 10:09:53 -07:00
offset + bctx->extent_len >
bctx->sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset)
return 0;
}
bctx->found++;
found->found_refs++;
if (ino < found->ino) {
found->ino = ino;
found->offset = offset;
} else if (found->ino == ino) {
/*
* same extent found more then once in the same file.
*/
if (found->offset > offset + bctx->extent_len)
found->offset = offset;
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Given an inode, offset and extent item, it finds a good clone for a clone
* instruction. Returns -ENOENT when none could be found. The function makes
* sure that the returned clone is usable at the point where sending is at the
* moment. This means, that no clones are accepted which lie behind the current
* inode+offset.
*
* path must point to the extent item when called.
*/
static int find_extent_clone(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct btrfs_path *path,
u64 ino, u64 data_offset,
u64 ino_size,
struct clone_root **found)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret;
int extent_type;
u64 logical;
u64 disk_byte;
u64 num_bytes;
u64 extent_item_pos;
u64 flags = 0;
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
struct extent_buffer *eb = path->nodes[0];
struct backref_ctx *backref_ctx = NULL;
struct clone_root *cur_clone_root;
struct btrfs_key found_key;
struct btrfs_path *tmp_path;
struct btrfs_extent_item *ei;
int compressed;
u32 i;
tmp_path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!tmp_path)
return -ENOMEM;
/* We only use this path under the commit sem */
tmp_path->need_commit_sem = 0;
backref_ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*backref_ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!backref_ctx) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
if (data_offset >= ino_size) {
/*
* There may be extents that lie behind the file's size.
* I at least had this in combination with snapshotting while
* writing large files.
*/
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
fi = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
extent_type = btrfs_file_extent_type(eb, fi);
if (extent_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
}
compressed = btrfs_file_extent_compression(eb, fi);
num_bytes = btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(eb, fi);
disk_byte = btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(eb, fi);
if (disk_byte == 0) {
ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
}
logical = disk_byte + btrfs_file_extent_offset(eb, fi);
down_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
ret = extent_from_logical(fs_info, disk_byte, tmp_path,
&found_key, &flags);
up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (flags & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) {
ret = -EIO;
goto out;
}
ei = btrfs_item_ptr(tmp_path->nodes[0], tmp_path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_extent_item);
/*
* Backreference walking (iterate_extent_inodes() below) is currently
* too expensive when an extent has a large number of references, both
* in time spent and used memory. So for now just fallback to write
* operations instead of clone operations when an extent has more than
* a certain amount of references.
*/
if (btrfs_extent_refs(tmp_path->nodes[0], ei) > SEND_MAX_EXTENT_REFS) {
ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
}
btrfs_release_path(tmp_path);
/*
* Setup the clone roots.
*/
for (i = 0; i < sctx->clone_roots_cnt; i++) {
cur_clone_root = sctx->clone_roots + i;
cur_clone_root->ino = (u64)-1;
cur_clone_root->offset = 0;
cur_clone_root->found_refs = 0;
}
backref_ctx->sctx = sctx;
backref_ctx->found = 0;
backref_ctx->cur_objectid = ino;
backref_ctx->cur_offset = data_offset;
backref_ctx->found_itself = 0;
backref_ctx->extent_len = num_bytes;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix clone operations for compressed extents Marc reported a problem where the receiving end of an incremental send was performing clone operations that failed with -EINVAL. This happened because, unlike for uncompressed extents, we were not checking if the source clone offset and length, after summing the data offset, falls within the source file's boundaries. So make sure we do such checks when attempting to issue clone operations for compressed extents. Problem reproducible with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount -o compress /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount -o compress /dev/sdc /mnt2 # Create the file with a single extent of 128K. This creates a metadata file # extent item with a data start offset of 0 and a logical length of 128K. $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 64K 128K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo # Now rewrite the range 64K to 112K of our file. This will make the inode's # metadata continue to point to the 128K extent we created before, but now # with an extent item that points to the extent with a data start offset of # 112K and a logical length of 16K. # That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset # at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 192K. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 64K 112K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo # Now rewrite the range 180K to 12K. This will make the inode's metadata # continue to point the the 128K extent we created earlier, with a single # extent item that points to it with a start offset of 112K and a logical # length of 4K. # That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset # at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 180K. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 180K 12K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ touch /mnt/bar # Calls the btrfs clone ioctl. $ ~/xfstests/src/cloner -s $((176 * 1024)) -d $((176 * 1024)) \ -l $((4 * 1024)) /mnt/foo /mnt/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 At subvol /mnt/snap1 At subvol snap1 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: failed to clone extents to bar Invalid argument A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> Tested-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Tested-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <jan.steffens@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-05-02 18:56:00 -06:00
/*
* For non-compressed extents iterate_extent_inodes() gives us extent
* offsets that already take into account the data offset, but not for
* compressed extents, since the offset is logical and not relative to
* the physical extent locations. We must take this into account to
* avoid sending clone offsets that go beyond the source file's size,
* which would result in the clone ioctl failing with -EINVAL on the
* receiving end.
*/
if (compressed == BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE)
backref_ctx->data_offset = 0;
else
backref_ctx->data_offset = btrfs_file_extent_offset(eb, fi);
/*
* The last extent of a file may be too large due to page alignment.
* We need to adjust extent_len in this case so that the checks in
* __iterate_backrefs work.
*/
if (data_offset + num_bytes >= ino_size)
backref_ctx->extent_len = ino_size - data_offset;
/*
* Now collect all backrefs.
*/
if (compressed == BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE)
extent_item_pos = logical - found_key.objectid;
else
extent_item_pos = 0;
ret = iterate_extent_inodes(fs_info, found_key.objectid,
extent_item_pos, 1, __iterate_backrefs,
btrfs: add a flag to iterate_inodes_from_logical to find all extent refs for uncompressed extents The LOGICAL_INO ioctl provides a backward mapping from extent bytenr and offset (encoded as a single logical address) to a list of extent refs. LOGICAL_INO complements TREE_SEARCH, which provides the forward mapping (extent ref -> extent bytenr and offset, or logical address). These are useful capabilities for programs that manipulate extents and extent references from userspace (e.g. dedup and defrag utilities). When the extents are uncompressed (and not encrypted and not other), check_extent_in_eb performs filtering of the extent refs to remove any extent refs which do not contain the same extent offset as the 'logical' parameter's extent offset. This prevents LOGICAL_INO from returning references to more than a single block. To find the set of extent references to an uncompressed extent from [a, b), userspace has to run a loop like this pseudocode: for (i = a; i < b; ++i) extent_ref_set += LOGICAL_INO(i); At each iteration of the loop (up to 32768 iterations for a 128M extent), data we are interested in is collected in the kernel, then deleted by the filter in check_extent_in_eb. When the extents are compressed (or encrypted or other), the 'logical' parameter must be an extent bytenr (the 'a' parameter in the loop). No filtering by extent offset is done (or possible?) so the result is the complete set of extent refs for the entire extent. This removes the need for the loop, since we get all the extent refs in one call. Add an 'ignore_offset' argument to iterate_inodes_from_logical, [...several levels of function call graph...], and check_extent_in_eb, so that we can disable the extent offset filtering for uncompressed extents. This flag can be set by an improved version of the LOGICAL_INO ioctl to get either behavior as desired. There is no functional change in this patch. The new flag is always false. Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ minor coding style fixes ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-09-22 11:58:45 -06:00
backref_ctx, false);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (!backref_ctx->found_itself) {
/* found a bug in backref code? */
ret = -EIO;
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"did not find backref in send_root. inode=%llu, offset=%llu, disk_byte=%llu found extent=%llu",
ino, data_offset, disk_byte, found_key.objectid);
goto out;
}
btrfs_debug(fs_info,
"find_extent_clone: data_offset=%llu, ino=%llu, num_bytes=%llu, logical=%llu",
data_offset, ino, num_bytes, logical);
if (!backref_ctx->found)
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "no clones found");
cur_clone_root = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < sctx->clone_roots_cnt; i++) {
if (sctx->clone_roots[i].found_refs) {
if (!cur_clone_root)
cur_clone_root = sctx->clone_roots + i;
else if (sctx->clone_roots[i].root == sctx->send_root)
/* prefer clones from send_root over others */
cur_clone_root = sctx->clone_roots + i;
}
}
if (cur_clone_root) {
*found = cur_clone_root;
ret = 0;
} else {
ret = -ENOENT;
}
out:
btrfs_free_path(tmp_path);
kfree(backref_ctx);
return ret;
}
static int read_symlink(struct btrfs_root *root,
u64 ino,
struct fs_path *dest)
{
int ret;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *ei;
u8 type;
u8 compression;
unsigned long off;
int len;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
key.objectid = ino;
key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
/*
* An empty symlink inode. Can happen in rare error paths when
* creating a symlink (transaction committed before the inode
* eviction handler removed the symlink inode items and a crash
* happened in between or the subvol was snapshoted in between).
* Print an informative message to dmesg/syslog so that the user
* can delete the symlink.
*/
btrfs_err(root->fs_info,
"Found empty symlink inode %llu at root %llu",
ino, root->root_key.objectid);
ret = -EIO;
goto out;
}
ei = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
type = btrfs_file_extent_type(path->nodes[0], ei);
compression = btrfs_file_extent_compression(path->nodes[0], ei);
BUG_ON(type != BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE);
BUG_ON(compression);
off = btrfs_file_extent_inline_start(ei);
len = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(path->nodes[0], ei);
ret = fs_path_add_from_extent_buffer(dest, path->nodes[0], off, len);
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
/*
* Helper function to generate a file name that is unique in the root of
* send_root and parent_root. This is used to generate names for orphan inodes.
*/
static int gen_unique_name(struct send_ctx *sctx,
u64 ino, u64 gen,
struct fs_path *dest)
{
int ret = 0;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
char tmp[64];
int len;
u64 idx = 0;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
while (1) {
len = snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), "o%llu-%llu-%llu",
ino, gen, idx);
ASSERT(len < sizeof(tmp));
di = btrfs_lookup_dir_item(NULL, sctx->send_root,
path, BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID,
tmp, strlen(tmp), 0);
btrfs_release_path(path);
if (IS_ERR(di)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(di);
goto out;
}
if (di) {
/* not unique, try again */
idx++;
continue;
}
if (!sctx->parent_root) {
/* unique */
ret = 0;
break;
}
di = btrfs_lookup_dir_item(NULL, sctx->parent_root,
path, BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID,
tmp, strlen(tmp), 0);
btrfs_release_path(path);
if (IS_ERR(di)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(di);
goto out;
}
if (di) {
/* not unique, try again */
idx++;
continue;
}
/* unique */
break;
}
ret = fs_path_add(dest, tmp, strlen(tmp));
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
enum inode_state {
inode_state_no_change,
inode_state_will_create,
inode_state_did_create,
inode_state_will_delete,
inode_state_did_delete,
};
static int get_cur_inode_state(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino, u64 gen)
{
int ret;
int left_ret;
int right_ret;
u64 left_gen;
u64 right_gen;
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->send_root, ino, NULL, &left_gen, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT)
goto out;
left_ret = ret;
if (!sctx->parent_root) {
right_ret = -ENOENT;
} else {
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->parent_root, ino, NULL, &right_gen,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT)
goto out;
right_ret = ret;
}
if (!left_ret && !right_ret) {
if (left_gen == gen && right_gen == gen) {
ret = inode_state_no_change;
} else if (left_gen == gen) {
if (ino < sctx->send_progress)
ret = inode_state_did_create;
else
ret = inode_state_will_create;
} else if (right_gen == gen) {
if (ino < sctx->send_progress)
ret = inode_state_did_delete;
else
ret = inode_state_will_delete;
} else {
ret = -ENOENT;
}
} else if (!left_ret) {
if (left_gen == gen) {
if (ino < sctx->send_progress)
ret = inode_state_did_create;
else
ret = inode_state_will_create;
} else {
ret = -ENOENT;
}
} else if (!right_ret) {
if (right_gen == gen) {
if (ino < sctx->send_progress)
ret = inode_state_did_delete;
else
ret = inode_state_will_delete;
} else {
ret = -ENOENT;
}
} else {
ret = -ENOENT;
}
out:
return ret;
}
static int is_inode_existent(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino, u64 gen)
{
int ret;
Btrfs: send, fix failure to rename top level inode due to name collision Under certain situations, an incremental send operation can fail due to a premature attempt to create a new top level inode (a direct child of the subvolume/snapshot root) whose name collides with another inode that was removed from the send snapshot. Consider the following example scenario. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 8) |---- a1/ (ino 257, gen 9) |---- a2/ (ino 258, gen 9) Send snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |---- a2/ (ino 257, gen 7) In this scenario, when receiving the incremental send stream, the btrfs receive command fails like this (ran in verbose mode, -vv argument): rmdir a1 mkfile o257-7-0 rename o257-7-0 -> a2 ERROR: rename o257-7-0 -> a2 failed: Is a directory What happens when computing the incremental send stream is: 1) An operation to remove the directory with inode number 257 and generation 9 is issued. 2) An operation to create the inode with number 257 and generation 7 is issued. This creates the inode with an orphanized name of "o257-7-0". 3) An operation rename the new inode 257 to its final name, "a2", is issued. This is incorrect because inode 258, which has the same name and it's a child of the same parent (root inode 256), was not yet processed and therefore no rmdir operation for it was yet issued. The rename operation is issued because we fail to detect that the name of the new inode 257 collides with inode 258, because their parent, a subvolume/snapshot root (inode 256) has a different generation in both snapshots. So fix this by ignoring the generation value of a parent directory that matches a root inode (number 256) when we are checking if the name of the inode currently being processed collides with the name of some other inode that was not yet processed. We can achieve this scenario of different inodes with the same number but different generation values either by mounting a filesystem with the inode cache option (-o inode_cache) or by creating and sending snapshots across different filesystems, like in the following example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a1 $ mkdir /mnt/a2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ touch /mnt/a2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap # Take note that once the filesystem is created, its current # generation has value 7 so the inode from the second snapshot has # a generation value of 7. And after receiving the first snapshot # the filesystem is at a generation value of 10, because the call to # create the second snapshot bumps the generation to 8 (the snapshot # creation ioctl does a transaction commit), the receive command calls # the snapshot creation ioctl to create the first snapshot, which bumps # the filesystem's generation to 9, and finally when the receive # operation finishes it calls an ioctl to transition the first snapshot # (snap1) from RW mode to RO mode, which does another transaction commit # and bumps the filesystem's generation to 10. $ rm -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt /tmp/1.snap # Receive of snapshot snap2 used to fail. $ btrfs receive /mnt /tmp/2.snap Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote changelog to be more precise and clear] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-01-05 01:24:55 -07:00
if (ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
return 1;
ret = get_cur_inode_state(sctx, ino, gen);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret == inode_state_no_change ||
ret == inode_state_did_create ||
ret == inode_state_will_delete)
ret = 1;
else
ret = 0;
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* Helper function to lookup a dir item in a dir.
*/
static int lookup_dir_item_inode(struct btrfs_root *root,
u64 dir, const char *name, int name_len,
u64 *found_inode,
u8 *found_type)
{
int ret = 0;
struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_path *path;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
di = btrfs_lookup_dir_item(NULL, root, path,
dir, name, name_len, 0);
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(di)) {
ret = di ? PTR_ERR(di) : -ENOENT;
goto out;
}
btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], di, &key);
if (key.type == BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY) {
ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
}
*found_inode = key.objectid;
*found_type = btrfs_dir_type(path->nodes[0], di);
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
/*
* Looks up the first btrfs_inode_ref of a given ino. It returns the parent dir,
* generation of the parent dir and the name of the dir entry.
*/
static int get_first_ref(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 ino,
u64 *dir, u64 *dir_gen, struct fs_path *name)
{
int ret;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_key found_key;
struct btrfs_path *path;
int len;
u64 parent_dir;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
key.objectid = ino;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot_for_read(root, &key, path, 1, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (!ret)
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &found_key,
path->slots[0]);
if (ret || found_key.objectid != ino ||
(found_key.type != BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY &&
found_key.type != BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY)) {
ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: send, fix incorrect ref access when using extrefs When running send, if an inode only has extended reference items associated to it and no regular references, send.c:get_first_ref() was incorrectly assuming the reference it found was of type BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY due to use of the wrong key variable. This caused weird behaviour when using the found item has a regular reference, such as weird path string, and occasionally (when lucky) a crash: [ 190.600652] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 190.600994] Modules linked in: btrfs xor raid6_pq binfmt_misc nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc psmouse serio_raw evbug pcspkr i2c_piix4 e1000 floppy [ 190.602565] CPU: 2 PID: 14520 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 3.13.0-fdm-btrfs-next-26+ #1 [ 190.602728] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 190.602868] task: ffff8800d447c920 ti: ffff8801fa79e000 task.ti: ffff8801fa79e000 [ 190.603030] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813266b4>] [<ffffffff813266b4>] memcpy+0x54/0x110 [ 190.603262] RSP: 0018:ffff8801fa79f880 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 190.603395] RAX: ffff8800d4326e3f RBX: 000000000000036a RCX: ffff880000000000 [ 190.603553] RDX: 000000000000032a RSI: ffe708844042936a RDI: ffff8800d43271a9 [ 190.603710] RBP: ffff8801fa79f8c8 R08: 00000000003a4ef0 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 190.603867] R10: 793a4ef09f000000 R11: 9f0000000053726f R12: ffff8800d43271a9 [ 190.604020] R13: 0000160000000000 R14: ffff8802110134f0 R15: 000000000000036a [ 190.604020] FS: 00007fb423d09b80(0000) GS:ffff880216200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 190.604020] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 190.604020] CR2: 00007fb4229d4b78 CR3: 00000001f5d76000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 190.604020] Stack: [ 190.604020] ffffffffa01f4d49 ffff8801fa79f8f0 00000000000009f9 ffff8801fa79f8c8 [ 190.604020] 00000000000009f9 ffff880211013260 000000000000f971 ffff88021147dba8 [ 190.604020] 00000000000009f9 ffff8801fa79f918 ffffffffa02367f5 ffff8801fa79f928 [ 190.604020] Call Trace: [ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa01f4d49>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xb9/0x120 [btrfs] [ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa02367f5>] fs_path_add_from_extent_buffer+0x45/0x60 [btrfs] [ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa0238806>] get_first_ref+0x1f6/0x210 [btrfs] [ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa0238994>] __get_cur_name_and_parent+0x174/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 190.604020] [<ffffffff8118df3d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x11d/0x1e0 [ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa0236674>] ? fs_path_alloc+0x24/0x60 [btrfs] [ 190.604020] [<ffffffffa0238c91>] get_cur_path+0xd1/0x240 [btrfs] (...) Steps to reproduce (either crash or some weirdness like an odd path string): mkfs.btrfs -f -O extref /dev/sdd mount /dev/sdd /mnt mkdir /mnt/testdir touch /mnt/testdir/foobar for i in `seq 1 2550`; do ln /mnt/testdir/foobar /mnt/testdir/foobar_link_`printf "%04d" $i` done ln /mnt/testdir/foobar /mnt/testdir/final_foobar_name rm -f /mnt/testdir/foobar for i in `seq 1 2550`; do rm -f /mnt/testdir/foobar_link_`printf "%04d" $i` done btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap btrfs send /mnt/mysnap -f /tmp/mysnap.send Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
2014-05-13 15:01:02 -06:00
if (found_key.type == BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY) {
struct btrfs_inode_ref *iref;
iref = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_inode_ref);
len = btrfs_inode_ref_name_len(path->nodes[0], iref);
ret = fs_path_add_from_extent_buffer(name, path->nodes[0],
(unsigned long)(iref + 1),
len);
parent_dir = found_key.offset;
} else {
struct btrfs_inode_extref *extref;
extref = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_inode_extref);
len = btrfs_inode_extref_name_len(path->nodes[0], extref);
ret = fs_path_add_from_extent_buffer(name, path->nodes[0],
(unsigned long)&extref->name, len);
parent_dir = btrfs_inode_extref_parent(path->nodes[0], extref);
}
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
btrfs_release_path(path);
if (dir_gen) {
ret = get_inode_info(root, parent_dir, NULL, dir_gen, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
*dir = parent_dir;
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
static int is_first_ref(struct btrfs_root *root,
u64 ino, u64 dir,
const char *name, int name_len)
{
int ret;
struct fs_path *tmp_name;
u64 tmp_dir;
tmp_name = fs_path_alloc();
if (!tmp_name)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = get_first_ref(root, ino, &tmp_dir, NULL, tmp_name);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (dir != tmp_dir || name_len != fs_path_len(tmp_name)) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
ret = !memcmp(tmp_name->start, name, name_len);
out:
fs_path_free(tmp_name);
return ret;
}
/*
* Used by process_recorded_refs to determine if a new ref would overwrite an
* already existing ref. In case it detects an overwrite, it returns the
* inode/gen in who_ino/who_gen.
* When an overwrite is detected, process_recorded_refs does proper orphanizing
* to make sure later references to the overwritten inode are possible.
* Orphanizing is however only required for the first ref of an inode.
* process_recorded_refs does an additional is_first_ref check to see if
* orphanizing is really required.
*/
static int will_overwrite_ref(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 dir, u64 dir_gen,
const char *name, int name_len,
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for link commands In some scenarios an incremental send stream can contain link commands with an invalid target path. Such scenarios happen after moving some directory inode A, renaming a regular file inode B into the old name of inode A and finally creating a new hard link for inode B at directory inode A. Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) | |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- file1 (ino 261) | |--- dir4/ (ino 262) | |--- dir5/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- dir4 (ino 261) | |--- dir6/ (ino 263) |--- dir44/ (ino 262) |--- file11 (ino 261) |--- dir55/ (ino 260) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, a link command contains an invalid target path which makes the receiver fail. The following is the verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=90076fe6-5ba6-e64a-9321-9279670ed16b (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2/dir3 utimes rename dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 ERROR: link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 failed: Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) When processing inode 261, we orphanize inode 262 due to a name/location collision with one of the new hard links for inode 261 (created in the second step below). 2) We create one of the 2 new hard links for inode 261, the one whose location is at "dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4". 3) We then attempt to create the other new hard link for inode 261, which has inode 262 as its parent directory. Because the path for this new hard link was computed before we started processing the new references (hard links), it reflects the old name/location of inode 262, that is, it does not account for the orphanization step that happened when we started processing the new references for inode 261, whence it is no longer valid, causing the receiver to fail. So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of new references if we ended up orphanizing other inodes which are directories. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-06-22 13:03:51 -06:00
u64 *who_ino, u64 *who_gen, u64 *who_mode)
{
int ret = 0;
u64 gen;
u64 other_inode = 0;
u8 other_type = 0;
if (!sctx->parent_root)
goto out;
ret = is_inode_existent(sctx, dir, dir_gen);
if (ret <= 0)
goto out;
/*
* If we have a parent root we need to verify that the parent dir was
* not deleted and then re-created, if it was then we have no overwrite
* and we can just unlink this entry.
*/
Btrfs: send, fix failure to rename top level inode due to name collision Under certain situations, an incremental send operation can fail due to a premature attempt to create a new top level inode (a direct child of the subvolume/snapshot root) whose name collides with another inode that was removed from the send snapshot. Consider the following example scenario. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 8) |---- a1/ (ino 257, gen 9) |---- a2/ (ino 258, gen 9) Send snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |---- a2/ (ino 257, gen 7) In this scenario, when receiving the incremental send stream, the btrfs receive command fails like this (ran in verbose mode, -vv argument): rmdir a1 mkfile o257-7-0 rename o257-7-0 -> a2 ERROR: rename o257-7-0 -> a2 failed: Is a directory What happens when computing the incremental send stream is: 1) An operation to remove the directory with inode number 257 and generation 9 is issued. 2) An operation to create the inode with number 257 and generation 7 is issued. This creates the inode with an orphanized name of "o257-7-0". 3) An operation rename the new inode 257 to its final name, "a2", is issued. This is incorrect because inode 258, which has the same name and it's a child of the same parent (root inode 256), was not yet processed and therefore no rmdir operation for it was yet issued. The rename operation is issued because we fail to detect that the name of the new inode 257 collides with inode 258, because their parent, a subvolume/snapshot root (inode 256) has a different generation in both snapshots. So fix this by ignoring the generation value of a parent directory that matches a root inode (number 256) when we are checking if the name of the inode currently being processed collides with the name of some other inode that was not yet processed. We can achieve this scenario of different inodes with the same number but different generation values either by mounting a filesystem with the inode cache option (-o inode_cache) or by creating and sending snapshots across different filesystems, like in the following example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a1 $ mkdir /mnt/a2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ touch /mnt/a2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap # Take note that once the filesystem is created, its current # generation has value 7 so the inode from the second snapshot has # a generation value of 7. And after receiving the first snapshot # the filesystem is at a generation value of 10, because the call to # create the second snapshot bumps the generation to 8 (the snapshot # creation ioctl does a transaction commit), the receive command calls # the snapshot creation ioctl to create the first snapshot, which bumps # the filesystem's generation to 9, and finally when the receive # operation finishes it calls an ioctl to transition the first snapshot # (snap1) from RW mode to RO mode, which does another transaction commit # and bumps the filesystem's generation to 10. $ rm -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt /tmp/1.snap # Receive of snapshot snap2 used to fail. $ btrfs receive /mnt /tmp/2.snap Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote changelog to be more precise and clear] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-01-05 01:24:55 -07:00
if (sctx->parent_root && dir != BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->parent_root, dir, NULL, &gen, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
if (gen != dir_gen)
goto out;
}
ret = lookup_dir_item_inode(sctx->parent_root, dir, name, name_len,
&other_inode, &other_type);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
/*
* Check if the overwritten ref was already processed. If yes, the ref
* was already unlinked/moved, so we can safely assume that we will not
* overwrite anything at this point in time.
*/
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
if (other_inode > sctx->send_progress ||
is_waiting_for_move(sctx, other_inode)) {
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->parent_root, other_inode, NULL,
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for link commands In some scenarios an incremental send stream can contain link commands with an invalid target path. Such scenarios happen after moving some directory inode A, renaming a regular file inode B into the old name of inode A and finally creating a new hard link for inode B at directory inode A. Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) | |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- file1 (ino 261) | |--- dir4/ (ino 262) | |--- dir5/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- dir4 (ino 261) | |--- dir6/ (ino 263) |--- dir44/ (ino 262) |--- file11 (ino 261) |--- dir55/ (ino 260) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, a link command contains an invalid target path which makes the receiver fail. The following is the verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=90076fe6-5ba6-e64a-9321-9279670ed16b (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2/dir3 utimes rename dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 ERROR: link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 failed: Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) When processing inode 261, we orphanize inode 262 due to a name/location collision with one of the new hard links for inode 261 (created in the second step below). 2) We create one of the 2 new hard links for inode 261, the one whose location is at "dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4". 3) We then attempt to create the other new hard link for inode 261, which has inode 262 as its parent directory. Because the path for this new hard link was computed before we started processing the new references (hard links), it reflects the old name/location of inode 262, that is, it does not account for the orphanization step that happened when we started processing the new references for inode 261, whence it is no longer valid, causing the receiver to fail. So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of new references if we ended up orphanizing other inodes which are directories. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-06-22 13:03:51 -06:00
who_gen, who_mode, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = 1;
*who_ino = other_inode;
} else {
ret = 0;
}
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* Checks if the ref was overwritten by an already processed inode. This is
* used by __get_cur_name_and_parent to find out if the ref was orphanized and
* thus the orphan name needs be used.
* process_recorded_refs also uses it to avoid unlinking of refs that were
* overwritten.
*/
static int did_overwrite_ref(struct send_ctx *sctx,
u64 dir, u64 dir_gen,
u64 ino, u64 ino_gen,
const char *name, int name_len)
{
int ret = 0;
u64 gen;
u64 ow_inode;
u8 other_type;
if (!sctx->parent_root)
goto out;
ret = is_inode_existent(sctx, dir, dir_gen);
if (ret <= 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: incremental send, do not issue invalid rmdir operations When both the parent and send snapshots have a directory inode with the same number but different generations (therefore they are different inodes) and both have an entry with the same name, an incremental send stream will contain an invalid rmdir operation that refers to the orphanized name of the inode from the parent snapshot. The following example scenario shows how this happens. Parent snapshot: . |---- d259_old/ (ino 259, gen 9) | |---- d1/ (ino 258, gen 9) | |---- f (ino 257, gen 9) Send snapshot: . |---- d258/ (ino 258, gen 7) |---- d259/ (ino 259, gen 7) |---- d1/ (ino 257, gen 7) When the kernel is processing inode 258 it notices that in both snapshots there is an inode numbered 259 that is a parent of an inode 258. However it ignores the fact that the inodes numbered 259 have different generations in both snapshots, which means they are effectively different inodes. Then it checks that both inodes 259 have a dentry named "d1" and because of that it issues a rmdir operation with orphanized name of the inode 258 from the parent snapshot. This happens at send.c:process_record_refs(), which calls send.c:did_overwrite_first_ref() that returns true and because of that later on at process_recorded_refs() such rmdir operation is issued because the inode being currently processed (258) is a directory and it was deleted in the send snapshot (and replaced with another inode that has the same number and is a directory too). Fix this issue by comparing the generations of parent directory inodes that have the same number and make send.c:did_overwrite_first_ref() when the generations are different. The following steps reproduce the problem. $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ touch /mnt/f $ mkdir /mnt/d1 $ mkdir /mnt/d259_old $ mv /mnt/d1 /mnt/d259_old/d1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/d1 $ mkdir /mnt/dir258 $ mkdir /mnt/dir259 $ mv /mnt/d1 /mnt/dir259/d1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs receive /mnt/ -f /tmp/1.snap # Take note that once the filesystem is created, its current # generation has value 7 so the inodes from the second snapshot all have # a generation value of 7. And after receiving the first snapshot # the filesystem is at a generation value of 10, because the call to # create the second snapshot bumps the generation to 8 (the snapshot # creation ioctl does a transaction commit), the receive command calls # the snapshot creation ioctl to create the first snapshot, which bumps # the filesystem's generation to 9, and finally when the receive # operation finishes it calls an ioctl to transition the first snapshot # (snap1) from RW mode to RO mode, which does another transaction commit # and bumps the filesystem's generation to 10. This means all the inodes # in the first snapshot (snap1) have a generation value of 9. $ rm -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs receive -vv /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=9c03962f-f620-0047-9f98-32e5a87116d9, ctransid=7 parent_uuid=d17a6e3f-14e5-df4f-be39-a7951a5399aa, parent_ctransid=9 utimes unlink f mkdir o257-7-0 mkdir o259-7-0 rename o257-7-0 -> o259-7-0/d1 chown o259-7-0/d1 - uid=0, gid=0 chmod o259-7-0/d1 - mode=0755 utimes o259-7-0/d1 rmdir o258-9-0 ERROR: rmdir o258-9-0 failed: No such file or directory Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote changelog to be more precise and clear] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-01-05 01:24:58 -07:00
if (dir != BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->send_root, dir, NULL, &gen, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
if (gen != dir_gen)
goto out;
}
/* check if the ref was overwritten by another ref */
ret = lookup_dir_item_inode(sctx->send_root, dir, name, name_len,
&ow_inode, &other_type);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT)
goto out;
if (ret) {
/* was never and will never be overwritten */
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->send_root, ow_inode, NULL, &gen, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ow_inode == ino && gen == ino_gen) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
/*
* We know that it is or will be overwritten. Check this now.
* The current inode being processed might have been the one that caused
Btrfs: send, fix corner case for reference overwrite detection When the inode given to did_overwrite_ref() matches the current progress and has a reference that collides with the reference of other inode that has the same number as the current progress, we were always telling our caller that the inode's reference was overwritten, which is incorrect because the other inode might be a new inode (different generation number) in which case we must return false from did_overwrite_ref() so that its callers don't use an orphanized path for the inode (as it will never be orphanized, instead it will be unlinked and the new inode created later). The following test case for fstests reproduces the issue: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single extent of 64K. mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo/bar \ | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 echo "File digest before being replaced:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo/bar | _filter_scratch # Remove the file and then create a new one in the same location with # the same name but with different content. This new file ends up # getting the same inode number as the previous one, because that inode # number was the highest inode number used by the snapshot's root and # therefore when attempting to find the a new inode number for the new # file, we end up reusing the same inode number. This happens because # currently btrfs uses the highest inode number summed by 1 for the # first inode created once a snapshot's root is loaded (done at # fs/btrfs/inode-map.c:btrfs_find_free_objectid in the linux kernel # tree). # Having these two different files in the snapshots with the same inode # number (but different generation numbers) caused the btrfs send code # to emit an incorrect path for the file when issuing an unlink # operation because it failed to realize they were different files. rm -f $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0 96K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the original filesystem after being replaced:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digest from the new file. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Reported-by: Martin Raiber <martin@urbackup.org> Fixes: 8b191a684968 ("Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-09-26 08:30:23 -06:00
* inode 'ino' to be orphanized, therefore check if ow_inode matches
* the current inode being processed.
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
*/
Btrfs: send, fix corner case for reference overwrite detection When the inode given to did_overwrite_ref() matches the current progress and has a reference that collides with the reference of other inode that has the same number as the current progress, we were always telling our caller that the inode's reference was overwritten, which is incorrect because the other inode might be a new inode (different generation number) in which case we must return false from did_overwrite_ref() so that its callers don't use an orphanized path for the inode (as it will never be orphanized, instead it will be unlinked and the new inode created later). The following test case for fstests reproduces the issue: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single extent of 64K. mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo/bar \ | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 echo "File digest before being replaced:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo/bar | _filter_scratch # Remove the file and then create a new one in the same location with # the same name but with different content. This new file ends up # getting the same inode number as the previous one, because that inode # number was the highest inode number used by the snapshot's root and # therefore when attempting to find the a new inode number for the new # file, we end up reusing the same inode number. This happens because # currently btrfs uses the highest inode number summed by 1 for the # first inode created once a snapshot's root is loaded (done at # fs/btrfs/inode-map.c:btrfs_find_free_objectid in the linux kernel # tree). # Having these two different files in the snapshots with the same inode # number (but different generation numbers) caused the btrfs send code # to emit an incorrect path for the file when issuing an unlink # operation because it failed to realize they were different files. rm -f $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0 96K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the original filesystem after being replaced:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digest from the new file. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Reported-by: Martin Raiber <martin@urbackup.org> Fixes: 8b191a684968 ("Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-09-26 08:30:23 -06:00
if ((ow_inode < sctx->send_progress) ||
(ino != sctx->cur_ino && ow_inode == sctx->cur_ino &&
gen == sctx->cur_inode_gen))
ret = 1;
else
ret = 0;
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* Same as did_overwrite_ref, but also checks if it is the first ref of an inode
* that got overwritten. This is used by process_recorded_refs to determine
* if it has to use the path as returned by get_cur_path or the orphan name.
*/
static int did_overwrite_first_ref(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino, u64 gen)
{
int ret = 0;
struct fs_path *name = NULL;
u64 dir;
u64 dir_gen;
if (!sctx->parent_root)
goto out;
name = fs_path_alloc();
if (!name)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = get_first_ref(sctx->parent_root, ino, &dir, &dir_gen, name);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = did_overwrite_ref(sctx, dir, dir_gen, ino, gen,
name->start, fs_path_len(name));
out:
fs_path_free(name);
return ret;
}
/*
* Insert a name cache entry. On 32bit kernels the radix tree index is 32bit,
* so we need to do some special handling in case we have clashes. This function
* takes care of this with the help of name_cache_entry::radix_list.
* In case of error, nce is kfreed.
*/
static int name_cache_insert(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct name_cache_entry *nce)
{
int ret = 0;
struct list_head *nce_head;
nce_head = radix_tree_lookup(&sctx->name_cache,
(unsigned long)nce->ino);
if (!nce_head) {
nce_head = kmalloc(sizeof(*nce_head), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nce_head) {
kfree(nce);
return -ENOMEM;
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(nce_head);
ret = radix_tree_insert(&sctx->name_cache, nce->ino, nce_head);
if (ret < 0) {
kfree(nce_head);
kfree(nce);
return ret;
}
}
list_add_tail(&nce->radix_list, nce_head);
list_add_tail(&nce->list, &sctx->name_cache_list);
sctx->name_cache_size++;
return ret;
}
static void name_cache_delete(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct name_cache_entry *nce)
{
struct list_head *nce_head;
nce_head = radix_tree_lookup(&sctx->name_cache,
(unsigned long)nce->ino);
if (!nce_head) {
btrfs_err(sctx->send_root->fs_info,
"name_cache_delete lookup failed ino %llu cache size %d, leaking memory",
nce->ino, sctx->name_cache_size);
}
list_del(&nce->radix_list);
list_del(&nce->list);
sctx->name_cache_size--;
/*
* We may not get to the final release of nce_head if the lookup fails
*/
if (nce_head && list_empty(nce_head)) {
radix_tree_delete(&sctx->name_cache, (unsigned long)nce->ino);
kfree(nce_head);
}
}
static struct name_cache_entry *name_cache_search(struct send_ctx *sctx,
u64 ino, u64 gen)
{
struct list_head *nce_head;
struct name_cache_entry *cur;
nce_head = radix_tree_lookup(&sctx->name_cache, (unsigned long)ino);
if (!nce_head)
return NULL;
list_for_each_entry(cur, nce_head, radix_list) {
if (cur->ino == ino && cur->gen == gen)
return cur;
}
return NULL;
}
/*
* Removes the entry from the list and adds it back to the end. This marks the
* entry as recently used so that name_cache_clean_unused does not remove it.
*/
static void name_cache_used(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct name_cache_entry *nce)
{
list_del(&nce->list);
list_add_tail(&nce->list, &sctx->name_cache_list);
}
/*
* Remove some entries from the beginning of name_cache_list.
*/
static void name_cache_clean_unused(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
struct name_cache_entry *nce;
if (sctx->name_cache_size < SEND_CTX_NAME_CACHE_CLEAN_SIZE)
return;
while (sctx->name_cache_size > SEND_CTX_MAX_NAME_CACHE_SIZE) {
nce = list_entry(sctx->name_cache_list.next,
struct name_cache_entry, list);
name_cache_delete(sctx, nce);
kfree(nce);
}
}
static void name_cache_free(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
struct name_cache_entry *nce;
while (!list_empty(&sctx->name_cache_list)) {
nce = list_entry(sctx->name_cache_list.next,
struct name_cache_entry, list);
name_cache_delete(sctx, nce);
kfree(nce);
}
}
/*
* Used by get_cur_path for each ref up to the root.
* Returns 0 if it succeeded.
* Returns 1 if the inode is not existent or got overwritten. In that case, the
* name is an orphan name. This instructs get_cur_path to stop iterating. If 1
* is returned, parent_ino/parent_gen are not guaranteed to be valid.
* Returns <0 in case of error.
*/
static int __get_cur_name_and_parent(struct send_ctx *sctx,
u64 ino, u64 gen,
u64 *parent_ino,
u64 *parent_gen,
struct fs_path *dest)
{
int ret;
int nce_ret;
struct name_cache_entry *nce = NULL;
/*
* First check if we already did a call to this function with the same
* ino/gen. If yes, check if the cache entry is still up-to-date. If yes
* return the cached result.
*/
nce = name_cache_search(sctx, ino, gen);
if (nce) {
if (ino < sctx->send_progress && nce->need_later_update) {
name_cache_delete(sctx, nce);
kfree(nce);
nce = NULL;
} else {
name_cache_used(sctx, nce);
*parent_ino = nce->parent_ino;
*parent_gen = nce->parent_gen;
ret = fs_path_add(dest, nce->name, nce->name_len);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = nce->ret;
goto out;
}
}
/*
* If the inode is not existent yet, add the orphan name and return 1.
* This should only happen for the parent dir that we determine in
* __record_new_ref
*/
ret = is_inode_existent(sctx, ino, gen);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (!ret) {
ret = gen_unique_name(sctx, ino, gen, dest);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = 1;
goto out_cache;
}
/*
* Depending on whether the inode was already processed or not, use
* send_root or parent_root for ref lookup.
*/
Btrfs: fix send issuing outdated paths for utimes, chown and chmod When doing an incremental send, if we had a directory pending a move/rename operation and none of its parents, except for the immediate parent, were pending a move/rename, after processing the directory's references, we would be issuing utimes, chown and chmod intructions against am outdated path - a path which matched the one in the parent root. This change also simplifies a bit the code that deals with building a path for a directory which has a move/rename operation delayed. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f $ chmod 0777 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ chmod 0700 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: chmod a/b/c/d/e failed. No such file or directory A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-20 17:01:32 -07:00
if (ino < sctx->send_progress)
ret = get_first_ref(sctx->send_root, ino,
parent_ino, parent_gen, dest);
else
ret = get_first_ref(sctx->parent_root, ino,
parent_ino, parent_gen, dest);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
/*
* Check if the ref was overwritten by an inode's ref that was processed
* earlier. If yes, treat as orphan and return 1.
*/
ret = did_overwrite_ref(sctx, *parent_ino, *parent_gen, ino, gen,
dest->start, dest->end - dest->start);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
fs_path_reset(dest);
ret = gen_unique_name(sctx, ino, gen, dest);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = 1;
}
out_cache:
/*
* Store the result of the lookup in the name cache.
*/
nce = kmalloc(sizeof(*nce) + fs_path_len(dest) + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nce) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
nce->ino = ino;
nce->gen = gen;
nce->parent_ino = *parent_ino;
nce->parent_gen = *parent_gen;
nce->name_len = fs_path_len(dest);
nce->ret = ret;
strcpy(nce->name, dest->start);
if (ino < sctx->send_progress)
nce->need_later_update = 0;
else
nce->need_later_update = 1;
nce_ret = name_cache_insert(sctx, nce);
if (nce_ret < 0)
ret = nce_ret;
name_cache_clean_unused(sctx);
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* Magic happens here. This function returns the first ref to an inode as it
* would look like while receiving the stream at this point in time.
* We walk the path up to the root. For every inode in between, we check if it
* was already processed/sent. If yes, we continue with the parent as found
* in send_root. If not, we continue with the parent as found in parent_root.
* If we encounter an inode that was deleted at this point in time, we use the
* inodes "orphan" name instead of the real name and stop. Same with new inodes
* that were not created yet and overwritten inodes/refs.
*
* When do we have orphan inodes:
* 1. When an inode is freshly created and thus no valid refs are available yet
* 2. When a directory lost all it's refs (deleted) but still has dir items
* inside which were not processed yet (pending for move/delete). If anyone
* tried to get the path to the dir items, it would get a path inside that
* orphan directory.
* 3. When an inode is moved around or gets new links, it may overwrite the ref
* of an unprocessed inode. If in that case the first ref would be
* overwritten, the overwritten inode gets "orphanized". Later when we
* process this overwritten inode, it is restored at a new place by moving
* the orphan inode.
*
* sctx->send_progress tells this function at which point in time receiving
* would be.
*/
static int get_cur_path(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino, u64 gen,
struct fs_path *dest)
{
int ret = 0;
struct fs_path *name = NULL;
u64 parent_inode = 0;
u64 parent_gen = 0;
int stop = 0;
name = fs_path_alloc();
if (!name) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
dest->reversed = 1;
fs_path_reset(dest);
while (!stop && ino != BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
struct waiting_dir_move *wdm;
fs_path_reset(name);
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
if (is_waiting_for_rm(sctx, ino, gen)) {
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
ret = gen_unique_name(sctx, ino, gen, name);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = fs_path_add_path(dest, name);
break;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
wdm = get_waiting_dir_move(sctx, ino);
if (wdm && wdm->orphanized) {
ret = gen_unique_name(sctx, ino, gen, name);
stop = 1;
} else if (wdm) {
Btrfs: fix send issuing outdated paths for utimes, chown and chmod When doing an incremental send, if we had a directory pending a move/rename operation and none of its parents, except for the immediate parent, were pending a move/rename, after processing the directory's references, we would be issuing utimes, chown and chmod intructions against am outdated path - a path which matched the one in the parent root. This change also simplifies a bit the code that deals with building a path for a directory which has a move/rename operation delayed. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f $ chmod 0777 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ chmod 0700 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: chmod a/b/c/d/e failed. No such file or directory A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-20 17:01:32 -07:00
ret = get_first_ref(sctx->parent_root, ino,
&parent_inode, &parent_gen, name);
} else {
ret = __get_cur_name_and_parent(sctx, ino, gen,
&parent_inode,
&parent_gen, name);
if (ret)
stop = 1;
}
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
ret = fs_path_add_path(dest, name);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ino = parent_inode;
gen = parent_gen;
}
out:
fs_path_free(name);
if (!ret)
fs_path_unreverse(dest);
return ret;
}
/*
* Sends a BTRFS_SEND_C_SUBVOL command/item to userspace
*/
static int send_subvol_begin(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret;
struct btrfs_root *send_root = sctx->send_root;
struct btrfs_root *parent_root = sctx->parent_root;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_root_ref *ref;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
char *name = NULL;
int namelen;
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
name = kmalloc(BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!name) {
btrfs_free_path(path);
return -ENOMEM;
}
key.objectid = send_root->root_key.objectid;
key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_BACKREF_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot_for_read(send_root->fs_info->tree_root,
&key, path, 1, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
}
leaf = path->nodes[0];
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]);
if (key.type != BTRFS_ROOT_BACKREF_KEY ||
key.objectid != send_root->root_key.objectid) {
ret = -ENOENT;
goto out;
}
ref = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0], struct btrfs_root_ref);
namelen = btrfs_root_ref_name_len(leaf, ref);
read_extent_buffer(leaf, name, (unsigned long)(ref + 1), namelen);
btrfs_release_path(path);
if (parent_root) {
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_SNAPSHOT);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
} else {
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_SUBVOL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
TLV_PUT_STRING(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, name, namelen);
btrfs: fix resending received snapshot with parent This fixes a regression introduced by 37b8d27d between v4.1 and v4.2. When a snapshot is received, its received_uuid is set to the original uuid of the subvolume. When that snapshot is then resent to a third filesystem, it's received_uuid is set to the second uuid instead of the original one. The same was true for the parent_uuid. This behaviour was partially changed in 37b8d27d, but in that patch only the parent_uuid was taken from the real original, not the uuid itself, causing the search for the parent to fail in the case below. This happens for example when trying to send a series of linked snapshots (e.g. created by snapper) from the backup file system back to the original one. The following commands reproduce the issue in v4.2.1 (no error in 4.1.6) # setup three test file systems for i in 1 2 3; do truncate -s 50M fs$i mkfs.btrfs fs$i mkdir $i mount fs$i $i done echo "content" > 1/testfile btrfs su snapshot -r 1/ 1/snap1 echo "changed content" > 1/testfile btrfs su snapshot -r 1/ 1/snap2 # works fine: btrfs send 1/snap1 | btrfs receive 2/ btrfs send -p 1/snap1 1/snap2 | btrfs receive 2/ # ERROR: could not find parent subvolume btrfs send 2/snap1 | btrfs receive 3/ btrfs send -p 2/snap1 2/snap2 | btrfs receive 3/ Signed-off-by: Robin Ruede <rruede+git@gmail.com> Fixes: 37b8d27de5d0 ("Btrfs: use received_uuid of parent during send") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca>
2015-09-30 13:23:33 -06:00
if (!btrfs_is_empty_uuid(sctx->send_root->root_item.received_uuid))
TLV_PUT_UUID(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_UUID,
sctx->send_root->root_item.received_uuid);
else
TLV_PUT_UUID(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_UUID,
sctx->send_root->root_item.uuid);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CTRANSID,
le64_to_cpu(sctx->send_root->root_item.ctransid));
if (parent_root) {
if (!btrfs_is_empty_uuid(parent_root->root_item.received_uuid))
TLV_PUT_UUID(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_UUID,
parent_root->root_item.received_uuid);
else
TLV_PUT_UUID(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_UUID,
parent_root->root_item.uuid);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_CTRANSID,
le64_to_cpu(sctx->parent_root->root_item.ctransid));
}
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
kfree(name);
return ret;
}
static int send_truncate(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino, u64 gen, u64 size)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret = 0;
struct fs_path *p;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "send_truncate %llu size=%llu", ino, size);
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_TRUNCATE);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, ino, gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, p);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_SIZE, size);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
static int send_chmod(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino, u64 gen, u64 mode)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret = 0;
struct fs_path *p;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "send_chmod %llu mode=%llu", ino, mode);
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_CHMOD);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, ino, gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, p);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_MODE, mode & 07777);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
static int send_chown(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino, u64 gen, u64 uid, u64 gid)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret = 0;
struct fs_path *p;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "send_chown %llu uid=%llu, gid=%llu",
ino, uid, gid);
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_CHOWN);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, ino, gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, p);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_UID, uid);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_GID, gid);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
static int send_utimes(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino, u64 gen)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret = 0;
struct fs_path *p = NULL;
struct btrfs_inode_item *ii;
struct btrfs_path *path = NULL;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
struct btrfs_key key;
int slot;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "send_utimes %llu", ino);
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
key.objectid = ino;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, sctx->send_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret > 0)
ret = -ENOENT;
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
eb = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
ii = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, slot, struct btrfs_inode_item);
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_UTIMES);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, ino, gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, p);
TLV_PUT_BTRFS_TIMESPEC(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_ATIME, eb, &ii->atime);
TLV_PUT_BTRFS_TIMESPEC(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_MTIME, eb, &ii->mtime);
TLV_PUT_BTRFS_TIMESPEC(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CTIME, eb, &ii->ctime);
/* TODO Add otime support when the otime patches get into upstream */
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
fs_path_free(p);
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
/*
* Sends a BTRFS_SEND_C_MKXXX or SYMLINK command to user space. We don't have
* a valid path yet because we did not process the refs yet. So, the inode
* is created as orphan.
*/
static int send_create_inode(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret = 0;
struct fs_path *p;
int cmd;
u64 gen;
u64 mode;
u64 rdev;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "send_create_inode %llu", ino);
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
if (ino != sctx->cur_ino) {
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->send_root, ino, NULL, &gen, &mode,
NULL, NULL, &rdev);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
} else {
gen = sctx->cur_inode_gen;
mode = sctx->cur_inode_mode;
rdev = sctx->cur_inode_rdev;
}
if (S_ISREG(mode)) {
cmd = BTRFS_SEND_C_MKFILE;
} else if (S_ISDIR(mode)) {
cmd = BTRFS_SEND_C_MKDIR;
} else if (S_ISLNK(mode)) {
cmd = BTRFS_SEND_C_SYMLINK;
} else if (S_ISCHR(mode) || S_ISBLK(mode)) {
cmd = BTRFS_SEND_C_MKNOD;
} else if (S_ISFIFO(mode)) {
cmd = BTRFS_SEND_C_MKFIFO;
} else if (S_ISSOCK(mode)) {
cmd = BTRFS_SEND_C_MKSOCK;
} else {
btrfs_warn(sctx->send_root->fs_info, "unexpected inode type %o",
(int)(mode & S_IFMT));
ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
goto out;
}
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, cmd);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = gen_unique_name(sctx, ino, gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, p);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_INO, ino);
if (S_ISLNK(mode)) {
fs_path_reset(p);
ret = read_symlink(sctx->send_root, ino, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH_LINK, p);
} else if (S_ISCHR(mode) || S_ISBLK(mode) ||
S_ISFIFO(mode) || S_ISSOCK(mode)) {
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_RDEV, new_encode_dev(rdev));
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_MODE, mode);
}
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
tlv_put_failure:
out:
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
/*
* We need some special handling for inodes that get processed before the parent
* directory got created. See process_recorded_refs for details.
* This function does the check if we already created the dir out of order.
*/
static int did_create_dir(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 dir)
{
int ret = 0;
struct btrfs_path *path = NULL;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_key found_key;
struct btrfs_key di_key;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
int slot;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
key.objectid = dir;
key.type = BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, sctx->send_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
while (1) {
eb = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(eb)) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(sctx->send_root, path);
if (ret < 0) {
goto out;
} else if (ret > 0) {
ret = 0;
break;
}
continue;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, slot);
if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid ||
found_key.type != key.type) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
di = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, slot, struct btrfs_dir_item);
btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(eb, di, &di_key);
if (di_key.type != BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY &&
di_key.objectid < sctx->send_progress) {
ret = 1;
goto out;
}
path->slots[0]++;
}
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
/*
* Only creates the inode if it is:
* 1. Not a directory
* 2. Or a directory which was not created already due to out of order
* directories. See did_create_dir and process_recorded_refs for details.
*/
static int send_create_inode_if_needed(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret;
if (S_ISDIR(sctx->cur_inode_mode)) {
ret = did_create_dir(sctx, sctx->cur_ino);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
}
ret = send_create_inode(sctx, sctx->cur_ino);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
out:
return ret;
}
struct recorded_ref {
struct list_head list;
char *name;
struct fs_path *full_path;
u64 dir;
u64 dir_gen;
int name_len;
};
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for unlink commands An incremental send can contain unlink operations with an invalid target path when we rename some directory inode A, then rename some file inode B to the old name of inode A and directory inode A is an ancestor of inode B in the parent snapshot (but not anymore in the send snapshot). Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- file1 (ino 259) | |--- file3 (ino 261) | |--- dir3/ (ino 262) |--- file22 (ino 260) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) |--- dir3 (ino 260) |--- file3/ (ino 262) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) |--- file11 (ino 269) |--- file33 (ino 261) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, an unlink operation contains an invalid path which makes the receiver fail. The following is verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=7d5450da-a573-e043-a451-ec85f4879f0f (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2 link dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/file1 unlink dir1/dir2/file1 utimes dir1/dir2 truncate dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 size=0 utimes dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 rename dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0/file22 unlink dir1/dir3/file22 ERROR: unlink dir1/dir3/file22 failed. Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) Before we start processing the new and deleted references for inode 260, we compute the full path of the deleted reference ("dir1/dir3/file22") and cache it in the list of deleted references for our inode. 2) We then start processing the new references for inode 260, for which there is only one new, located at "dir1/dir3". When processing this new reference, we check that inode 262, which was not yet processed, collides with the new reference and because of that we orphanize inode 262 so its new full path becomes "o262-7-0". 3) After the orphanization of inode 262, we create the new reference for inode 260 by issuing a link command with a target path of "dir1/dir3" and a source path of "o262-7-0/file22". 4) We then start processing the deleted references for inode 260, for which there is only one with the base name of "file22", and issue an unlink operation containing the target path computed at step 1, which is wrong because that path no longer exists and should be replaced with "o262-7-0/file22". So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of deleted references if when we processed the new references for an inode we ended up orphanizing any other inode that is an ancestor of our inode in the parent snapshot. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ adjusted after prev patch removed fs_path::dir_path and dir_path_len ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-13 07:13:11 -06:00
static void set_ref_path(struct recorded_ref *ref, struct fs_path *path)
{
ref->full_path = path;
ref->name = (char *)kbasename(ref->full_path->start);
ref->name_len = ref->full_path->end - ref->name;
}
/*
* We need to process new refs before deleted refs, but compare_tree gives us
* everything mixed. So we first record all refs and later process them.
* This function is a helper to record one ref.
*/
static int __record_ref(struct list_head *head, u64 dir,
u64 dir_gen, struct fs_path *path)
{
struct recorded_ref *ref;
ref = kmalloc(sizeof(*ref), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ref)
return -ENOMEM;
ref->dir = dir;
ref->dir_gen = dir_gen;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for unlink commands An incremental send can contain unlink operations with an invalid target path when we rename some directory inode A, then rename some file inode B to the old name of inode A and directory inode A is an ancestor of inode B in the parent snapshot (but not anymore in the send snapshot). Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- file1 (ino 259) | |--- file3 (ino 261) | |--- dir3/ (ino 262) |--- file22 (ino 260) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) |--- dir3 (ino 260) |--- file3/ (ino 262) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) |--- file11 (ino 269) |--- file33 (ino 261) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, an unlink operation contains an invalid path which makes the receiver fail. The following is verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=7d5450da-a573-e043-a451-ec85f4879f0f (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2 link dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/file1 unlink dir1/dir2/file1 utimes dir1/dir2 truncate dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 size=0 utimes dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 rename dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0/file22 unlink dir1/dir3/file22 ERROR: unlink dir1/dir3/file22 failed. Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) Before we start processing the new and deleted references for inode 260, we compute the full path of the deleted reference ("dir1/dir3/file22") and cache it in the list of deleted references for our inode. 2) We then start processing the new references for inode 260, for which there is only one new, located at "dir1/dir3". When processing this new reference, we check that inode 262, which was not yet processed, collides with the new reference and because of that we orphanize inode 262 so its new full path becomes "o262-7-0". 3) After the orphanization of inode 262, we create the new reference for inode 260 by issuing a link command with a target path of "dir1/dir3" and a source path of "o262-7-0/file22". 4) We then start processing the deleted references for inode 260, for which there is only one with the base name of "file22", and issue an unlink operation containing the target path computed at step 1, which is wrong because that path no longer exists and should be replaced with "o262-7-0/file22". So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of deleted references if when we processed the new references for an inode we ended up orphanizing any other inode that is an ancestor of our inode in the parent snapshot. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ adjusted after prev patch removed fs_path::dir_path and dir_path_len ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-13 07:13:11 -06:00
set_ref_path(ref, path);
list_add_tail(&ref->list, head);
return 0;
}
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
static int dup_ref(struct recorded_ref *ref, struct list_head *list)
{
struct recorded_ref *new;
new = kmalloc(sizeof(*ref), GFP_KERNEL);
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
if (!new)
return -ENOMEM;
new->dir = ref->dir;
new->dir_gen = ref->dir_gen;
new->full_path = NULL;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->list);
list_add_tail(&new->list, list);
return 0;
}
static void __free_recorded_refs(struct list_head *head)
{
struct recorded_ref *cur;
while (!list_empty(head)) {
cur = list_entry(head->next, struct recorded_ref, list);
fs_path_free(cur->full_path);
list_del(&cur->list);
kfree(cur);
}
}
static void free_recorded_refs(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
__free_recorded_refs(&sctx->new_refs);
__free_recorded_refs(&sctx->deleted_refs);
}
/*
* Renames/moves a file/dir to its orphan name. Used when the first
* ref of an unprocessed inode gets overwritten and for all non empty
* directories.
*/
static int orphanize_inode(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino, u64 gen,
struct fs_path *path)
{
int ret;
struct fs_path *orphan;
orphan = fs_path_alloc();
if (!orphan)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = gen_unique_name(sctx, ino, gen, orphan);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = send_rename(sctx, path, orphan);
out:
fs_path_free(orphan);
return ret;
}
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
static struct orphan_dir_info *add_orphan_dir_info(struct send_ctx *sctx,
u64 dir_ino, u64 dir_gen)
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
{
struct rb_node **p = &sctx->orphan_dirs.rb_node;
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
struct orphan_dir_info *entry, *odi;
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
entry = rb_entry(parent, struct orphan_dir_info, node);
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
if (dir_ino < entry->ino)
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
p = &(*p)->rb_left;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
else if (dir_ino > entry->ino)
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
p = &(*p)->rb_right;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
else if (dir_gen < entry->gen)
p = &(*p)->rb_left;
else if (dir_gen > entry->gen)
p = &(*p)->rb_right;
else
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
return entry;
}
odi = kmalloc(sizeof(*odi), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!odi)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
odi->ino = dir_ino;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
odi->gen = dir_gen;
odi->last_dir_index_offset = 0;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
rb_link_node(&odi->node, parent, p);
rb_insert_color(&odi->node, &sctx->orphan_dirs);
return odi;
}
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
static struct orphan_dir_info *get_orphan_dir_info(struct send_ctx *sctx,
u64 dir_ino, u64 gen)
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
{
struct rb_node *n = sctx->orphan_dirs.rb_node;
struct orphan_dir_info *entry;
while (n) {
entry = rb_entry(n, struct orphan_dir_info, node);
if (dir_ino < entry->ino)
n = n->rb_left;
else if (dir_ino > entry->ino)
n = n->rb_right;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
else if (gen < entry->gen)
n = n->rb_left;
else if (gen > entry->gen)
n = n->rb_right;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
else
return entry;
}
return NULL;
}
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
static int is_waiting_for_rm(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 dir_ino, u64 gen)
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
{
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
struct orphan_dir_info *odi = get_orphan_dir_info(sctx, dir_ino, gen);
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
return odi != NULL;
}
static void free_orphan_dir_info(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct orphan_dir_info *odi)
{
if (!odi)
return;
rb_erase(&odi->node, &sctx->orphan_dirs);
kfree(odi);
}
/*
* Returns 1 if a directory can be removed at this point in time.
* We check this by iterating all dir items and checking if the inode behind
* the dir item was already processed.
*/
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
static int can_rmdir(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 dir, u64 dir_gen,
u64 send_progress)
{
int ret = 0;
struct btrfs_root *root = sctx->parent_root;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_key found_key;
struct btrfs_key loc;
struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
struct orphan_dir_info *odi = NULL;
/*
* Don't try to rmdir the top/root subvolume dir.
*/
if (dir == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
return 0;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
key.objectid = dir;
key.type = BTRFS_DIR_INDEX_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
odi = get_orphan_dir_info(sctx, dir, dir_gen);
if (odi)
key.offset = odi->last_dir_index_offset;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
while (1) {
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
struct waiting_dir_move *dm;
if (path->slots[0] >= btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[0])) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(root, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
else if (ret > 0)
break;
continue;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &found_key,
path->slots[0]);
if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid ||
found_key.type != key.type)
break;
di = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_dir_item);
btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], di, &loc);
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
dm = get_waiting_dir_move(sctx, loc.objectid);
if (dm) {
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
odi = add_orphan_dir_info(sctx, dir, dir_gen);
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
if (IS_ERR(odi)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(odi);
goto out;
}
odi->gen = dir_gen;
odi->last_dir_index_offset = found_key.offset;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
dm->rmdir_ino = dir;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
dm->rmdir_gen = dir_gen;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
if (loc.objectid > send_progress) {
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
odi = add_orphan_dir_info(sctx, dir, dir_gen);
if (IS_ERR(odi)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(odi);
goto out;
}
odi->gen = dir_gen;
odi->last_dir_index_offset = found_key.offset;
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
path->slots[0]++;
}
free_orphan_dir_info(sctx, odi);
ret = 1;
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
static int is_waiting_for_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino)
{
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
struct waiting_dir_move *entry = get_waiting_dir_move(sctx, ino);
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
return entry != NULL;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
}
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
static int add_waiting_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino, bool orphanized)
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
{
struct rb_node **p = &sctx->waiting_dir_moves.rb_node;
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
struct waiting_dir_move *entry, *dm;
dm = kmalloc(sizeof(*dm), GFP_KERNEL);
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
if (!dm)
return -ENOMEM;
dm->ino = ino;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
dm->rmdir_ino = 0;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
dm->rmdir_gen = 0;
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
dm->orphanized = orphanized;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
entry = rb_entry(parent, struct waiting_dir_move, node);
if (ino < entry->ino) {
p = &(*p)->rb_left;
} else if (ino > entry->ino) {
p = &(*p)->rb_right;
} else {
kfree(dm);
return -EEXIST;
}
}
rb_link_node(&dm->node, parent, p);
rb_insert_color(&dm->node, &sctx->waiting_dir_moves);
return 0;
}
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
static struct waiting_dir_move *
get_waiting_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 ino)
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
{
struct rb_node *n = sctx->waiting_dir_moves.rb_node;
struct waiting_dir_move *entry;
while (n) {
entry = rb_entry(n, struct waiting_dir_move, node);
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
if (ino < entry->ino)
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
n = n->rb_left;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
else if (ino > entry->ino)
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
n = n->rb_right;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
else
return entry;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
}
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
return NULL;
}
static void free_waiting_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct waiting_dir_move *dm)
{
if (!dm)
return;
rb_erase(&dm->node, &sctx->waiting_dir_moves);
kfree(dm);
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
}
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-19 08:20:54 -06:00
static int add_pending_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx,
u64 ino,
u64 ino_gen,
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
u64 parent_ino,
struct list_head *new_refs,
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
struct list_head *deleted_refs,
const bool is_orphan)
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
{
struct rb_node **p = &sctx->pending_dir_moves.rb_node;
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
struct pending_dir_move *entry = NULL, *pm;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
struct recorded_ref *cur;
int exists = 0;
int ret;
pm = kmalloc(sizeof(*pm), GFP_KERNEL);
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
if (!pm)
return -ENOMEM;
pm->parent_ino = parent_ino;
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-19 08:20:54 -06:00
pm->ino = ino;
pm->gen = ino_gen;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pm->list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pm->update_refs);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&pm->node);
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
entry = rb_entry(parent, struct pending_dir_move, node);
if (parent_ino < entry->parent_ino) {
p = &(*p)->rb_left;
} else if (parent_ino > entry->parent_ino) {
p = &(*p)->rb_right;
} else {
exists = 1;
break;
}
}
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
list_for_each_entry(cur, deleted_refs, list) {
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
ret = dup_ref(cur, &pm->update_refs);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
list_for_each_entry(cur, new_refs, list) {
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
ret = dup_ref(cur, &pm->update_refs);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
ret = add_waiting_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino, is_orphan);
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
if (ret)
goto out;
if (exists) {
list_add_tail(&pm->list, &entry->list);
} else {
rb_link_node(&pm->node, parent, p);
rb_insert_color(&pm->node, &sctx->pending_dir_moves);
}
ret = 0;
out:
if (ret) {
__free_recorded_refs(&pm->update_refs);
kfree(pm);
}
return ret;
}
static struct pending_dir_move *get_pending_dir_moves(struct send_ctx *sctx,
u64 parent_ino)
{
struct rb_node *n = sctx->pending_dir_moves.rb_node;
struct pending_dir_move *entry;
while (n) {
entry = rb_entry(n, struct pending_dir_move, node);
if (parent_ino < entry->parent_ino)
n = n->rb_left;
else if (parent_ino > entry->parent_ino)
n = n->rb_right;
else
return entry;
}
return NULL;
}
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
static int path_loop(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct fs_path *name,
u64 ino, u64 gen, u64 *ancestor_ino)
{
int ret = 0;
u64 parent_inode = 0;
u64 parent_gen = 0;
u64 start_ino = ino;
*ancestor_ino = 0;
while (ino != BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
fs_path_reset(name);
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
if (is_waiting_for_rm(sctx, ino, gen))
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
break;
if (is_waiting_for_move(sctx, ino)) {
if (*ancestor_ino == 0)
*ancestor_ino = ino;
ret = get_first_ref(sctx->parent_root, ino,
&parent_inode, &parent_gen, name);
} else {
ret = __get_cur_name_and_parent(sctx, ino, gen,
&parent_inode,
&parent_gen, name);
if (ret > 0) {
ret = 0;
break;
}
}
if (ret < 0)
break;
if (parent_inode == start_ino) {
ret = 1;
if (*ancestor_ino == 0)
*ancestor_ino = ino;
break;
}
ino = parent_inode;
gen = parent_gen;
}
return ret;
}
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
static int apply_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct pending_dir_move *pm)
{
struct fs_path *from_path = NULL;
struct fs_path *to_path = NULL;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled: Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umout /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory" A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-16 06:43:11 -07:00
struct fs_path *name = NULL;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
u64 orig_progress = sctx->send_progress;
struct recorded_ref *cur;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled: Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umout /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory" A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-16 06:43:11 -07:00
u64 parent_ino, parent_gen;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
struct waiting_dir_move *dm = NULL;
u64 rmdir_ino = 0;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
u64 rmdir_gen;
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
u64 ancestor;
bool is_orphan;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
int ret;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled: Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umout /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory" A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-16 06:43:11 -07:00
name = fs_path_alloc();
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
from_path = fs_path_alloc();
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled: Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umout /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory" A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-16 06:43:11 -07:00
if (!name || !from_path) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
dm = get_waiting_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino);
ASSERT(dm);
rmdir_ino = dm->rmdir_ino;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
rmdir_gen = dm->rmdir_gen;
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
is_orphan = dm->orphanized;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
free_waiting_dir_move(sctx, dm);
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled: Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umout /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory" A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-16 06:43:11 -07:00
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
if (is_orphan) {
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
ret = gen_unique_name(sctx, pm->ino,
pm->gen, from_path);
} else {
ret = get_first_ref(sctx->parent_root, pm->ino,
&parent_ino, &parent_gen, name);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, parent_ino, parent_gen,
from_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = fs_path_add_path(from_path, name);
}
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled: Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umout /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory" A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-16 06:43:11 -07:00
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
sctx->send_progress = sctx->cur_ino + 1;
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
ret = path_loop(sctx, name, pm->ino, pm->gen, &ancestor);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
if (ret) {
LIST_HEAD(deleted_refs);
ASSERT(ancestor > BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID);
ret = add_pending_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino, pm->gen, ancestor,
&pm->update_refs, &deleted_refs,
is_orphan);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (rmdir_ino) {
dm = get_waiting_dir_move(sctx, pm->ino);
ASSERT(dm);
dm->rmdir_ino = rmdir_ino;
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
dm->rmdir_gen = rmdir_gen;
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
}
goto out;
}
fs_path_reset(name);
to_path = name;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled: Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umout /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory" A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-16 06:43:11 -07:00
name = NULL;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, pm->ino, pm->gen, to_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = send_rename(sctx, from_path, to_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
if (rmdir_ino) {
struct orphan_dir_info *odi;
u64 gen;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
btrfs: send: fix wrong file path when there is an inode with a pending rmdir commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream. When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail. Example reproducer: $ cat test-send-rmdir.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT mkdir $MNT/dir touch $MNT/dir/file1 touch $MNT/dir/file2 touch $MNT/dir/file3 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- dir/ (ino 257) # |----- file1 (ino 258) # |----- file2 (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 260) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1 # Now remove our directory and all its files. rm -fr $MNT/dir # Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that # the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number # that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid" # available after mounting again the filesystem. umount $MNT mount $DEV $MNT # Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well). touch $MNT/newfile # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- newfile (ino 257) # btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 # Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply # both send streams to recreate both snapshots. umount $DEV mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT umount $MNT When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream fails: $ ./test-send-rmdir.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode number and generation number, instead of only inode number. A test case for fstests follows soon. Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-12-10 05:09:02 -07:00
odi = get_orphan_dir_info(sctx, rmdir_ino, rmdir_gen);
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
if (!odi) {
/* already deleted */
goto finish;
}
gen = odi->gen;
ret = can_rmdir(sctx, rmdir_ino, gen, sctx->cur_ino);
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (!ret)
goto finish;
name = fs_path_alloc();
if (!name) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, rmdir_ino, gen, name);
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = send_rmdir(sctx, name);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
finish:
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
ret = send_utimes(sctx, pm->ino, pm->gen);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
/*
* After rename/move, need to update the utimes of both new parent(s)
* and old parent(s).
*/
list_for_each_entry(cur, &pm->update_refs, list) {
Btrfs: send, fix invalid leaf accesses due to incorrect utimes operations During an incremental send, if we have delayed rename operations for inodes that were children of directories which were removed in the send snapshot, we can end up accessing incorrect items in a leaf or accessing beyond the last item of the leaf due to issuing utimes operations for the removed inodes. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- a/ (ino 257) | |--- c/ (ino 262) | |--- b/ (ino 258) | |--- d/ (ino 263) | |--- del/ (ino 261) |--- x/ (ino 259) |--- y/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- a/ (ino 257) | |--- b/ (ino 258) | |--- c/ (ino 262) | |--- y/ (ino 260) | |--- d/ (ino 263) |--- x/ (ino 259) 1) When processing inodes 259 and 260, we end up delaying their rename operations because their parents, inodes 263 and 262 respectively, were not yet processed and therefore not yet renamed; 2) When processing inode 262, its rename operation is issued and right after the rename operation for inode 260 is issued. However right after issuing the rename operation for inode 260, at send.c:apply_dir_move(), we issue utimes operations for all current and past parents of inode 260. This means we try to send a utimes operation for its old parent, inode 261 (deleted in the send snapshot), which does not cause any immediate and deterministic failure, because when the target inode is not found in the send snapshot, the send.c:send_utimes() function ignores it and uses the leaf region pointed to by path->slots[0], which can be any unrelated item (belonging to other inode) or it can be a region outside the leaf boundaries, if the leaf is full and path->slots[0] matches the number of items in the leaf. So we end up either successfully sending a utimes operation, which is fine and irrelevant because the old parent (inode 261) will end up being deleted later, or we end up doing an invalid memory access tha crashes the kernel. So fix this by making apply_dir_move() issue utimes operations only for parents that still exist in the send snapshot. In a separate patch we will make send_utimes() return an error (-ENOENT) if the given inode does not exists in the send snapshot. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and better organized] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:50 -06:00
/*
* The parent inode might have been deleted in the send snapshot
*/
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->send_root, cur->dir, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret == -ENOENT) {
ret = 0;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
continue;
Btrfs: send, fix invalid leaf accesses due to incorrect utimes operations During an incremental send, if we have delayed rename operations for inodes that were children of directories which were removed in the send snapshot, we can end up accessing incorrect items in a leaf or accessing beyond the last item of the leaf due to issuing utimes operations for the removed inodes. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- a/ (ino 257) | |--- c/ (ino 262) | |--- b/ (ino 258) | |--- d/ (ino 263) | |--- del/ (ino 261) |--- x/ (ino 259) |--- y/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- a/ (ino 257) | |--- b/ (ino 258) | |--- c/ (ino 262) | |--- y/ (ino 260) | |--- d/ (ino 263) |--- x/ (ino 259) 1) When processing inodes 259 and 260, we end up delaying their rename operations because their parents, inodes 263 and 262 respectively, were not yet processed and therefore not yet renamed; 2) When processing inode 262, its rename operation is issued and right after the rename operation for inode 260 is issued. However right after issuing the rename operation for inode 260, at send.c:apply_dir_move(), we issue utimes operations for all current and past parents of inode 260. This means we try to send a utimes operation for its old parent, inode 261 (deleted in the send snapshot), which does not cause any immediate and deterministic failure, because when the target inode is not found in the send snapshot, the send.c:send_utimes() function ignores it and uses the leaf region pointed to by path->slots[0], which can be any unrelated item (belonging to other inode) or it can be a region outside the leaf boundaries, if the leaf is full and path->slots[0] matches the number of items in the leaf. So we end up either successfully sending a utimes operation, which is fine and irrelevant because the old parent (inode 261) will end up being deleted later, or we end up doing an invalid memory access tha crashes the kernel. So fix this by making apply_dir_move() issue utimes operations only for parents that still exist in the send snapshot. In a separate patch we will make send_utimes() return an error (-ENOENT) if the given inode does not exists in the send snapshot. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and better organized] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:50 -06:00
}
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
ret = send_utimes(sctx, cur->dir, cur->dir_gen);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
out:
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled: Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umout /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory" A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-16 06:43:11 -07:00
fs_path_free(name);
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
fs_path_free(from_path);
fs_path_free(to_path);
sctx->send_progress = orig_progress;
return ret;
}
static void free_pending_move(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct pending_dir_move *m)
{
if (!list_empty(&m->list))
list_del(&m->list);
if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&m->node))
rb_erase(&m->node, &sctx->pending_dir_moves);
__free_recorded_refs(&m->update_refs);
kfree(m);
}
Btrfs: send, fix infinite loop due to directory rename dependencies When doing an incremental send, due to the need of delaying directory move (rename) operations we can end up in infinite loop at apply_children_dir_moves(). An example scenario that triggers this problem is described below, where directory names correspond to the numbers of their respective inodes. Parent snapshot: . |--- 261/ |--- 271/ |--- 266/ |--- 259/ |--- 260/ | |--- 267 | |--- 264/ | |--- 258/ | |--- 257/ | |--- 265/ |--- 268/ |--- 269/ | |--- 262/ | |--- 270/ |--- 272/ | |--- 263/ | |--- 275/ | |--- 274/ |--- 273/ Send snapshot: . |-- 275/ |-- 274/ |-- 273/ |-- 262/ |-- 269/ |-- 258/ |-- 271/ |-- 268/ |-- 267/ |-- 270/ |-- 259/ | |-- 265/ | |-- 272/ |-- 257/ |-- 260/ |-- 264/ |-- 263/ |-- 261/ |-- 266/ When processing inode 257 we delay its move (rename) operation because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 272, was not yet processed. Then when processing inode 272, we delay the move operation for that inode because inode 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot. Finally we delay the move operation for inode 274 when processing it because inode 275 is its new parent in the send snapshot and was not yet moved. When finishing processing inode 275, we start to do the move operations that were previously delayed (at apply_children_dir_moves()), resulting in the following iterations: 1) We issue the move operation for inode 274; 2) Because inode 262 depended on the move operation of inode 274 (it was delayed because 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot), we issue the move operation for inode 262; 3) We issue the move operation for inode 272, because it was delayed by inode 274 too (ancestor of 272 in the send snapshot); 4) We issue the move operation for inode 269 (it was delayed by 262); 5) We issue the move operation for inode 257 (it was delayed by 272); 6) We issue the move operation for inode 260 (it was delayed by 272); 7) We issue the move operation for inode 258 (it was delayed by 269); 8) We issue the move operation for inode 264 (it was delayed by 257); 9) We issue the move operation for inode 271 (it was delayed by 258); 10) We issue the move operation for inode 263 (it was delayed by 264); 11) We issue the move operation for inode 268 (it was delayed by 271); 12) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 270 (it was delayed by 271). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 267 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 270. So we delay again the move operation for inode 270, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 267 is moved; 13) We issue the move operation for inode 261 (it was delayed by 263); 14) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 263). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12); 15) We issue the move operation for inode 267 (it was delayed by 268); 16) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 270). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12). So here we added again the same delayed move operation that we added in step 14; 17) We attempt again to see if we can issue the move operation for inode 266, and as in step 16, we realize we can not due to a path loop in the current state due to a dependency on inode 270. Again we delay inode's 266 rename to happen after inode's 270 move operation, adding the same dependency to the empty stack that we did in steps 14 and 16. The next iteration will pick the same move dependency on the stack (the only entry) and realize again there is still a path loop and then again the same dependency to the stack, over and over, resulting in an infinite loop. So fix this by preventing adding the same move dependency entries to the stack by removing each pending move record from the red black tree of pending moves. This way the next call to get_pending_dir_moves() will not return anything for the current parent inode. A test case for fstests, with this reproducer, follows soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Wrote changelog with example and more clear explanation] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-11-14 11:32:37 -07:00
static void tail_append_pending_moves(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct pending_dir_move *moves,
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
struct list_head *stack)
{
if (list_empty(&moves->list)) {
list_add_tail(&moves->list, stack);
} else {
LIST_HEAD(list);
list_splice_init(&moves->list, &list);
list_add_tail(&moves->list, stack);
list_splice_tail(&list, stack);
}
Btrfs: send, fix infinite loop due to directory rename dependencies When doing an incremental send, due to the need of delaying directory move (rename) operations we can end up in infinite loop at apply_children_dir_moves(). An example scenario that triggers this problem is described below, where directory names correspond to the numbers of their respective inodes. Parent snapshot: . |--- 261/ |--- 271/ |--- 266/ |--- 259/ |--- 260/ | |--- 267 | |--- 264/ | |--- 258/ | |--- 257/ | |--- 265/ |--- 268/ |--- 269/ | |--- 262/ | |--- 270/ |--- 272/ | |--- 263/ | |--- 275/ | |--- 274/ |--- 273/ Send snapshot: . |-- 275/ |-- 274/ |-- 273/ |-- 262/ |-- 269/ |-- 258/ |-- 271/ |-- 268/ |-- 267/ |-- 270/ |-- 259/ | |-- 265/ | |-- 272/ |-- 257/ |-- 260/ |-- 264/ |-- 263/ |-- 261/ |-- 266/ When processing inode 257 we delay its move (rename) operation because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 272, was not yet processed. Then when processing inode 272, we delay the move operation for that inode because inode 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot. Finally we delay the move operation for inode 274 when processing it because inode 275 is its new parent in the send snapshot and was not yet moved. When finishing processing inode 275, we start to do the move operations that were previously delayed (at apply_children_dir_moves()), resulting in the following iterations: 1) We issue the move operation for inode 274; 2) Because inode 262 depended on the move operation of inode 274 (it was delayed because 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot), we issue the move operation for inode 262; 3) We issue the move operation for inode 272, because it was delayed by inode 274 too (ancestor of 272 in the send snapshot); 4) We issue the move operation for inode 269 (it was delayed by 262); 5) We issue the move operation for inode 257 (it was delayed by 272); 6) We issue the move operation for inode 260 (it was delayed by 272); 7) We issue the move operation for inode 258 (it was delayed by 269); 8) We issue the move operation for inode 264 (it was delayed by 257); 9) We issue the move operation for inode 271 (it was delayed by 258); 10) We issue the move operation for inode 263 (it was delayed by 264); 11) We issue the move operation for inode 268 (it was delayed by 271); 12) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 270 (it was delayed by 271). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 267 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 270. So we delay again the move operation for inode 270, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 267 is moved; 13) We issue the move operation for inode 261 (it was delayed by 263); 14) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 263). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12); 15) We issue the move operation for inode 267 (it was delayed by 268); 16) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 270). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12). So here we added again the same delayed move operation that we added in step 14; 17) We attempt again to see if we can issue the move operation for inode 266, and as in step 16, we realize we can not due to a path loop in the current state due to a dependency on inode 270. Again we delay inode's 266 rename to happen after inode's 270 move operation, adding the same dependency to the empty stack that we did in steps 14 and 16. The next iteration will pick the same move dependency on the stack (the only entry) and realize again there is still a path loop and then again the same dependency to the stack, over and over, resulting in an infinite loop. So fix this by preventing adding the same move dependency entries to the stack by removing each pending move record from the red black tree of pending moves. This way the next call to get_pending_dir_moves() will not return anything for the current parent inode. A test case for fstests, with this reproducer, follows soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Wrote changelog with example and more clear explanation] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-11-14 11:32:37 -07:00
if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&moves->node)) {
rb_erase(&moves->node, &sctx->pending_dir_moves);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&moves->node);
}
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
}
static int apply_children_dir_moves(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
struct pending_dir_move *pm;
struct list_head stack;
u64 parent_ino = sctx->cur_ino;
int ret = 0;
pm = get_pending_dir_moves(sctx, parent_ino);
if (!pm)
return 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&stack);
Btrfs: send, fix infinite loop due to directory rename dependencies When doing an incremental send, due to the need of delaying directory move (rename) operations we can end up in infinite loop at apply_children_dir_moves(). An example scenario that triggers this problem is described below, where directory names correspond to the numbers of their respective inodes. Parent snapshot: . |--- 261/ |--- 271/ |--- 266/ |--- 259/ |--- 260/ | |--- 267 | |--- 264/ | |--- 258/ | |--- 257/ | |--- 265/ |--- 268/ |--- 269/ | |--- 262/ | |--- 270/ |--- 272/ | |--- 263/ | |--- 275/ | |--- 274/ |--- 273/ Send snapshot: . |-- 275/ |-- 274/ |-- 273/ |-- 262/ |-- 269/ |-- 258/ |-- 271/ |-- 268/ |-- 267/ |-- 270/ |-- 259/ | |-- 265/ | |-- 272/ |-- 257/ |-- 260/ |-- 264/ |-- 263/ |-- 261/ |-- 266/ When processing inode 257 we delay its move (rename) operation because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 272, was not yet processed. Then when processing inode 272, we delay the move operation for that inode because inode 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot. Finally we delay the move operation for inode 274 when processing it because inode 275 is its new parent in the send snapshot and was not yet moved. When finishing processing inode 275, we start to do the move operations that were previously delayed (at apply_children_dir_moves()), resulting in the following iterations: 1) We issue the move operation for inode 274; 2) Because inode 262 depended on the move operation of inode 274 (it was delayed because 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot), we issue the move operation for inode 262; 3) We issue the move operation for inode 272, because it was delayed by inode 274 too (ancestor of 272 in the send snapshot); 4) We issue the move operation for inode 269 (it was delayed by 262); 5) We issue the move operation for inode 257 (it was delayed by 272); 6) We issue the move operation for inode 260 (it was delayed by 272); 7) We issue the move operation for inode 258 (it was delayed by 269); 8) We issue the move operation for inode 264 (it was delayed by 257); 9) We issue the move operation for inode 271 (it was delayed by 258); 10) We issue the move operation for inode 263 (it was delayed by 264); 11) We issue the move operation for inode 268 (it was delayed by 271); 12) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 270 (it was delayed by 271). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 267 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 270. So we delay again the move operation for inode 270, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 267 is moved; 13) We issue the move operation for inode 261 (it was delayed by 263); 14) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 263). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12); 15) We issue the move operation for inode 267 (it was delayed by 268); 16) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 270). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12). So here we added again the same delayed move operation that we added in step 14; 17) We attempt again to see if we can issue the move operation for inode 266, and as in step 16, we realize we can not due to a path loop in the current state due to a dependency on inode 270. Again we delay inode's 266 rename to happen after inode's 270 move operation, adding the same dependency to the empty stack that we did in steps 14 and 16. The next iteration will pick the same move dependency on the stack (the only entry) and realize again there is still a path loop and then again the same dependency to the stack, over and over, resulting in an infinite loop. So fix this by preventing adding the same move dependency entries to the stack by removing each pending move record from the red black tree of pending moves. This way the next call to get_pending_dir_moves() will not return anything for the current parent inode. A test case for fstests, with this reproducer, follows soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Wrote changelog with example and more clear explanation] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-11-14 11:32:37 -07:00
tail_append_pending_moves(sctx, pm, &stack);
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
while (!list_empty(&stack)) {
pm = list_first_entry(&stack, struct pending_dir_move, list);
parent_ino = pm->ino;
ret = apply_dir_move(sctx, pm);
free_pending_move(sctx, pm);
if (ret)
goto out;
pm = get_pending_dir_moves(sctx, parent_ino);
if (pm)
Btrfs: send, fix infinite loop due to directory rename dependencies When doing an incremental send, due to the need of delaying directory move (rename) operations we can end up in infinite loop at apply_children_dir_moves(). An example scenario that triggers this problem is described below, where directory names correspond to the numbers of their respective inodes. Parent snapshot: . |--- 261/ |--- 271/ |--- 266/ |--- 259/ |--- 260/ | |--- 267 | |--- 264/ | |--- 258/ | |--- 257/ | |--- 265/ |--- 268/ |--- 269/ | |--- 262/ | |--- 270/ |--- 272/ | |--- 263/ | |--- 275/ | |--- 274/ |--- 273/ Send snapshot: . |-- 275/ |-- 274/ |-- 273/ |-- 262/ |-- 269/ |-- 258/ |-- 271/ |-- 268/ |-- 267/ |-- 270/ |-- 259/ | |-- 265/ | |-- 272/ |-- 257/ |-- 260/ |-- 264/ |-- 263/ |-- 261/ |-- 266/ When processing inode 257 we delay its move (rename) operation because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 272, was not yet processed. Then when processing inode 272, we delay the move operation for that inode because inode 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot. Finally we delay the move operation for inode 274 when processing it because inode 275 is its new parent in the send snapshot and was not yet moved. When finishing processing inode 275, we start to do the move operations that were previously delayed (at apply_children_dir_moves()), resulting in the following iterations: 1) We issue the move operation for inode 274; 2) Because inode 262 depended on the move operation of inode 274 (it was delayed because 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot), we issue the move operation for inode 262; 3) We issue the move operation for inode 272, because it was delayed by inode 274 too (ancestor of 272 in the send snapshot); 4) We issue the move operation for inode 269 (it was delayed by 262); 5) We issue the move operation for inode 257 (it was delayed by 272); 6) We issue the move operation for inode 260 (it was delayed by 272); 7) We issue the move operation for inode 258 (it was delayed by 269); 8) We issue the move operation for inode 264 (it was delayed by 257); 9) We issue the move operation for inode 271 (it was delayed by 258); 10) We issue the move operation for inode 263 (it was delayed by 264); 11) We issue the move operation for inode 268 (it was delayed by 271); 12) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 270 (it was delayed by 271). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 267 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 270. So we delay again the move operation for inode 270, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 267 is moved; 13) We issue the move operation for inode 261 (it was delayed by 263); 14) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 263). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12); 15) We issue the move operation for inode 267 (it was delayed by 268); 16) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was delayed by 270). We detect a path loop in the current state, because inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12). So here we added again the same delayed move operation that we added in step 14; 17) We attempt again to see if we can issue the move operation for inode 266, and as in step 16, we realize we can not due to a path loop in the current state due to a dependency on inode 270. Again we delay inode's 266 rename to happen after inode's 270 move operation, adding the same dependency to the empty stack that we did in steps 14 and 16. The next iteration will pick the same move dependency on the stack (the only entry) and realize again there is still a path loop and then again the same dependency to the stack, over and over, resulting in an infinite loop. So fix this by preventing adding the same move dependency entries to the stack by removing each pending move record from the red black tree of pending moves. This way the next call to get_pending_dir_moves() will not return anything for the current parent inode. A test case for fstests, with this reproducer, follows soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Wrote changelog with example and more clear explanation] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-11-14 11:32:37 -07:00
tail_append_pending_moves(sctx, pm, &stack);
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
}
return 0;
out:
while (!list_empty(&stack)) {
pm = list_first_entry(&stack, struct pending_dir_move, list);
free_pending_move(sctx, pm);
}
return ret;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
/*
* We might need to delay a directory rename even when no ancestor directory
* (in the send root) with a higher inode number than ours (sctx->cur_ino) was
* renamed. This happens when we rename a directory to the old name (the name
* in the parent root) of some other unrelated directory that got its rename
* delayed due to some ancestor with higher number that got renamed.
*
* Example:
*
* Parent snapshot:
* . (ino 256)
* |---- a/ (ino 257)
* | |---- file (ino 260)
* |
* |---- b/ (ino 258)
* |---- c/ (ino 259)
*
* Send snapshot:
* . (ino 256)
* |---- a/ (ino 258)
* |---- x/ (ino 259)
* |---- y/ (ino 257)
* |----- file (ino 260)
*
* Here we can not rename 258 from 'b' to 'a' without the rename of inode 257
* from 'a' to 'x/y' happening first, which in turn depends on the rename of
* inode 259 from 'c' to 'x'. So the order of rename commands the send stream
* must issue is:
*
* 1 - rename 259 from 'c' to 'x'
* 2 - rename 257 from 'a' to 'x/y'
* 3 - rename 258 from 'b' to 'a'
*
* Returns 1 if the rename of sctx->cur_ino needs to be delayed, 0 if it can
* be done right away and < 0 on error.
*/
static int wait_for_dest_dir_move(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct recorded_ref *parent_ref,
const bool is_orphan)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->parent_root->fs_info;
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_key di_key;
struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
u64 left_gen;
u64 right_gen;
int ret = 0;
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
struct waiting_dir_move *wdm;
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sctx->waiting_dir_moves))
return 0;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
key.objectid = parent_ref->dir;
key.type = BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = btrfs_name_hash(parent_ref->name, parent_ref->name_len);
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, sctx->parent_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0) {
goto out;
} else if (ret > 0) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
di = btrfs_match_dir_item_name(fs_info, path, parent_ref->name,
parent_ref->name_len);
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
if (!di) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
/*
* di_key.objectid has the number of the inode that has a dentry in the
* parent directory with the same name that sctx->cur_ino is being
* renamed to. We need to check if that inode is in the send root as
* well and if it is currently marked as an inode with a pending rename,
* if it is, we need to delay the rename of sctx->cur_ino as well, so
* that it happens after that other inode is renamed.
*/
btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], di, &di_key);
if (di_key.type != BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->parent_root, di_key.objectid, NULL,
&left_gen, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->send_root, di_key.objectid, NULL,
&right_gen, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0) {
if (ret == -ENOENT)
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
/* Different inode, no need to delay the rename of sctx->cur_ino */
if (right_gen != left_gen) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
wdm = get_waiting_dir_move(sctx, di_key.objectid);
if (wdm && !wdm->orphanized) {
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
ret = add_pending_dir_move(sctx,
sctx->cur_ino,
sctx->cur_inode_gen,
di_key.objectid,
&sctx->new_refs,
&sctx->deleted_refs,
is_orphan);
if (!ret)
ret = 1;
}
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames unnecessarily Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency of delayed directory renames. Consider the following reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir /mnt/data $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t6 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3 $ mkdir /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/ $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed directory renames was created: ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261 Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode 261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular dependency of delayed renames listed above. Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not also a descendent of the inode in the parent root. Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example. A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-03-27 11:50:45 -06:00
/*
Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming file Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-16 18:54:00 -07:00
* Check if inode ino2, or any of its ancestors, is inode ino1.
* Return 1 if true, 0 if false and < 0 on error.
*/
static int check_ino_in_path(struct btrfs_root *root,
const u64 ino1,
const u64 ino1_gen,
const u64 ino2,
const u64 ino2_gen,
struct fs_path *fs_path)
{
u64 ino = ino2;
if (ino1 == ino2)
return ino1_gen == ino2_gen;
while (ino > BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
u64 parent;
u64 parent_gen;
int ret;
fs_path_reset(fs_path);
ret = get_first_ref(root, ino, &parent, &parent_gen, fs_path);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (parent == ino1)
return parent_gen == ino1_gen;
ino = parent;
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Check if ino ino1 is an ancestor of inode ino2 in the given root for any
* possible path (in case ino2 is not a directory and has multiple hard links).
Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames unnecessarily Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency of delayed directory renames. Consider the following reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir /mnt/data $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t6 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3 $ mkdir /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/ $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed directory renames was created: ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261 Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode 261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular dependency of delayed renames listed above. Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not also a descendent of the inode in the parent root. Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example. A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-03-27 11:50:45 -06:00
* Return 1 if true, 0 if false and < 0 on error.
*/
static int is_ancestor(struct btrfs_root *root,
const u64 ino1,
const u64 ino1_gen,
const u64 ino2,
struct fs_path *fs_path)
{
Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming file Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-16 18:54:00 -07:00
bool free_fs_path = false;
Btrfs: send, fix invalid path after renaming and linking file Currently an incremental snapshot can generate link operations which contain an invalid target path. Such case happens when in the send snapshot a file was renamed, a new hard link added for it and some other inode (with a lower number) got renamed to the former name of that file. Example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f1 (ino 257) |--- f2 (ino 258) |--- f3 (ino 259) Send snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f2 (ino 257) |--- f3 (ino 258) |--- f4 (ino 259) |--- f5 (ino 258) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, inode 258 is orphanized (renamed to "o258-7-0"), because its current reference has the same name as the new reference for inode 257; 2) When processing inode 258, we iterate over all its new references, which have the names "f3" and "f5". The first iteration sees name "f5" and renames the inode from its orphan name ("o258-7-0") to "f5", while the second iteration sees the name "f3" and, incorrectly, issues a link operation with a target name matching the orphan name, which no longer exists. The first iteration had reset the current valid path of the inode to "f5", but in the second iteration we lost it because we found another inode, with a higher number of 259, which has a reference named "f3" as well, so we orphanized inode 259 and recomputed the current valid path of inode 258 to its old orphan name because inode 259 could be an ancestor of inode 258 and therefore the current valid path could contain the pre-orphanization name of inode 259. However in this case inode 259 is not an ancestor of inode 258 so the current valid path should not be recomputed. This makes the receiver fail with the following error: ERROR: link f3 -> o258-7-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by not recomputing the current valid path for an inode whenever we find a colliding reference from some not yet processed inode (inode number higher then the one currently being processed), unless that other inode is an ancestor of the one we are currently processing. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-07 04:41:29 -06:00
int ret = 0;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming file Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-16 18:54:00 -07:00
struct btrfs_path *path = NULL;
struct btrfs_key key;
Btrfs: send, fix invalid path after renaming and linking file Currently an incremental snapshot can generate link operations which contain an invalid target path. Such case happens when in the send snapshot a file was renamed, a new hard link added for it and some other inode (with a lower number) got renamed to the former name of that file. Example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f1 (ino 257) |--- f2 (ino 258) |--- f3 (ino 259) Send snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f2 (ino 257) |--- f3 (ino 258) |--- f4 (ino 259) |--- f5 (ino 258) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, inode 258 is orphanized (renamed to "o258-7-0"), because its current reference has the same name as the new reference for inode 257; 2) When processing inode 258, we iterate over all its new references, which have the names "f3" and "f5". The first iteration sees name "f5" and renames the inode from its orphan name ("o258-7-0") to "f5", while the second iteration sees the name "f3" and, incorrectly, issues a link operation with a target name matching the orphan name, which no longer exists. The first iteration had reset the current valid path of the inode to "f5", but in the second iteration we lost it because we found another inode, with a higher number of 259, which has a reference named "f3" as well, so we orphanized inode 259 and recomputed the current valid path of inode 258 to its old orphan name because inode 259 could be an ancestor of inode 258 and therefore the current valid path could contain the pre-orphanization name of inode 259. However in this case inode 259 is not an ancestor of inode 258 so the current valid path should not be recomputed. This makes the receiver fail with the following error: ERROR: link f3 -> o258-7-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by not recomputing the current valid path for an inode whenever we find a colliding reference from some not yet processed inode (inode number higher then the one currently being processed), unless that other inode is an ancestor of the one we are currently processing. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-07 04:41:29 -06:00
if (!fs_path) {
fs_path = fs_path_alloc();
if (!fs_path)
return -ENOMEM;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming file Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-16 18:54:00 -07:00
free_fs_path = true;
Btrfs: send, fix invalid path after renaming and linking file Currently an incremental snapshot can generate link operations which contain an invalid target path. Such case happens when in the send snapshot a file was renamed, a new hard link added for it and some other inode (with a lower number) got renamed to the former name of that file. Example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f1 (ino 257) |--- f2 (ino 258) |--- f3 (ino 259) Send snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f2 (ino 257) |--- f3 (ino 258) |--- f4 (ino 259) |--- f5 (ino 258) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, inode 258 is orphanized (renamed to "o258-7-0"), because its current reference has the same name as the new reference for inode 257; 2) When processing inode 258, we iterate over all its new references, which have the names "f3" and "f5". The first iteration sees name "f5" and renames the inode from its orphan name ("o258-7-0") to "f5", while the second iteration sees the name "f3" and, incorrectly, issues a link operation with a target name matching the orphan name, which no longer exists. The first iteration had reset the current valid path of the inode to "f5", but in the second iteration we lost it because we found another inode, with a higher number of 259, which has a reference named "f3" as well, so we orphanized inode 259 and recomputed the current valid path of inode 258 to its old orphan name because inode 259 could be an ancestor of inode 258 and therefore the current valid path could contain the pre-orphanization name of inode 259. However in this case inode 259 is not an ancestor of inode 258 so the current valid path should not be recomputed. This makes the receiver fail with the following error: ERROR: link f3 -> o258-7-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by not recomputing the current valid path for an inode whenever we find a colliding reference from some not yet processed inode (inode number higher then the one currently being processed), unless that other inode is an ancestor of the one we are currently processing. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-07 04:41:29 -06:00
}
Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames unnecessarily Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency of delayed directory renames. Consider the following reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir /mnt/data $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t6 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3 $ mkdir /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/ $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed directory renames was created: ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261 Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode 261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular dependency of delayed renames listed above. Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not also a descendent of the inode in the parent root. Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example. A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-03-27 11:50:45 -06:00
Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming file Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-16 18:54:00 -07:00
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames unnecessarily Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency of delayed directory renames. Consider the following reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir /mnt/data $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t6 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3 $ mkdir /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/ $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed directory renames was created: ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261 Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode 261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular dependency of delayed renames listed above. Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not also a descendent of the inode in the parent root. Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example. A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-03-27 11:50:45 -06:00
Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming file Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-16 18:54:00 -07:00
key.objectid = ino2;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
while (true) {
struct extent_buffer *leaf = path->nodes[0];
int slot = path->slots[0];
u32 cur_offset = 0;
u32 item_size;
if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(leaf)) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(root, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret > 0)
break;
continue;
Btrfs: send, fix invalid path after renaming and linking file Currently an incremental snapshot can generate link operations which contain an invalid target path. Such case happens when in the send snapshot a file was renamed, a new hard link added for it and some other inode (with a lower number) got renamed to the former name of that file. Example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f1 (ino 257) |--- f2 (ino 258) |--- f3 (ino 259) Send snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f2 (ino 257) |--- f3 (ino 258) |--- f4 (ino 259) |--- f5 (ino 258) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, inode 258 is orphanized (renamed to "o258-7-0"), because its current reference has the same name as the new reference for inode 257; 2) When processing inode 258, we iterate over all its new references, which have the names "f3" and "f5". The first iteration sees name "f5" and renames the inode from its orphan name ("o258-7-0") to "f5", while the second iteration sees the name "f3" and, incorrectly, issues a link operation with a target name matching the orphan name, which no longer exists. The first iteration had reset the current valid path of the inode to "f5", but in the second iteration we lost it because we found another inode, with a higher number of 259, which has a reference named "f3" as well, so we orphanized inode 259 and recomputed the current valid path of inode 258 to its old orphan name because inode 259 could be an ancestor of inode 258 and therefore the current valid path could contain the pre-orphanization name of inode 259. However in this case inode 259 is not an ancestor of inode 258 so the current valid path should not be recomputed. This makes the receiver fail with the following error: ERROR: link f3 -> o258-7-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by not recomputing the current valid path for an inode whenever we find a colliding reference from some not yet processed inode (inode number higher then the one currently being processed), unless that other inode is an ancestor of the one we are currently processing. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-07 04:41:29 -06:00
}
Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming file Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-16 18:54:00 -07:00
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot);
if (key.objectid != ino2)
break;
if (key.type != BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY &&
key.type != BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY)
break;
item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot);
while (cur_offset < item_size) {
u64 parent;
u64 parent_gen;
if (key.type == BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY) {
unsigned long ptr;
struct btrfs_inode_extref *extref;
ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, slot);
extref = (struct btrfs_inode_extref *)
(ptr + cur_offset);
parent = btrfs_inode_extref_parent(leaf,
extref);
cur_offset += sizeof(*extref);
cur_offset += btrfs_inode_extref_name_len(leaf,
extref);
} else {
parent = key.offset;
cur_offset = item_size;
}
ret = get_inode_info(root, parent, NULL, &parent_gen,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = check_ino_in_path(root, ino1, ino1_gen,
parent, parent_gen, fs_path);
if (ret)
goto out;
Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames unnecessarily Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency of delayed directory renames. Consider the following reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir /mnt/data $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t6 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3 $ mkdir /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/ $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed directory renames was created: ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261 Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode 261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular dependency of delayed renames listed above. Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not also a descendent of the inode in the parent root. Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example. A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-03-27 11:50:45 -06:00
}
Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming file Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-16 18:54:00 -07:00
path->slots[0]++;
Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames unnecessarily Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency of delayed directory renames. Consider the following reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir /mnt/data $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t6 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3 $ mkdir /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/ $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed directory renames was created: ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261 Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode 261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular dependency of delayed renames listed above. Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not also a descendent of the inode in the parent root. Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example. A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-03-27 11:50:45 -06:00
}
Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming file Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-16 18:54:00 -07:00
ret = 0;
Btrfs: send, fix invalid path after renaming and linking file Currently an incremental snapshot can generate link operations which contain an invalid target path. Such case happens when in the send snapshot a file was renamed, a new hard link added for it and some other inode (with a lower number) got renamed to the former name of that file. Example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f1 (ino 257) |--- f2 (ino 258) |--- f3 (ino 259) Send snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f2 (ino 257) |--- f3 (ino 258) |--- f4 (ino 259) |--- f5 (ino 258) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, inode 258 is orphanized (renamed to "o258-7-0"), because its current reference has the same name as the new reference for inode 257; 2) When processing inode 258, we iterate over all its new references, which have the names "f3" and "f5". The first iteration sees name "f5" and renames the inode from its orphan name ("o258-7-0") to "f5", while the second iteration sees the name "f3" and, incorrectly, issues a link operation with a target name matching the orphan name, which no longer exists. The first iteration had reset the current valid path of the inode to "f5", but in the second iteration we lost it because we found another inode, with a higher number of 259, which has a reference named "f3" as well, so we orphanized inode 259 and recomputed the current valid path of inode 258 to its old orphan name because inode 259 could be an ancestor of inode 258 and therefore the current valid path could contain the pre-orphanization name of inode 259. However in this case inode 259 is not an ancestor of inode 258 so the current valid path should not be recomputed. This makes the receiver fail with the following error: ERROR: link f3 -> o258-7-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by not recomputing the current valid path for an inode whenever we find a colliding reference from some not yet processed inode (inode number higher then the one currently being processed), unless that other inode is an ancestor of the one we are currently processing. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-07 04:41:29 -06:00
out:
Btrfs: incremental send, fix wrong unlink path after renaming file Under some circumstances, an incremental send operation can issue wrong paths for unlink commands related to files that have multiple hard links and some (or all) of those links were renamed between the parent and send snapshots. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- b/ (ino 259) | | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | | | |---- f2l1 (ino 261) | |---- d/ (ino 262) |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) |---- f2l2 (ino 261) |---- f1_2 (ino 258) Send snapshot . (ino 256) |---- a/ (ino 257) | |---- f2l1/ (ino 263) | |---- b2/ (ino 259) | |---- c/ (ino 260) | | |---- d3 (ino 262) | | |---- f1l1_2 (ino 258) | | |---- f2l2_2 (ino 261) | | |---- f1_2 (ino 258) | | | |---- f2 (ino 261) | |---- f1l2 (ino 258) | |---- d (ino 261) When computing the incremental send stream the following steps happen: 1) When processing inode 261, a rename operation is issued that renames inode 262, which currently as a path of "d", to an orphan name of "o262-7-0". This is done because in the send snapshot, inode 261 has of its hard links with a path of "d" as well. 2) Two link operations are issued that create the new hard links for inode 261, whose names are "d" and "f2l2_2", at paths "/" and "o262-7-0/" respectively. 3) Still while processing inode 261, unlink operations are issued to remove the old hard links of inode 261, with names "f2l1" and "f2l2", at paths "a/" and "d/". However path "d/" does not correspond anymore to the directory inode 262 but corresponds instead to a hard link of inode 261 (link command issued in the previous step). This makes the receiver fail with a ENOTDIR error when attempting the unlink operation. The problem happens because before sending the unlink operation, we failed to detect that inode 262 was one of ancestors for inode 261 in the parent snapshot, and therefore we didn't recompute the path for inode 262 before issuing the unlink operation for the link named "f2l2" of inode 262. The detection failed because the function "is_ancestor()" only follows the first hard link it finds for an inode instead of all of its hard links (as it was originally created for being used with directories only, for which only one hard link exists). So fix this by making "is_ancestor()" follow all hard links of the input inode. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-11-16 18:54:00 -07:00
btrfs_free_path(path);
if (free_fs_path)
Btrfs: send, fix invalid path after renaming and linking file Currently an incremental snapshot can generate link operations which contain an invalid target path. Such case happens when in the send snapshot a file was renamed, a new hard link added for it and some other inode (with a lower number) got renamed to the former name of that file. Example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f1 (ino 257) |--- f2 (ino 258) |--- f3 (ino 259) Send snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f2 (ino 257) |--- f3 (ino 258) |--- f4 (ino 259) |--- f5 (ino 258) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, inode 258 is orphanized (renamed to "o258-7-0"), because its current reference has the same name as the new reference for inode 257; 2) When processing inode 258, we iterate over all its new references, which have the names "f3" and "f5". The first iteration sees name "f5" and renames the inode from its orphan name ("o258-7-0") to "f5", while the second iteration sees the name "f3" and, incorrectly, issues a link operation with a target name matching the orphan name, which no longer exists. The first iteration had reset the current valid path of the inode to "f5", but in the second iteration we lost it because we found another inode, with a higher number of 259, which has a reference named "f3" as well, so we orphanized inode 259 and recomputed the current valid path of inode 258 to its old orphan name because inode 259 could be an ancestor of inode 258 and therefore the current valid path could contain the pre-orphanization name of inode 259. However in this case inode 259 is not an ancestor of inode 258 so the current valid path should not be recomputed. This makes the receiver fail with the following error: ERROR: link f3 -> o258-7-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by not recomputing the current valid path for an inode whenever we find a colliding reference from some not yet processed inode (inode number higher then the one currently being processed), unless that other inode is an ancestor of the one we are currently processing. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-07 04:41:29 -06:00
fs_path_free(fs_path);
return ret;
Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames unnecessarily Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency of delayed directory renames. Consider the following reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir /mnt/data $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t6 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3 $ mkdir /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/ $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed directory renames was created: ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261 Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode 261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular dependency of delayed renames listed above. Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not also a descendent of the inode in the parent root. Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example. A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-03-27 11:50:45 -06:00
}
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
static int wait_for_parent_move(struct send_ctx *sctx,
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
struct recorded_ref *parent_ref,
const bool is_orphan)
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
{
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
int ret = 0;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
u64 ino = parent_ref->dir;
Btrfs: incremental send, do not delay rename when parent inode is new When we are checking if we need to delay the rename operation for an inode we not checking if a parent inode that exists in the send and parent snapshots is really the same inode or not, that is, we are not comparing the generation number of the parent inode in the send and parent snapshots. Not only this results in unnecessarily delaying a rename operation but also can later on make us generate an incorrect name for a new inode in the send snapshot that has the same number as another inode in the parent snapshot but a different generation. Here follows an example where this happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |--- dir258/ (ino 258, gen 7) | |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7) | |--- dir259/ (ino 259, gen 7) Send snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |--- file258 (ino 258, gen 10) | |--- new_dir259/ (ino 259, gen 10) |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, its new parent is created using its orphan name (o257-21-0), and the rename operation for inode 257 is delayed because its new parent (inode 259) was not yet processed - this decision to delay the rename operation does not make much sense because the inode 259 in the send snapshot is a new inode, it's not the same as inode 259 in the parent snapshot. 2) When processing inode 258 we end up delaying its rmdir operation, because inode 257 was not yet renamed (moved away from the directory inode 258 represents). We also create the new inode 258 using its orphan name "o258-10-0", then rename it to its final name of "file258" and then issue a truncate operation for it. However this truncate operation contains an incorrect name, which corresponds to the orphan name and not to the final name, which makes the receiver fail. This happens because when we attempt to compute the inode's current name we verify that there's another inode with the same number (258) that has its rmdir operation pending and because of that we generate an orphan name for the new inode 258 (we do this in the function get_cur_path()). Fix this by not delayed the rename operation of an inode if it has parents with the same number but different generations in both snapshots. The following steps reproduce this example scenario. $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/dir257 $ mkdir /mnt/dir258 $ mkdir /mnt/dir259 $ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/dir258/dir257 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/dir258/dir257 /mnt/dir257 $ rmdir /mnt/dir258 $ rmdir /mnt/dir259 # Remount the filesystem so that the next created inodes will have the # numbers 258 and 259. This is because when a filesystem is mounted, # btrfs sets the subvolume's inode counter to a value corresponding to # the highest inode number in the subvolume plus 1. This inode counter # is used to assign a unique number to each new inode and it's # incremented by 1 after very inode creation. # Note: we unmount and then mount instead of doing a mount with # "-o remount" because otherwise the inode counter remains at value 260. $ umount /mnt $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ touch /mnt/file258 $ mkdir /mnt/new_dir259 $ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/new_dir259/dir257 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/1.snap $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/2.snap -vv receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=e059b6d1-7f55-f140-8d7c-9a3039d23c97, ctransid=10 parent_uuid=77e98cb6-8762-814f-9e05-e8ba877fc0b0, parent_ctransid=7 utimes mkdir o259-10-0 rename dir258 -> o258-7-0 utimes mkfile o258-10-0 rename o258-10-0 -> file258 utimes truncate o258-10-0 size=0 ERROR: truncate o258-10-0 failed: No such file or directory Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-01-10 19:15:39 -07:00
u64 ino_gen = parent_ref->dir_gen;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
u64 parent_ino_before, parent_ino_after;
struct fs_path *path_before = NULL;
struct fs_path *path_after = NULL;
int len1, len2;
path_after = fs_path_alloc();
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
path_before = fs_path_alloc();
if (!path_after || !path_before) {
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-19 08:20:54 -06:00
/*
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
* Our current directory inode may not yet be renamed/moved because some
* ancestor (immediate or not) has to be renamed/moved first. So find if
* such ancestor exists and make sure our own rename/move happens after
Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames unnecessarily Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency of delayed directory renames. Consider the following reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir /mnt/data $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t6 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3 $ mkdir /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/ $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed directory renames was created: ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261 Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode 261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular dependency of delayed renames listed above. Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not also a descendent of the inode in the parent root. Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example. A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-03-27 11:50:45 -06:00
* that ancestor is processed to avoid path build infinite loops (done
* at get_cur_path()).
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-19 08:20:54 -06:00
*/
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
while (ino > BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
Btrfs: incremental send, do not delay rename when parent inode is new When we are checking if we need to delay the rename operation for an inode we not checking if a parent inode that exists in the send and parent snapshots is really the same inode or not, that is, we are not comparing the generation number of the parent inode in the send and parent snapshots. Not only this results in unnecessarily delaying a rename operation but also can later on make us generate an incorrect name for a new inode in the send snapshot that has the same number as another inode in the parent snapshot but a different generation. Here follows an example where this happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |--- dir258/ (ino 258, gen 7) | |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7) | |--- dir259/ (ino 259, gen 7) Send snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |--- file258 (ino 258, gen 10) | |--- new_dir259/ (ino 259, gen 10) |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, its new parent is created using its orphan name (o257-21-0), and the rename operation for inode 257 is delayed because its new parent (inode 259) was not yet processed - this decision to delay the rename operation does not make much sense because the inode 259 in the send snapshot is a new inode, it's not the same as inode 259 in the parent snapshot. 2) When processing inode 258 we end up delaying its rmdir operation, because inode 257 was not yet renamed (moved away from the directory inode 258 represents). We also create the new inode 258 using its orphan name "o258-10-0", then rename it to its final name of "file258" and then issue a truncate operation for it. However this truncate operation contains an incorrect name, which corresponds to the orphan name and not to the final name, which makes the receiver fail. This happens because when we attempt to compute the inode's current name we verify that there's another inode with the same number (258) that has its rmdir operation pending and because of that we generate an orphan name for the new inode 258 (we do this in the function get_cur_path()). Fix this by not delayed the rename operation of an inode if it has parents with the same number but different generations in both snapshots. The following steps reproduce this example scenario. $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/dir257 $ mkdir /mnt/dir258 $ mkdir /mnt/dir259 $ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/dir258/dir257 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/dir258/dir257 /mnt/dir257 $ rmdir /mnt/dir258 $ rmdir /mnt/dir259 # Remount the filesystem so that the next created inodes will have the # numbers 258 and 259. This is because when a filesystem is mounted, # btrfs sets the subvolume's inode counter to a value corresponding to # the highest inode number in the subvolume plus 1. This inode counter # is used to assign a unique number to each new inode and it's # incremented by 1 after very inode creation. # Note: we unmount and then mount instead of doing a mount with # "-o remount" because otherwise the inode counter remains at value 260. $ umount /mnt $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ touch /mnt/file258 $ mkdir /mnt/new_dir259 $ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/new_dir259/dir257 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/1.snap $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/2.snap -vv receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=e059b6d1-7f55-f140-8d7c-9a3039d23c97, ctransid=10 parent_uuid=77e98cb6-8762-814f-9e05-e8ba877fc0b0, parent_ctransid=7 utimes mkdir o259-10-0 rename dir258 -> o258-7-0 utimes mkfile o258-10-0 rename o258-10-0 -> file258 utimes truncate o258-10-0 size=0 ERROR: truncate o258-10-0 failed: No such file or directory Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-01-10 19:15:39 -07:00
u64 parent_ino_after_gen;
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
if (is_waiting_for_move(sctx, ino)) {
Btrfs: incremental send, don't delay directory renames unnecessarily Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency of delayed directory renames. Consider the following reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir /mnt/data $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t6 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3 $ mkdir /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/ $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed directory renames was created: ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261 Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode 261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular dependency of delayed renames listed above. Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not also a descendent of the inode in the parent root. Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example. A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-03-27 11:50:45 -06:00
/*
* If the current inode is an ancestor of ino in the
* parent root, we need to delay the rename of the
* current inode, otherwise don't delayed the rename
* because we can end up with a circular dependency
* of renames, resulting in some directories never
* getting the respective rename operations issued in
* the send stream or getting into infinite path build
* loops.
*/
ret = is_ancestor(sctx->parent_root,
sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen,
ino, path_before);
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid paths for rename operations Example scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 277) |---- tmp/ (ino 278) |---- pre/ (ino 280) | |---- wait_dir/ (ino 281) | |---- desc/ (ino 282) |---- ance/ (ino 283) | |---- below_ance/ (ino 279) | |---- other_dir/ (ino 284) Send snapshot: . (ino 277) |---- tmp/ (ino 278) |---- other_dir/ (ino 284) |---- below_ance/ (ino 279) | |---- pre/ (ino 280) | |---- wait_dir/ (ino 281) |---- desc/ (ino 282) |---- ance/ (ino 283) While computing the send stream the following steps happen: 1) While processing inode 279 we end up delaying its rename operation because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 284, was not yet processed and therefore not yet renamed; 2) Later when processing inode 280 we end up renaming it immediately to "ance/below_once/pre" and not delay its rename operation because its new parent (inode 279 in the send snapshot) has its rename operation delayed and inode 280 is not an encestor of inode 279 (its parent in the send snapshot) in the parent snapshot; 3) When processing inode 281 we end up delaying its rename operation because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 284, was not yet processed and therefore not yet renamed; 4) When processing inode 282 we do not delay its rename operation because its parent in the send snapshot, inode 281, already has its own rename operation delayed and our current inode (282) is not an ancestor of inode 281 in the parent snapshot. Therefore inode 282 is renamed to "ance/below_ance/pre/wait_dir"; 5) When processing inode 283 we realize that we can rename it because one of its ancestors in the send snapshot, inode 281, has its rename operation delayed and inode 283 is not an ancestor of inode 281 in the parent snapshot. So a rename operation to rename inode 283 to "ance/below_ance/pre/wait_dir/desc/ance" is issued. This path is invalid due to a missing path building loop that was undetected by the incremental send implementation, as inode 283 ends up getting included twice in the path (once with its path in the parent snapshot). Therefore its rename operation must wait before the ancestor inode 284 is renamed. Fix this by not terminating the rename dependency checks when we find an ancestor, in the send snapshot, that has its rename operation delayed. So that we continue doing the same checks if the current inode is not an ancestor, in the parent snapshot, of an ancestor in the send snapshot we are processing in the loop. The problem and reproducer were reported by Robbie Ko, as part of a patch titled "Btrfs: incremental send, avoid ancestor rename to descendant". However the fix was unnecessarily complicated and can be addressed with much less code and effort. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2016-06-27 09:54:44 -06:00
if (ret)
break;
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
}
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-19 08:20:54 -06:00
fs_path_reset(path_before);
fs_path_reset(path_after);
ret = get_first_ref(sctx->send_root, ino, &parent_ino_after,
Btrfs: incremental send, do not delay rename when parent inode is new When we are checking if we need to delay the rename operation for an inode we not checking if a parent inode that exists in the send and parent snapshots is really the same inode or not, that is, we are not comparing the generation number of the parent inode in the send and parent snapshots. Not only this results in unnecessarily delaying a rename operation but also can later on make us generate an incorrect name for a new inode in the send snapshot that has the same number as another inode in the parent snapshot but a different generation. Here follows an example where this happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |--- dir258/ (ino 258, gen 7) | |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7) | |--- dir259/ (ino 259, gen 7) Send snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |--- file258 (ino 258, gen 10) | |--- new_dir259/ (ino 259, gen 10) |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, its new parent is created using its orphan name (o257-21-0), and the rename operation for inode 257 is delayed because its new parent (inode 259) was not yet processed - this decision to delay the rename operation does not make much sense because the inode 259 in the send snapshot is a new inode, it's not the same as inode 259 in the parent snapshot. 2) When processing inode 258 we end up delaying its rmdir operation, because inode 257 was not yet renamed (moved away from the directory inode 258 represents). We also create the new inode 258 using its orphan name "o258-10-0", then rename it to its final name of "file258" and then issue a truncate operation for it. However this truncate operation contains an incorrect name, which corresponds to the orphan name and not to the final name, which makes the receiver fail. This happens because when we attempt to compute the inode's current name we verify that there's another inode with the same number (258) that has its rmdir operation pending and because of that we generate an orphan name for the new inode 258 (we do this in the function get_cur_path()). Fix this by not delayed the rename operation of an inode if it has parents with the same number but different generations in both snapshots. The following steps reproduce this example scenario. $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/dir257 $ mkdir /mnt/dir258 $ mkdir /mnt/dir259 $ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/dir258/dir257 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/dir258/dir257 /mnt/dir257 $ rmdir /mnt/dir258 $ rmdir /mnt/dir259 # Remount the filesystem so that the next created inodes will have the # numbers 258 and 259. This is because when a filesystem is mounted, # btrfs sets the subvolume's inode counter to a value corresponding to # the highest inode number in the subvolume plus 1. This inode counter # is used to assign a unique number to each new inode and it's # incremented by 1 after very inode creation. # Note: we unmount and then mount instead of doing a mount with # "-o remount" because otherwise the inode counter remains at value 260. $ umount /mnt $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ touch /mnt/file258 $ mkdir /mnt/new_dir259 $ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/new_dir259/dir257 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/1.snap $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/2.snap -vv receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=e059b6d1-7f55-f140-8d7c-9a3039d23c97, ctransid=10 parent_uuid=77e98cb6-8762-814f-9e05-e8ba877fc0b0, parent_ctransid=7 utimes mkdir o259-10-0 rename dir258 -> o258-7-0 utimes mkfile o258-10-0 rename o258-10-0 -> file258 utimes truncate o258-10-0 size=0 ERROR: truncate o258-10-0 failed: No such file or directory Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-01-10 19:15:39 -07:00
&parent_ino_after_gen, path_after);
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-19 08:20:54 -06:00
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_first_ref(sctx->parent_root, ino, &parent_ino_before,
NULL, path_before);
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOENT) {
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-19 08:20:54 -06:00
goto out;
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
} else if (ret == -ENOENT) {
ret = 0;
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
break;
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-19 08:20:54 -06:00
}
len1 = fs_path_len(path_before);
len2 = fs_path_len(path_after);
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
if (ino > sctx->cur_ino &&
(parent_ino_before != parent_ino_after || len1 != len2 ||
memcmp(path_before->start, path_after->start, len1))) {
Btrfs: incremental send, do not delay rename when parent inode is new When we are checking if we need to delay the rename operation for an inode we not checking if a parent inode that exists in the send and parent snapshots is really the same inode or not, that is, we are not comparing the generation number of the parent inode in the send and parent snapshots. Not only this results in unnecessarily delaying a rename operation but also can later on make us generate an incorrect name for a new inode in the send snapshot that has the same number as another inode in the parent snapshot but a different generation. Here follows an example where this happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |--- dir258/ (ino 258, gen 7) | |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7) | |--- dir259/ (ino 259, gen 7) Send snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |--- file258 (ino 258, gen 10) | |--- new_dir259/ (ino 259, gen 10) |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, its new parent is created using its orphan name (o257-21-0), and the rename operation for inode 257 is delayed because its new parent (inode 259) was not yet processed - this decision to delay the rename operation does not make much sense because the inode 259 in the send snapshot is a new inode, it's not the same as inode 259 in the parent snapshot. 2) When processing inode 258 we end up delaying its rmdir operation, because inode 257 was not yet renamed (moved away from the directory inode 258 represents). We also create the new inode 258 using its orphan name "o258-10-0", then rename it to its final name of "file258" and then issue a truncate operation for it. However this truncate operation contains an incorrect name, which corresponds to the orphan name and not to the final name, which makes the receiver fail. This happens because when we attempt to compute the inode's current name we verify that there's another inode with the same number (258) that has its rmdir operation pending and because of that we generate an orphan name for the new inode 258 (we do this in the function get_cur_path()). Fix this by not delayed the rename operation of an inode if it has parents with the same number but different generations in both snapshots. The following steps reproduce this example scenario. $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/dir257 $ mkdir /mnt/dir258 $ mkdir /mnt/dir259 $ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/dir258/dir257 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/dir258/dir257 /mnt/dir257 $ rmdir /mnt/dir258 $ rmdir /mnt/dir259 # Remount the filesystem so that the next created inodes will have the # numbers 258 and 259. This is because when a filesystem is mounted, # btrfs sets the subvolume's inode counter to a value corresponding to # the highest inode number in the subvolume plus 1. This inode counter # is used to assign a unique number to each new inode and it's # incremented by 1 after very inode creation. # Note: we unmount and then mount instead of doing a mount with # "-o remount" because otherwise the inode counter remains at value 260. $ umount /mnt $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ touch /mnt/file258 $ mkdir /mnt/new_dir259 $ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/new_dir259/dir257 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/1.snap $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/2.snap -vv receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=e059b6d1-7f55-f140-8d7c-9a3039d23c97, ctransid=10 parent_uuid=77e98cb6-8762-814f-9e05-e8ba877fc0b0, parent_ctransid=7 utimes mkdir o259-10-0 rename dir258 -> o258-7-0 utimes mkfile o258-10-0 rename o258-10-0 -> file258 utimes truncate o258-10-0 size=0 ERROR: truncate o258-10-0 failed: No such file or directory Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-01-10 19:15:39 -07:00
u64 parent_ino_gen;
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->parent_root, ino, NULL,
&parent_ino_gen, NULL, NULL, NULL,
NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ino_gen == parent_ino_gen) {
ret = 1;
break;
}
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-19 08:20:54 -06:00
}
ino = parent_ino_after;
Btrfs: incremental send, do not delay rename when parent inode is new When we are checking if we need to delay the rename operation for an inode we not checking if a parent inode that exists in the send and parent snapshots is really the same inode or not, that is, we are not comparing the generation number of the parent inode in the send and parent snapshots. Not only this results in unnecessarily delaying a rename operation but also can later on make us generate an incorrect name for a new inode in the send snapshot that has the same number as another inode in the parent snapshot but a different generation. Here follows an example where this happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |--- dir258/ (ino 258, gen 7) | |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7) | |--- dir259/ (ino 259, gen 7) Send snapshot: . (ino 256, gen 3) |--- file258 (ino 258, gen 10) | |--- new_dir259/ (ino 259, gen 10) |--- dir257/ (ino 257, gen 7) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, its new parent is created using its orphan name (o257-21-0), and the rename operation for inode 257 is delayed because its new parent (inode 259) was not yet processed - this decision to delay the rename operation does not make much sense because the inode 259 in the send snapshot is a new inode, it's not the same as inode 259 in the parent snapshot. 2) When processing inode 258 we end up delaying its rmdir operation, because inode 257 was not yet renamed (moved away from the directory inode 258 represents). We also create the new inode 258 using its orphan name "o258-10-0", then rename it to its final name of "file258" and then issue a truncate operation for it. However this truncate operation contains an incorrect name, which corresponds to the orphan name and not to the final name, which makes the receiver fail. This happens because when we attempt to compute the inode's current name we verify that there's another inode with the same number (258) that has its rmdir operation pending and because of that we generate an orphan name for the new inode 258 (we do this in the function get_cur_path()). Fix this by not delayed the rename operation of an inode if it has parents with the same number but different generations in both snapshots. The following steps reproduce this example scenario. $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/dir257 $ mkdir /mnt/dir258 $ mkdir /mnt/dir259 $ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/dir258/dir257 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/dir258/dir257 /mnt/dir257 $ rmdir /mnt/dir258 $ rmdir /mnt/dir259 # Remount the filesystem so that the next created inodes will have the # numbers 258 and 259. This is because when a filesystem is mounted, # btrfs sets the subvolume's inode counter to a value corresponding to # the highest inode number in the subvolume plus 1. This inode counter # is used to assign a unique number to each new inode and it's # incremented by 1 after very inode creation. # Note: we unmount and then mount instead of doing a mount with # "-o remount" because otherwise the inode counter remains at value 260. $ umount /mnt $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ touch /mnt/file258 $ mkdir /mnt/new_dir259 $ mv /mnt/dir257 /mnt/new_dir259/dir257 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/1.snap $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmo/2.snap -vv receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=e059b6d1-7f55-f140-8d7c-9a3039d23c97, ctransid=10 parent_uuid=77e98cb6-8762-814f-9e05-e8ba877fc0b0, parent_ctransid=7 utimes mkdir o259-10-0 rename dir258 -> o258-7-0 utimes mkfile o258-10-0 rename o258-10-0 -> file258 utimes truncate o258-10-0 size=0 ERROR: truncate o258-10-0 failed: No such file or directory Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-01-10 19:15:39 -07:00
ino_gen = parent_ino_after_gen;
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-19 08:20:54 -06:00
}
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
out:
fs_path_free(path_before);
fs_path_free(path_after);
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
if (ret == 1) {
ret = add_pending_dir_move(sctx,
sctx->cur_ino,
sctx->cur_inode_gen,
ino,
&sctx->new_refs,
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
&sctx->deleted_refs,
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
is_orphan);
Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-27 14:14:01 -06:00
if (!ret)
ret = 1;
}
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
return ret;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for link commands In some scenarios an incremental send stream can contain link commands with an invalid target path. Such scenarios happen after moving some directory inode A, renaming a regular file inode B into the old name of inode A and finally creating a new hard link for inode B at directory inode A. Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) | |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- file1 (ino 261) | |--- dir4/ (ino 262) | |--- dir5/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- dir4 (ino 261) | |--- dir6/ (ino 263) |--- dir44/ (ino 262) |--- file11 (ino 261) |--- dir55/ (ino 260) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, a link command contains an invalid target path which makes the receiver fail. The following is the verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=90076fe6-5ba6-e64a-9321-9279670ed16b (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2/dir3 utimes rename dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 ERROR: link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 failed: Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) When processing inode 261, we orphanize inode 262 due to a name/location collision with one of the new hard links for inode 261 (created in the second step below). 2) We create one of the 2 new hard links for inode 261, the one whose location is at "dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4". 3) We then attempt to create the other new hard link for inode 261, which has inode 262 as its parent directory. Because the path for this new hard link was computed before we started processing the new references (hard links), it reflects the old name/location of inode 262, that is, it does not account for the orphanization step that happened when we started processing the new references for inode 261, whence it is no longer valid, causing the receiver to fail. So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of new references if we ended up orphanizing other inodes which are directories. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-06-22 13:03:51 -06:00
static int update_ref_path(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct recorded_ref *ref)
{
int ret;
struct fs_path *new_path;
/*
* Our reference's name member points to its full_path member string, so
* we use here a new path.
*/
new_path = fs_path_alloc();
if (!new_path)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, ref->dir, ref->dir_gen, new_path);
if (ret < 0) {
fs_path_free(new_path);
return ret;
}
ret = fs_path_add(new_path, ref->name, ref->name_len);
if (ret < 0) {
fs_path_free(new_path);
return ret;
}
fs_path_free(ref->full_path);
set_ref_path(ref, new_path);
return 0;
}
btrfs: send, recompute reference path after orphanization of a directory commit 9c2b4e0347067396ceb3ae929d6888c81d610259 upstream. During an incremental send, when an inode has multiple new references we might end up emitting rename operations for orphanizations that have a source path that is no longer valid due to a previous orphanization of some directory inode. This causes the receiver to fail since it tries to rename a path that does not exists. Example reproducer: $ cat reproducer.sh #!/bin/bash mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi >/dev/null mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi touch /mnt/sdi/f1 touch /mnt/sdi/f2 mkdir /mnt/sdi/d1 mkdir /mnt/sdi/d1/d2 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- f1 (ino 257) # |----- f2 (ino 258) # |----- d1/ (ino 259) # |----- d2/ (ino 260) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdi/snap1 # Now do a series of changes such that: # # *) inode 258 has one new hardlink and the previous name changed # # *) both names conflict with the old names of two other inodes: # # 1) the new name "d1" conflicts with the old name of inode 259, # under directory inode 256 (root) # # 2) the new name "d2" conflicts with the old name of inode 260 # under directory inode 259 # # *) inodes 259 and 260 now have the old names of inode 258 # # *) inode 257 is now located under inode 260 - an inode with a number # smaller than the inode (258) for which we created a second hard # link and swapped its names with inodes 259 and 260 # ln /mnt/sdi/f2 /mnt/sdi/d1/f2_link mv /mnt/sdi/f1 /mnt/sdi/d1/d2/f1 # Swap d1 and f2. mv /mnt/sdi/d1 /mnt/sdi/tmp mv /mnt/sdi/f2 /mnt/sdi/d1 mv /mnt/sdi/tmp /mnt/sdi/f2 # Swap d2 and f2_link mv /mnt/sdi/f2/d2 /mnt/sdi/tmp mv /mnt/sdi/f2/f2_link /mnt/sdi/f2/d2 mv /mnt/sdi/tmp /mnt/sdi/f2/f2_link # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- d1 (ino 258) # |----- f2/ (ino 259) # |----- f2_link/ (ino 260) # | |----- f1 (ino 257) # | # |----- d2 (ino 258) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p /mnt/sdi/snap1 /mnt/sdi/snap2 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdj >/dev/null mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send /mnt/sdj umount /mnt/sdi umount /mnt/sdj When executed the receive of the incremental stream fails: $ ./reproducer.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: rename d1/d2 -> o260-6-0 failed: No such file or directory This happens because: 1) When processing inode 257 we end up computing the name for inode 259 because it is an ancestor in the send snapshot, and at that point it still has its old name, "d1", from the parent snapshot because inode 259 was not yet processed. We then cache that name, which is valid until we start processing inode 259 (or set the progress to 260 after processing its references); 2) Later we start processing inode 258 and collecting all its new references into the list sctx->new_refs. The first reference in the list happens to be the reference for name "d1" while the reference for name "d2" is next (the last element of the list). We compute the full path "d1/d2" for this second reference and store it in the reference (its ->full_path member). The path used for the new parent directory was "d1" and not "f2" because inode 259, the new parent, was not yet processed; 3) When we start processing the new references at process_recorded_refs() we start with the first reference in the list, for the new name "d1". Because there is a conflicting inode that was not yet processed, which is directory inode 259, we orphanize it, renaming it from "d1" to "o259-6-0"; 4) Then we start processing the new reference for name "d2", and we realize it conflicts with the reference of inode 260 in the parent snapshot. So we issue an orphanization operation for inode 260 by emitting a rename operation with a destination path of "o260-6-0" and a source path of "d1/d2" - this source path is the value we stored in the reference earlier at step 2), corresponding to the ->full_path member of the reference, however that path is no longer valid due to the orphanization of the directory inode 259 in step 3). This makes the receiver fail since the path does not exists, it should have been "o259-6-0/d2". Fix this by recomputing the full path of a reference before emitting an orphanization if we previously orphanized any directory, since that directory could be a parent in the new path. This is a rare scenario so keeping it simple and not checking if that previously orphanized directory is in fact an ancestor of the inode we are trying to orphanize. A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-21 07:13:30 -06:00
/*
* When processing the new references for an inode we may orphanize an existing
* directory inode because its old name conflicts with one of the new references
* of the current inode. Later, when processing another new reference of our
* inode, we might need to orphanize another inode, but the path we have in the
* reference reflects the pre-orphanization name of the directory we previously
* orphanized. For example:
*
* parent snapshot looks like:
*
* . (ino 256)
* |----- f1 (ino 257)
* |----- f2 (ino 258)
* |----- d1/ (ino 259)
* |----- d2/ (ino 260)
*
* send snapshot looks like:
*
* . (ino 256)
* |----- d1 (ino 258)
* |----- f2/ (ino 259)
* |----- f2_link/ (ino 260)
* | |----- f1 (ino 257)
* |
* |----- d2 (ino 258)
*
* When processing inode 257 we compute the name for inode 259 as "d1", and we
* cache it in the name cache. Later when we start processing inode 258, when
* collecting all its new references we set a full path of "d1/d2" for its new
* reference with name "d2". When we start processing the new references we
* start by processing the new reference with name "d1", and this results in
* orphanizing inode 259, since its old reference causes a conflict. Then we
* move on the next new reference, with name "d2", and we find out we must
* orphanize inode 260, as its old reference conflicts with ours - but for the
* orphanization we use a source path corresponding to the path we stored in the
* new reference, which is "d1/d2" and not "o259-6-0/d2" - this makes the
* receiver fail since the path component "d1/" no longer exists, it was renamed
* to "o259-6-0/" when processing the previous new reference. So in this case we
* must recompute the path in the new reference and use it for the new
* orphanization operation.
*/
static int refresh_ref_path(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct recorded_ref *ref)
{
char *name;
int ret;
name = kmemdup(ref->name, ref->name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!name)
return -ENOMEM;
fs_path_reset(ref->full_path);
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, ref->dir, ref->dir_gen, ref->full_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = fs_path_add(ref->full_path, name, ref->name_len);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
/* Update the reference's base name pointer. */
set_ref_path(ref, ref->full_path);
out:
kfree(name);
return ret;
}
/*
* This does all the move/link/unlink/rmdir magic.
*/
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
static int process_recorded_refs(struct send_ctx *sctx, int *pending_move)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret = 0;
struct recorded_ref *cur;
struct recorded_ref *cur2;
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
struct list_head check_dirs;
struct fs_path *valid_path = NULL;
u64 ow_inode = 0;
u64 ow_gen;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for link commands In some scenarios an incremental send stream can contain link commands with an invalid target path. Such scenarios happen after moving some directory inode A, renaming a regular file inode B into the old name of inode A and finally creating a new hard link for inode B at directory inode A. Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) | |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- file1 (ino 261) | |--- dir4/ (ino 262) | |--- dir5/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- dir4 (ino 261) | |--- dir6/ (ino 263) |--- dir44/ (ino 262) |--- file11 (ino 261) |--- dir55/ (ino 260) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, a link command contains an invalid target path which makes the receiver fail. The following is the verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=90076fe6-5ba6-e64a-9321-9279670ed16b (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2/dir3 utimes rename dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 ERROR: link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 failed: Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) When processing inode 261, we orphanize inode 262 due to a name/location collision with one of the new hard links for inode 261 (created in the second step below). 2) We create one of the 2 new hard links for inode 261, the one whose location is at "dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4". 3) We then attempt to create the other new hard link for inode 261, which has inode 262 as its parent directory. Because the path for this new hard link was computed before we started processing the new references (hard links), it reflects the old name/location of inode 262, that is, it does not account for the orphanization step that happened when we started processing the new references for inode 261, whence it is no longer valid, causing the receiver to fail. So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of new references if we ended up orphanizing other inodes which are directories. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-06-22 13:03:51 -06:00
u64 ow_mode;
int did_overwrite = 0;
int is_orphan = 0;
u64 last_dir_ino_rm = 0;
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
bool can_rename = true;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for link commands In some scenarios an incremental send stream can contain link commands with an invalid target path. Such scenarios happen after moving some directory inode A, renaming a regular file inode B into the old name of inode A and finally creating a new hard link for inode B at directory inode A. Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) | |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- file1 (ino 261) | |--- dir4/ (ino 262) | |--- dir5/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- dir4 (ino 261) | |--- dir6/ (ino 263) |--- dir44/ (ino 262) |--- file11 (ino 261) |--- dir55/ (ino 260) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, a link command contains an invalid target path which makes the receiver fail. The following is the verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=90076fe6-5ba6-e64a-9321-9279670ed16b (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2/dir3 utimes rename dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 ERROR: link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 failed: Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) When processing inode 261, we orphanize inode 262 due to a name/location collision with one of the new hard links for inode 261 (created in the second step below). 2) We create one of the 2 new hard links for inode 261, the one whose location is at "dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4". 3) We then attempt to create the other new hard link for inode 261, which has inode 262 as its parent directory. Because the path for this new hard link was computed before we started processing the new references (hard links), it reflects the old name/location of inode 262, that is, it does not account for the orphanization step that happened when we started processing the new references for inode 261, whence it is no longer valid, causing the receiver to fail. So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of new references if we ended up orphanizing other inodes which are directories. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-06-22 13:03:51 -06:00
bool orphanized_dir = false;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for unlink commands An incremental send can contain unlink operations with an invalid target path when we rename some directory inode A, then rename some file inode B to the old name of inode A and directory inode A is an ancestor of inode B in the parent snapshot (but not anymore in the send snapshot). Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- file1 (ino 259) | |--- file3 (ino 261) | |--- dir3/ (ino 262) |--- file22 (ino 260) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) |--- dir3 (ino 260) |--- file3/ (ino 262) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) |--- file11 (ino 269) |--- file33 (ino 261) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, an unlink operation contains an invalid path which makes the receiver fail. The following is verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=7d5450da-a573-e043-a451-ec85f4879f0f (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2 link dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/file1 unlink dir1/dir2/file1 utimes dir1/dir2 truncate dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 size=0 utimes dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 rename dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0/file22 unlink dir1/dir3/file22 ERROR: unlink dir1/dir3/file22 failed. Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) Before we start processing the new and deleted references for inode 260, we compute the full path of the deleted reference ("dir1/dir3/file22") and cache it in the list of deleted references for our inode. 2) We then start processing the new references for inode 260, for which there is only one new, located at "dir1/dir3". When processing this new reference, we check that inode 262, which was not yet processed, collides with the new reference and because of that we orphanize inode 262 so its new full path becomes "o262-7-0". 3) After the orphanization of inode 262, we create the new reference for inode 260 by issuing a link command with a target path of "dir1/dir3" and a source path of "o262-7-0/file22". 4) We then start processing the deleted references for inode 260, for which there is only one with the base name of "file22", and issue an unlink operation containing the target path computed at step 1, which is wrong because that path no longer exists and should be replaced with "o262-7-0/file22". So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of deleted references if when we processed the new references for an inode we ended up orphanizing any other inode that is an ancestor of our inode in the parent snapshot. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ adjusted after prev patch removed fs_path::dir_path and dir_path_len ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-13 07:13:11 -06:00
bool orphanized_ancestor = false;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "process_recorded_refs %llu", sctx->cur_ino);
/*
* This should never happen as the root dir always has the same ref
* which is always '..'
*/
BUG_ON(sctx->cur_ino <= BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID);
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&check_dirs);
valid_path = fs_path_alloc();
if (!valid_path) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
/*
* First, check if the first ref of the current inode was overwritten
* before. If yes, we know that the current inode was already orphanized
* and thus use the orphan name. If not, we can use get_cur_path to
* get the path of the first ref as it would like while receiving at
* this point in time.
* New inodes are always orphan at the beginning, so force to use the
* orphan name in this case.
* The first ref is stored in valid_path and will be updated if it
* gets moved around.
*/
if (!sctx->cur_inode_new) {
ret = did_overwrite_first_ref(sctx, sctx->cur_ino,
sctx->cur_inode_gen);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret)
did_overwrite = 1;
}
if (sctx->cur_inode_new || did_overwrite) {
ret = gen_unique_name(sctx, sctx->cur_ino,
sctx->cur_inode_gen, valid_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
is_orphan = 1;
} else {
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen,
valid_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
btrfs: send, orphanize first all conflicting inodes when processing references commit 98272bb77bf4cc20ed1ffca89832d713e70ebf09 upstream. When doing an incremental send it is possible that when processing the new references for an inode we end up issuing rename or link operations that have an invalid path, which contains the orphanized name of a directory before we actually orphanized it, causing the receiver to fail. The following reproducer triggers such scenario: $ cat reproducer.sh #!/bin/bash mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi >/dev/null mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi touch /mnt/sdi/a touch /mnt/sdi/b mkdir /mnt/sdi/testdir # We want "a" to have a lower inode number then "testdir" (257 vs 259). mv /mnt/sdi/a /mnt/sdi/testdir/a # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- testdir/ (ino 259) # | |----- a (ino 257) # | # |----- b (ino 258) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdi/snap1 # Now rename 259 to "testdir_2", then change the name of 257 to # "testdir" and make it a direct descendant of the root inode (256). # Also create a new link for inode 257 with the old name of inode 258. # By swapping the names and location of several inodes and create a # nasty dependency chain of rename and link operations. mv /mnt/sdi/testdir/a /mnt/sdi/a2 touch /mnt/sdi/testdir/a mv /mnt/sdi/b /mnt/sdi/b2 ln /mnt/sdi/a2 /mnt/sdi/b mv /mnt/sdi/testdir /mnt/sdi/testdir_2 mv /mnt/sdi/a2 /mnt/sdi/testdir # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- testdir_2/ (ino 259) # | |----- a (ino 260) # | # |----- testdir (ino 257) # |----- b (ino 257) # |----- b2 (ino 258) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p /mnt/sdi/snap1 /mnt/sdi/snap2 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdj >/dev/null mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send /mnt/sdj umount /mnt/sdi umount /mnt/sdj When running the reproducer, the receive of the incremental send stream fails: $ ./reproducer.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: link b -> o259-6-0/a failed: No such file or directory The problem happens because of the following: 1) Before we start iterating the list of new references for inode 257, we generate its current path and store it at @valid_path, done at the very beginning of process_recorded_refs(). The generated path is "o259-6-0/a", containing the orphanized name for inode 259; 2) Then we iterate over the list of new references, which has the references "b" and "testdir" in that specific order; 3) We process reference "b" first, because it is in the list before reference "testdir". We then issue a link operation to create the new reference "b" using a target path corresponding to the content at @valid_path, which corresponds to "o259-6-0/a". However we haven't yet orphanized inode 259, its name is still "testdir", and not "o259-6-0". The orphanization of 259 did not happen yet because we will process the reference named "testdir" for inode 257 only in the next iteration of the loop that goes over the list of new references. Fix the issue by having a preliminar iteration over all the new references at process_recorded_refs(). This iteration is responsible only for doing the orphanization of other inodes that have and old reference that conflicts with one of the new references of the inode we are currently processing. The emission of rename and link operations happen now in the next iteration of the new references. A test case for fstests will follow soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-21 07:13:29 -06:00
/*
* Before doing any rename and link operations, do a first pass on the
* new references to orphanize any unprocessed inodes that may have a
* reference that conflicts with one of the new references of the current
* inode. This needs to happen first because a new reference may conflict
* with the old reference of a parent directory, so we must make sure
* that the path used for link and rename commands don't use an
* orphanized name when an ancestor was not yet orphanized.
*
* Example:
*
* Parent snapshot:
*
* . (ino 256)
* |----- testdir/ (ino 259)
* | |----- a (ino 257)
* |
* |----- b (ino 258)
*
* Send snapshot:
*
* . (ino 256)
* |----- testdir_2/ (ino 259)
* | |----- a (ino 260)
* |
* |----- testdir (ino 257)
* |----- b (ino 257)
* |----- b2 (ino 258)
*
* Processing the new reference for inode 257 with name "b" may happen
* before processing the new reference with name "testdir". If so, we
* must make sure that by the time we send a link command to create the
* hard link "b", inode 259 was already orphanized, since the generated
* path in "valid_path" already contains the orphanized name for 259.
* We are processing inode 257, so only later when processing 259 we do
* the rename operation to change its temporary (orphanized) name to
* "testdir_2".
*/
list_for_each_entry(cur, &sctx->new_refs, list) {
ret = get_cur_inode_state(sctx, cur->dir, cur->dir_gen);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
btrfs: send, orphanize first all conflicting inodes when processing references commit 98272bb77bf4cc20ed1ffca89832d713e70ebf09 upstream. When doing an incremental send it is possible that when processing the new references for an inode we end up issuing rename or link operations that have an invalid path, which contains the orphanized name of a directory before we actually orphanized it, causing the receiver to fail. The following reproducer triggers such scenario: $ cat reproducer.sh #!/bin/bash mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi >/dev/null mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi touch /mnt/sdi/a touch /mnt/sdi/b mkdir /mnt/sdi/testdir # We want "a" to have a lower inode number then "testdir" (257 vs 259). mv /mnt/sdi/a /mnt/sdi/testdir/a # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- testdir/ (ino 259) # | |----- a (ino 257) # | # |----- b (ino 258) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdi/snap1 # Now rename 259 to "testdir_2", then change the name of 257 to # "testdir" and make it a direct descendant of the root inode (256). # Also create a new link for inode 257 with the old name of inode 258. # By swapping the names and location of several inodes and create a # nasty dependency chain of rename and link operations. mv /mnt/sdi/testdir/a /mnt/sdi/a2 touch /mnt/sdi/testdir/a mv /mnt/sdi/b /mnt/sdi/b2 ln /mnt/sdi/a2 /mnt/sdi/b mv /mnt/sdi/testdir /mnt/sdi/testdir_2 mv /mnt/sdi/a2 /mnt/sdi/testdir # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- testdir_2/ (ino 259) # | |----- a (ino 260) # | # |----- testdir (ino 257) # |----- b (ino 257) # |----- b2 (ino 258) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p /mnt/sdi/snap1 /mnt/sdi/snap2 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdj >/dev/null mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send /mnt/sdj umount /mnt/sdi umount /mnt/sdj When running the reproducer, the receive of the incremental send stream fails: $ ./reproducer.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: link b -> o259-6-0/a failed: No such file or directory The problem happens because of the following: 1) Before we start iterating the list of new references for inode 257, we generate its current path and store it at @valid_path, done at the very beginning of process_recorded_refs(). The generated path is "o259-6-0/a", containing the orphanized name for inode 259; 2) Then we iterate over the list of new references, which has the references "b" and "testdir" in that specific order; 3) We process reference "b" first, because it is in the list before reference "testdir". We then issue a link operation to create the new reference "b" using a target path corresponding to the content at @valid_path, which corresponds to "o259-6-0/a". However we haven't yet orphanized inode 259, its name is still "testdir", and not "o259-6-0". The orphanization of 259 did not happen yet because we will process the reference named "testdir" for inode 257 only in the next iteration of the loop that goes over the list of new references. Fix the issue by having a preliminar iteration over all the new references at process_recorded_refs(). This iteration is responsible only for doing the orphanization of other inodes that have and old reference that conflicts with one of the new references of the inode we are currently processing. The emission of rename and link operations happen now in the next iteration of the new references. A test case for fstests will follow soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-21 07:13:29 -06:00
if (ret == inode_state_will_create)
continue;
/*
btrfs: send, orphanize first all conflicting inodes when processing references commit 98272bb77bf4cc20ed1ffca89832d713e70ebf09 upstream. When doing an incremental send it is possible that when processing the new references for an inode we end up issuing rename or link operations that have an invalid path, which contains the orphanized name of a directory before we actually orphanized it, causing the receiver to fail. The following reproducer triggers such scenario: $ cat reproducer.sh #!/bin/bash mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi >/dev/null mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi touch /mnt/sdi/a touch /mnt/sdi/b mkdir /mnt/sdi/testdir # We want "a" to have a lower inode number then "testdir" (257 vs 259). mv /mnt/sdi/a /mnt/sdi/testdir/a # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- testdir/ (ino 259) # | |----- a (ino 257) # | # |----- b (ino 258) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdi/snap1 # Now rename 259 to "testdir_2", then change the name of 257 to # "testdir" and make it a direct descendant of the root inode (256). # Also create a new link for inode 257 with the old name of inode 258. # By swapping the names and location of several inodes and create a # nasty dependency chain of rename and link operations. mv /mnt/sdi/testdir/a /mnt/sdi/a2 touch /mnt/sdi/testdir/a mv /mnt/sdi/b /mnt/sdi/b2 ln /mnt/sdi/a2 /mnt/sdi/b mv /mnt/sdi/testdir /mnt/sdi/testdir_2 mv /mnt/sdi/a2 /mnt/sdi/testdir # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- testdir_2/ (ino 259) # | |----- a (ino 260) # | # |----- testdir (ino 257) # |----- b (ino 257) # |----- b2 (ino 258) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p /mnt/sdi/snap1 /mnt/sdi/snap2 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdj >/dev/null mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send /mnt/sdj umount /mnt/sdi umount /mnt/sdj When running the reproducer, the receive of the incremental send stream fails: $ ./reproducer.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: link b -> o259-6-0/a failed: No such file or directory The problem happens because of the following: 1) Before we start iterating the list of new references for inode 257, we generate its current path and store it at @valid_path, done at the very beginning of process_recorded_refs(). The generated path is "o259-6-0/a", containing the orphanized name for inode 259; 2) Then we iterate over the list of new references, which has the references "b" and "testdir" in that specific order; 3) We process reference "b" first, because it is in the list before reference "testdir". We then issue a link operation to create the new reference "b" using a target path corresponding to the content at @valid_path, which corresponds to "o259-6-0/a". However we haven't yet orphanized inode 259, its name is still "testdir", and not "o259-6-0". The orphanization of 259 did not happen yet because we will process the reference named "testdir" for inode 257 only in the next iteration of the loop that goes over the list of new references. Fix the issue by having a preliminar iteration over all the new references at process_recorded_refs(). This iteration is responsible only for doing the orphanization of other inodes that have and old reference that conflicts with one of the new references of the inode we are currently processing. The emission of rename and link operations happen now in the next iteration of the new references. A test case for fstests will follow soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-21 07:13:29 -06:00
* Check if this new ref would overwrite the first ref of another
* unprocessed inode. If yes, orphanize the overwritten inode.
* If we find an overwritten ref that is not the first ref,
* simply unlink it.
*/
ret = will_overwrite_ref(sctx, cur->dir, cur->dir_gen,
cur->name, cur->name_len,
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for link commands In some scenarios an incremental send stream can contain link commands with an invalid target path. Such scenarios happen after moving some directory inode A, renaming a regular file inode B into the old name of inode A and finally creating a new hard link for inode B at directory inode A. Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) | |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- file1 (ino 261) | |--- dir4/ (ino 262) | |--- dir5/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- dir4 (ino 261) | |--- dir6/ (ino 263) |--- dir44/ (ino 262) |--- file11 (ino 261) |--- dir55/ (ino 260) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, a link command contains an invalid target path which makes the receiver fail. The following is the verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=90076fe6-5ba6-e64a-9321-9279670ed16b (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2/dir3 utimes rename dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 ERROR: link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 failed: Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) When processing inode 261, we orphanize inode 262 due to a name/location collision with one of the new hard links for inode 261 (created in the second step below). 2) We create one of the 2 new hard links for inode 261, the one whose location is at "dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4". 3) We then attempt to create the other new hard link for inode 261, which has inode 262 as its parent directory. Because the path for this new hard link was computed before we started processing the new references (hard links), it reflects the old name/location of inode 262, that is, it does not account for the orphanization step that happened when we started processing the new references for inode 261, whence it is no longer valid, causing the receiver to fail. So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of new references if we ended up orphanizing other inodes which are directories. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-06-22 13:03:51 -06:00
&ow_inode, &ow_gen, &ow_mode);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = is_first_ref(sctx->parent_root,
ow_inode, cur->dir, cur->name,
cur->name_len);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
Btrfs: incremental send, clear name from cache after orphanization If a directory's reference ends up being orphanized, because the inode currently being processed has a new path that matches that directory's path, make sure we evict the name of the directory from the name cache. This is because there might be descendent inodes (either directories or regular files) that will be orphanized later too, and therefore the orphan name of the ancestor must be used, otherwise we send issue rename operations with a wrong path in the send stream. Reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1/p2 /mnt/data $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/p2 /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/p1/n2/p1 /mnt/data $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename data/p1/p2 -> data/n4/p1/p2 failed. no such file or directory Directories data/p1 (inode 263) and data/p1/p2 (inode 264) in the parent snapshot are both orphanized during the incremental send, and as soon as data/p1 is orphanized, we must make sure that when orphanizing data/p1/p2 we use a source path of o263-6-o/p2 for the rename operation instead of the old path data/p1/p2 (the one before the orphanization of inode 263). A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-03-12 09:16:20 -06:00
struct name_cache_entry *nce;
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
struct waiting_dir_move *wdm;
Btrfs: incremental send, clear name from cache after orphanization If a directory's reference ends up being orphanized, because the inode currently being processed has a new path that matches that directory's path, make sure we evict the name of the directory from the name cache. This is because there might be descendent inodes (either directories or regular files) that will be orphanized later too, and therefore the orphan name of the ancestor must be used, otherwise we send issue rename operations with a wrong path in the send stream. Reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1/p2 /mnt/data $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/p2 /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/p1/n2/p1 /mnt/data $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename data/p1/p2 -> data/n4/p1/p2 failed. no such file or directory Directories data/p1 (inode 263) and data/p1/p2 (inode 264) in the parent snapshot are both orphanized during the incremental send, and as soon as data/p1 is orphanized, we must make sure that when orphanizing data/p1/p2 we use a source path of o263-6-o/p2 for the rename operation instead of the old path data/p1/p2 (the one before the orphanization of inode 263). A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-03-12 09:16:20 -06:00
btrfs: send, recompute reference path after orphanization of a directory commit 9c2b4e0347067396ceb3ae929d6888c81d610259 upstream. During an incremental send, when an inode has multiple new references we might end up emitting rename operations for orphanizations that have a source path that is no longer valid due to a previous orphanization of some directory inode. This causes the receiver to fail since it tries to rename a path that does not exists. Example reproducer: $ cat reproducer.sh #!/bin/bash mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi >/dev/null mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi touch /mnt/sdi/f1 touch /mnt/sdi/f2 mkdir /mnt/sdi/d1 mkdir /mnt/sdi/d1/d2 # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- f1 (ino 257) # |----- f2 (ino 258) # |----- d1/ (ino 259) # |----- d2/ (ino 260) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdi/snap1 # Now do a series of changes such that: # # *) inode 258 has one new hardlink and the previous name changed # # *) both names conflict with the old names of two other inodes: # # 1) the new name "d1" conflicts with the old name of inode 259, # under directory inode 256 (root) # # 2) the new name "d2" conflicts with the old name of inode 260 # under directory inode 259 # # *) inodes 259 and 260 now have the old names of inode 258 # # *) inode 257 is now located under inode 260 - an inode with a number # smaller than the inode (258) for which we created a second hard # link and swapped its names with inodes 259 and 260 # ln /mnt/sdi/f2 /mnt/sdi/d1/f2_link mv /mnt/sdi/f1 /mnt/sdi/d1/d2/f1 # Swap d1 and f2. mv /mnt/sdi/d1 /mnt/sdi/tmp mv /mnt/sdi/f2 /mnt/sdi/d1 mv /mnt/sdi/tmp /mnt/sdi/f2 # Swap d2 and f2_link mv /mnt/sdi/f2/d2 /mnt/sdi/tmp mv /mnt/sdi/f2/f2_link /mnt/sdi/f2/d2 mv /mnt/sdi/tmp /mnt/sdi/f2/f2_link # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- d1 (ino 258) # |----- f2/ (ino 259) # |----- f2_link/ (ino 260) # | |----- f1 (ino 257) # | # |----- d2 (ino 258) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p /mnt/sdi/snap1 /mnt/sdi/snap2 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdj >/dev/null mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send /mnt/sdj umount /mnt/sdi umount /mnt/sdj When executed the receive of the incremental stream fails: $ ./reproducer.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: rename d1/d2 -> o260-6-0 failed: No such file or directory This happens because: 1) When processing inode 257 we end up computing the name for inode 259 because it is an ancestor in the send snapshot, and at that point it still has its old name, "d1", from the parent snapshot because inode 259 was not yet processed. We then cache that name, which is valid until we start processing inode 259 (or set the progress to 260 after processing its references); 2) Later we start processing inode 258 and collecting all its new references into the list sctx->new_refs. The first reference in the list happens to be the reference for name "d1" while the reference for name "d2" is next (the last element of the list). We compute the full path "d1/d2" for this second reference and store it in the reference (its ->full_path member). The path used for the new parent directory was "d1" and not "f2" because inode 259, the new parent, was not yet processed; 3) When we start processing the new references at process_recorded_refs() we start with the first reference in the list, for the new name "d1". Because there is a conflicting inode that was not yet processed, which is directory inode 259, we orphanize it, renaming it from "d1" to "o259-6-0"; 4) Then we start processing the new reference for name "d2", and we realize it conflicts with the reference of inode 260 in the parent snapshot. So we issue an orphanization operation for inode 260 by emitting a rename operation with a destination path of "o260-6-0" and a source path of "d1/d2" - this source path is the value we stored in the reference earlier at step 2), corresponding to the ->full_path member of the reference, however that path is no longer valid due to the orphanization of the directory inode 259 in step 3). This makes the receiver fail since the path does not exists, it should have been "o259-6-0/d2". Fix this by recomputing the full path of a reference before emitting an orphanization if we previously orphanized any directory, since that directory could be a parent in the new path. This is a rare scenario so keeping it simple and not checking if that previously orphanized directory is in fact an ancestor of the inode we are trying to orphanize. A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-21 07:13:30 -06:00
if (orphanized_dir) {
ret = refresh_ref_path(sctx, cur);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
ret = orphanize_inode(sctx, ow_inode, ow_gen,
cur->full_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for link commands In some scenarios an incremental send stream can contain link commands with an invalid target path. Such scenarios happen after moving some directory inode A, renaming a regular file inode B into the old name of inode A and finally creating a new hard link for inode B at directory inode A. Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) | |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- file1 (ino 261) | |--- dir4/ (ino 262) | |--- dir5/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- dir4 (ino 261) | |--- dir6/ (ino 263) |--- dir44/ (ino 262) |--- file11 (ino 261) |--- dir55/ (ino 260) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, a link command contains an invalid target path which makes the receiver fail. The following is the verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=90076fe6-5ba6-e64a-9321-9279670ed16b (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2/dir3 utimes rename dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 ERROR: link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 failed: Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) When processing inode 261, we orphanize inode 262 due to a name/location collision with one of the new hard links for inode 261 (created in the second step below). 2) We create one of the 2 new hard links for inode 261, the one whose location is at "dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4". 3) We then attempt to create the other new hard link for inode 261, which has inode 262 as its parent directory. Because the path for this new hard link was computed before we started processing the new references (hard links), it reflects the old name/location of inode 262, that is, it does not account for the orphanization step that happened when we started processing the new references for inode 261, whence it is no longer valid, causing the receiver to fail. So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of new references if we ended up orphanizing other inodes which are directories. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-06-22 13:03:51 -06:00
if (S_ISDIR(ow_mode))
orphanized_dir = true;
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
/*
* If ow_inode has its rename operation delayed
* make sure that its orphanized name is used in
* the source path when performing its rename
* operation.
*/
if (is_waiting_for_move(sctx, ow_inode)) {
wdm = get_waiting_dir_move(sctx,
ow_inode);
ASSERT(wdm);
wdm->orphanized = true;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, clear name from cache after orphanization If a directory's reference ends up being orphanized, because the inode currently being processed has a new path that matches that directory's path, make sure we evict the name of the directory from the name cache. This is because there might be descendent inodes (either directories or regular files) that will be orphanized later too, and therefore the orphan name of the ancestor must be used, otherwise we send issue rename operations with a wrong path in the send stream. Reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1/p2 /mnt/data $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/p2 /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/p1 $ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/p1/n2/p1 /mnt/data $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename data/p1/p2 -> data/n4/p1/p2 failed. no such file or directory Directories data/p1 (inode 263) and data/p1/p2 (inode 264) in the parent snapshot are both orphanized during the incremental send, and as soon as data/p1 is orphanized, we must make sure that when orphanizing data/p1/p2 we use a source path of o263-6-o/p2 for the rename operation instead of the old path data/p1/p2 (the one before the orphanization of inode 263). A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-03-12 09:16:20 -06:00
/*
* Make sure we clear our orphanized inode's
* name from the name cache. This is because the
* inode ow_inode might be an ancestor of some
* other inode that will be orphanized as well
* later and has an inode number greater than
* sctx->send_progress. We need to prevent
* future name lookups from using the old name
* and get instead the orphan name.
*/
nce = name_cache_search(sctx, ow_inode, ow_gen);
if (nce) {
name_cache_delete(sctx, nce);
kfree(nce);
}
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
/*
* ow_inode might currently be an ancestor of
* cur_ino, therefore compute valid_path (the
* current path of cur_ino) again because it
* might contain the pre-orphanization name of
* ow_inode, which is no longer valid.
*/
Btrfs: send, fix invalid path after renaming and linking file Currently an incremental snapshot can generate link operations which contain an invalid target path. Such case happens when in the send snapshot a file was renamed, a new hard link added for it and some other inode (with a lower number) got renamed to the former name of that file. Example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f1 (ino 257) |--- f2 (ino 258) |--- f3 (ino 259) Send snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f2 (ino 257) |--- f3 (ino 258) |--- f4 (ino 259) |--- f5 (ino 258) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, inode 258 is orphanized (renamed to "o258-7-0"), because its current reference has the same name as the new reference for inode 257; 2) When processing inode 258, we iterate over all its new references, which have the names "f3" and "f5". The first iteration sees name "f5" and renames the inode from its orphan name ("o258-7-0") to "f5", while the second iteration sees the name "f3" and, incorrectly, issues a link operation with a target name matching the orphan name, which no longer exists. The first iteration had reset the current valid path of the inode to "f5", but in the second iteration we lost it because we found another inode, with a higher number of 259, which has a reference named "f3" as well, so we orphanized inode 259 and recomputed the current valid path of inode 258 to its old orphan name because inode 259 could be an ancestor of inode 258 and therefore the current valid path could contain the pre-orphanization name of inode 259. However in this case inode 259 is not an ancestor of inode 258 so the current valid path should not be recomputed. This makes the receiver fail with the following error: ERROR: link f3 -> o258-7-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by not recomputing the current valid path for an inode whenever we find a colliding reference from some not yet processed inode (inode number higher then the one currently being processed), unless that other inode is an ancestor of the one we are currently processing. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-07 04:41:29 -06:00
ret = is_ancestor(sctx->parent_root,
ow_inode, ow_gen,
sctx->cur_ino, NULL);
if (ret > 0) {
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for unlink commands An incremental send can contain unlink operations with an invalid target path when we rename some directory inode A, then rename some file inode B to the old name of inode A and directory inode A is an ancestor of inode B in the parent snapshot (but not anymore in the send snapshot). Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- file1 (ino 259) | |--- file3 (ino 261) | |--- dir3/ (ino 262) |--- file22 (ino 260) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) |--- dir3 (ino 260) |--- file3/ (ino 262) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) |--- file11 (ino 269) |--- file33 (ino 261) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, an unlink operation contains an invalid path which makes the receiver fail. The following is verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=7d5450da-a573-e043-a451-ec85f4879f0f (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2 link dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/file1 unlink dir1/dir2/file1 utimes dir1/dir2 truncate dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 size=0 utimes dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 rename dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0/file22 unlink dir1/dir3/file22 ERROR: unlink dir1/dir3/file22 failed. Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) Before we start processing the new and deleted references for inode 260, we compute the full path of the deleted reference ("dir1/dir3/file22") and cache it in the list of deleted references for our inode. 2) We then start processing the new references for inode 260, for which there is only one new, located at "dir1/dir3". When processing this new reference, we check that inode 262, which was not yet processed, collides with the new reference and because of that we orphanize inode 262 so its new full path becomes "o262-7-0". 3) After the orphanization of inode 262, we create the new reference for inode 260 by issuing a link command with a target path of "dir1/dir3" and a source path of "o262-7-0/file22". 4) We then start processing the deleted references for inode 260, for which there is only one with the base name of "file22", and issue an unlink operation containing the target path computed at step 1, which is wrong because that path no longer exists and should be replaced with "o262-7-0/file22". So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of deleted references if when we processed the new references for an inode we ended up orphanizing any other inode that is an ancestor of our inode in the parent snapshot. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ adjusted after prev patch removed fs_path::dir_path and dir_path_len ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-13 07:13:11 -06:00
orphanized_ancestor = true;
Btrfs: send, fix invalid path after renaming and linking file Currently an incremental snapshot can generate link operations which contain an invalid target path. Such case happens when in the send snapshot a file was renamed, a new hard link added for it and some other inode (with a lower number) got renamed to the former name of that file. Example: Parent snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f1 (ino 257) |--- f2 (ino 258) |--- f3 (ino 259) Send snapshot . (ino 256) | |--- f2 (ino 257) |--- f3 (ino 258) |--- f4 (ino 259) |--- f5 (ino 258) The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream: 1) When processing inode 257, inode 258 is orphanized (renamed to "o258-7-0"), because its current reference has the same name as the new reference for inode 257; 2) When processing inode 258, we iterate over all its new references, which have the names "f3" and "f5". The first iteration sees name "f5" and renames the inode from its orphan name ("o258-7-0") to "f5", while the second iteration sees the name "f3" and, incorrectly, issues a link operation with a target name matching the orphan name, which no longer exists. The first iteration had reset the current valid path of the inode to "f5", but in the second iteration we lost it because we found another inode, with a higher number of 259, which has a reference named "f3" as well, so we orphanized inode 259 and recomputed the current valid path of inode 258 to its old orphan name because inode 259 could be an ancestor of inode 258 and therefore the current valid path could contain the pre-orphanization name of inode 259. However in this case inode 259 is not an ancestor of inode 258 so the current valid path should not be recomputed. This makes the receiver fail with the following error: ERROR: link f3 -> o258-7-0 failed: No such file or directory So fix this by not recomputing the current valid path for an inode whenever we find a colliding reference from some not yet processed inode (inode number higher then the one currently being processed), unless that other inode is an ancestor of the one we are currently processing. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-07 04:41:29 -06:00
fs_path_reset(valid_path);
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, sctx->cur_ino,
sctx->cur_inode_gen,
valid_path);
}
Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [Rewrote change log to be more detailed and organized, and improved comments] Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-06-23 04:39:46 -06:00
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
} else {
ret = send_unlink(sctx, cur->full_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
}
btrfs: send, orphanize first all conflicting inodes when processing references commit 98272bb77bf4cc20ed1ffca89832d713e70ebf09 upstream. When doing an incremental send it is possible that when processing the new references for an inode we end up issuing rename or link operations that have an invalid path, which contains the orphanized name of a directory before we actually orphanized it, causing the receiver to fail. The following reproducer triggers such scenario: $ cat reproducer.sh #!/bin/bash mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdi >/dev/null mount /dev/sdi /mnt/sdi touch /mnt/sdi/a touch /mnt/sdi/b mkdir /mnt/sdi/testdir # We want "a" to have a lower inode number then "testdir" (257 vs 259). mv /mnt/sdi/a /mnt/sdi/testdir/a # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- testdir/ (ino 259) # | |----- a (ino 257) # | # |----- b (ino 258) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap1 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdi/snap1 # Now rename 259 to "testdir_2", then change the name of 257 to # "testdir" and make it a direct descendant of the root inode (256). # Also create a new link for inode 257 with the old name of inode 258. # By swapping the names and location of several inodes and create a # nasty dependency chain of rename and link operations. mv /mnt/sdi/testdir/a /mnt/sdi/a2 touch /mnt/sdi/testdir/a mv /mnt/sdi/b /mnt/sdi/b2 ln /mnt/sdi/a2 /mnt/sdi/b mv /mnt/sdi/testdir /mnt/sdi/testdir_2 mv /mnt/sdi/a2 /mnt/sdi/testdir # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- testdir_2/ (ino 259) # | |----- a (ino 260) # | # |----- testdir (ino 257) # |----- b (ino 257) # |----- b2 (ino 258) btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdi /mnt/sdi/snap2 btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p /mnt/sdi/snap1 /mnt/sdi/snap2 mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdj >/dev/null mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send /mnt/sdj btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send /mnt/sdj umount /mnt/sdi umount /mnt/sdj When running the reproducer, the receive of the incremental send stream fails: $ ./reproducer.sh Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1 Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2' At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2 At subvol snap1 At snapshot snap2 ERROR: link b -> o259-6-0/a failed: No such file or directory The problem happens because of the following: 1) Before we start iterating the list of new references for inode 257, we generate its current path and store it at @valid_path, done at the very beginning of process_recorded_refs(). The generated path is "o259-6-0/a", containing the orphanized name for inode 259; 2) Then we iterate over the list of new references, which has the references "b" and "testdir" in that specific order; 3) We process reference "b" first, because it is in the list before reference "testdir". We then issue a link operation to create the new reference "b" using a target path corresponding to the content at @valid_path, which corresponds to "o259-6-0/a". However we haven't yet orphanized inode 259, its name is still "testdir", and not "o259-6-0". The orphanization of 259 did not happen yet because we will process the reference named "testdir" for inode 257 only in the next iteration of the loop that goes over the list of new references. Fix the issue by having a preliminar iteration over all the new references at process_recorded_refs(). This iteration is responsible only for doing the orphanization of other inodes that have and old reference that conflicts with one of the new references of the inode we are currently processing. The emission of rename and link operations happen now in the next iteration of the new references. A test case for fstests will follow soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-21 07:13:29 -06:00
}
list_for_each_entry(cur, &sctx->new_refs, list) {
/*
* We may have refs where the parent directory does not exist
* yet. This happens if the parent directories inum is higher
* than the current inum. To handle this case, we create the
* parent directory out of order. But we need to check if this
* did already happen before due to other refs in the same dir.
*/
ret = get_cur_inode_state(sctx, cur->dir, cur->dir_gen);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret == inode_state_will_create) {
ret = 0;
/*
* First check if any of the current inodes refs did
* already create the dir.
*/
list_for_each_entry(cur2, &sctx->new_refs, list) {
if (cur == cur2)
break;
if (cur2->dir == cur->dir) {
ret = 1;
break;
}
}
/*
* If that did not happen, check if a previous inode
* did already create the dir.
*/
if (!ret)
ret = did_create_dir(sctx, cur->dir);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (!ret) {
ret = send_create_inode(sctx, cur->dir);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
}
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
if (S_ISDIR(sctx->cur_inode_mode) && sctx->parent_root) {
ret = wait_for_dest_dir_move(sctx, cur, is_orphan);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret == 1) {
can_rename = false;
*pending_move = 1;
}
}
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
if (S_ISDIR(sctx->cur_inode_mode) && sctx->parent_root &&
can_rename) {
ret = wait_for_parent_move(sctx, cur, is_orphan);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret == 1) {
can_rename = false;
*pending_move = 1;
}
}
/*
* link/move the ref to the new place. If we have an orphan
* inode, move it and update valid_path. If not, link or move
* it depending on the inode mode.
*/
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
if (is_orphan && can_rename) {
ret = send_rename(sctx, valid_path, cur->full_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
is_orphan = 0;
ret = fs_path_copy(valid_path, cur->full_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a "directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames for this case too. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/a $ mkdir /mnt/b $ mkdir /mnt/c $ touch /mnt/a/file $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows soon. Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2015-02-28 15:29:22 -07:00
} else if (can_rename) {
if (S_ISDIR(sctx->cur_inode_mode)) {
/*
* Dirs can't be linked, so move it. For moved
* dirs, we always have one new and one deleted
* ref. The deleted ref is ignored later.
*/
Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too, as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed. For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided by Robbie Ko): $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4 $ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t5 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t7 $ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t4 $ mkdir /mnt/data/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7 $ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4 $ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5 $ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 $ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3 $ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- t7/ (ino 264) |-- t4/ (ino 266) |-- t5/ (ino 263) |-- t6/ (ino 261) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t7/ (ino 262) |-- t3/ (ino 267) And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following: . (ino 256) |-- data/ (ino 257) |-- n4/ (ino 260) |-- n1/ (ino 258) |-- t2/ (ino 265) |-- n2/ (ino 259) |-- t3/ (ino 267) | |-- t7 (ino 264) | |-- t6/ (ino 261) | |-- t4/ (ino 266) | |-- t5/ (ino 263) | |-- t7/ (ino 262) While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following: start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example parent of 264 -> 267 parent of 267 -> 262 parent of 262 -> 259 parent of 259 -> 261 parent of 261 -> 263 parent of 263 -> 266 parent of 266 -> 264 |--> back to first iteration while current path string length is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not. A test case for fstests follows soon. Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem. Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-04-09 07:09:14 -06:00
ret = send_rename(sctx, valid_path,
cur->full_path);
if (!ret)
ret = fs_path_copy(valid_path,
cur->full_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
} else {
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for link commands In some scenarios an incremental send stream can contain link commands with an invalid target path. Such scenarios happen after moving some directory inode A, renaming a regular file inode B into the old name of inode A and finally creating a new hard link for inode B at directory inode A. Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) | |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- file1 (ino 261) | |--- dir4/ (ino 262) | |--- dir5/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- dir4 (ino 261) | |--- dir6/ (ino 263) |--- dir44/ (ino 262) |--- file11 (ino 261) |--- dir55/ (ino 260) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, a link command contains an invalid target path which makes the receiver fail. The following is the verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=90076fe6-5ba6-e64a-9321-9279670ed16b (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2/dir3 utimes rename dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 ERROR: link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 failed: Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) When processing inode 261, we orphanize inode 262 due to a name/location collision with one of the new hard links for inode 261 (created in the second step below). 2) We create one of the 2 new hard links for inode 261, the one whose location is at "dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4". 3) We then attempt to create the other new hard link for inode 261, which has inode 262 as its parent directory. Because the path for this new hard link was computed before we started processing the new references (hard links), it reflects the old name/location of inode 262, that is, it does not account for the orphanization step that happened when we started processing the new references for inode 261, whence it is no longer valid, causing the receiver to fail. So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of new references if we ended up orphanizing other inodes which are directories. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-06-22 13:03:51 -06:00
/*
* We might have previously orphanized an inode
* which is an ancestor of our current inode,
* so our reference's full path, which was
* computed before any such orphanizations, must
* be updated.
*/
if (orphanized_dir) {
ret = update_ref_path(sctx, cur);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
ret = send_link(sctx, cur->full_path,
valid_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
}
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ret = dup_ref(cur, &check_dirs);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
if (S_ISDIR(sctx->cur_inode_mode) && sctx->cur_inode_deleted) {
/*
* Check if we can already rmdir the directory. If not,
* orphanize it. For every dir item inside that gets deleted
* later, we do this check again and rmdir it then if possible.
* See the use of check_dirs for more details.
*/
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
ret = can_rmdir(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen,
sctx->cur_ino);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = send_rmdir(sctx, valid_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
} else if (!is_orphan) {
ret = orphanize_inode(sctx, sctx->cur_ino,
sctx->cur_inode_gen, valid_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
is_orphan = 1;
}
list_for_each_entry(cur, &sctx->deleted_refs, list) {
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ret = dup_ref(cur, &check_dirs);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
} else if (S_ISDIR(sctx->cur_inode_mode) &&
!list_empty(&sctx->deleted_refs)) {
/*
* We have a moved dir. Add the old parent to check_dirs
*/
cur = list_entry(sctx->deleted_refs.next, struct recorded_ref,
list);
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ret = dup_ref(cur, &check_dirs);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
} else if (!S_ISDIR(sctx->cur_inode_mode)) {
/*
* We have a non dir inode. Go through all deleted refs and
* unlink them if they were not already overwritten by other
* inodes.
*/
list_for_each_entry(cur, &sctx->deleted_refs, list) {
ret = did_overwrite_ref(sctx, cur->dir, cur->dir_gen,
sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen,
cur->name, cur->name_len);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (!ret) {
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for unlink commands An incremental send can contain unlink operations with an invalid target path when we rename some directory inode A, then rename some file inode B to the old name of inode A and directory inode A is an ancestor of inode B in the parent snapshot (but not anymore in the send snapshot). Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- file1 (ino 259) | |--- file3 (ino 261) | |--- dir3/ (ino 262) |--- file22 (ino 260) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) |--- dir3 (ino 260) |--- file3/ (ino 262) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) |--- file11 (ino 269) |--- file33 (ino 261) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, an unlink operation contains an invalid path which makes the receiver fail. The following is verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=7d5450da-a573-e043-a451-ec85f4879f0f (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2 link dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/file1 unlink dir1/dir2/file1 utimes dir1/dir2 truncate dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 size=0 utimes dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 rename dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0/file22 unlink dir1/dir3/file22 ERROR: unlink dir1/dir3/file22 failed. Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) Before we start processing the new and deleted references for inode 260, we compute the full path of the deleted reference ("dir1/dir3/file22") and cache it in the list of deleted references for our inode. 2) We then start processing the new references for inode 260, for which there is only one new, located at "dir1/dir3". When processing this new reference, we check that inode 262, which was not yet processed, collides with the new reference and because of that we orphanize inode 262 so its new full path becomes "o262-7-0". 3) After the orphanization of inode 262, we create the new reference for inode 260 by issuing a link command with a target path of "dir1/dir3" and a source path of "o262-7-0/file22". 4) We then start processing the deleted references for inode 260, for which there is only one with the base name of "file22", and issue an unlink operation containing the target path computed at step 1, which is wrong because that path no longer exists and should be replaced with "o262-7-0/file22". So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of deleted references if when we processed the new references for an inode we ended up orphanizing any other inode that is an ancestor of our inode in the parent snapshot. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ adjusted after prev patch removed fs_path::dir_path and dir_path_len ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-13 07:13:11 -06:00
/*
* If we orphanized any ancestor before, we need
* to recompute the full path for deleted names,
* since any such path was computed before we
* processed any references and orphanized any
* ancestor inode.
*/
if (orphanized_ancestor) {
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for link commands In some scenarios an incremental send stream can contain link commands with an invalid target path. Such scenarios happen after moving some directory inode A, renaming a regular file inode B into the old name of inode A and finally creating a new hard link for inode B at directory inode A. Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) | |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- file1 (ino 261) | |--- dir4/ (ino 262) | |--- dir5/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- dir3/ (ino 259) | |--- dir4 (ino 261) | |--- dir6/ (ino 263) |--- dir44/ (ino 262) |--- file11 (ino 261) |--- dir55/ (ino 260) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, a link command contains an invalid target path which makes the receiver fail. The following is the verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot mysnap2 uuid=90076fe6-5ba6-e64a-9321-9279670ed16b (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2/dir3 utimes rename dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 ERROR: link dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/dir3/file1 failed: Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) When processing inode 261, we orphanize inode 262 due to a name/location collision with one of the new hard links for inode 261 (created in the second step below). 2) We create one of the 2 new hard links for inode 261, the one whose location is at "dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4". 3) We then attempt to create the other new hard link for inode 261, which has inode 262 as its parent directory. Because the path for this new hard link was computed before we started processing the new references (hard links), it reflects the old name/location of inode 262, that is, it does not account for the orphanization step that happened when we started processing the new references for inode 261, whence it is no longer valid, causing the receiver to fail. So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of new references if we ended up orphanizing other inodes which are directories. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-06-22 13:03:51 -06:00
ret = update_ref_path(sctx, cur);
if (ret < 0)
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path for unlink commands An incremental send can contain unlink operations with an invalid target path when we rename some directory inode A, then rename some file inode B to the old name of inode A and directory inode A is an ancestor of inode B in the parent snapshot (but not anymore in the send snapshot). Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens. Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) | |--- file1 (ino 259) | |--- file3 (ino 261) | |--- dir3/ (ino 262) |--- file22 (ino 260) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) | |--- dir1/ (ino 257) |--- dir2/ (ino 258) |--- dir3 (ino 260) |--- file3/ (ino 262) |--- dir4/ (ino 263) |--- file11 (ino 269) |--- file33 (ino 261) When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, an unlink operation contains an invalid path which makes the receiver fail. The following is verbose output of the btrfs receive command: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=7d5450da-a573-e043-a451-ec85f4879f0f (...) utimes utimes dir1 utimes dir1/dir2 link dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/file1 unlink dir1/dir2/file1 utimes dir1/dir2 truncate dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 size=0 utimes dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 rename dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0 link dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0/file22 unlink dir1/dir3/file22 ERROR: unlink dir1/dir3/file22 failed. Not a directory The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send stream the lead to this issue: 1) Before we start processing the new and deleted references for inode 260, we compute the full path of the deleted reference ("dir1/dir3/file22") and cache it in the list of deleted references for our inode. 2) We then start processing the new references for inode 260, for which there is only one new, located at "dir1/dir3". When processing this new reference, we check that inode 262, which was not yet processed, collides with the new reference and because of that we orphanize inode 262 so its new full path becomes "o262-7-0". 3) After the orphanization of inode 262, we create the new reference for inode 260 by issuing a link command with a target path of "dir1/dir3" and a source path of "o262-7-0/file22". 4) We then start processing the deleted references for inode 260, for which there is only one with the base name of "file22", and issue an unlink operation containing the target path computed at step 1, which is wrong because that path no longer exists and should be replaced with "o262-7-0/file22". So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of deleted references if when we processed the new references for an inode we ended up orphanizing any other inode that is an ancestor of our inode in the parent snapshot. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> [ adjusted after prev patch removed fs_path::dir_path and dir_path_len ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-06-13 07:13:11 -06:00
goto out;
}
ret = send_unlink(sctx, cur->full_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ret = dup_ref(cur, &check_dirs);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
/*
* If the inode is still orphan, unlink the orphan. This may
* happen when a previous inode did overwrite the first ref
* of this inode and no new refs were added for the current
* inode. Unlinking does not mean that the inode is deleted in
* all cases. There may still be links to this inode in other
* places.
*/
if (is_orphan) {
ret = send_unlink(sctx, valid_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
}
/*
* We did collect all parent dirs where cur_inode was once located. We
* now go through all these dirs and check if they are pending for
* deletion and if it's finally possible to perform the rmdir now.
* We also update the inode stats of the parent dirs here.
*/
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
list_for_each_entry(cur, &check_dirs, list) {
/*
* In case we had refs into dirs that were not processed yet,
* we don't need to do the utime and rmdir logic for these dirs.
* The dir will be processed later.
*/
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
if (cur->dir > sctx->cur_ino)
continue;
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ret = get_cur_inode_state(sctx, cur->dir, cur->dir_gen);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret == inode_state_did_create ||
ret == inode_state_no_change) {
/* TODO delayed utimes */
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ret = send_utimes(sctx, cur->dir, cur->dir_gen);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
} else if (ret == inode_state_did_delete &&
cur->dir != last_dir_ino_rm) {
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
ret = can_rmdir(sctx, cur->dir, cur->dir_gen,
sctx->cur_ino);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, cur->dir,
cur->dir_gen, valid_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = send_rmdir(sctx, valid_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
last_dir_ino_rm = cur->dir;
}
}
}
ret = 0;
out:
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
__free_recorded_refs(&check_dirs);
free_recorded_refs(sctx);
fs_path_free(valid_path);
return ret;
}
static int record_ref(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 dir, struct fs_path *name,
void *ctx, struct list_head *refs)
{
int ret = 0;
struct send_ctx *sctx = ctx;
struct fs_path *p;
u64 gen;
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = get_inode_info(root, dir, NULL, &gen, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, dir, gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = fs_path_add_path(p, name);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = __record_ref(refs, dir, gen, p);
out:
if (ret)
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
static int __record_new_ref(int num, u64 dir, int index,
struct fs_path *name,
void *ctx)
{
struct send_ctx *sctx = ctx;
return record_ref(sctx->send_root, dir, name, ctx, &sctx->new_refs);
}
static int __record_deleted_ref(int num, u64 dir, int index,
struct fs_path *name,
void *ctx)
{
struct send_ctx *sctx = ctx;
return record_ref(sctx->parent_root, dir, name, ctx,
&sctx->deleted_refs);
}
static int record_new_ref(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret;
ret = iterate_inode_ref(sctx->send_root, sctx->left_path,
sctx->cmp_key, 0, __record_new_ref, sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = 0;
out:
return ret;
}
static int record_deleted_ref(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret;
ret = iterate_inode_ref(sctx->parent_root, sctx->right_path,
sctx->cmp_key, 0, __record_deleted_ref, sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = 0;
out:
return ret;
}
struct find_ref_ctx {
u64 dir;
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
u64 dir_gen;
struct btrfs_root *root;
struct fs_path *name;
int found_idx;
};
static int __find_iref(int num, u64 dir, int index,
struct fs_path *name,
void *ctx_)
{
struct find_ref_ctx *ctx = ctx_;
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
u64 dir_gen;
int ret;
if (dir == ctx->dir && fs_path_len(name) == fs_path_len(ctx->name) &&
strncmp(name->start, ctx->name->start, fs_path_len(name)) == 0) {
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
/*
* To avoid doing extra lookups we'll only do this if everything
* else matches.
*/
ret = get_inode_info(ctx->root, dir, NULL, &dir_gen, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
if (dir_gen != ctx->dir_gen)
return 0;
ctx->found_idx = num;
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
static int find_iref(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_key *key,
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
u64 dir, u64 dir_gen, struct fs_path *name)
{
int ret;
struct find_ref_ctx ctx;
ctx.dir = dir;
ctx.name = name;
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ctx.dir_gen = dir_gen;
ctx.found_idx = -1;
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ctx.root = root;
ret = iterate_inode_ref(root, path, key, 0, __find_iref, &ctx);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (ctx.found_idx == -1)
return -ENOENT;
return ctx.found_idx;
}
static int __record_changed_new_ref(int num, u64 dir, int index,
struct fs_path *name,
void *ctx)
{
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
u64 dir_gen;
int ret;
struct send_ctx *sctx = ctx;
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->send_root, dir, NULL, &dir_gen, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = find_iref(sctx->parent_root, sctx->right_path,
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
sctx->cmp_key, dir, dir_gen, name);
if (ret == -ENOENT)
ret = __record_new_ref(num, dir, index, name, sctx);
else if (ret > 0)
ret = 0;
return ret;
}
static int __record_changed_deleted_ref(int num, u64 dir, int index,
struct fs_path *name,
void *ctx)
{
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
u64 dir_gen;
int ret;
struct send_ctx *sctx = ctx;
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->parent_root, dir, NULL, &dir_gen, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = find_iref(sctx->send_root, sctx->left_path, sctx->cmp_key,
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
dir, dir_gen, name);
if (ret == -ENOENT)
ret = __record_deleted_ref(num, dir, index, name, sctx);
else if (ret > 0)
ret = 0;
return ret;
}
static int record_changed_ref(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret = 0;
ret = iterate_inode_ref(sctx->send_root, sctx->left_path,
sctx->cmp_key, 0, __record_changed_new_ref, sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = iterate_inode_ref(sctx->parent_root, sctx->right_path,
sctx->cmp_key, 0, __record_changed_deleted_ref, sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = 0;
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* Record and process all refs at once. Needed when an inode changes the
* generation number, which means that it was deleted and recreated.
*/
static int process_all_refs(struct send_ctx *sctx,
enum btrfs_compare_tree_result cmd)
{
int ret;
struct btrfs_root *root;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_key found_key;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
int slot;
iterate_inode_ref_t cb;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
int pending_move = 0;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
if (cmd == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW) {
root = sctx->send_root;
cb = __record_new_ref;
} else if (cmd == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_DELETED) {
root = sctx->parent_root;
cb = __record_deleted_ref;
} else {
btrfs_err(sctx->send_root->fs_info,
"Wrong command %d in process_all_refs", cmd);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
key.objectid = sctx->cmp_key->objectid;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
while (1) {
eb = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(eb)) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(root, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
else if (ret > 0)
break;
continue;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, slot);
if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid ||
(found_key.type != BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY &&
found_key.type != BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY))
break;
ret = iterate_inode_ref(root, path, &found_key, 0, cb, sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
path->slots[0]++;
}
btrfs_release_path(path);
/*
* We don't actually care about pending_move as we are simply
* re-creating this inode and will be rename'ing it into place once we
* rename the parent directory.
*/
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
ret = process_recorded_refs(sctx, &pending_move);
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
static int send_set_xattr(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct fs_path *path,
const char *name, int name_len,
const char *data, int data_len)
{
int ret = 0;
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_SET_XATTR);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, path);
TLV_PUT_STRING(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_XATTR_NAME, name, name_len);
TLV_PUT(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_XATTR_DATA, data, data_len);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
return ret;
}
static int send_remove_xattr(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct fs_path *path,
const char *name, int name_len)
{
int ret = 0;
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_REMOVE_XATTR);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, path);
TLV_PUT_STRING(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_XATTR_NAME, name, name_len);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
return ret;
}
static int __process_new_xattr(int num, struct btrfs_key *di_key,
const char *name, int name_len,
const char *data, int data_len,
u8 type, void *ctx)
{
int ret;
struct send_ctx *sctx = ctx;
struct fs_path *p;
struct posix_acl_xattr_header dummy_acl;
btrfs: send: emit file capabilities after chown commit 89efda52e6b6930f80f5adda9c3c9edfb1397191 upstream. Whenever a chown is executed, all capabilities of the file being touched are lost. When doing incremental send with a file with capabilities, there is a situation where the capability can be lost on the receiving side. The sequence of actions bellow shows the problem: $ mount /dev/sda fs1 $ mount /dev/sdb fs2 $ touch fs1/foo.bar $ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_init $ btrfs send fs1/snap_init | btrfs receive fs2 $ chgrp adm fs1/foo.bar $ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_complete $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_incremental $ btrfs send fs1/snap_complete | btrfs receive fs2 $ btrfs send -p fs1/snap_init fs1/snap_incremental | btrfs receive fs2 At this point, only a chown was emitted by "btrfs send" since only the group was changed. This makes the cap_sys_nice capability to be dropped from fs2/snap_incremental/foo.bar To fix that, only emit capabilities after chown is emitted. The current code first checks for xattrs that are new/changed, emits them, and later emit the chown. Now, __process_new_xattr skips capabilities, letting only finish_inode_if_needed to emit them, if they exist, for the inode being processed. This behavior was being worked around in "btrfs receive" side by caching the capability and only applying it after chown. Now, xattrs are only emmited _after_ chown, making that workaround not needed anymore. Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/202 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Suggested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-10 20:15:07 -06:00
/* Capabilities are emitted by finish_inode_if_needed */
if (!strncmp(name, XATTR_NAME_CAPS, name_len))
return 0;
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
/*
* This hack is needed because empty acls are stored as zero byte
* data in xattrs. Problem with that is, that receiving these zero byte
* acls will fail later. To fix this, we send a dummy acl list that
* only contains the version number and no entries.
*/
if (!strncmp(name, XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS, name_len) ||
!strncmp(name, XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT, name_len)) {
if (data_len == 0) {
dummy_acl.a_version =
cpu_to_le32(POSIX_ACL_XATTR_VERSION);
data = (char *)&dummy_acl;
data_len = sizeof(dummy_acl);
}
}
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = send_set_xattr(sctx, p, name, name_len, data, data_len);
out:
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
static int __process_deleted_xattr(int num, struct btrfs_key *di_key,
const char *name, int name_len,
const char *data, int data_len,
u8 type, void *ctx)
{
int ret;
struct send_ctx *sctx = ctx;
struct fs_path *p;
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = send_remove_xattr(sctx, p, name, name_len);
out:
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
static int process_new_xattr(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret = 0;
ret = iterate_dir_item(sctx->send_root, sctx->left_path,
__process_new_xattr, sctx);
return ret;
}
static int process_deleted_xattr(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
return iterate_dir_item(sctx->parent_root, sctx->right_path,
__process_deleted_xattr, sctx);
}
struct find_xattr_ctx {
const char *name;
int name_len;
int found_idx;
char *found_data;
int found_data_len;
};
static int __find_xattr(int num, struct btrfs_key *di_key,
const char *name, int name_len,
const char *data, int data_len,
u8 type, void *vctx)
{
struct find_xattr_ctx *ctx = vctx;
if (name_len == ctx->name_len &&
strncmp(name, ctx->name, name_len) == 0) {
ctx->found_idx = num;
ctx->found_data_len = data_len;
ctx->found_data = kmemdup(data, data_len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ctx->found_data)
return -ENOMEM;
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
static int find_xattr(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_key *key,
const char *name, int name_len,
char **data, int *data_len)
{
int ret;
struct find_xattr_ctx ctx;
ctx.name = name;
ctx.name_len = name_len;
ctx.found_idx = -1;
ctx.found_data = NULL;
ctx.found_data_len = 0;
ret = iterate_dir_item(root, path, __find_xattr, &ctx);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (ctx.found_idx == -1)
return -ENOENT;
if (data) {
*data = ctx.found_data;
*data_len = ctx.found_data_len;
} else {
kfree(ctx.found_data);
}
return ctx.found_idx;
}
static int __process_changed_new_xattr(int num, struct btrfs_key *di_key,
const char *name, int name_len,
const char *data, int data_len,
u8 type, void *ctx)
{
int ret;
struct send_ctx *sctx = ctx;
char *found_data = NULL;
int found_data_len = 0;
ret = find_xattr(sctx->parent_root, sctx->right_path,
sctx->cmp_key, name, name_len, &found_data,
&found_data_len);
if (ret == -ENOENT) {
ret = __process_new_xattr(num, di_key, name, name_len, data,
data_len, type, ctx);
} else if (ret >= 0) {
if (data_len != found_data_len ||
memcmp(data, found_data, data_len)) {
ret = __process_new_xattr(num, di_key, name, name_len,
data, data_len, type, ctx);
} else {
ret = 0;
}
}
kfree(found_data);
return ret;
}
static int __process_changed_deleted_xattr(int num, struct btrfs_key *di_key,
const char *name, int name_len,
const char *data, int data_len,
u8 type, void *ctx)
{
int ret;
struct send_ctx *sctx = ctx;
ret = find_xattr(sctx->send_root, sctx->left_path, sctx->cmp_key,
name, name_len, NULL, NULL);
if (ret == -ENOENT)
ret = __process_deleted_xattr(num, di_key, name, name_len, data,
data_len, type, ctx);
else if (ret >= 0)
ret = 0;
return ret;
}
static int process_changed_xattr(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret = 0;
ret = iterate_dir_item(sctx->send_root, sctx->left_path,
__process_changed_new_xattr, sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = iterate_dir_item(sctx->parent_root, sctx->right_path,
__process_changed_deleted_xattr, sctx);
out:
return ret;
}
static int process_all_new_xattrs(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret;
struct btrfs_root *root;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_key found_key;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
int slot;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
root = sctx->send_root;
key.objectid = sctx->cmp_key->objectid;
key.type = BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
while (1) {
eb = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(eb)) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(root, path);
if (ret < 0) {
goto out;
} else if (ret > 0) {
ret = 0;
break;
}
continue;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, slot);
if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid ||
found_key.type != key.type) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
ret = iterate_dir_item(root, path, __process_new_xattr, sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
path->slots[0]++;
}
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
static ssize_t fill_read_buf(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 offset, u32 len)
{
struct btrfs_root *root = sctx->send_root;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
struct inode *inode;
struct page *page;
char *addr;
struct btrfs_key key;
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 06:29:47 -06:00
pgoff_t index = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
pgoff_t last_index;
unsigned pg_offset = offset_in_page(offset);
ssize_t ret = 0;
key.objectid = sctx->cur_ino;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
inode = btrfs_iget(fs_info->sb, &key, root, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(inode))
return PTR_ERR(inode);
if (offset + len > i_size_read(inode)) {
if (offset > i_size_read(inode))
len = 0;
else
len = offset - i_size_read(inode);
}
if (len == 0)
goto out;
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 06:29:47 -06:00
last_index = (offset + len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
/* initial readahead */
memset(&sctx->ra, 0, sizeof(struct file_ra_state));
file_ra_state_init(&sctx->ra, inode->i_mapping);
while (index <= last_index) {
unsigned cur_len = min_t(unsigned, len,
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 06:29:47 -06:00
PAGE_SIZE - pg_offset);
page = find_lock_page(inode->i_mapping, index);
if (!page) {
page_cache_sync_readahead(inode->i_mapping, &sctx->ra,
NULL, index, last_index + 1 - index);
page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!page) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
break;
}
}
if (PageReadahead(page)) {
page_cache_async_readahead(inode->i_mapping, &sctx->ra,
NULL, page, index, last_index + 1 - index);
}
if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
btrfs_readpage(NULL, page);
lock_page(page);
if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
unlock_page(page);
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 06:29:47 -06:00
put_page(page);
ret = -EIO;
break;
}
}
addr = kmap(page);
memcpy(sctx->read_buf + ret, addr + pg_offset, cur_len);
kunmap(page);
unlock_page(page);
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 06:29:47 -06:00
put_page(page);
index++;
pg_offset = 0;
len -= cur_len;
ret += cur_len;
}
out:
iput(inode);
return ret;
}
/*
* Read some bytes from the current inode/file and send a write command to
* user space.
*/
static int send_write(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 offset, u32 len)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->send_root->fs_info;
int ret = 0;
struct fs_path *p;
ssize_t num_read = 0;
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
btrfs_debug(fs_info, "send_write offset=%llu, len=%d", offset, len);
num_read = fill_read_buf(sctx, offset, len);
if (num_read <= 0) {
if (num_read < 0)
ret = num_read;
goto out;
}
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_WRITE);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, p);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_FILE_OFFSET, offset);
TLV_PUT(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_DATA, sctx->read_buf, num_read);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
fs_path_free(p);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
return num_read;
}
/*
* Send a clone command to user space.
*/
static int send_clone(struct send_ctx *sctx,
u64 offset, u32 len,
struct clone_root *clone_root)
{
int ret = 0;
struct fs_path *p;
u64 gen;
btrfs_debug(sctx->send_root->fs_info,
"send_clone offset=%llu, len=%d, clone_root=%llu, clone_inode=%llu, clone_offset=%llu",
offset, len, clone_root->root->root_key.objectid,
clone_root->ino, clone_root->offset);
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_CLONE);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_FILE_OFFSET, offset);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_LEN, len);
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, p);
if (clone_root->root == sctx->send_root) {
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->send_root, clone_root->ino, NULL,
&gen, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, clone_root->ino, gen, p);
} else {
ret = get_inode_path(clone_root->root, clone_root->ino, p);
}
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
/*
* If the parent we're using has a received_uuid set then use that as
* our clone source as that is what we will look for when doing a
* receive.
*
* This covers the case that we create a snapshot off of a received
* subvolume and then use that as the parent and try to receive on a
* different host.
*/
if (!btrfs_is_empty_uuid(clone_root->root->root_item.received_uuid))
TLV_PUT_UUID(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_UUID,
clone_root->root->root_item.received_uuid);
else
TLV_PUT_UUID(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_UUID,
clone_root->root->root_item.uuid);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_CTRANSID,
le64_to_cpu(clone_root->root->root_item.ctransid));
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_PATH, p);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_CLONE_OFFSET,
clone_root->offset);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
/*
* Send an update extent command to user space.
*/
static int send_update_extent(struct send_ctx *sctx,
u64 offset, u32 len)
{
int ret = 0;
struct fs_path *p;
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_UPDATE_EXTENT);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, p);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_FILE_OFFSET, offset);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_SIZE, len);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
tlv_put_failure:
out:
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
static int send_hole(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 end)
{
struct fs_path *p = NULL;
u64 offset = sctx->cur_inode_last_extent;
u64 len;
int ret = 0;
Btrfs: send, fix incorrect file layout after hole punching beyond eof When doing an incremental send, if we have a file in the parent snapshot that has prealloc extents beyond EOF and in the send snapshot it got a hole punch that partially covers the prealloc extents, the send stream, when replayed by a receiver, can result in a file that has a size bigger than it should and filled with zeroes past the correct EOF. For example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 4M" /mnt/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xea 0 1M" /mnt/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.send /mnt/snap1 $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 1M 2M" /mnt/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/2.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 $ stat --format %s /mnt/snap2/foobar 1048576 $ md5sum /mnt/snap2/foobar d31659e82e87798acd4669a1e0a19d4f /mnt/snap2/foobar $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /mnt/1.snap /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /mnt/2.snap /mnt $ stat --format %s /mnt/snap2/foobar 3145728 # --> should be 1Mb and not 3Mb (which was the end offset of hole # punch operation) $ md5sum /mnt/snap2/foobar 117baf295297c2a995f92da725b0b651 /mnt/snap2/foobar # --> should be d31659e82e87798acd4669a1e0a19d4f as in the original fs This issue actually happens only since commit ffa7c4296e93 ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations"), but before that commit we were issuing a write operation full of zeroes (to "punch" a hole) which was extending the file size beyond the correct value and then immediately issue a truncate operation to the correct size and undoing the previous write operation. Since the send protocol does not support fallocate, for extent preallocation and hole punching, fix this by not even attempting to send a "hole" (regular write full of zeroes) if it starts at an offset greater then or equals to the file's size. This approach, besides being much more simple then making send issue the truncate operation, adds the benefit of avoiding the useless pair of write of zeroes and truncate operations, saving time and IO at the receiver and reducing the size of the send stream. A test case for fstests follows soon. Fixes: ffa7c4296e93 ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.17+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-07-30 05:39:58 -06:00
/*
* A hole that starts at EOF or beyond it. Since we do not yet support
* fallocate (for extent preallocation and hole punching), sending a
* write of zeroes starting at EOF or beyond would later require issuing
* a truncate operation which would undo the write and achieve nothing.
*/
if (offset >= sctx->cur_inode_size)
return 0;
Btrfs: incremental send, fix file corruption when no-holes feature is enabled When using the no-holes feature, if we have a file with prealloc extents with a start offset beyond the file's eof, doing an incremental send can cause corruption of the file due to incorrect hole detection. Such case requires that the prealloc extent(s) exist in both the parent and send snapshots, and that a hole is punched into the file that covers all its extents that do not cross the eof boundary. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 500K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "falloc -k 1200K 800K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base $ btrfs send -f /tmp/base.snap /mnt/sdb/base $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 0 500K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr $ btrfs send -p /mnt/sdb/base -f /tmp/incr.snap /mnt/sdb/incr $ md5sum /mnt/sdb/incr/foobar 816df6f64deba63b029ca19d880ee10a /mnt/sdb/incr/foobar $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/base.snap /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/incr.snap /mnt/sdc $ md5sum /mnt/sdc/incr/foobar cf2ef71f4a9e90c2f6013ba3b2257ed2 /mnt/sdc/incr/foobar --> Different checksum, because the prealloc extent beyond the file's eof confused the hole detection code and it assumed a hole starting at offset 0 and ending at the offset of the prealloc extent (1200Kb) instead of ending at the offset 500Kb (the file's size). Fix this by ensuring we never cross the file's size when issuing the write operations for a hole. Fixes: 16e7549f045d33 ("Btrfs: incompatible format change to remove hole extents") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.14+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-05-20 02:55:42 -06:00
/*
* Don't go beyond the inode's i_size due to prealloc extents that start
* after the i_size.
*/
end = min_t(u64, end, sctx->cur_inode_size);
if (sctx->flags & BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA)
return send_update_extent(sctx, offset, end - offset);
p = fs_path_alloc();
if (!p)
return -ENOMEM;
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen, p);
if (ret < 0)
goto tlv_put_failure;
memset(sctx->read_buf, 0, BTRFS_SEND_READ_SIZE);
while (offset < end) {
len = min_t(u64, end - offset, BTRFS_SEND_READ_SIZE);
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_WRITE);
if (ret < 0)
break;
TLV_PUT_PATH(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_PATH, p);
TLV_PUT_U64(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_FILE_OFFSET, offset);
TLV_PUT(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_A_DATA, sctx->read_buf, len);
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
if (ret < 0)
break;
offset += len;
}
Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-02-06 13:40:40 -07:00
sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset = offset;
tlv_put_failure:
fs_path_free(p);
return ret;
}
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
static int send_extent_data(struct send_ctx *sctx,
const u64 offset,
const u64 len)
{
u64 sent = 0;
if (sctx->flags & BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_NO_FILE_DATA)
return send_update_extent(sctx, offset, len);
while (sent < len) {
u64 size = len - sent;
int ret;
if (size > BTRFS_SEND_READ_SIZE)
size = BTRFS_SEND_READ_SIZE;
ret = send_write(sctx, offset + sent, size);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (!ret)
break;
sent += ret;
}
return 0;
}
btrfs: send: emit file capabilities after chown commit 89efda52e6b6930f80f5adda9c3c9edfb1397191 upstream. Whenever a chown is executed, all capabilities of the file being touched are lost. When doing incremental send with a file with capabilities, there is a situation where the capability can be lost on the receiving side. The sequence of actions bellow shows the problem: $ mount /dev/sda fs1 $ mount /dev/sdb fs2 $ touch fs1/foo.bar $ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_init $ btrfs send fs1/snap_init | btrfs receive fs2 $ chgrp adm fs1/foo.bar $ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_complete $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_incremental $ btrfs send fs1/snap_complete | btrfs receive fs2 $ btrfs send -p fs1/snap_init fs1/snap_incremental | btrfs receive fs2 At this point, only a chown was emitted by "btrfs send" since only the group was changed. This makes the cap_sys_nice capability to be dropped from fs2/snap_incremental/foo.bar To fix that, only emit capabilities after chown is emitted. The current code first checks for xattrs that are new/changed, emits them, and later emit the chown. Now, __process_new_xattr skips capabilities, letting only finish_inode_if_needed to emit them, if they exist, for the inode being processed. This behavior was being worked around in "btrfs receive" side by caching the capability and only applying it after chown. Now, xattrs are only emmited _after_ chown, making that workaround not needed anymore. Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/202 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Suggested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-10 20:15:07 -06:00
/*
* Search for a capability xattr related to sctx->cur_ino. If the capability is
* found, call send_set_xattr function to emit it.
*
* Return 0 if there isn't a capability, or when the capability was emitted
* successfully, or < 0 if an error occurred.
*/
static int send_capabilities(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
struct fs_path *fspath = NULL;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_dir_item *di;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
unsigned long data_ptr;
char *buf = NULL;
int buf_len;
int ret = 0;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
di = btrfs_lookup_xattr(NULL, sctx->send_root, path, sctx->cur_ino,
XATTR_NAME_CAPS, strlen(XATTR_NAME_CAPS), 0);
if (!di) {
/* There is no xattr for this inode */
goto out;
} else if (IS_ERR(di)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(di);
goto out;
}
leaf = path->nodes[0];
buf_len = btrfs_dir_data_len(leaf, di);
fspath = fs_path_alloc();
buf = kmalloc(buf_len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!fspath || !buf) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
ret = get_cur_path(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen, fspath);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
data_ptr = (unsigned long)(di + 1) + btrfs_dir_name_len(leaf, di);
read_extent_buffer(leaf, buf, data_ptr, buf_len);
ret = send_set_xattr(sctx, fspath, XATTR_NAME_CAPS,
strlen(XATTR_NAME_CAPS), buf, buf_len);
out:
kfree(buf);
fs_path_free(fspath);
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
static int clone_range(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct clone_root *clone_root,
const u64 disk_byte,
u64 data_offset,
u64 offset,
u64 len)
{
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
int ret;
u64 clone_src_i_size = 0;
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
Btrfs: incremental send, fix emission of invalid clone operations When doing an incremental send it's possible that the computed send stream contains clone operations that will fail on the receiver if the receiver has compression enabled and the clone operations target a sector sized extent that starts at a zero file offset, is not compressed on the source filesystem but ends up being compressed and inlined at the destination filesystem. Example scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount -o compress /dev/sdb /mnt # By doing a direct IO write, the data is not compressed. $ xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 4K" /mnt/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1 $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/foobar 0 8K 4K" /mnt/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/mysnap1 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/2.snap -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount -o compress /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt ERROR: failed to clone extents to foobar Operation not supported The same could be achieved by mounting the source filesystem without compression and doing a buffered IO write instead of a direct IO one, and mounting the destination filesystem with compression enabled. So fix this by issuing regular write operations in the send stream instead of clone operations when the source offset is zero and the range has a length matching the sector size. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2017-08-10 15:54:51 -06:00
/*
* Prevent cloning from a zero offset with a length matching the sector
* size because in some scenarios this will make the receiver fail.
*
* For example, if in the source filesystem the extent at offset 0
* has a length of sectorsize and it was written using direct IO, then
* it can never be an inline extent (even if compression is enabled).
* Then this extent can be cloned in the original filesystem to a non
* zero file offset, but it may not be possible to clone in the
* destination filesystem because it can be inlined due to compression
* on the destination filesystem (as the receiver's write operations are
* always done using buffered IO). The same happens when the original
* filesystem does not have compression enabled but the destination
* filesystem has.
*/
if (clone_root->offset == 0 &&
len == sctx->send_root->fs_info->sectorsize)
return send_extent_data(sctx, offset, len);
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
Btrfs: send, improve clone range Improve clone_range in two scenarios. 1. Remove the limit of inode size when find clone inodes We can do partial clone, so there is no need to limit the size of the candidate inode. When clone a range, we clone the legal range only by bytenr, offset, len, inode size. 2. In the scenarios of rewrite or clone_range, data_offset rarely matches exactly, so the chance of a clone is missed. e.g. 1. Write a 1M file dd if=/dev/zero of=1M bs=1M count=1 2. Clone 1M file cp --reflink 1M clone 3. Rewrite 4k on the clone file dd if=/dev/zero of=clone bs=4k count=1 conv=notrunc The disk layout is as follows: item 16 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15353 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1103101952 nr 1048576 extent data offset 0 nr 1048576 ram 1048576 extent compression(none) ... item 22 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 14959 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1104150528 nr 4096 extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 4096 extent compression(none) item 23 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 14906 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1103101952 nr 1048576 extent data offset 4096 nr 1044480 ram 1048576 extent compression(none) When send, inode 258 file offset 4096~1048576 (item 23) has a chance to clone_range, but because data_offset does not match inode 257 (item 16), it causes missed clone and can only transfer actual data. Improve the problem by judging whether the current data_offset has overlap with the file extent item, and if so, adjusting offset and extent_len so that we can clone correctly. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-03-29 04:03:27 -06:00
/*
* There are inodes that have extents that lie behind its i_size. Don't
* accept clones from these extents.
*/
ret = __get_inode_info(clone_root->root, path, clone_root->ino,
&clone_src_i_size, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
btrfs_release_path(path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
/*
* We can't send a clone operation for the entire range if we find
* extent items in the respective range in the source file that
* refer to different extents or if we find holes.
* So check for that and do a mix of clone and regular write/copy
* operations if needed.
*
* Example:
*
* mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda
* mount /dev/sda /mnt
* xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" /mnt/foo
* cp --reflink=always /mnt/foo /mnt/bar
* xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 50K" /mnt/foo
* btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap
*
* If when we send the snapshot and we are processing file bar (which
* has a higher inode number than foo) we blindly send a clone operation
* for the [0, 100K[ range from foo to bar, the receiver ends up getting
* a file bar that matches the content of file foo - iow, doesn't match
* the content from bar in the original filesystem.
*/
key.objectid = clone_root->ino;
key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY;
key.offset = clone_root->offset;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, clone_root->root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret > 0 && path->slots[0] > 0) {
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &key, path->slots[0] - 1);
if (key.objectid == clone_root->ino &&
key.type == BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY)
path->slots[0]--;
}
while (true) {
struct extent_buffer *leaf = path->nodes[0];
int slot = path->slots[0];
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *ei;
u8 type;
u64 ext_len;
u64 clone_len;
Btrfs: send, improve clone range Improve clone_range in two scenarios. 1. Remove the limit of inode size when find clone inodes We can do partial clone, so there is no need to limit the size of the candidate inode. When clone a range, we clone the legal range only by bytenr, offset, len, inode size. 2. In the scenarios of rewrite or clone_range, data_offset rarely matches exactly, so the chance of a clone is missed. e.g. 1. Write a 1M file dd if=/dev/zero of=1M bs=1M count=1 2. Clone 1M file cp --reflink 1M clone 3. Rewrite 4k on the clone file dd if=/dev/zero of=clone bs=4k count=1 conv=notrunc The disk layout is as follows: item 16 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15353 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1103101952 nr 1048576 extent data offset 0 nr 1048576 ram 1048576 extent compression(none) ... item 22 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 14959 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1104150528 nr 4096 extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 4096 extent compression(none) item 23 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 14906 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1103101952 nr 1048576 extent data offset 4096 nr 1044480 ram 1048576 extent compression(none) When send, inode 258 file offset 4096~1048576 (item 23) has a chance to clone_range, but because data_offset does not match inode 257 (item 16), it causes missed clone and can only transfer actual data. Improve the problem by judging whether the current data_offset has overlap with the file extent item, and if so, adjusting offset and extent_len so that we can clone correctly. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-03-29 04:03:27 -06:00
u64 clone_data_offset;
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(leaf)) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(clone_root->root, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
else if (ret > 0)
break;
continue;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot);
/*
* We might have an implicit trailing hole (NO_HOLES feature
* enabled). We deal with it after leaving this loop.
*/
if (key.objectid != clone_root->ino ||
key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY)
break;
ei = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
type = btrfs_file_extent_type(leaf, ei);
if (type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
ext_len = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, ei);
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 06:29:47 -06:00
ext_len = PAGE_ALIGN(ext_len);
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
} else {
ext_len = btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(leaf, ei);
}
if (key.offset + ext_len <= clone_root->offset)
goto next;
if (key.offset > clone_root->offset) {
/* Implicit hole, NO_HOLES feature enabled. */
u64 hole_len = key.offset - clone_root->offset;
if (hole_len > len)
hole_len = len;
ret = send_extent_data(sctx, offset, hole_len);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
len -= hole_len;
if (len == 0)
break;
offset += hole_len;
clone_root->offset += hole_len;
data_offset += hole_len;
}
if (key.offset >= clone_root->offset + len)
break;
Btrfs: send, improve clone range Improve clone_range in two scenarios. 1. Remove the limit of inode size when find clone inodes We can do partial clone, so there is no need to limit the size of the candidate inode. When clone a range, we clone the legal range only by bytenr, offset, len, inode size. 2. In the scenarios of rewrite or clone_range, data_offset rarely matches exactly, so the chance of a clone is missed. e.g. 1. Write a 1M file dd if=/dev/zero of=1M bs=1M count=1 2. Clone 1M file cp --reflink 1M clone 3. Rewrite 4k on the clone file dd if=/dev/zero of=clone bs=4k count=1 conv=notrunc The disk layout is as follows: item 16 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15353 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1103101952 nr 1048576 extent data offset 0 nr 1048576 ram 1048576 extent compression(none) ... item 22 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 14959 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1104150528 nr 4096 extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 4096 extent compression(none) item 23 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 14906 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 1103101952 nr 1048576 extent data offset 4096 nr 1044480 ram 1048576 extent compression(none) When send, inode 258 file offset 4096~1048576 (item 23) has a chance to clone_range, but because data_offset does not match inode 257 (item 16), it causes missed clone and can only transfer actual data. Improve the problem by judging whether the current data_offset has overlap with the file extent item, and if so, adjusting offset and extent_len so that we can clone correctly. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-03-29 04:03:27 -06:00
if (key.offset >= clone_src_i_size)
break;
if (key.offset + ext_len > clone_src_i_size)
ext_len = clone_src_i_size - key.offset;
clone_data_offset = btrfs_file_extent_offset(leaf, ei);
if (btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(leaf, ei) == disk_byte) {
clone_root->offset = key.offset;
if (clone_data_offset < data_offset &&
clone_data_offset + ext_len > data_offset) {
u64 extent_offset;
extent_offset = data_offset - clone_data_offset;
ext_len -= extent_offset;
clone_data_offset += extent_offset;
clone_root->offset += extent_offset;
}
}
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
clone_len = min_t(u64, ext_len, len);
if (btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(leaf, ei) == disk_byte &&
Btrfs: incremental send, fix emission of invalid clone operations When doing an incremental send we can now issue clone operations with a source range that ends at the source's file eof and with a destination range that ends at an offset smaller then the destination's file eof. If the eof of the source file is not aligned to the sector size of the filesystem, the receiver will get a -EINVAL error when trying to do the operation or, on older kernels, silently corrupt the destination file. The corruption happens on kernels without commit ac765f83f1397646 ("Btrfs: fix data corruption due to cloning of eof block"), while the failure to clone happens on kernels with that commit. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb1 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/foo $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xc7 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/bar $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x4d 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/baz $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xe2 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/zoo $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base $ btrfs send -f /tmp/base.send /mnt/sdb/base $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/bar 1560K 500K 100K" /mnt/sdb/bar $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/bar 1560K 0 100K" /mnt/sdb/zoo $ xfs_io -c "truncate 550K" /mnt/sdb/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr $ btrfs send -f /tmp/incr.send -p /mnt/sdb/base /mnt/sdb/incr $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/base.send /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -vv -f /tmp/incr.send /mnt/sdc (...) truncate bar size=563200 utimes bar clone zoo - source=bar source offset=512000 offset=0 length=51200 ERROR: failed to clone extents to zoo Invalid argument The failure happens because the clone source range ends at the eof of file bar, 563200, which is not aligned to the filesystems sector size (4Kb in this case), and the destination range ends at offset 0 + 51200, which is less then the size of the file zoo (2Mb). So fix this by detecting such case and instead of issuing a clone operation for the whole range, do a clone operation for smaller range that is sector size aligned followed by a write operation for the block containing the eof. Here we will always be pessimistic and assume the destination filesystem of the send stream has the largest possible sector size (64Kb), since we have no way of determining it. This fixes a recent regression introduced in kernel 5.2-rc1. Fixes: 040ee6120cb6706 ("Btrfs: send, improve clone range") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-05-20 02:57:00 -06:00
clone_data_offset == data_offset) {
const u64 src_end = clone_root->offset + clone_len;
const u64 sectorsize = SZ_64K;
/*
* We can't clone the last block, when its size is not
* sector size aligned, into the middle of a file. If we
* do so, the receiver will get a failure (-EINVAL) when
* trying to clone or will silently corrupt the data in
* the destination file if it's on a kernel without the
* fix introduced by commit ac765f83f1397646
* ("Btrfs: fix data corruption due to cloning of eof
* block).
*
* So issue a clone of the aligned down range plus a
* regular write for the eof block, if we hit that case.
*
* Also, we use the maximum possible sector size, 64K,
* because we don't know what's the sector size of the
* filesystem that receives the stream, so we have to
* assume the largest possible sector size.
*/
if (src_end == clone_src_i_size &&
!IS_ALIGNED(src_end, sectorsize) &&
offset + clone_len < sctx->cur_inode_size) {
u64 slen;
slen = ALIGN_DOWN(src_end - clone_root->offset,
sectorsize);
if (slen > 0) {
ret = send_clone(sctx, offset, slen,
clone_root);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
ret = send_extent_data(sctx, offset + slen,
clone_len - slen);
} else {
ret = send_clone(sctx, offset, clone_len,
clone_root);
}
} else {
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
ret = send_extent_data(sctx, offset, clone_len);
Btrfs: incremental send, fix emission of invalid clone operations When doing an incremental send we can now issue clone operations with a source range that ends at the source's file eof and with a destination range that ends at an offset smaller then the destination's file eof. If the eof of the source file is not aligned to the sector size of the filesystem, the receiver will get a -EINVAL error when trying to do the operation or, on older kernels, silently corrupt the destination file. The corruption happens on kernels without commit ac765f83f1397646 ("Btrfs: fix data corruption due to cloning of eof block"), while the failure to clone happens on kernels with that commit. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb1 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/foo $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xc7 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/bar $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x4d 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/baz $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xe2 0 2M" /mnt/sdb/zoo $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base $ btrfs send -f /tmp/base.send /mnt/sdb/base $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/bar 1560K 500K 100K" /mnt/sdb/bar $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/bar 1560K 0 100K" /mnt/sdb/zoo $ xfs_io -c "truncate 550K" /mnt/sdb/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr $ btrfs send -f /tmp/incr.send -p /mnt/sdb/base /mnt/sdb/incr $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/base.send /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -vv -f /tmp/incr.send /mnt/sdc (...) truncate bar size=563200 utimes bar clone zoo - source=bar source offset=512000 offset=0 length=51200 ERROR: failed to clone extents to zoo Invalid argument The failure happens because the clone source range ends at the eof of file bar, 563200, which is not aligned to the filesystems sector size (4Kb in this case), and the destination range ends at offset 0 + 51200, which is less then the size of the file zoo (2Mb). So fix this by detecting such case and instead of issuing a clone operation for the whole range, do a clone operation for smaller range that is sector size aligned followed by a write operation for the block containing the eof. Here we will always be pessimistic and assume the destination filesystem of the send stream has the largest possible sector size (64Kb), since we have no way of determining it. This fixes a recent regression introduced in kernel 5.2-rc1. Fixes: 040ee6120cb6706 ("Btrfs: send, improve clone range") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-05-20 02:57:00 -06:00
}
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
len -= clone_len;
if (len == 0)
break;
offset += clone_len;
clone_root->offset += clone_len;
data_offset += clone_len;
next:
path->slots[0]++;
}
if (len > 0)
ret = send_extent_data(sctx, offset, len);
else
ret = 0;
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
static int send_write_or_clone(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_key *key,
struct clone_root *clone_root)
{
int ret = 0;
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *ei;
u64 offset = key->offset;
u64 len;
u8 type;
Btrfs: fix send to not send non-aligned clone operations It is possible for the send feature to send clone operations that request a cloning range (offset + length) that is not aligned with the block size. This makes the btrfs receive command send issue a clone ioctl call that will fail, as the ioctl will return an -EINVAL error because of the unaligned range. Fix this by not sending clone operations for non block aligned ranges, and instead send regular write operation for these (less common) cases. The following xfstest reproduces this issue, which fails on the second btrfs receive command without this change: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=`mktemp -d` status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $tmp } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root rm -f $seqres.full _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1 _scratch_mount $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 819200" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch $XFS_IO_PROG -c "falloc -k 819200 667648" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 1482752 2978" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 | \ _filter_scratch $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 883305" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 | \ _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $tmp/1.snap 2>&1 | _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \ -f $tmp/2.snap 2>&1 | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch _scratch_unmount _check_btrfs_filesystem $SCRATCH_DEV _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1 _scratch_mount $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/1.snap md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo | _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/2.snap md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch _scratch_unmount _check_btrfs_filesystem $SCRATCH_DEV status=0 exit The tests expected output is: QA output created by 025 FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT' FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT' wrote 2978/2978 bytes at offset 1482752 XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT' Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1' FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT' Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2' At subvol SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 At subvol SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3 SCRATCH_MNT/foo 42b6369eae2a8725c1aacc0440e597aa SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo 129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3 SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo At subvol mysnap1 42b6369eae2a8725c1aacc0440e597aa SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo At snapshot mysnap2 129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3 SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-11 19:26:28 -07:00
u64 bs = sctx->send_root->fs_info->sb->s_blocksize;
ei = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
type = btrfs_file_extent_type(path->nodes[0], ei);
if (type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
len = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(path->nodes[0], ei);
/*
* it is possible the inline item won't cover the whole page,
* but there may be items after this page. Make
* sure to send the whole thing
*/
mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-04-01 06:29:47 -06:00
len = PAGE_ALIGN(len);
} else {
len = btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(path->nodes[0], ei);
}
Btrfs: send, fix missing truncate for inode with prealloc extent past eof An incremental send operation can miss a truncate operation when an inode has an increased size in the send snapshot and a prealloc extent beyond its size. Consider the following scenario where a necessary truncate operation is missing in the incremental send stream: 1) In the parent snapshot an inode has a size of 1282957 bytes and it has no prealloc extents beyond its size; 2) In the the send snapshot it has a size of 5738496 bytes and has a new extent at offsets 1884160 (length of 106496 bytes) and a prealloc extent beyond eof at offset 6729728 (and a length of 339968 bytes); 3) When processing the prealloc extent, at offset 6729728, we end up at send.c:send_write_or_clone() and set the @len variable to a value of 18446744073708560384 because @offset plus the original @len value is larger then the inode's size (6729728 + 339968 > 5738496). We then call send_extent_data(), with that @offset and @len, which in turn calls send_write(), and then the later calls fill_read_buf(). Because the offset passed to fill_read_buf() is greater then inode's i_size, this function returns 0 immediately, which makes send_write() and send_extent_data() do nothing and return immediately as well. When we get back to send.c:send_write_or_clone() we adjust the value of sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset to @offset plus @len, which corresponds to 6729728 + 18446744073708560384 = 5738496, which is precisely the the size of the inode in the send snapshot; 4) Later when at send.c:finish_inode_if_needed() we determine that we don't need to issue a truncate operation because the value of sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset corresponds to the inode's new size, 5738496 bytes. This is wrong because the last write operation that was issued started at offset 1884160 with a length of 106496 bytes, so the correct value for sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset should be 1990656 (1884160 + 106496), so that a truncate operation with a value of 5738496 bytes would have been sent to insert a trailing hole at the destination. So fix the issue by making send.c:send_write_or_clone() not attempt to send write or clone operations for extents that start beyond the inode's size, since such attempts do nothing but waste time by calling helper functions and allocating path structures, and send currently has no fallocate command in order to create prealloc extents at the destination (either beyond a file's eof or not). The issue was found running the test btrfs/007 from fstests using a seed value of 1524346151 for fsstress. Reported-by: Gu, Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com> Fixes: ffa7c4296e93 ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-04-30 12:05:07 -06:00
if (offset >= sctx->cur_inode_size) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
if (offset + len > sctx->cur_inode_size)
len = sctx->cur_inode_size - offset;
if (len == 0) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: fix send to not send non-aligned clone operations It is possible for the send feature to send clone operations that request a cloning range (offset + length) that is not aligned with the block size. This makes the btrfs receive command send issue a clone ioctl call that will fail, as the ioctl will return an -EINVAL error because of the unaligned range. Fix this by not sending clone operations for non block aligned ranges, and instead send regular write operation for these (less common) cases. The following xfstest reproduces this issue, which fails on the second btrfs receive command without this change: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=`mktemp -d` status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $tmp } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root rm -f $seqres.full _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1 _scratch_mount $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 819200" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch $XFS_IO_PROG -c "falloc -k 819200 667648" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 1482752 2978" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 | \ _filter_scratch $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 883305" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 | \ _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $tmp/1.snap 2>&1 | _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \ -f $tmp/2.snap 2>&1 | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch _scratch_unmount _check_btrfs_filesystem $SCRATCH_DEV _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1 _scratch_mount $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/1.snap md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo | _filter_scratch $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/2.snap md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch _scratch_unmount _check_btrfs_filesystem $SCRATCH_DEV status=0 exit The tests expected output is: QA output created by 025 FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT' FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT' wrote 2978/2978 bytes at offset 1482752 XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT' Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1' FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT' Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2' At subvol SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 At subvol SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3 SCRATCH_MNT/foo 42b6369eae2a8725c1aacc0440e597aa SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo 129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3 SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo At subvol mysnap1 42b6369eae2a8725c1aacc0440e597aa SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo At snapshot mysnap2 129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3 SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-11 19:26:28 -07:00
if (clone_root && IS_ALIGNED(offset + len, bs)) {
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
u64 disk_byte;
u64 data_offset;
disk_byte = btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(path->nodes[0], ei);
data_offset = btrfs_file_extent_offset(path->nodes[0], ei);
ret = clone_range(sctx, clone_root, disk_byte, data_offset,
offset, len);
} else {
Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning operations If we have a file that shares an extent with other files, when processing the extent item relative to a shared extent, we blindly issue a clone operation that will target a length matching the length in the extent item and uses as a source some other file the receiver already has and points to the same extent. However that range in the other file might not exclusively point only to the shared extent, and so using that length will result in the receiver getting a file with different data from the one in the send snapshot. This issue happened both for incremental and full send operations. So fix this by issuing clone operations with lengths that don't cover regions of the source file that point to different extents (or have holes). The following test case for fstests reproduces the problem. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink _require_xfs_io_command "fpunch" send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single 100K extent. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Clone our file into a new file named bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Now overwrite parts of our foo file. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 50K 10K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 90K 10K" \ -c "fpunch 70K 10k" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # We expect the destination filesystem to have exactly the same file # data as the original filesystem. # The btrfs send implementation had a bug where it sent a clone # operation from file foo into file bar covering the whole [0, 100K[ # range after creating and writing the file foo. This was incorrect # because the file bar now included the updates done to file foo after # we cloned foo to bar, breaking the COW nature of reflink copies # (cloned extents). echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Another test case that reproduces the problem when we have compressed extents: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root _require_cp_reflink send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" # Create our file with an extent of 100K starting at file offset 0K. $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 100K" \ -c "fsync" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Rewrite part of the previous extent (its first 40K) and write a new # 100K extent starting at file offset 100K. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0K 40K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 100K 100K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Our file foo now has 3 file extent items in its metadata: # # 1) One covering the file range 0 to 40K; # 2) One covering the file range 40K to 100K, which points to the first # extent we wrote to the file and has a data offset field with value # 40K (our file no longer uses the first 40K of data from that # extent); # 3) One covering the file range 100K to 200K. # Now clone our file foo into file bar. cp --reflink=always $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/bar # Create our snapshot for the send operation. _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap echo "File digests in the original filesystem:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/snap -f $send_files_dir/1.snap # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving the send stream and verify we # get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. # Btrfs send used to issue a clone operation from foo's range # [80K, 140K[ to bar's range [40K, 100K[ when cloning the extent pointed # to by foo's second file extent item, this was incorrect because of bad # accounting of the file extent item's data offset field. The correct # range to clone from should have been [40K, 100K[. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount "-o compress" _run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap echo "File digests in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digests we got in the original filesystem. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/foo | _filter_scratch md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/snap/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2015-10-02 03:47:34 -06:00
ret = send_extent_data(sctx, offset, len);
}
Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-02-06 13:40:40 -07:00
sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset = offset + len;
out:
return ret;
}
static int is_extent_unchanged(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct btrfs_path *left_path,
struct btrfs_key *ekey)
{
int ret = 0;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_path *path = NULL;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
int slot;
struct btrfs_key found_key;
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *ei;
u64 left_disknr;
u64 right_disknr;
u64 left_offset;
u64 right_offset;
u64 left_offset_fixed;
u64 left_len;
u64 right_len;
u64 left_gen;
u64 right_gen;
u8 left_type;
u8 right_type;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
eb = left_path->nodes[0];
slot = left_path->slots[0];
ei = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, slot, struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
left_type = btrfs_file_extent_type(eb, ei);
if (left_type != BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_REG) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
left_disknr = btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(eb, ei);
left_len = btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(eb, ei);
left_offset = btrfs_file_extent_offset(eb, ei);
left_gen = btrfs_file_extent_generation(eb, ei);
/*
* Following comments will refer to these graphics. L is the left
* extents which we are checking at the moment. 1-8 are the right
* extents that we iterate.
*
* |-----L-----|
* |-1-|-2a-|-3-|-4-|-5-|-6-|
*
* |-----L-----|
* |--1--|-2b-|...(same as above)
*
* Alternative situation. Happens on files where extents got split.
* |-----L-----|
* |-----------7-----------|-6-|
*
* Alternative situation. Happens on files which got larger.
* |-----L-----|
* |-8-|
* Nothing follows after 8.
*/
key.objectid = ekey->objectid;
key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY;
key.offset = ekey->offset;
ret = btrfs_search_slot_for_read(sctx->parent_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
/*
* Handle special case where the right side has no extents at all.
*/
eb = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, slot);
if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid ||
found_key.type != key.type) {
/* If we're a hole then just pretend nothing changed */
ret = (left_disknr) ? 0 : 1;
goto out;
}
/*
* We're now on 2a, 2b or 7.
*/
key = found_key;
while (key.offset < ekey->offset + left_len) {
ei = btrfs_item_ptr(eb, slot, struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
right_type = btrfs_file_extent_type(eb, ei);
if (right_type != BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_REG &&
right_type != BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
if (right_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
right_len = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(eb, ei);
right_len = PAGE_ALIGN(right_len);
} else {
right_len = btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(eb, ei);
}
/*
* Are we at extent 8? If yes, we know the extent is changed.
* This may only happen on the first iteration.
*/
if (found_key.offset + right_len <= ekey->offset) {
/* If we're a hole just pretend nothing changed */
ret = (left_disknr) ? 0 : 1;
goto out;
}
/*
* We just wanted to see if when we have an inline extent, what
* follows it is a regular extent (wanted to check the above
* condition for inline extents too). This should normally not
* happen but it's possible for example when we have an inline
* compressed extent representing data with a size matching
* the page size (currently the same as sector size).
*/
if (right_type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid memory access When doing an incremental send, while processing an extent that changed between the parent and send snapshots and that extent was an inline extent in the parent snapshot, it's possible to access a memory region beyond the end of leaf if the inline extent is very small and it is the first item in a leaf. An example scenario is described below. The send snapshot has the following leaf: leaf 33865728 items 33 free space 773 generation 46 owner 5 fs uuid ab7090d8-dafd-4fb9-9246-723b6d2e2fb7 chunk uuid 2d16478c-c704-4ab9-b574-68bff2281b1f (...) item 14 key (335 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 3052 itemsize 53 generation 36 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 12791808 nr 4096 extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 4096 extent compression 0 (none) item 15 key (335 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 2999 itemsize 53 generation 36 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 138170368 nr 225280 extent data offset 0 nr 225280 ram 225280 extent compression 0 (none) (...) And the parent snapshot has the following leaf: leaf 31272960 items 17 free space 17 generation 31 owner 5 fs uuid ab7090d8-dafd-4fb9-9246-723b6d2e2fb7 chunk uuid 2d16478c-c704-4ab9-b574-68bff2281b1f item 0 key (335 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 3951 itemsize 44 generation 31 type 0 (inline) inline extent data size 23 ram_bytes 613 compression 1 (zlib) (...) When computing the send stream, it is detected that the extent of inode 335, at file offset 0, and at fs/btrfs/send.c:is_extent_unchanged() we grab the leaf from the parent snapshot and access the inline extent item. However, before jumping to the 'out' label, we access the 'offset' and 'disk_bytenr' fields of the extent item, which should not be done for inline extents since the inlined data starts at the offset of the 'disk_bytenr' field and can be very small. For example accessing the 'offset' field of the file extent item results in the following trace: [ 599.705368] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 599.706296] Modules linked in: btrfs psmouse i2c_piix4 ppdev acpi_cpufreq serio_raw parport_pc i2c_core evdev tpm_tis tpm_tis_core sg pcspkr parport tpm button su$ [ 599.709340] CPU: 7 PID: 5283 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.10.0-rc8-btrfs-next-46+ #1 [ 599.709340] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 599.709340] task: ffff88023eedd040 task.stack: ffffc90006658000 [ 599.709340] RIP: 0010:read_extent_buffer+0xdb/0xf4 [btrfs] [ 599.709340] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000665ba00 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 599.709340] RAX: db73880000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000001 [ 599.709340] RDX: ffffc9000665ba60 RSI: db73880000000000 RDI: ffffc9000665ba5f [ 599.709340] RBP: ffffc9000665ba30 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff88020dc5e098 [ 599.709340] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000160000000000 R12: 6db6db6db6db6db7 [ 599.709340] R13: ffff880000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88020dc5e088 [ 599.709340] FS: 00007f519555a8c0(0000) GS:ffff88023f3c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 599.709340] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 599.709340] CR2: 00007f1411afd000 CR3: 0000000235f8e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 599.709340] Call Trace: [ 599.709340] btrfs_get_token_64+0x93/0xce [btrfs] [ 599.709340] ? printk+0x48/0x50 [ 599.709340] btrfs_get_64+0xb/0xd [btrfs] [ 599.709340] process_extent+0x3a1/0x1106 [btrfs] [ 599.709340] ? btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0x5/0xef [btrfs] [ 599.709340] changed_cb+0xb03/0xb3d [btrfs] [ 599.709340] ? btrfs_get_token_32+0x7a/0xcc [btrfs] [ 599.709340] btrfs_compare_trees+0x432/0x53d [btrfs] [ 599.709340] ? process_extent+0x1106/0x1106 [btrfs] [ 599.709340] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x960/0xe26 [btrfs] [ 599.709340] btrfs_ioctl+0x181b/0x1fed [btrfs] [ 599.709340] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x150/0x1ac [ 599.709340] vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x38 [ 599.709340] ? vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x38 [ 599.709340] do_vfs_ioctl+0x611/0x645 [ 599.709340] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x5b/0x5d [ 599.709340] ? __fget+0x6d/0x79 [ 599.709340] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x7b [ 599.709340] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad [ 599.709340] RIP: 0033:0x7f51945eec47 [ 599.709340] RSP: 002b:00007ffc21c13e98 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 599.709340] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: ffffffff81096459 RCX: 00007f51945eec47 [ 599.709340] RDX: 00007ffc21c13f20 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 599.709340] RBP: ffffc9000665bf98 R08: 00007f519450d700 R09: 00007f519450d700 [ 599.709340] R10: 00007f519450d9d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000046 [ 599.709340] R13: ffffc9000665bf78 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007f5195574040 [ 599.709340] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x43/0xb1 [ 599.709340] Code: 29 f0 49 39 d8 4c 0f 47 c3 49 03 81 58 01 00 00 44 89 c1 4c 01 c2 4c 29 c3 48 c1 f8 03 49 0f af c4 48 c1 e0 0c 4c 01 e8 48 01 c6 <f3> a4 31 f6 4$ [ 599.709340] RIP: read_extent_buffer+0xdb/0xf4 [btrfs] RSP: ffffc9000665ba00 [ 599.762057] ---[ end trace fe00d7af61b9f49e ]--- This is because the 'offset' field starts at an offset of 37 bytes (offsetof(struct btrfs_file_extent_item, offset)), has a length of 8 bytes and therefore attemping to read it causes a 1 byte access beyond the end of the leaf, as the first item's content in a leaf is located at the tail of the leaf, the item size is 44 bytes and the offset of that field plus its length (37 + 8 = 45) goes beyond the item's size by 1 byte. So fix this by accessing the 'offset' and 'disk_bytenr' fields after jumping to the 'out' label if we are processing an inline extent. We move the reading operation of the 'disk_bytenr' field too because we have the same problem as for the 'offset' field explained above when the inline data is less then 8 bytes. The access to the 'generation' field is also moved but just for the sake of grouping access to all the fields. Fixes: e1cbfd7bf6da ("Btrfs: send, fix file hole not being preserved due to inline extent") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.12+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-07-06 08:31:46 -06:00
right_disknr = btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(eb, ei);
right_offset = btrfs_file_extent_offset(eb, ei);
right_gen = btrfs_file_extent_generation(eb, ei);
left_offset_fixed = left_offset;
if (key.offset < ekey->offset) {
/* Fix the right offset for 2a and 7. */
right_offset += ekey->offset - key.offset;
} else {
/* Fix the left offset for all behind 2a and 2b */
left_offset_fixed += key.offset - ekey->offset;
}
/*
* Check if we have the same extent.
*/
if (left_disknr != right_disknr ||
left_offset_fixed != right_offset ||
left_gen != right_gen) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
/*
* Go to the next extent.
*/
ret = btrfs_next_item(sctx->parent_root, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (!ret) {
eb = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, slot);
}
if (ret || found_key.objectid != key.objectid ||
found_key.type != key.type) {
key.offset += right_len;
break;
}
if (found_key.offset != key.offset + right_len) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
key = found_key;
}
/*
* We're now behind the left extent (treat as unchanged) or at the end
* of the right side (treat as changed).
*/
if (key.offset >= ekey->offset + left_len)
ret = 1;
else
ret = 0;
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
static int get_last_extent(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 offset)
{
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_root *root = sctx->send_root;
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
struct btrfs_key key;
u64 extent_end;
u8 type;
int ret;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
sctx->cur_inode_last_extent = 0;
key.objectid = sctx->cur_ino;
key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY;
key.offset = offset;
ret = btrfs_search_slot_for_read(root, &key, path, 0, 1);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = 0;
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &key, path->slots[0]);
if (key.objectid != sctx->cur_ino || key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY)
goto out;
fi = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
type = btrfs_file_extent_type(path->nodes[0], fi);
if (type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
u64 size = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(path->nodes[0], fi);
extent_end = ALIGN(key.offset + size,
sctx->send_root->fs_info->sectorsize);
} else {
extent_end = key.offset +
btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(path->nodes[0], fi);
}
sctx->cur_inode_last_extent = extent_end;
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, fix unnecessary hole writes for sparse files When using the NO_HOLES feature, during an incremental send we often issue write operations for holes when we should not, because that range is already a hole in the destination snapshot. While that does not change the contents of the file at the receiver, it avoids preservation of file holes, leading to wasted disk space and extra IO during send/receive. A couple examples where the holes are not preserved follows. $ mkfs.btrfs -O no-holes -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 4K" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 4K" -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 1028K 4K" /mnt/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 # Now add one new extent to our first test file, increasing its size and # leaving a 1Mb hole between the first extent and this new extent. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 1028K 4K" /mnt/foo # Now overwrite the last extent of our second test file. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 1028K 4K" /mnt/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/foo /mnt/snap2/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 25088..25095 8 0x2000 1: [8..2055]: hole 2048 2: [2056..2063]: 24576..24583 8 0x2001 $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/bar /mnt/snap2/bar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 25096..25103 8 0x2000 1: [8..2055]: hole 2048 2: [2056..2063]: 24584..24591 8 0x2001 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt # It's not relevant to enable no-holes in the new filesystem. $ mkfs.btrfs -O no-holes -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/foo /mnt/snap2/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 24576..24583 8 0x2000 1: [8..2063]: 25624..27679 2056 0x1 $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/bar /mnt/snap2/bar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 24584..24591 8 0x2000 1: [8..2063]: 27680..29735 2056 0x1 The holes do not exist in the second filesystem and they were replaced with extents filled with the byte 0x00, making each file take 1032Kb of space instead of 8Kb. So fix this by not issuing the write operations consisting of buffers filled with the byte 0x00 when the destination snapshot already has a hole for the respective range. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-02-14 10:56:32 -07:00
static int range_is_hole_in_parent(struct send_ctx *sctx,
const u64 start,
const u64 end)
{
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_root *root = sctx->parent_root;
u64 search_start = start;
int ret;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
key.objectid = sctx->cur_ino;
key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY;
key.offset = search_start;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret > 0 && path->slots[0] > 0)
path->slots[0]--;
while (search_start < end) {
struct extent_buffer *leaf = path->nodes[0];
int slot = path->slots[0];
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
u64 extent_end;
if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(leaf)) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(root, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
else if (ret > 0)
break;
continue;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot);
if (key.objectid < sctx->cur_ino ||
key.type < BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY)
goto next;
if (key.objectid > sctx->cur_ino ||
key.type > BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY ||
key.offset >= end)
break;
fi = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
if (btrfs_file_extent_type(leaf, fi) ==
BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
u64 size = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, fi);
Btrfs: incremental send, fix unnecessary hole writes for sparse files When using the NO_HOLES feature, during an incremental send we often issue write operations for holes when we should not, because that range is already a hole in the destination snapshot. While that does not change the contents of the file at the receiver, it avoids preservation of file holes, leading to wasted disk space and extra IO during send/receive. A couple examples where the holes are not preserved follows. $ mkfs.btrfs -O no-holes -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 4K" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 4K" -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 1028K 4K" /mnt/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 # Now add one new extent to our first test file, increasing its size and # leaving a 1Mb hole between the first extent and this new extent. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 1028K 4K" /mnt/foo # Now overwrite the last extent of our second test file. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 1028K 4K" /mnt/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/foo /mnt/snap2/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 25088..25095 8 0x2000 1: [8..2055]: hole 2048 2: [2056..2063]: 24576..24583 8 0x2001 $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/bar /mnt/snap2/bar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 25096..25103 8 0x2000 1: [8..2055]: hole 2048 2: [2056..2063]: 24584..24591 8 0x2001 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt # It's not relevant to enable no-holes in the new filesystem. $ mkfs.btrfs -O no-holes -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/foo /mnt/snap2/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 24576..24583 8 0x2000 1: [8..2063]: 25624..27679 2056 0x1 $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/bar /mnt/snap2/bar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 24584..24591 8 0x2000 1: [8..2063]: 27680..29735 2056 0x1 The holes do not exist in the second filesystem and they were replaced with extents filled with the byte 0x00, making each file take 1032Kb of space instead of 8Kb. So fix this by not issuing the write operations consisting of buffers filled with the byte 0x00 when the destination snapshot already has a hole for the respective range. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-02-14 10:56:32 -07:00
extent_end = ALIGN(key.offset + size,
root->fs_info->sectorsize);
} else {
extent_end = key.offset +
btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(leaf, fi);
}
if (extent_end <= start)
goto next;
if (btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(leaf, fi) == 0) {
search_start = extent_end;
goto next;
}
ret = 0;
goto out;
next:
path->slots[0]++;
}
ret = 1;
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
static int maybe_send_hole(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_key *key)
{
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
u64 extent_end;
u8 type;
int ret = 0;
if (sctx->cur_ino != key->objectid || !need_send_hole(sctx))
return 0;
if (sctx->cur_inode_last_extent == (u64)-1) {
ret = get_last_extent(sctx, key->offset - 1);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
fi = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
type = btrfs_file_extent_type(path->nodes[0], fi);
if (type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
u64 size = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(path->nodes[0], fi);
extent_end = ALIGN(key->offset + size,
sctx->send_root->fs_info->sectorsize);
} else {
extent_end = key->offset +
btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(path->nodes[0], fi);
}
if (path->slots[0] == 0 &&
sctx->cur_inode_last_extent < key->offset) {
/*
* We might have skipped entire leafs that contained only
* file extent items for our current inode. These leafs have
* a generation number smaller (older) than the one in the
* current leaf and the leaf our last extent came from, and
* are located between these 2 leafs.
*/
ret = get_last_extent(sctx, key->offset - 1);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
Btrfs: incremental send, fix unnecessary hole writes for sparse files When using the NO_HOLES feature, during an incremental send we often issue write operations for holes when we should not, because that range is already a hole in the destination snapshot. While that does not change the contents of the file at the receiver, it avoids preservation of file holes, leading to wasted disk space and extra IO during send/receive. A couple examples where the holes are not preserved follows. $ mkfs.btrfs -O no-holes -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 4K" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 4K" -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 1028K 4K" /mnt/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 # Now add one new extent to our first test file, increasing its size and # leaving a 1Mb hole between the first extent and this new extent. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 1028K 4K" /mnt/foo # Now overwrite the last extent of our second test file. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 1028K 4K" /mnt/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/foo /mnt/snap2/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 25088..25095 8 0x2000 1: [8..2055]: hole 2048 2: [2056..2063]: 24576..24583 8 0x2001 $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/bar /mnt/snap2/bar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 25096..25103 8 0x2000 1: [8..2055]: hole 2048 2: [2056..2063]: 24584..24591 8 0x2001 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.snap $ umount /mnt # It's not relevant to enable no-holes in the new filesystem. $ mkfs.btrfs -O no-holes -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap $ btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/foo /mnt/snap2/foo: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 24576..24583 8 0x2000 1: [8..2063]: 25624..27679 2056 0x1 $ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" /mnt/snap2/bar /mnt/snap2/bar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..7]: 24584..24591 8 0x2000 1: [8..2063]: 27680..29735 2056 0x1 The holes do not exist in the second filesystem and they were replaced with extents filled with the byte 0x00, making each file take 1032Kb of space instead of 8Kb. So fix this by not issuing the write operations consisting of buffers filled with the byte 0x00 when the destination snapshot already has a hole for the respective range. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
2017-02-14 10:56:32 -07:00
if (sctx->cur_inode_last_extent < key->offset) {
ret = range_is_hole_in_parent(sctx,
sctx->cur_inode_last_extent,
key->offset);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
else if (ret == 0)
ret = send_hole(sctx, key->offset);
else
ret = 0;
}
sctx->cur_inode_last_extent = extent_end;
return ret;
}
static int process_extent(struct send_ctx *sctx,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_key *key)
{
struct clone_root *found_clone = NULL;
int ret = 0;
if (S_ISLNK(sctx->cur_inode_mode))
return 0;
if (sctx->parent_root && !sctx->cur_inode_new) {
ret = is_extent_unchanged(sctx, path, key);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = 0;
goto out_hole;
}
} else {
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *ei;
u8 type;
ei = btrfs_item_ptr(path->nodes[0], path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
type = btrfs_file_extent_type(path->nodes[0], ei);
if (type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_PREALLOC ||
type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_REG) {
/*
* The send spec does not have a prealloc command yet,
* so just leave a hole for prealloc'ed extents until
* we have enough commands queued up to justify rev'ing
* the send spec.
*/
if (type == BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_PREALLOC) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
/* Have a hole, just skip it. */
if (btrfs_file_extent_disk_bytenr(path->nodes[0], ei) == 0) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
}
}
ret = find_extent_clone(sctx, path, key->objectid, key->offset,
sctx->cur_inode_size, &found_clone);
if (ret != -ENOENT && ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = send_write_or_clone(sctx, path, key, found_clone);
if (ret)
goto out;
out_hole:
ret = maybe_send_hole(sctx, path, key);
out:
return ret;
}
static int process_all_extents(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret;
struct btrfs_root *root;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_key found_key;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
int slot;
root = sctx->send_root;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
key.objectid = sctx->cmp_key->objectid;
key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
while (1) {
eb = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(eb)) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(root, path);
if (ret < 0) {
goto out;
} else if (ret > 0) {
ret = 0;
break;
}
continue;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &found_key, slot);
if (found_key.objectid != key.objectid ||
found_key.type != key.type) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
ret = process_extent(sctx, path, &found_key);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
path->slots[0]++;
}
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
static int process_recorded_refs_if_needed(struct send_ctx *sctx, int at_end,
int *pending_move,
int *refs_processed)
{
int ret = 0;
if (sctx->cur_ino == 0)
goto out;
if (!at_end && sctx->cur_ino == sctx->cmp_key->objectid &&
sctx->cmp_key->type <= BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY)
goto out;
if (list_empty(&sctx->new_refs) && list_empty(&sctx->deleted_refs))
goto out;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
ret = process_recorded_refs(sctx, pending_move);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
*refs_processed = 1;
out:
return ret;
}
static int finish_inode_if_needed(struct send_ctx *sctx, int at_end)
{
int ret = 0;
u64 left_mode;
u64 left_uid;
u64 left_gid;
u64 right_mode;
u64 right_uid;
u64 right_gid;
int need_chmod = 0;
int need_chown = 0;
Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-02-06 13:40:40 -07:00
int need_truncate = 1;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
int pending_move = 0;
int refs_processed = 0;
Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item) since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then fail with errno ENOENT. Example using a full send with a subvolume: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar # keep an open file descriptor on file bar $ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar $ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar # Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while # holding the open file descriptor. $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1 At subvol /mnt/sv1 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory Example using an incremental send with snapshots: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1 $ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2 # Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while # holding an open file descriptor on it. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false $ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo $ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo # Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode items, such as xattrs and extents). A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reported-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-07-24 04:54:04 -06:00
if (sctx->ignore_cur_inode)
return 0;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
ret = process_recorded_refs_if_needed(sctx, at_end, &pending_move,
&refs_processed);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
/*
* We have processed the refs and thus need to advance send_progress.
* Now, calls to get_cur_xxx will take the updated refs of the current
* inode into account.
*
* On the other hand, if our current inode is a directory and couldn't
* be moved/renamed because its parent was renamed/moved too and it has
* a higher inode number, we can only move/rename our current inode
* after we moved/renamed its parent. Therefore in this case operate on
* the old path (pre move/rename) of our current inode, and the
* move/rename will be performed later.
*/
if (refs_processed && !pending_move)
sctx->send_progress = sctx->cur_ino + 1;
if (sctx->cur_ino == 0 || sctx->cur_inode_deleted)
goto out;
if (!at_end && sctx->cmp_key->objectid == sctx->cur_ino)
goto out;
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->send_root, sctx->cur_ino, NULL, NULL,
&left_mode, &left_uid, &left_gid, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (!sctx->parent_root || sctx->cur_inode_new) {
need_chown = 1;
if (!S_ISLNK(sctx->cur_inode_mode))
need_chmod = 1;
Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-02-06 13:40:40 -07:00
if (sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset == sctx->cur_inode_size)
need_truncate = 0;
} else {
Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-02-06 13:40:40 -07:00
u64 old_size;
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->parent_root, sctx->cur_ino,
Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-02-06 13:40:40 -07:00
&old_size, NULL, &right_mode, &right_uid,
&right_gid, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (left_uid != right_uid || left_gid != right_gid)
need_chown = 1;
if (!S_ISLNK(sctx->cur_inode_mode) && left_mode != right_mode)
need_chmod = 1;
Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-02-06 13:40:40 -07:00
if ((old_size == sctx->cur_inode_size) ||
(sctx->cur_inode_size > old_size &&
sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset == sctx->cur_inode_size))
need_truncate = 0;
}
if (S_ISREG(sctx->cur_inode_mode)) {
if (need_send_hole(sctx)) {
Btrfs: send, fix data corruption due to incorrect hole detection During an incremental send, when we finish processing an inode (corresponding to a regular file) we would assume the gap between the end of the last processed file extent and the file's size corresponded to a file hole, and therefore incorrectly send a bunch of zero bytes to overwrite that region in the file. This affects only kernel 3.14. Reproducer: mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc mount /dev/sdc /mnt xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 268435456" /mnt/foo btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap0 xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x01 -b 9216 16190218 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x02 -b 1121 198720104 1121" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x05 -b 9216 107887439 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x06 -b 9216 225520207 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x07 -b 67584 102138300 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x08 -b 7000 94897484 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x09 -b 113664 245083212 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x10 -b 123 17937788 123" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x11 -b 39936 229573311 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x12 -b 67584 174792222 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x13 -b 9216 249253213 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x16 -b 67584 150046083 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x17 -b 39936 118246040 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x18 -b 67584 215965442 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x19 -b 33792 97096725 33792" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x20 -b 125952 166300596 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x21 -b 123 1078957 123" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x25 -b 9216 212044492 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x26 -b 7000 265037146 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x27 -b 42757 215922685 42757" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x28 -b 7000 69865411 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x29 -b 67584 67948958 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x30 -b 39936 266967019 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x31 -b 1121 19582453 1121" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x32 -b 17408 257710255 17408" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x33 -b 39936 3895518 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x34 -b 125952 12045847 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x35 -b 17408 19156379 17408" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x36 -b 39936 50160066 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x37 -b 113664 9549793 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x38 -b 105472 94391506 105472" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x39 -b 23552 143632863 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x40 -b 39936 241283845 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x41 -b 113664 199937606 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x42 -b 67584 67380093 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x43 -b 67584 26793129 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x44 -b 39936 14421913 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x45 -b 123 253097405 123" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x46 -b 1121 128233424 1121" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x47 -b 105472 91577959 105472" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x48 -b 1121 7245381 1121" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x49 -b 113664 182414694 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x50 -b 9216 32750608 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x51 -b 67584 266546049 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x52 -b 67584 87969398 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x53 -b 9216 260848797 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x54 -b 39936 119461243 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x55 -b 7000 200178693 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x56 -b 9216 243316029 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x57 -b 7000 209658229 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x58 -b 101376 179745192 101376" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x59 -b 9216 64012300 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x60 -b 125952 181705139 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x61 -b 23552 235737348 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x62 -b 113664 106021355 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x63 -b 67584 135753552 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x64 -b 23552 95730888 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x65 -b 11 17311415 11" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x66 -b 33792 120695553 33792" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x67 -b 9216 17164631 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x68 -b 9216 136065853 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x69 -b 67584 37752198 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x70 -b 101376 189717473 101376" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x71 -b 7000 227463698 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x72 -b 9216 12655137 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x73 -b 7000 7488866 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x74 -b 113664 87813649 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x75 -b 33792 25802183 33792" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x76 -b 39936 93524024 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x77 -b 33792 113336388 33792" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x78 -b 105472 184955320 105472" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x79 -b 101376 225691598 101376" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x80 -b 23552 77023155 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x81 -b 11 201888192 11" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x82 -b 11 115332492 11" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x83 -b 67584 230278015 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x84 -b 11 120589073 11" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x85 -b 125952 202207819 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x86 -b 113664 86672080 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x87 -b 17408 208459603 17408" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x88 -b 7000 73372211 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x89 -b 7000 42252122 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x90 -b 23552 46784881 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x91 -b 101376 63172351 101376" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x92 -b 23552 59341931 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x93 -b 39936 239599283 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x94 -b 67584 175643105 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x97 -b 23552 105534880 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x98 -b 113664 8236844 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x99 -b 125952 144489686 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa0 -b 7000 73273112 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa1 -b 125952 194580243 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa2 -b 123 56296779 123" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa3 -b 11 233066845 11" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa4 -b 39936 197727090 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa5 -b 101376 53579812 101376" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa6 -b 9216 85669738 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa7 -b 125952 21266322 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa8 -b 23552 125726568 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa9 -b 9216 18423680 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb0 -b 1121 165901483 1121" /mnt/foo btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1 xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 10 16190218 10" /mnt/foo btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2 md5sum /mnt/foo # returns 79e53f1466bfc09fd82b450689e6119e md5sum /mnt/mysnap2/foo # returns 79e53f1466bfc09fd82b450689e6119e too btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/2.snap mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc mount /dev/sdc /mnt btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap md5sum /mnt/mysnap2/foo # returns 2bb414c5155767cedccd7063e51beabd !! A testcase for xfstests follows soon too. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-30 16:02:53 -06:00
if (sctx->cur_inode_last_extent == (u64)-1 ||
sctx->cur_inode_last_extent <
sctx->cur_inode_size) {
ret = get_last_extent(sctx, (u64)-1);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
if (sctx->cur_inode_last_extent <
sctx->cur_inode_size) {
ret = send_hole(sctx, sctx->cur_inode_size);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
}
Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-02-06 13:40:40 -07:00
if (need_truncate) {
ret = send_truncate(sctx, sctx->cur_ino,
sctx->cur_inode_gen,
sctx->cur_inode_size);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
}
if (need_chown) {
ret = send_chown(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen,
left_uid, left_gid);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
if (need_chmod) {
ret = send_chmod(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen,
left_mode);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
btrfs: send: emit file capabilities after chown commit 89efda52e6b6930f80f5adda9c3c9edfb1397191 upstream. Whenever a chown is executed, all capabilities of the file being touched are lost. When doing incremental send with a file with capabilities, there is a situation where the capability can be lost on the receiving side. The sequence of actions bellow shows the problem: $ mount /dev/sda fs1 $ mount /dev/sdb fs2 $ touch fs1/foo.bar $ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_init $ btrfs send fs1/snap_init | btrfs receive fs2 $ chgrp adm fs1/foo.bar $ setcap cap_sys_nice+ep fs1/foo.bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_complete $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r fs1 fs1/snap_incremental $ btrfs send fs1/snap_complete | btrfs receive fs2 $ btrfs send -p fs1/snap_init fs1/snap_incremental | btrfs receive fs2 At this point, only a chown was emitted by "btrfs send" since only the group was changed. This makes the cap_sys_nice capability to be dropped from fs2/snap_incremental/foo.bar To fix that, only emit capabilities after chown is emitted. The current code first checks for xattrs that are new/changed, emits them, and later emit the chown. Now, __process_new_xattr skips capabilities, letting only finish_inode_if_needed to emit them, if they exist, for the inode being processed. This behavior was being worked around in "btrfs receive" side by caching the capability and only applying it after chown. Now, xattrs are only emmited _after_ chown, making that workaround not needed anymore. Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/202 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Suggested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-10 20:15:07 -06:00
ret = send_capabilities(sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
/*
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
* If other directory inodes depended on our current directory
* inode's move/rename, now do their move/rename operations.
*/
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
if (!is_waiting_for_move(sctx, sctx->cur_ino)) {
ret = apply_children_dir_moves(sctx);
if (ret)
goto out;
/*
* Need to send that every time, no matter if it actually
* changed between the two trees as we have done changes to
* the inode before. If our inode is a directory and it's
* waiting to be moved/renamed, we will send its utimes when
* it's moved/renamed, therefore we don't need to do it here.
*/
sctx->send_progress = sctx->cur_ino + 1;
ret = send_utimes(sctx, sctx->cur_ino, sctx->cur_inode_gen);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
}
out:
return ret;
}
Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item) since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then fail with errno ENOENT. Example using a full send with a subvolume: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar # keep an open file descriptor on file bar $ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar $ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar # Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while # holding the open file descriptor. $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1 At subvol /mnt/sv1 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory Example using an incremental send with snapshots: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1 $ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2 # Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while # holding an open file descriptor on it. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false $ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo $ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo # Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode items, such as xattrs and extents). A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reported-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-07-24 04:54:04 -06:00
struct parent_paths_ctx {
struct list_head *refs;
struct send_ctx *sctx;
};
static int record_parent_ref(int num, u64 dir, int index, struct fs_path *name,
void *ctx)
{
struct parent_paths_ctx *ppctx = ctx;
return record_ref(ppctx->sctx->parent_root, dir, name, ppctx->sctx,
ppctx->refs);
}
/*
* Issue unlink operations for all paths of the current inode found in the
* parent snapshot.
*/
static int btrfs_unlink_all_paths(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
LIST_HEAD(deleted_refs);
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct parent_paths_ctx ctx;
int ret;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
key.objectid = sctx->cur_ino;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, sctx->parent_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ctx.refs = &deleted_refs;
ctx.sctx = sctx;
while (true) {
struct extent_buffer *eb = path->nodes[0];
int slot = path->slots[0];
if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(eb)) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(sctx->parent_root, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
else if (ret > 0)
break;
continue;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, slot);
if (key.objectid != sctx->cur_ino)
break;
if (key.type != BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY &&
key.type != BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY)
break;
ret = iterate_inode_ref(sctx->parent_root, path, &key, 1,
record_parent_ref, &ctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
path->slots[0]++;
}
while (!list_empty(&deleted_refs)) {
struct recorded_ref *ref;
ref = list_first_entry(&deleted_refs, struct recorded_ref, list);
ret = send_unlink(sctx, ref->full_path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
fs_path_free(ref->full_path);
list_del(&ref->list);
kfree(ref);
}
ret = 0;
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
if (ret)
__free_recorded_refs(&deleted_refs);
return ret;
}
static int changed_inode(struct send_ctx *sctx,
enum btrfs_compare_tree_result result)
{
int ret = 0;
struct btrfs_key *key = sctx->cmp_key;
struct btrfs_inode_item *left_ii = NULL;
struct btrfs_inode_item *right_ii = NULL;
u64 left_gen = 0;
u64 right_gen = 0;
sctx->cur_ino = key->objectid;
sctx->cur_inode_new_gen = 0;
sctx->cur_inode_last_extent = (u64)-1;
Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations When send finishes processing an inode representing a regular file, it always issues a truncate operation for that file, even if its size did not change or the last write sets the file size correctly. In the most common cases, the issued write operations set the file to correct size (either full or incremental sends) or the file size did not change (for incremental sends), so the only case where a truncate operation is needed is when a file size becomes smaller in the send snapshot when compared to the parent snapshot. By not issuing unnecessary truncate operations we reduce the stream size and save time in the receiver. Currently truncating a file to the same size triggers writeback of its last page (if it's dirty) and waits for it to complete (only if the file size is not aligned with the filesystem's sector size). This is being fixed by another patch and is independent of this change (that patch's title is "Btrfs: skip writeback of last page when truncating file to same size"). The following script was used to measure time spent by a receiver without this change applied, with this change applied, and without this change and with the truncate fix applied (the fix to not make it start and wait for writeback to complete). $ cat test_send.sh #!/bin/bash SRC_DEV=/dev/sdc DST_DEV=/dev/sdd SRC_MNT=/mnt/sdc DST_MNT=/mnt/sdd mkfs.btrfs -f $SRC_DEV >/dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $DST_DEV >/dev/null mount $SRC_DEV $SRC_MNT mount $DST_DEV $DST_MNT echo "Creating source filesystem" for ((t = 0; t < 10; t++)); do ( for ((i = 1; i <= 20000; i++)); do xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 5000" \ $SRC_MNT/file_$i > /dev/null done ) & worker_pids[$t]=$! done wait ${worker_pids[@]} echo "Creating and sending snapshot" btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $SRC_MNT $SRC_MNT/snap1 >/dev/null /usr/bin/time -f "send took %e seconds" \ btrfs send -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $SRC_MNT/snap1 /usr/bin/time -f "receive took %e seconds" \ btrfs receive -f $SRC_MNT/send_file $DST_MNT umount $SRC_MNT umount $DST_MNT The results, which are averages for 5 runs for each case, were the following: * Without this change average receive time was 26.49 seconds standard deviation of 2.53 seconds * Without this change and with the truncate fix average receive time was 12.51 seconds standard deviation of 0.32 seconds * With this change and without the truncate fix average receive time was 10.02 seconds standard deviation of 1.11 seconds Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-02-06 13:40:40 -07:00
sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset = 0;
Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item) since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then fail with errno ENOENT. Example using a full send with a subvolume: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar # keep an open file descriptor on file bar $ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar $ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar # Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while # holding the open file descriptor. $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1 At subvol /mnt/sv1 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory Example using an incremental send with snapshots: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1 $ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2 # Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while # holding an open file descriptor on it. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false $ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo $ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo # Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode items, such as xattrs and extents). A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reported-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-07-24 04:54:04 -06:00
sctx->ignore_cur_inode = false;
/*
* Set send_progress to current inode. This will tell all get_cur_xxx
* functions that the current inode's refs are not updated yet. Later,
* when process_recorded_refs is finished, it is set to cur_ino + 1.
*/
sctx->send_progress = sctx->cur_ino;
if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW ||
result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED) {
left_ii = btrfs_item_ptr(sctx->left_path->nodes[0],
sctx->left_path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_inode_item);
left_gen = btrfs_inode_generation(sctx->left_path->nodes[0],
left_ii);
} else {
right_ii = btrfs_item_ptr(sctx->right_path->nodes[0],
sctx->right_path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_inode_item);
right_gen = btrfs_inode_generation(sctx->right_path->nodes[0],
right_ii);
}
if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED) {
right_ii = btrfs_item_ptr(sctx->right_path->nodes[0],
sctx->right_path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_inode_item);
right_gen = btrfs_inode_generation(sctx->right_path->nodes[0],
right_ii);
/*
* The cur_ino = root dir case is special here. We can't treat
* the inode as deleted+reused because it would generate a
* stream that tries to delete/mkdir the root dir.
*/
if (left_gen != right_gen &&
sctx->cur_ino != BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
sctx->cur_inode_new_gen = 1;
}
Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item) since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then fail with errno ENOENT. Example using a full send with a subvolume: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar # keep an open file descriptor on file bar $ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar $ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar # Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while # holding the open file descriptor. $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1 At subvol /mnt/sv1 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory Example using an incremental send with snapshots: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1 $ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2 # Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while # holding an open file descriptor on it. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false $ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo $ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo # Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode items, such as xattrs and extents). A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reported-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-07-24 04:54:04 -06:00
/*
* Normally we do not find inodes with a link count of zero (orphans)
* because the most common case is to create a snapshot and use it
* for a send operation. However other less common use cases involve
* using a subvolume and send it after turning it to RO mode just
* after deleting all hard links of a file while holding an open
* file descriptor against it or turning a RO snapshot into RW mode,
* keep an open file descriptor against a file, delete it and then
* turn the snapshot back to RO mode before using it for a send
* operation. So if we find such cases, ignore the inode and all its
* items completely if it's a new inode, or if it's a changed inode
* make sure all its previous paths (from the parent snapshot) are all
* unlinked and all other the inode items are ignored.
*/
if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW ||
result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED) {
u32 nlinks;
nlinks = btrfs_inode_nlink(sctx->left_path->nodes[0], left_ii);
if (nlinks == 0) {
sctx->ignore_cur_inode = true;
if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED)
ret = btrfs_unlink_all_paths(sctx);
goto out;
}
}
if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW) {
sctx->cur_inode_gen = left_gen;
sctx->cur_inode_new = 1;
sctx->cur_inode_deleted = 0;
sctx->cur_inode_size = btrfs_inode_size(
sctx->left_path->nodes[0], left_ii);
sctx->cur_inode_mode = btrfs_inode_mode(
sctx->left_path->nodes[0], left_ii);
sctx->cur_inode_rdev = btrfs_inode_rdev(
sctx->left_path->nodes[0], left_ii);
if (sctx->cur_ino != BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
ret = send_create_inode_if_needed(sctx);
} else if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_DELETED) {
sctx->cur_inode_gen = right_gen;
sctx->cur_inode_new = 0;
sctx->cur_inode_deleted = 1;
sctx->cur_inode_size = btrfs_inode_size(
sctx->right_path->nodes[0], right_ii);
sctx->cur_inode_mode = btrfs_inode_mode(
sctx->right_path->nodes[0], right_ii);
} else if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED) {
/*
* We need to do some special handling in case the inode was
* reported as changed with a changed generation number. This
* means that the original inode was deleted and new inode
* reused the same inum. So we have to treat the old inode as
* deleted and the new one as new.
*/
if (sctx->cur_inode_new_gen) {
/*
* First, process the inode as if it was deleted.
*/
sctx->cur_inode_gen = right_gen;
sctx->cur_inode_new = 0;
sctx->cur_inode_deleted = 1;
sctx->cur_inode_size = btrfs_inode_size(
sctx->right_path->nodes[0], right_ii);
sctx->cur_inode_mode = btrfs_inode_mode(
sctx->right_path->nodes[0], right_ii);
ret = process_all_refs(sctx,
BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_DELETED);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
/*
* Now process the inode as if it was new.
*/
sctx->cur_inode_gen = left_gen;
sctx->cur_inode_new = 1;
sctx->cur_inode_deleted = 0;
sctx->cur_inode_size = btrfs_inode_size(
sctx->left_path->nodes[0], left_ii);
sctx->cur_inode_mode = btrfs_inode_mode(
sctx->left_path->nodes[0], left_ii);
sctx->cur_inode_rdev = btrfs_inode_rdev(
sctx->left_path->nodes[0], left_ii);
ret = send_create_inode_if_needed(sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = process_all_refs(sctx, BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
/*
* Advance send_progress now as we did not get into
* process_recorded_refs_if_needed in the new_gen case.
*/
sctx->send_progress = sctx->cur_ino + 1;
/*
* Now process all extents and xattrs of the inode as if
* they were all new.
*/
ret = process_all_extents(sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = process_all_new_xattrs(sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
} else {
sctx->cur_inode_gen = left_gen;
sctx->cur_inode_new = 0;
sctx->cur_inode_new_gen = 0;
sctx->cur_inode_deleted = 0;
sctx->cur_inode_size = btrfs_inode_size(
sctx->left_path->nodes[0], left_ii);
sctx->cur_inode_mode = btrfs_inode_mode(
sctx->left_path->nodes[0], left_ii);
}
}
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* We have to process new refs before deleted refs, but compare_trees gives us
* the new and deleted refs mixed. To fix this, we record the new/deleted refs
* first and later process them in process_recorded_refs.
* For the cur_inode_new_gen case, we skip recording completely because
* changed_inode did already initiate processing of refs. The reason for this is
* that in this case, compare_tree actually compares the refs of 2 different
* inodes. To fix this, process_all_refs is used in changed_inode to handle all
* refs of the right tree as deleted and all refs of the left tree as new.
*/
static int changed_ref(struct send_ctx *sctx,
enum btrfs_compare_tree_result result)
{
int ret = 0;
if (sctx->cur_ino != sctx->cmp_key->objectid) {
inconsistent_snapshot_error(sctx, result, "reference");
return -EIO;
}
if (!sctx->cur_inode_new_gen &&
sctx->cur_ino != BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID) {
if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW)
ret = record_new_ref(sctx);
else if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_DELETED)
ret = record_deleted_ref(sctx);
else if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED)
ret = record_changed_ref(sctx);
}
return ret;
}
/*
* Process new/deleted/changed xattrs. We skip processing in the
* cur_inode_new_gen case because changed_inode did already initiate processing
* of xattrs. The reason is the same as in changed_ref
*/
static int changed_xattr(struct send_ctx *sctx,
enum btrfs_compare_tree_result result)
{
int ret = 0;
if (sctx->cur_ino != sctx->cmp_key->objectid) {
inconsistent_snapshot_error(sctx, result, "xattr");
return -EIO;
}
if (!sctx->cur_inode_new_gen && !sctx->cur_inode_deleted) {
if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW)
ret = process_new_xattr(sctx);
else if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_DELETED)
ret = process_deleted_xattr(sctx);
else if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED)
ret = process_changed_xattr(sctx);
}
return ret;
}
/*
* Process new/deleted/changed extents. We skip processing in the
* cur_inode_new_gen case because changed_inode did already initiate processing
* of extents. The reason is the same as in changed_ref
*/
static int changed_extent(struct send_ctx *sctx,
enum btrfs_compare_tree_result result)
{
int ret = 0;
Btrfs: fix incremental send failure after deduplication When doing an incremental send operation we can fail if we previously did deduplication operations against a file that exists in both snapshots. In that case we will fail the send operation with -EIO and print a message to dmesg/syslog like the following: BTRFS error (device sdc): Send: inconsistent snapshot, found updated \ extent for inode 257 without updated inode item, send root is 258, \ parent root is 257 This requires that we deduplicate to the same file in both snapshots for the same amount of times on each snapshot. The issue happens because a deduplication only updates the iversion of an inode and does not update any other field of the inode, therefore if we deduplicate the file on each snapshot for the same amount of time, the inode will have the same iversion value (stored as the "sequence" field on the inode item) on both snapshots, therefore it will be seen as unchanged between in the send snapshot while there are new/updated/deleted extent items when comparing to the parent snapshot. This makes the send operation return -EIO and print an error message. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt # Create our first file. The first half of the file has several 64Kb # extents while the second half as a single 512Kb extent. $ xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 -b 64K 0 512K" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 512K 512K" /mnt/foo # Create the base snapshot and the parent send stream from it. $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/mysnap1 # Create our second file, that has exactly the same data as the first # file. $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 0 1M" /mnt/bar # Create the second snapshot, used for the incremental send, before # doing the file deduplication. $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2 # Now before creating the incremental send stream: # # 1) Deduplicate into a subrange of file foo in snapshot mysnap1. This # will drop several extent items and add a new one, also updating # the inode's iversion (sequence field in inode item) by 1, but not # any other field of the inode; # # 2) Deduplicate into a different subrange of file foo in snapshot # mysnap2. This will replace an extent item with a new one, also # updating the inode's iversion by 1 but not any other field of the # inode. # # After these two deduplication operations, the inode items, for file # foo, are identical in both snapshots, but we have different extent # items for this inode in both snapshots. We want to check this doesn't # cause send to fail with an error or produce an incorrect stream. $ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 0 0 512K" /mnt/mysnap1/foo $ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 512K 512K 512K" /mnt/mysnap2/foo # Create the incremental send stream. $ btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/mysnap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -5: Input/output error This issue started happening back in 2015 when deduplication was updated to not update the inode's ctime and mtime and update only the iversion. Back then we would hit a BUG_ON() in send, but later in 2016 send was updated to return -EIO and print the error message instead of doing the BUG_ON(). A test case for fstests follows soon. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203933 Fixes: 1c919a5e13702c ("btrfs: don't update mtime/ctime on deduped inodes") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-07-17 06:23:39 -06:00
/*
* We have found an extent item that changed without the inode item
* having changed. This can happen either after relocation (where the
* disk_bytenr of an extent item is replaced at
* relocation.c:replace_file_extents()) or after deduplication into a
* file in both the parent and send snapshots (where an extent item can
* get modified or replaced with a new one). Note that deduplication
* updates the inode item, but it only changes the iversion (sequence
* field in the inode item) of the inode, so if a file is deduplicated
* the same amount of times in both the parent and send snapshots, its
* iversion becames the same in both snapshots, whence the inode item is
* the same on both snapshots.
*/
if (sctx->cur_ino != sctx->cmp_key->objectid)
return 0;
if (!sctx->cur_inode_new_gen && !sctx->cur_inode_deleted) {
if (result != BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_DELETED)
ret = process_extent(sctx, sctx->left_path,
sctx->cmp_key);
}
return ret;
}
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
static int dir_changed(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 dir)
{
u64 orig_gen, new_gen;
int ret;
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->send_root, dir, NULL, &new_gen, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = get_inode_info(sctx->parent_root, dir, NULL, &orig_gen, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;
return (orig_gen != new_gen) ? 1 : 0;
}
static int compare_refs(struct send_ctx *sctx, struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_key *key)
{
struct btrfs_inode_extref *extref;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
u64 dirid = 0, last_dirid = 0;
unsigned long ptr;
u32 item_size;
u32 cur_offset = 0;
int ref_name_len;
int ret = 0;
/* Easy case, just check this one dirid */
if (key->type == BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY) {
dirid = key->offset;
ret = dir_changed(sctx, dirid);
goto out;
}
leaf = path->nodes[0];
item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, path->slots[0]);
ptr = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, path->slots[0]);
while (cur_offset < item_size) {
extref = (struct btrfs_inode_extref *)(ptr +
cur_offset);
dirid = btrfs_inode_extref_parent(leaf, extref);
ref_name_len = btrfs_inode_extref_name_len(leaf, extref);
cur_offset += ref_name_len + sizeof(*extref);
if (dirid == last_dirid)
continue;
ret = dir_changed(sctx, dirid);
if (ret)
break;
last_dirid = dirid;
}
out:
return ret;
}
/*
* Updates compare related fields in sctx and simply forwards to the actual
* changed_xxx functions.
*/
static int changed_cb(struct btrfs_path *left_path,
struct btrfs_path *right_path,
struct btrfs_key *key,
enum btrfs_compare_tree_result result,
void *ctx)
{
int ret = 0;
struct send_ctx *sctx = ctx;
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
if (result == BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME) {
if (key->type == BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY ||
key->type == BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY) {
ret = compare_refs(sctx, left_path, key);
if (!ret)
return 0;
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
} else if (key->type == BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY) {
return maybe_send_hole(sctx, left_path, key);
} else {
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
return 0;
}
Btrfs: fix send issues related to inode number reuse If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive. In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs list. This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send volume to compare with. There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether. Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
2013-08-16 14:52:55 -06:00
result = BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED;
ret = 0;
}
sctx->left_path = left_path;
sctx->right_path = right_path;
sctx->cmp_key = key;
ret = finish_inode_if_needed(sctx, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
/* Ignore non-FS objects */
if (key->objectid == BTRFS_FREE_INO_OBJECTID ||
key->objectid == BTRFS_FREE_SPACE_OBJECTID)
goto out;
Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item) since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then fail with errno ENOENT. Example using a full send with a subvolume: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar # keep an open file descriptor on file bar $ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar $ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar # Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while # holding the open file descriptor. $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1 At subvol /mnt/sv1 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory Example using an incremental send with snapshots: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1 $ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2 # Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while # holding an open file descriptor on it. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false $ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo $ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo # Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode items, such as xattrs and extents). A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reported-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-07-24 04:54:04 -06:00
if (key->type == BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY) {
ret = changed_inode(sctx, result);
Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item) since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then fail with errno ENOENT. Example using a full send with a subvolume: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar # keep an open file descriptor on file bar $ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar $ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar # Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while # holding the open file descriptor. $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1 At subvol /mnt/sv1 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory Example using an incremental send with snapshots: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1 $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1 $ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2 # Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while # holding an open file descriptor on it. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false $ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo $ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo # Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send. $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 At subvol /mnt/snap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode items, such as xattrs and extents). A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reported-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-07-24 04:54:04 -06:00
} else if (!sctx->ignore_cur_inode) {
if (key->type == BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY ||
key->type == BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY)
ret = changed_ref(sctx, result);
else if (key->type == BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY)
ret = changed_xattr(sctx, result);
else if (key->type == BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY)
ret = changed_extent(sctx, result);
}
out:
return ret;
}
static int full_send_tree(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret;
struct btrfs_root *send_root = sctx->send_root;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct extent_buffer *eb;
int slot;
path = alloc_path_for_send();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
key.objectid = BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID;
key.type = BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = 0;
ret = btrfs_search_slot_for_read(send_root, &key, path, 1, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret)
goto out_finish;
while (1) {
eb = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, slot);
ret = changed_cb(path, NULL, &key,
BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW, sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = btrfs_next_item(send_root, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret) {
ret = 0;
break;
}
}
out_finish:
ret = finish_inode_if_needed(sctx, 1);
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
static int tree_move_down(struct btrfs_path *path, int *level)
{
struct extent_buffer *eb;
BUG_ON(*level == 0);
eb = btrfs_read_node_slot(path->nodes[*level], path->slots[*level]);
if (IS_ERR(eb))
return PTR_ERR(eb);
path->nodes[*level - 1] = eb;
path->slots[*level - 1] = 0;
(*level)--;
return 0;
}
static int tree_move_next_or_upnext(struct btrfs_path *path,
int *level, int root_level)
{
int ret = 0;
int nritems;
nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[*level]);
path->slots[*level]++;
while (path->slots[*level] >= nritems) {
if (*level == root_level)
return -1;
/* move upnext */
path->slots[*level] = 0;
free_extent_buffer(path->nodes[*level]);
path->nodes[*level] = NULL;
(*level)++;
path->slots[*level]++;
nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[*level]);
ret = 1;
}
return ret;
}
/*
* Returns 1 if it had to move up and next. 0 is returned if it moved only next
* or down.
*/
static int tree_advance(struct btrfs_path *path,
int *level, int root_level,
int allow_down,
struct btrfs_key *key)
{
int ret;
if (*level == 0 || !allow_down) {
ret = tree_move_next_or_upnext(path, level, root_level);
} else {
ret = tree_move_down(path, level);
}
if (ret >= 0) {
if (*level == 0)
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[*level], key,
path->slots[*level]);
else
btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[*level], key,
path->slots[*level]);
}
return ret;
}
static int tree_compare_item(struct btrfs_path *left_path,
struct btrfs_path *right_path,
char *tmp_buf)
{
int cmp;
int len1, len2;
unsigned long off1, off2;
len1 = btrfs_item_size_nr(left_path->nodes[0], left_path->slots[0]);
len2 = btrfs_item_size_nr(right_path->nodes[0], right_path->slots[0]);
if (len1 != len2)
return 1;
off1 = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(left_path->nodes[0], left_path->slots[0]);
off2 = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(right_path->nodes[0],
right_path->slots[0]);
read_extent_buffer(left_path->nodes[0], tmp_buf, off1, len1);
cmp = memcmp_extent_buffer(right_path->nodes[0], tmp_buf, off2, len1);
if (cmp)
return 1;
return 0;
}
/*
* This function compares two trees and calls the provided callback for
* every changed/new/deleted item it finds.
* If shared tree blocks are encountered, whole subtrees are skipped, making
* the compare pretty fast on snapshotted subvolumes.
*
* This currently works on commit roots only. As commit roots are read only,
* we don't do any locking. The commit roots are protected with transactions.
* Transactions are ended and rejoined when a commit is tried in between.
*
* This function checks for modifications done to the trees while comparing.
* If it detects a change, it aborts immediately.
*/
static int btrfs_compare_trees(struct btrfs_root *left_root,
struct btrfs_root *right_root,
btrfs_changed_cb_t changed_cb, void *ctx)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = left_root->fs_info;
int ret;
int cmp;
struct btrfs_path *left_path = NULL;
struct btrfs_path *right_path = NULL;
struct btrfs_key left_key;
struct btrfs_key right_key;
char *tmp_buf = NULL;
int left_root_level;
int right_root_level;
int left_level;
int right_level;
int left_end_reached;
int right_end_reached;
int advance_left;
int advance_right;
u64 left_blockptr;
u64 right_blockptr;
u64 left_gen;
u64 right_gen;
left_path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!left_path) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
right_path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!right_path) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
tmp_buf = kvmalloc(fs_info->nodesize, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tmp_buf) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
left_path->search_commit_root = 1;
left_path->skip_locking = 1;
right_path->search_commit_root = 1;
right_path->skip_locking = 1;
/*
* Strategy: Go to the first items of both trees. Then do
*
* If both trees are at level 0
* Compare keys of current items
* If left < right treat left item as new, advance left tree
* and repeat
* If left > right treat right item as deleted, advance right tree
* and repeat
* If left == right do deep compare of items, treat as changed if
* needed, advance both trees and repeat
* If both trees are at the same level but not at level 0
* Compare keys of current nodes/leafs
* If left < right advance left tree and repeat
* If left > right advance right tree and repeat
* If left == right compare blockptrs of the next nodes/leafs
* If they match advance both trees but stay at the same level
* and repeat
* If they don't match advance both trees while allowing to go
* deeper and repeat
* If tree levels are different
* Advance the tree that needs it and repeat
*
* Advancing a tree means:
* If we are at level 0, try to go to the next slot. If that's not
* possible, go one level up and repeat. Stop when we found a level
* where we could go to the next slot. We may at this point be on a
* node or a leaf.
*
* If we are not at level 0 and not on shared tree blocks, go one
* level deeper.
*
* If we are not at level 0 and on shared tree blocks, go one slot to
* the right if possible or go up and right.
*/
down_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
left_level = btrfs_header_level(left_root->commit_root);
left_root_level = left_level;
left_path->nodes[left_level] =
btrfs_clone_extent_buffer(left_root->commit_root);
if (!left_path->nodes[left_level]) {
up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
right_level = btrfs_header_level(right_root->commit_root);
right_root_level = right_level;
right_path->nodes[right_level] =
btrfs_clone_extent_buffer(right_root->commit_root);
if (!right_path->nodes[right_level]) {
up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
if (left_level == 0)
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(left_path->nodes[left_level],
&left_key, left_path->slots[left_level]);
else
btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(left_path->nodes[left_level],
&left_key, left_path->slots[left_level]);
if (right_level == 0)
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(right_path->nodes[right_level],
&right_key, right_path->slots[right_level]);
else
btrfs_node_key_to_cpu(right_path->nodes[right_level],
&right_key, right_path->slots[right_level]);
left_end_reached = right_end_reached = 0;
advance_left = advance_right = 0;
while (1) {
btrfs: Relinquish CPUs in btrfs_compare_trees When doing any form of incremental send the parent and the child trees need to be compared via btrfs_compare_trees. This can result in long loop chains without ever relinquishing the CPU. This causes softlockup detector to trigger when comparing trees with a lot of items. Example report: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 24s! [snapperd:16153] CPU: 0 PID: 16153 Comm: snapperd Not tainted 5.2.9-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO) pc : __ll_sc_arch_atomic_sub_return+0x14/0x20 lr : btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages+0xe0/0x1e8 [btrfs] sp : ffff00001273b7e0 Call trace: __ll_sc_arch_atomic_sub_return+0x14/0x20 release_extent_buffer+0xdc/0x120 [btrfs] free_extent_buffer.part.0+0xb0/0x118 [btrfs] free_extent_buffer+0x24/0x30 [btrfs] btrfs_release_path+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_free_path.part.0+0x20/0x40 [btrfs] btrfs_free_path+0x24/0x30 [btrfs] get_inode_info+0xa8/0xf8 [btrfs] finish_inode_if_needed+0xe0/0x6d8 [btrfs] changed_cb+0x9c/0x410 [btrfs] btrfs_compare_trees+0x284/0x648 [btrfs] send_subvol+0x33c/0x520 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x8a0/0xaf0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x199c/0x2288 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4b0/0x820 ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb8 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x188 el0_svc_handler+0x34/0x90 el0_svc+0x8/0xc Fix this by adding a call to cond_resched at the beginning of the main loop in btrfs_compare_trees. Fixes: 7069830a9e38 ("Btrfs: add btrfs_compare_trees function") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-09-04 10:33:58 -06:00
cond_resched();
if (advance_left && !left_end_reached) {
ret = tree_advance(left_path, &left_level,
left_root_level,
advance_left != ADVANCE_ONLY_NEXT,
&left_key);
if (ret == -1)
left_end_reached = ADVANCE;
else if (ret < 0)
goto out;
advance_left = 0;
}
if (advance_right && !right_end_reached) {
ret = tree_advance(right_path, &right_level,
right_root_level,
advance_right != ADVANCE_ONLY_NEXT,
&right_key);
if (ret == -1)
right_end_reached = ADVANCE;
else if (ret < 0)
goto out;
advance_right = 0;
}
if (left_end_reached && right_end_reached) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
} else if (left_end_reached) {
if (right_level == 0) {
ret = changed_cb(left_path, right_path,
&right_key,
BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_DELETED,
ctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
advance_right = ADVANCE;
continue;
} else if (right_end_reached) {
if (left_level == 0) {
ret = changed_cb(left_path, right_path,
&left_key,
BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW,
ctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
advance_left = ADVANCE;
continue;
}
if (left_level == 0 && right_level == 0) {
cmp = btrfs_comp_cpu_keys(&left_key, &right_key);
if (cmp < 0) {
ret = changed_cb(left_path, right_path,
&left_key,
BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_NEW,
ctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
advance_left = ADVANCE;
} else if (cmp > 0) {
ret = changed_cb(left_path, right_path,
&right_key,
BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_DELETED,
ctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
advance_right = ADVANCE;
} else {
enum btrfs_compare_tree_result result;
WARN_ON(!extent_buffer_uptodate(left_path->nodes[0]));
ret = tree_compare_item(left_path, right_path,
tmp_buf);
if (ret)
result = BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_CHANGED;
else
result = BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME;
ret = changed_cb(left_path, right_path,
&left_key, result, ctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
advance_left = ADVANCE;
advance_right = ADVANCE;
}
} else if (left_level == right_level) {
cmp = btrfs_comp_cpu_keys(&left_key, &right_key);
if (cmp < 0) {
advance_left = ADVANCE;
} else if (cmp > 0) {
advance_right = ADVANCE;
} else {
left_blockptr = btrfs_node_blockptr(
left_path->nodes[left_level],
left_path->slots[left_level]);
right_blockptr = btrfs_node_blockptr(
right_path->nodes[right_level],
right_path->slots[right_level]);
left_gen = btrfs_node_ptr_generation(
left_path->nodes[left_level],
left_path->slots[left_level]);
right_gen = btrfs_node_ptr_generation(
right_path->nodes[right_level],
right_path->slots[right_level]);
if (left_blockptr == right_blockptr &&
left_gen == right_gen) {
/*
* As we're on a shared block, don't
* allow to go deeper.
*/
advance_left = ADVANCE_ONLY_NEXT;
advance_right = ADVANCE_ONLY_NEXT;
} else {
advance_left = ADVANCE;
advance_right = ADVANCE;
}
}
} else if (left_level < right_level) {
advance_right = ADVANCE;
} else {
advance_left = ADVANCE;
}
}
out:
btrfs_free_path(left_path);
btrfs_free_path(right_path);
kvfree(tmp_buf);
return ret;
}
static int send_subvol(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int ret;
Btrfs: allow omitting stream header and end-cmd for btrfs send Two new flags are added to allow omitting the stream header and the end command for btrfs send streams. This is used in cases where you send multiple snapshots back-to-back in one stream. This used to be encoded like this (with 2 snapshots in this example): <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> + <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> + EOF The new format (if the two new flags are used) is this one: <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> Note that the currently existing receivers treat <end cmd> only as an indication that a new <stream header> is following. This means, you can just skip the sequence <end cmd> <stream header> without loosing compatibility. As long as an EOF is following, the currently existing receivers handle the new format (if the two new flags are used) exactly as the old one. So what is the benefit of this change? The goal is to be able to use a single stream (one TCP connection) to multiplex a request/response handshake plus Btrfs send streams, all in the same stream. In this case you cannot evaluate an EOF condition as an end of the Btrfs send stream. You need something else, and the <end cmd> is just perfect for this purpose. The summary is: The format change is driven by the need to send several Btrfs send streams over a single TCP connections, with the ability for a repeated request/response handshake in the middle. And this format change does not break any existing tool, it is completely compatible. You could compare the old behaviour of the Btrfs send stream to the one of ftp where you need a seperate request/response channel and newly opened data transfer channels for each file, while the new behaviour is more like http using a single stream for everything. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-04-10 11:10:52 -06:00
if (!(sctx->flags & BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_OMIT_STREAM_HEADER)) {
ret = send_header(sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
ret = send_subvol_begin(sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (sctx->parent_root) {
ret = btrfs_compare_trees(sctx->send_root, sctx->parent_root,
changed_cb, sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = finish_inode_if_needed(sctx, 1);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
} else {
ret = full_send_tree(sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
out:
free_recorded_refs(sctx);
return ret;
}
/*
* If orphan cleanup did remove any orphans from a root, it means the tree
* was modified and therefore the commit root is not the same as the current
* root anymore. This is a problem, because send uses the commit root and
* therefore can see inode items that don't exist in the current root anymore,
* and for example make calls to btrfs_iget, which will do tree lookups based
* on the current root and not on the commit root. Those lookups will fail,
* returning a -ESTALE error, and making send fail with that error. So make
* sure a send does not see any orphans we have just removed, and that it will
* see the same inodes regardless of whether a transaction commit happened
* before it started (meaning that the commit root will be the same as the
* current root) or not.
*/
static int ensure_commit_roots_uptodate(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
int i;
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans = NULL;
again:
if (sctx->parent_root &&
sctx->parent_root->node != sctx->parent_root->commit_root)
goto commit_trans;
for (i = 0; i < sctx->clone_roots_cnt; i++)
if (sctx->clone_roots[i].root->node !=
sctx->clone_roots[i].root->commit_root)
goto commit_trans;
if (trans)
return btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
return 0;
commit_trans:
/* Use any root, all fs roots will get their commit roots updated. */
if (!trans) {
trans = btrfs_join_transaction(sctx->send_root);
if (IS_ERR(trans))
return PTR_ERR(trans);
goto again;
}
return btrfs_commit_transaction(trans);
}
Btrfs: send, flush dellaloc in order to avoid data loss When we set a subvolume to read-only mode we do not flush dellaloc for any of its inodes (except if the filesystem is mounted with -o flushoncommit), since it does not affect correctness for any subsequent operations - except for a future send operation. The send operation will not be able to see the delalloc data since the respective file extent items, inode item updates, backreferences, etc, have not hit yet the subvolume and extent trees. Effectively this means data loss, since the send stream will not contain any data from existing delalloc. Another problem from this is that if the writeback starts and finishes while the send operation is in progress, we have the subvolume tree being being modified concurrently which can result in send failing unexpectedly with EIO or hitting runtime errors, assertion failures or hitting BUG_ONs, etc. Simple reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xea 0 108K" /mnt/sv/foo $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/send.stream /mnt/sv $ od -t x1 -A d /mnt/sv/foo 0000000 ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea * 0110592 $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/send.stream /mnt $ echo $? 0 $ od -t x1 -A d /mnt/sv/foo 0000000 # ---> empty file Since this a problem that affects send only, fix it in send by flushing dellaloc for all the roots used by the send operation before send starts to process the commit roots. This is a problem that affects send since it was introduced (commit 31db9f7c23fbf7 ("Btrfs: introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for btrfs send/receive")) but backporting it to older kernels has some dependencies: - For kernels between 3.19 and 4.20, it depends on commit 3cd24c698004d2 ("btrfs: use tagged writepage to mitigate livelock of snapshot") because the function btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot() does not exist before that commit. So one has to either pick that commit or replace the calls to btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot() in this patch with calls to btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes(). - For kernels older than 3.19 it also requires commit e5fa8f865b3324 ("Btrfs: ensure send always works on roots without orphans") because it depends on the function ensure_commit_roots_uptodate() which that commits introduced. - No dependencies for 5.0+ kernels. A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-15 02:29:36 -06:00
/*
* Make sure any existing dellaloc is flushed for any root used by a send
* operation so that we do not miss any data and we do not race with writeback
* finishing and changing a tree while send is using the tree. This could
* happen if a subvolume is in RW mode, has delalloc, is turned to RO mode and
* a send operation then uses the subvolume.
* After flushing delalloc ensure_commit_roots_uptodate() must be called.
*/
static int flush_delalloc_roots(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
struct btrfs_root *root = sctx->parent_root;
int ret;
int i;
if (root) {
ret = btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot(root);
if (ret)
return ret;
btrfs_wait_ordered_extents(root, U64_MAX, 0, U64_MAX);
}
for (i = 0; i < sctx->clone_roots_cnt; i++) {
root = sctx->clone_roots[i].root;
ret = btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot(root);
if (ret)
return ret;
btrfs_wait_ordered_extents(root, U64_MAX, 0, U64_MAX);
}
return 0;
}
static void btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress(struct btrfs_root* root)
{
spin_lock(&root->root_item_lock);
root->send_in_progress--;
/*
* Not much left to do, we don't know why it's unbalanced and
* can't blindly reset it to 0.
*/
if (root->send_in_progress < 0)
btrfs_err(root->fs_info,
"send_in_progress unbalanced %d root %llu",
root->send_in_progress, root->root_key.objectid);
spin_unlock(&root->root_item_lock);
}
Btrfs: fix race between send and deduplication that lead to failures and crashes Send operates on read only trees and expects them to never change while it is using them. This is part of its initial design, and this expection is due to two different reasons: 1) When it was introduced, no operations were allowed to modifiy read-only subvolumes/snapshots (including defrag for example). 2) It keeps send from having an impact on other filesystem operations. Namely send does not need to keep locks on the trees nor needs to hold on to transaction handles and delay transaction commits. This ends up being a consequence of the former reason. However the deduplication feature was introduced later (on September 2013, while send was introduced in July 2012) and it allowed for deduplication with destination files that belong to read-only trees (subvolumes and snapshots). That means that having a send operation (either full or incremental) running in parallel with a deduplication that has the destination inode in one of the trees used by the send operation, can result in tree nodes and leaves getting freed and reused while send is using them. This problem is similar to the problem solved for the root nodes getting freed and reused when a snapshot is made against one tree that is currenly being used by a send operation, fixed in commits [1] and [2]. These commits explain in detail how the problem happens and the explanation is valid for any node or leaf that is not the root of a tree as well. This problem was also discussed and explained recently in a thread [3]. The problem is very easy to reproduce when using send with large trees (snapshots) and just a few concurrent deduplication operations that target files in the trees used by send. A stress test case is being sent for fstests that triggers the issue easily. The most common error to hit is the send ioctl return -EIO with the following messages in dmesg/syslog: [1631617.204075] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63292, offset=0, disk_byte=5228134400 found extent=5228134400 [1631633.251754] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 32243712 wanted 24 found 27 The first one is very easy to hit while the second one happens much less frequently, except for very large trees (in that test case, snapshots with 100000 files having large xattrs to get deep and wide trees). Less frequently, at least one BUG_ON can be hit: [1631742.130080] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1631742.130625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806! [1631742.131188] invalid opcode: 0000 [#6] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [1631742.131726] CPU: 1 PID: 13394 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G B D W 5.0.0-rc8-btrfs-next-45 #1 [1631742.132265] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [1631742.133399] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs] (...) [1631742.135061] RSP: 0018:ffffb530021ebaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [1631742.135615] RAX: ffff93ac8912e000 RBX: 000000000000009d RCX: 0000000000000002 [1631742.136173] RDX: 000000000000009d RSI: ffff93ac564b0d08 RDI: ffff93ad5b48c000 [1631742.136759] RBP: ffffb530021ebb7d R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffb530021ebb7d [1631742.137324] R10: ffffb530021eba70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff93ac87d0a708 [1631742.137900] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 [1631742.138455] FS: 00007f4cdb1528c0(0000) GS:ffff93ad76a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1631742.139010] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1631742.139568] CR2: 00007f5acb3d0420 CR3: 000000012be3e006 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [1631742.140131] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [1631742.140719] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [1631742.141272] Call Trace: [1631742.141826] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [1631742.142390] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs] [1631742.142948] btrfs_compare_trees+0x268/0x690 [btrfs] [1631742.143533] ? process_extent+0x1070/0x1070 [btrfs] [1631742.144088] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs] [1631742.144645] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs] [1631742.145161] ? trace_sched_stick_numa+0xe0/0xe0 [1631742.145685] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs] [1631742.146179] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xd3/0x100 [1631742.146662] ? reweight_entity+0x154/0x1a0 [1631742.147135] ? update_curr+0x20/0x2a0 [1631742.147593] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x103/0x250 [1631742.148053] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [1631742.148510] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [1631742.148942] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [1631742.149361] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [1631742.149767] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [1631742.150159] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [1631742.150543] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [1631742.150931] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [1631742.151326] RIP: 0033:0x7f4cd9f5add7 (...) [1631742.152509] RSP: 002b:00007ffe91017708 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [1631742.152892] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f4cd9f5add7 [1631742.153268] RDX: 00007ffe91017790 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000007 [1631742.153633] RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 00007f4cd9e79700 R09: 00007f4cd9e79700 [1631742.153999] R10: 00007f4cd9e799d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [1631742.154365] R13: 0000555dfae53020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 (...) [1631742.156696] ---[ end trace 5dac9f96dcc3fd6b ]--- That BUG_ON happens because while send is using a node, that node is COWed by a concurrent deduplication, gets freed and gets reused as a leaf (because a transaction commit happened in between), so when it attempts to read a slot from the extent buffer, at ctree.c:read_node_slot(), the extent buffer contents were wiped out and it now matches a leaf (which can even belong to some other tree now), hitting the BUG_ON(level == 0). Fix this concurrency issue by not allowing send and deduplication to run in parallel if both operate on the same readonly trees, returning EAGAIN to user space and logging an exlicit warning in dmesg/syslog. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=be6821f82c3cc36e026f5afd10249988852b35ea [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6f2f0b394b54e2b159ef969a0b5274e9bbf82ff2 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H7iqSEEyFaEtpRZw3cp613y+4k2Q8b4W7mweR3tZA05bQ@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-22 09:43:42 -06:00
static void dedupe_in_progress_warn(const struct btrfs_root *root)
{
btrfs_warn_rl(root->fs_info,
"cannot use root %llu for send while deduplications on it are in progress (%d in progress)",
root->root_key.objectid, root->dedupe_in_progress);
}
long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args *arg)
{
int ret = 0;
struct btrfs_root *send_root = BTRFS_I(file_inode(mnt_file))->root;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = send_root->fs_info;
struct btrfs_root *clone_root;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct send_ctx *sctx = NULL;
u32 i;
u64 *clone_sources_tmp = NULL;
int clone_sources_to_rollback = 0;
unsigned alloc_size;
int sort_clone_roots = 0;
int index;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
/*
* The subvolume must remain read-only during send, protect against
* making it RW. This also protects against deletion.
*/
spin_lock(&send_root->root_item_lock);
Btrfs: fix race between send and deduplication that lead to failures and crashes Send operates on read only trees and expects them to never change while it is using them. This is part of its initial design, and this expection is due to two different reasons: 1) When it was introduced, no operations were allowed to modifiy read-only subvolumes/snapshots (including defrag for example). 2) It keeps send from having an impact on other filesystem operations. Namely send does not need to keep locks on the trees nor needs to hold on to transaction handles and delay transaction commits. This ends up being a consequence of the former reason. However the deduplication feature was introduced later (on September 2013, while send was introduced in July 2012) and it allowed for deduplication with destination files that belong to read-only trees (subvolumes and snapshots). That means that having a send operation (either full or incremental) running in parallel with a deduplication that has the destination inode in one of the trees used by the send operation, can result in tree nodes and leaves getting freed and reused while send is using them. This problem is similar to the problem solved for the root nodes getting freed and reused when a snapshot is made against one tree that is currenly being used by a send operation, fixed in commits [1] and [2]. These commits explain in detail how the problem happens and the explanation is valid for any node or leaf that is not the root of a tree as well. This problem was also discussed and explained recently in a thread [3]. The problem is very easy to reproduce when using send with large trees (snapshots) and just a few concurrent deduplication operations that target files in the trees used by send. A stress test case is being sent for fstests that triggers the issue easily. The most common error to hit is the send ioctl return -EIO with the following messages in dmesg/syslog: [1631617.204075] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63292, offset=0, disk_byte=5228134400 found extent=5228134400 [1631633.251754] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 32243712 wanted 24 found 27 The first one is very easy to hit while the second one happens much less frequently, except for very large trees (in that test case, snapshots with 100000 files having large xattrs to get deep and wide trees). Less frequently, at least one BUG_ON can be hit: [1631742.130080] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1631742.130625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806! [1631742.131188] invalid opcode: 0000 [#6] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [1631742.131726] CPU: 1 PID: 13394 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G B D W 5.0.0-rc8-btrfs-next-45 #1 [1631742.132265] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [1631742.133399] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs] (...) [1631742.135061] RSP: 0018:ffffb530021ebaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [1631742.135615] RAX: ffff93ac8912e000 RBX: 000000000000009d RCX: 0000000000000002 [1631742.136173] RDX: 000000000000009d RSI: ffff93ac564b0d08 RDI: ffff93ad5b48c000 [1631742.136759] RBP: ffffb530021ebb7d R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffb530021ebb7d [1631742.137324] R10: ffffb530021eba70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff93ac87d0a708 [1631742.137900] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 [1631742.138455] FS: 00007f4cdb1528c0(0000) GS:ffff93ad76a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1631742.139010] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1631742.139568] CR2: 00007f5acb3d0420 CR3: 000000012be3e006 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [1631742.140131] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [1631742.140719] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [1631742.141272] Call Trace: [1631742.141826] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [1631742.142390] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs] [1631742.142948] btrfs_compare_trees+0x268/0x690 [btrfs] [1631742.143533] ? process_extent+0x1070/0x1070 [btrfs] [1631742.144088] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs] [1631742.144645] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs] [1631742.145161] ? trace_sched_stick_numa+0xe0/0xe0 [1631742.145685] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs] [1631742.146179] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xd3/0x100 [1631742.146662] ? reweight_entity+0x154/0x1a0 [1631742.147135] ? update_curr+0x20/0x2a0 [1631742.147593] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x103/0x250 [1631742.148053] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [1631742.148510] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [1631742.148942] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [1631742.149361] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [1631742.149767] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [1631742.150159] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [1631742.150543] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [1631742.150931] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [1631742.151326] RIP: 0033:0x7f4cd9f5add7 (...) [1631742.152509] RSP: 002b:00007ffe91017708 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [1631742.152892] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f4cd9f5add7 [1631742.153268] RDX: 00007ffe91017790 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000007 [1631742.153633] RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 00007f4cd9e79700 R09: 00007f4cd9e79700 [1631742.153999] R10: 00007f4cd9e799d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [1631742.154365] R13: 0000555dfae53020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 (...) [1631742.156696] ---[ end trace 5dac9f96dcc3fd6b ]--- That BUG_ON happens because while send is using a node, that node is COWed by a concurrent deduplication, gets freed and gets reused as a leaf (because a transaction commit happened in between), so when it attempts to read a slot from the extent buffer, at ctree.c:read_node_slot(), the extent buffer contents were wiped out and it now matches a leaf (which can even belong to some other tree now), hitting the BUG_ON(level == 0). Fix this concurrency issue by not allowing send and deduplication to run in parallel if both operate on the same readonly trees, returning EAGAIN to user space and logging an exlicit warning in dmesg/syslog. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=be6821f82c3cc36e026f5afd10249988852b35ea [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6f2f0b394b54e2b159ef969a0b5274e9bbf82ff2 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H7iqSEEyFaEtpRZw3cp613y+4k2Q8b4W7mweR3tZA05bQ@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-22 09:43:42 -06:00
if (btrfs_root_readonly(send_root) && send_root->dedupe_in_progress) {
dedupe_in_progress_warn(send_root);
spin_unlock(&send_root->root_item_lock);
return -EAGAIN;
}
send_root->send_in_progress++;
spin_unlock(&send_root->root_item_lock);
/*
* Userspace tools do the checks and warn the user if it's
* not RO.
*/
if (!btrfs_root_readonly(send_root)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto out;
}
/*
* Check that we don't overflow at later allocations, we request
* clone_sources_count + 1 items, and compare to unsigned long inside
* access_ok.
*/
if (arg->clone_sources_count >
ULONG_MAX / sizeof(struct clone_root) - 1) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function Nobody has actually used the type (VERIFY_READ vs VERIFY_WRITE) argument of the user address range verification function since we got rid of the old racy i386-only code to walk page tables by hand. It existed because the original 80386 would not honor the write protect bit when in kernel mode, so you had to do COW by hand before doing any user access. But we haven't supported that in a long time, and these days the 'type' argument is a purely historical artifact. A discussion about extending 'user_access_begin()' to do the range checking resulted this patch, because there is no way we're going to move the old VERIFY_xyz interface to that model. And it's best done at the end of the merge window when I've done most of my merges, so let's just get this done once and for all. This patch was mostly done with a sed-script, with manual fix-ups for the cases that weren't of the trivial 'access_ok(VERIFY_xyz' form. There were a couple of notable cases: - csky still had the old "verify_area()" name as an alias. - the iter_iov code had magical hardcoded knowledge of the actual values of VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} (not that they mattered, since nothing really used it) - microblaze used the type argument for a debug printout but other than those oddities this should be a total no-op patch. I tried to fix up all architectures, did fairly extensive grepping for access_ok() uses, and the changes are trivial, but I may have missed something. Any missed conversion should be trivially fixable, though. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-03 19:57:57 -07:00
if (!access_ok(arg->clone_sources,
sizeof(*arg->clone_sources) *
arg->clone_sources_count)) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: allow omitting stream header and end-cmd for btrfs send Two new flags are added to allow omitting the stream header and the end command for btrfs send streams. This is used in cases where you send multiple snapshots back-to-back in one stream. This used to be encoded like this (with 2 snapshots in this example): <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> + <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> + EOF The new format (if the two new flags are used) is this one: <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> Note that the currently existing receivers treat <end cmd> only as an indication that a new <stream header> is following. This means, you can just skip the sequence <end cmd> <stream header> without loosing compatibility. As long as an EOF is following, the currently existing receivers handle the new format (if the two new flags are used) exactly as the old one. So what is the benefit of this change? The goal is to be able to use a single stream (one TCP connection) to multiplex a request/response handshake plus Btrfs send streams, all in the same stream. In this case you cannot evaluate an EOF condition as an end of the Btrfs send stream. You need something else, and the <end cmd> is just perfect for this purpose. The summary is: The format change is driven by the need to send several Btrfs send streams over a single TCP connections, with the ability for a repeated request/response handshake in the middle. And this format change does not break any existing tool, it is completely compatible. You could compare the old behaviour of the Btrfs send stream to the one of ftp where you need a seperate request/response channel and newly opened data transfer channels for each file, while the new behaviour is more like http using a single stream for everything. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-04-10 11:10:52 -06:00
if (arg->flags & ~BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_MASK) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
sctx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct send_ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sctx) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sctx->new_refs);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sctx->deleted_refs);
INIT_RADIX_TREE(&sctx->name_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sctx->name_cache_list);
sctx->flags = arg->flags;
sctx->send_filp = fget(arg->send_fd);
if (!sctx->send_filp) {
ret = -EBADF;
goto out;
}
sctx->send_root = send_root;
/*
* Unlikely but possible, if the subvolume is marked for deletion but
* is slow to remove the directory entry, send can still be started
*/
if (btrfs_root_dead(sctx->send_root)) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto out;
}
sctx->clone_roots_cnt = arg->clone_sources_count;
sctx->send_max_size = BTRFS_SEND_BUF_SIZE;
treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants There are many code paths opencoding kvmalloc. Let's use the helper instead. The main difference to kvmalloc is that those users are usually not considering all the aspects of the memory allocator. E.g. allocation requests <= 32kB (with 4kB pages) are basically never failing and invoke OOM killer to satisfy the allocation. This sounds too disruptive for something that has a reasonable fallback - the vmalloc. On the other hand those requests might fallback to vmalloc even when the memory allocator would succeed after several more reclaim/compaction attempts previously. There is no guarantee something like that happens though. This patch converts many of those places to kv[mz]alloc* helpers because they are more conservative. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306103327.2766-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> # Xen bits Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> # Lustre Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> # KVM/s390 Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> # nvdim Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> # btrfs Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> # Ceph Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> # mlx4 Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx5 Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Cc: Santosh Raspatur <santosh@chelsio.com> Cc: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@chelsio.com> Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com> Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-05-08 16:57:27 -06:00
sctx->send_buf = kvmalloc(sctx->send_max_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sctx->send_buf) {
treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants There are many code paths opencoding kvmalloc. Let's use the helper instead. The main difference to kvmalloc is that those users are usually not considering all the aspects of the memory allocator. E.g. allocation requests <= 32kB (with 4kB pages) are basically never failing and invoke OOM killer to satisfy the allocation. This sounds too disruptive for something that has a reasonable fallback - the vmalloc. On the other hand those requests might fallback to vmalloc even when the memory allocator would succeed after several more reclaim/compaction attempts previously. There is no guarantee something like that happens though. This patch converts many of those places to kv[mz]alloc* helpers because they are more conservative. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306103327.2766-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> # Xen bits Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> # Lustre Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> # KVM/s390 Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> # nvdim Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> # btrfs Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> # Ceph Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> # mlx4 Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx5 Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Cc: Santosh Raspatur <santosh@chelsio.com> Cc: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@chelsio.com> Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com> Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-05-08 16:57:27 -06:00
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants There are many code paths opencoding kvmalloc. Let's use the helper instead. The main difference to kvmalloc is that those users are usually not considering all the aspects of the memory allocator. E.g. allocation requests <= 32kB (with 4kB pages) are basically never failing and invoke OOM killer to satisfy the allocation. This sounds too disruptive for something that has a reasonable fallback - the vmalloc. On the other hand those requests might fallback to vmalloc even when the memory allocator would succeed after several more reclaim/compaction attempts previously. There is no guarantee something like that happens though. This patch converts many of those places to kv[mz]alloc* helpers because they are more conservative. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306103327.2766-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> # Xen bits Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> # Lustre Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> # KVM/s390 Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> # nvdim Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> # btrfs Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> # Ceph Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> # mlx4 Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx5 Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Cc: Santosh Raspatur <santosh@chelsio.com> Cc: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@chelsio.com> Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com> Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-05-08 16:57:27 -06:00
sctx->read_buf = kvmalloc(BTRFS_SEND_READ_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sctx->read_buf) {
treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants There are many code paths opencoding kvmalloc. Let's use the helper instead. The main difference to kvmalloc is that those users are usually not considering all the aspects of the memory allocator. E.g. allocation requests <= 32kB (with 4kB pages) are basically never failing and invoke OOM killer to satisfy the allocation. This sounds too disruptive for something that has a reasonable fallback - the vmalloc. On the other hand those requests might fallback to vmalloc even when the memory allocator would succeed after several more reclaim/compaction attempts previously. There is no guarantee something like that happens though. This patch converts many of those places to kv[mz]alloc* helpers because they are more conservative. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306103327.2766-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> # Xen bits Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> # Lustre Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> # KVM/s390 Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> # nvdim Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> # btrfs Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> # Ceph Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> # mlx4 Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx5 Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Cc: Santosh Raspatur <santosh@chelsio.com> Cc: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@chelsio.com> Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com> Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-05-08 16:57:27 -06:00
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
sctx->pending_dir_moves = RB_ROOT;
sctx->waiting_dir_moves = RB_ROOT;
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
sctx->orphan_dirs = RB_ROOT;
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
alloc_size = sizeof(struct clone_root) * (arg->clone_sources_count + 1);
sctx->clone_roots = kvzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sctx->clone_roots) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
alloc_size = arg->clone_sources_count * sizeof(*arg->clone_sources);
if (arg->clone_sources_count) {
treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants There are many code paths opencoding kvmalloc. Let's use the helper instead. The main difference to kvmalloc is that those users are usually not considering all the aspects of the memory allocator. E.g. allocation requests <= 32kB (with 4kB pages) are basically never failing and invoke OOM killer to satisfy the allocation. This sounds too disruptive for something that has a reasonable fallback - the vmalloc. On the other hand those requests might fallback to vmalloc even when the memory allocator would succeed after several more reclaim/compaction attempts previously. There is no guarantee something like that happens though. This patch converts many of those places to kv[mz]alloc* helpers because they are more conservative. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306103327.2766-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> # Xen bits Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> # Lustre Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> # KVM/s390 Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> # nvdim Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> # btrfs Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> # Ceph Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> # mlx4 Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx5 Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Cc: Santosh Raspatur <santosh@chelsio.com> Cc: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@chelsio.com> Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com> Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-05-08 16:57:27 -06:00
clone_sources_tmp = kvmalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!clone_sources_tmp) {
treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants There are many code paths opencoding kvmalloc. Let's use the helper instead. The main difference to kvmalloc is that those users are usually not considering all the aspects of the memory allocator. E.g. allocation requests <= 32kB (with 4kB pages) are basically never failing and invoke OOM killer to satisfy the allocation. This sounds too disruptive for something that has a reasonable fallback - the vmalloc. On the other hand those requests might fallback to vmalloc even when the memory allocator would succeed after several more reclaim/compaction attempts previously. There is no guarantee something like that happens though. This patch converts many of those places to kv[mz]alloc* helpers because they are more conservative. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306103327.2766-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> # Xen bits Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> # Lustre Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> # KVM/s390 Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> # nvdim Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> # btrfs Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> # Ceph Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> # mlx4 Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx5 Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Cc: Santosh Raspatur <santosh@chelsio.com> Cc: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@chelsio.com> Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com> Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-05-08 16:57:27 -06:00
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
ret = copy_from_user(clone_sources_tmp, arg->clone_sources,
alloc_size);
if (ret) {
ret = -EFAULT;
goto out;
}
for (i = 0; i < arg->clone_sources_count; i++) {
key.objectid = clone_sources_tmp[i];
key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = (u64)-1;
index = srcu_read_lock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu);
clone_root = btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name(fs_info, &key);
if (IS_ERR(clone_root)) {
srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index);
ret = PTR_ERR(clone_root);
goto out;
}
spin_lock(&clone_root->root_item_lock);
if (!btrfs_root_readonly(clone_root) ||
btrfs_root_dead(clone_root)) {
spin_unlock(&clone_root->root_item_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index);
ret = -EPERM;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: fix race between send and deduplication that lead to failures and crashes Send operates on read only trees and expects them to never change while it is using them. This is part of its initial design, and this expection is due to two different reasons: 1) When it was introduced, no operations were allowed to modifiy read-only subvolumes/snapshots (including defrag for example). 2) It keeps send from having an impact on other filesystem operations. Namely send does not need to keep locks on the trees nor needs to hold on to transaction handles and delay transaction commits. This ends up being a consequence of the former reason. However the deduplication feature was introduced later (on September 2013, while send was introduced in July 2012) and it allowed for deduplication with destination files that belong to read-only trees (subvolumes and snapshots). That means that having a send operation (either full or incremental) running in parallel with a deduplication that has the destination inode in one of the trees used by the send operation, can result in tree nodes and leaves getting freed and reused while send is using them. This problem is similar to the problem solved for the root nodes getting freed and reused when a snapshot is made against one tree that is currenly being used by a send operation, fixed in commits [1] and [2]. These commits explain in detail how the problem happens and the explanation is valid for any node or leaf that is not the root of a tree as well. This problem was also discussed and explained recently in a thread [3]. The problem is very easy to reproduce when using send with large trees (snapshots) and just a few concurrent deduplication operations that target files in the trees used by send. A stress test case is being sent for fstests that triggers the issue easily. The most common error to hit is the send ioctl return -EIO with the following messages in dmesg/syslog: [1631617.204075] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63292, offset=0, disk_byte=5228134400 found extent=5228134400 [1631633.251754] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 32243712 wanted 24 found 27 The first one is very easy to hit while the second one happens much less frequently, except for very large trees (in that test case, snapshots with 100000 files having large xattrs to get deep and wide trees). Less frequently, at least one BUG_ON can be hit: [1631742.130080] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1631742.130625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806! [1631742.131188] invalid opcode: 0000 [#6] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [1631742.131726] CPU: 1 PID: 13394 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G B D W 5.0.0-rc8-btrfs-next-45 #1 [1631742.132265] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [1631742.133399] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs] (...) [1631742.135061] RSP: 0018:ffffb530021ebaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [1631742.135615] RAX: ffff93ac8912e000 RBX: 000000000000009d RCX: 0000000000000002 [1631742.136173] RDX: 000000000000009d RSI: ffff93ac564b0d08 RDI: ffff93ad5b48c000 [1631742.136759] RBP: ffffb530021ebb7d R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffb530021ebb7d [1631742.137324] R10: ffffb530021eba70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff93ac87d0a708 [1631742.137900] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 [1631742.138455] FS: 00007f4cdb1528c0(0000) GS:ffff93ad76a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1631742.139010] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1631742.139568] CR2: 00007f5acb3d0420 CR3: 000000012be3e006 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [1631742.140131] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [1631742.140719] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [1631742.141272] Call Trace: [1631742.141826] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [1631742.142390] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs] [1631742.142948] btrfs_compare_trees+0x268/0x690 [btrfs] [1631742.143533] ? process_extent+0x1070/0x1070 [btrfs] [1631742.144088] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs] [1631742.144645] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs] [1631742.145161] ? trace_sched_stick_numa+0xe0/0xe0 [1631742.145685] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs] [1631742.146179] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xd3/0x100 [1631742.146662] ? reweight_entity+0x154/0x1a0 [1631742.147135] ? update_curr+0x20/0x2a0 [1631742.147593] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x103/0x250 [1631742.148053] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [1631742.148510] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [1631742.148942] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [1631742.149361] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [1631742.149767] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [1631742.150159] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [1631742.150543] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [1631742.150931] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [1631742.151326] RIP: 0033:0x7f4cd9f5add7 (...) [1631742.152509] RSP: 002b:00007ffe91017708 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [1631742.152892] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f4cd9f5add7 [1631742.153268] RDX: 00007ffe91017790 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000007 [1631742.153633] RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 00007f4cd9e79700 R09: 00007f4cd9e79700 [1631742.153999] R10: 00007f4cd9e799d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [1631742.154365] R13: 0000555dfae53020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 (...) [1631742.156696] ---[ end trace 5dac9f96dcc3fd6b ]--- That BUG_ON happens because while send is using a node, that node is COWed by a concurrent deduplication, gets freed and gets reused as a leaf (because a transaction commit happened in between), so when it attempts to read a slot from the extent buffer, at ctree.c:read_node_slot(), the extent buffer contents were wiped out and it now matches a leaf (which can even belong to some other tree now), hitting the BUG_ON(level == 0). Fix this concurrency issue by not allowing send and deduplication to run in parallel if both operate on the same readonly trees, returning EAGAIN to user space and logging an exlicit warning in dmesg/syslog. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=be6821f82c3cc36e026f5afd10249988852b35ea [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6f2f0b394b54e2b159ef969a0b5274e9bbf82ff2 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H7iqSEEyFaEtpRZw3cp613y+4k2Q8b4W7mweR3tZA05bQ@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-22 09:43:42 -06:00
if (clone_root->dedupe_in_progress) {
dedupe_in_progress_warn(clone_root);
spin_unlock(&clone_root->root_item_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index);
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
}
clone_root->send_in_progress++;
spin_unlock(&clone_root->root_item_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index);
sctx->clone_roots[i].root = clone_root;
clone_sources_to_rollback = i + 1;
}
kvfree(clone_sources_tmp);
clone_sources_tmp = NULL;
}
if (arg->parent_root) {
key.objectid = arg->parent_root;
key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = (u64)-1;
index = srcu_read_lock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu);
sctx->parent_root = btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name(fs_info, &key);
if (IS_ERR(sctx->parent_root)) {
srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index);
ret = PTR_ERR(sctx->parent_root);
goto out;
}
spin_lock(&sctx->parent_root->root_item_lock);
sctx->parent_root->send_in_progress++;
if (!btrfs_root_readonly(sctx->parent_root) ||
btrfs_root_dead(sctx->parent_root)) {
spin_unlock(&sctx->parent_root->root_item_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index);
ret = -EPERM;
goto out;
}
Btrfs: fix race between send and deduplication that lead to failures and crashes Send operates on read only trees and expects them to never change while it is using them. This is part of its initial design, and this expection is due to two different reasons: 1) When it was introduced, no operations were allowed to modifiy read-only subvolumes/snapshots (including defrag for example). 2) It keeps send from having an impact on other filesystem operations. Namely send does not need to keep locks on the trees nor needs to hold on to transaction handles and delay transaction commits. This ends up being a consequence of the former reason. However the deduplication feature was introduced later (on September 2013, while send was introduced in July 2012) and it allowed for deduplication with destination files that belong to read-only trees (subvolumes and snapshots). That means that having a send operation (either full or incremental) running in parallel with a deduplication that has the destination inode in one of the trees used by the send operation, can result in tree nodes and leaves getting freed and reused while send is using them. This problem is similar to the problem solved for the root nodes getting freed and reused when a snapshot is made against one tree that is currenly being used by a send operation, fixed in commits [1] and [2]. These commits explain in detail how the problem happens and the explanation is valid for any node or leaf that is not the root of a tree as well. This problem was also discussed and explained recently in a thread [3]. The problem is very easy to reproduce when using send with large trees (snapshots) and just a few concurrent deduplication operations that target files in the trees used by send. A stress test case is being sent for fstests that triggers the issue easily. The most common error to hit is the send ioctl return -EIO with the following messages in dmesg/syslog: [1631617.204075] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63292, offset=0, disk_byte=5228134400 found extent=5228134400 [1631633.251754] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 32243712 wanted 24 found 27 The first one is very easy to hit while the second one happens much less frequently, except for very large trees (in that test case, snapshots with 100000 files having large xattrs to get deep and wide trees). Less frequently, at least one BUG_ON can be hit: [1631742.130080] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1631742.130625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806! [1631742.131188] invalid opcode: 0000 [#6] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [1631742.131726] CPU: 1 PID: 13394 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G B D W 5.0.0-rc8-btrfs-next-45 #1 [1631742.132265] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [1631742.133399] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs] (...) [1631742.135061] RSP: 0018:ffffb530021ebaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [1631742.135615] RAX: ffff93ac8912e000 RBX: 000000000000009d RCX: 0000000000000002 [1631742.136173] RDX: 000000000000009d RSI: ffff93ac564b0d08 RDI: ffff93ad5b48c000 [1631742.136759] RBP: ffffb530021ebb7d R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffb530021ebb7d [1631742.137324] R10: ffffb530021eba70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff93ac87d0a708 [1631742.137900] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 [1631742.138455] FS: 00007f4cdb1528c0(0000) GS:ffff93ad76a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1631742.139010] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1631742.139568] CR2: 00007f5acb3d0420 CR3: 000000012be3e006 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [1631742.140131] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [1631742.140719] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [1631742.141272] Call Trace: [1631742.141826] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [1631742.142390] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs] [1631742.142948] btrfs_compare_trees+0x268/0x690 [btrfs] [1631742.143533] ? process_extent+0x1070/0x1070 [btrfs] [1631742.144088] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs] [1631742.144645] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs] [1631742.145161] ? trace_sched_stick_numa+0xe0/0xe0 [1631742.145685] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs] [1631742.146179] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xd3/0x100 [1631742.146662] ? reweight_entity+0x154/0x1a0 [1631742.147135] ? update_curr+0x20/0x2a0 [1631742.147593] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x103/0x250 [1631742.148053] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [1631742.148510] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [1631742.148942] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [1631742.149361] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [1631742.149767] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [1631742.150159] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [1631742.150543] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [1631742.150931] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [1631742.151326] RIP: 0033:0x7f4cd9f5add7 (...) [1631742.152509] RSP: 002b:00007ffe91017708 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [1631742.152892] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f4cd9f5add7 [1631742.153268] RDX: 00007ffe91017790 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000007 [1631742.153633] RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 00007f4cd9e79700 R09: 00007f4cd9e79700 [1631742.153999] R10: 00007f4cd9e799d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 [1631742.154365] R13: 0000555dfae53020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 (...) [1631742.156696] ---[ end trace 5dac9f96dcc3fd6b ]--- That BUG_ON happens because while send is using a node, that node is COWed by a concurrent deduplication, gets freed and gets reused as a leaf (because a transaction commit happened in between), so when it attempts to read a slot from the extent buffer, at ctree.c:read_node_slot(), the extent buffer contents were wiped out and it now matches a leaf (which can even belong to some other tree now), hitting the BUG_ON(level == 0). Fix this concurrency issue by not allowing send and deduplication to run in parallel if both operate on the same readonly trees, returning EAGAIN to user space and logging an exlicit warning in dmesg/syslog. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=be6821f82c3cc36e026f5afd10249988852b35ea [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6f2f0b394b54e2b159ef969a0b5274e9bbf82ff2 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H7iqSEEyFaEtpRZw3cp613y+4k2Q8b4W7mweR3tZA05bQ@mail.gmail.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-22 09:43:42 -06:00
if (sctx->parent_root->dedupe_in_progress) {
dedupe_in_progress_warn(sctx->parent_root);
spin_unlock(&sctx->parent_root->root_item_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index);
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
}
spin_unlock(&sctx->parent_root->root_item_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index);
}
/*
* Clones from send_root are allowed, but only if the clone source
* is behind the current send position. This is checked while searching
* for possible clone sources.
*/
sctx->clone_roots[sctx->clone_roots_cnt++].root = sctx->send_root;
/* We do a bsearch later */
sort(sctx->clone_roots, sctx->clone_roots_cnt,
sizeof(*sctx->clone_roots), __clone_root_cmp_sort,
NULL);
sort_clone_roots = 1;
Btrfs: send, flush dellaloc in order to avoid data loss When we set a subvolume to read-only mode we do not flush dellaloc for any of its inodes (except if the filesystem is mounted with -o flushoncommit), since it does not affect correctness for any subsequent operations - except for a future send operation. The send operation will not be able to see the delalloc data since the respective file extent items, inode item updates, backreferences, etc, have not hit yet the subvolume and extent trees. Effectively this means data loss, since the send stream will not contain any data from existing delalloc. Another problem from this is that if the writeback starts and finishes while the send operation is in progress, we have the subvolume tree being being modified concurrently which can result in send failing unexpectedly with EIO or hitting runtime errors, assertion failures or hitting BUG_ONs, etc. Simple reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xea 0 108K" /mnt/sv/foo $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv ro true $ btrfs send -f /tmp/send.stream /mnt/sv $ od -t x1 -A d /mnt/sv/foo 0000000 ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea ea * 0110592 $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/send.stream /mnt $ echo $? 0 $ od -t x1 -A d /mnt/sv/foo 0000000 # ---> empty file Since this a problem that affects send only, fix it in send by flushing dellaloc for all the roots used by the send operation before send starts to process the commit roots. This is a problem that affects send since it was introduced (commit 31db9f7c23fbf7 ("Btrfs: introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for btrfs send/receive")) but backporting it to older kernels has some dependencies: - For kernels between 3.19 and 4.20, it depends on commit 3cd24c698004d2 ("btrfs: use tagged writepage to mitigate livelock of snapshot") because the function btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot() does not exist before that commit. So one has to either pick that commit or replace the calls to btrfs_start_delalloc_snapshot() in this patch with calls to btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes(). - For kernels older than 3.19 it also requires commit e5fa8f865b3324 ("Btrfs: ensure send always works on roots without orphans") because it depends on the function ensure_commit_roots_uptodate() which that commits introduced. - No dependencies for 5.0+ kernels. A test case for fstests follows soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.19+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-15 02:29:36 -06:00
ret = flush_delalloc_roots(sctx);
if (ret)
goto out;
ret = ensure_commit_roots_uptodate(sctx);
if (ret)
goto out;
Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation Send always operates on read-only trees and always expected that while it is in progress, nothing changes in those trees. Due to that expectation and the fact that send is a read-only operation, it operates on commit roots and does not hold transaction handles. However relocation can COW nodes and leafs from read-only trees, which can cause unexpected failures and crashes (hitting BUG_ONs). while send using a node/leaf, it gets COWed, the transaction used to COW it is committed, a new transaction starts, the extent previously used for that node/leaf gets allocated, possibly for another tree, and the respective extent buffer' content changes while send is still using it. When this happens send normally fails with EIO being returned to user space and messages like the following are found in dmesg/syslog: [ 3408.699121] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 58703872 wanted 250 found 253 [ 3441.523123] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63211, offset=0, disk_byte=5222825984 found extent=5222825984 Other times, less often, we hit a BUG_ON() because an extent buffer that send is using used to be a node, and while send is still using it, it got COWed and got reused as a leaf while send is still using, producing the following trace: [ 3478.466280] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3478.466282] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806! [ 3478.466965] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [ 3478.467635] CPU: 0 PID: 2165 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.0.0-btrfs-next-46 #1 [ 3478.468311] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 3478.469681] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs] (...) [ 3478.471758] RSP: 0018:ffffa437826bfaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 3478.472457] RAX: ffff961416ed7000 RBX: 000000000000003d RCX: 0000000000000002 [ 3478.473151] RDX: 000000000000003d RSI: ffff96141e387408 RDI: ffff961599b30000 [ 3478.473837] RBP: ffffa437826bfb8e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffa437826bfb8e [ 3478.474515] R10: ffffa437826bfa70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9614385c8708 [ 3478.475186] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 3478.475840] FS: 00007f8e0e9cc8c0(0000) GS:ffff9615b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 3478.476489] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3478.477127] CR2: 00007f98b67a056e CR3: 0000000005df6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0 [ 3478.477762] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 3478.478385] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 3478.479003] Call Trace: [ 3478.479600] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 3478.480202] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs] [ 3478.480810] btrfs_compare_trees+0x30c/0x690 [btrfs] [ 3478.481388] ? process_extent+0x1280/0x1280 [btrfs] [ 3478.481954] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs] [ 3478.482510] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3478.483062] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs] [ 3478.483581] ? rq_clock_task+0x2e/0x60 [ 3478.484086] ? wake_up_new_task+0x1f3/0x370 [ 3478.484582] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [ 3478.485075] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [ 3478.485552] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [ 3478.486016] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [ 3478.486467] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 3478.486911] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 3478.487337] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [ 3478.487751] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 3478.488159] RIP: 0033:0x7f8e0d7d4dd7 (...) [ 3478.489349] RSP: 002b:00007ffcf6fb4908 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 3478.489742] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f8e0d7d4dd7 [ 3478.490142] RDX: 00007ffcf6fb4990 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000005 [ 3478.490548] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 00007f8e0d6f3700 R09: 00007f8e0d6f3700 [ 3478.490953] R10: 00007f8e0d6f39d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000005 [ 3478.491343] R13: 00005624e0780020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 (...) [ 3478.493352] ---[ end trace d5f537302be4f8c8 ]--- Another possibility, much less likely to happen, is that send will not fail but the contents of the stream it produces may not be correct. To avoid this, do not allow send and relocation (balance) to run in parallel. In the long term the goal is to allow for both to be able to run concurrently without any problems, but that will take a significant effort in development and testing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-22 09:44:09 -06:00
mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_BALANCE_RUNNING, &fs_info->flags)) {
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
btrfs_warn_rl(fs_info,
"cannot run send because a balance operation is in progress");
ret = -EAGAIN;
goto out;
}
fs_info->send_in_progress++;
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
current->journal_info = BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB;
ret = send_subvol(sctx);
current->journal_info = NULL;
Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation Send always operates on read-only trees and always expected that while it is in progress, nothing changes in those trees. Due to that expectation and the fact that send is a read-only operation, it operates on commit roots and does not hold transaction handles. However relocation can COW nodes and leafs from read-only trees, which can cause unexpected failures and crashes (hitting BUG_ONs). while send using a node/leaf, it gets COWed, the transaction used to COW it is committed, a new transaction starts, the extent previously used for that node/leaf gets allocated, possibly for another tree, and the respective extent buffer' content changes while send is still using it. When this happens send normally fails with EIO being returned to user space and messages like the following are found in dmesg/syslog: [ 3408.699121] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 58703872 wanted 250 found 253 [ 3441.523123] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63211, offset=0, disk_byte=5222825984 found extent=5222825984 Other times, less often, we hit a BUG_ON() because an extent buffer that send is using used to be a node, and while send is still using it, it got COWed and got reused as a leaf while send is still using, producing the following trace: [ 3478.466280] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3478.466282] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806! [ 3478.466965] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [ 3478.467635] CPU: 0 PID: 2165 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.0.0-btrfs-next-46 #1 [ 3478.468311] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 3478.469681] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs] (...) [ 3478.471758] RSP: 0018:ffffa437826bfaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 3478.472457] RAX: ffff961416ed7000 RBX: 000000000000003d RCX: 0000000000000002 [ 3478.473151] RDX: 000000000000003d RSI: ffff96141e387408 RDI: ffff961599b30000 [ 3478.473837] RBP: ffffa437826bfb8e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffa437826bfb8e [ 3478.474515] R10: ffffa437826bfa70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9614385c8708 [ 3478.475186] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 3478.475840] FS: 00007f8e0e9cc8c0(0000) GS:ffff9615b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 3478.476489] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3478.477127] CR2: 00007f98b67a056e CR3: 0000000005df6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0 [ 3478.477762] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 3478.478385] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 3478.479003] Call Trace: [ 3478.479600] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 3478.480202] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs] [ 3478.480810] btrfs_compare_trees+0x30c/0x690 [btrfs] [ 3478.481388] ? process_extent+0x1280/0x1280 [btrfs] [ 3478.481954] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs] [ 3478.482510] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3478.483062] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs] [ 3478.483581] ? rq_clock_task+0x2e/0x60 [ 3478.484086] ? wake_up_new_task+0x1f3/0x370 [ 3478.484582] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [ 3478.485075] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [ 3478.485552] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [ 3478.486016] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [ 3478.486467] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 3478.486911] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 3478.487337] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [ 3478.487751] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 3478.488159] RIP: 0033:0x7f8e0d7d4dd7 (...) [ 3478.489349] RSP: 002b:00007ffcf6fb4908 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 3478.489742] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f8e0d7d4dd7 [ 3478.490142] RDX: 00007ffcf6fb4990 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000005 [ 3478.490548] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 00007f8e0d6f3700 R09: 00007f8e0d6f3700 [ 3478.490953] R10: 00007f8e0d6f39d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000005 [ 3478.491343] R13: 00005624e0780020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 (...) [ 3478.493352] ---[ end trace d5f537302be4f8c8 ]--- Another possibility, much less likely to happen, is that send will not fail but the contents of the stream it produces may not be correct. To avoid this, do not allow send and relocation (balance) to run in parallel. In the long term the goal is to allow for both to be able to run concurrently without any problems, but that will take a significant effort in development and testing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-04-22 09:44:09 -06:00
mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
fs_info->send_in_progress--;
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
Btrfs: allow omitting stream header and end-cmd for btrfs send Two new flags are added to allow omitting the stream header and the end command for btrfs send streams. This is used in cases where you send multiple snapshots back-to-back in one stream. This used to be encoded like this (with 2 snapshots in this example): <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> + <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> + EOF The new format (if the two new flags are used) is this one: <stream header> + <sequence of commands> + <sequence of commands> + <end cmd> Note that the currently existing receivers treat <end cmd> only as an indication that a new <stream header> is following. This means, you can just skip the sequence <end cmd> <stream header> without loosing compatibility. As long as an EOF is following, the currently existing receivers handle the new format (if the two new flags are used) exactly as the old one. So what is the benefit of this change? The goal is to be able to use a single stream (one TCP connection) to multiplex a request/response handshake plus Btrfs send streams, all in the same stream. In this case you cannot evaluate an EOF condition as an end of the Btrfs send stream. You need something else, and the <end cmd> is just perfect for this purpose. The summary is: The format change is driven by the need to send several Btrfs send streams over a single TCP connections, with the ability for a repeated request/response handshake in the middle. And this format change does not break any existing tool, it is completely compatible. You could compare the old behaviour of the Btrfs send stream to the one of ftp where you need a seperate request/response channel and newly opened data transfer channels for each file, while the new behaviour is more like http using a single stream for everything. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
2013-04-10 11:10:52 -06:00
if (!(sctx->flags & BTRFS_SEND_FLAG_OMIT_END_CMD)) {
ret = begin_cmd(sctx, BTRFS_SEND_C_END);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = send_cmd(sctx);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
out:
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the one we're currently processing) were processed. This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop, which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc warning being displayed in dmesg: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0() Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012 [ 5381.660441] 00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007 [ 5381.660447] 0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660452] 0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0 [ 5381.660457] Call Trace: [ 5381.660464] [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [ 5381.660471] [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0 [ 5381.660476] [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 5381.660480] [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0 [ 5381.660487] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660491] [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440 [ 5381.660495] [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60 [ 5381.660502] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660508] [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0 [ 5381.660515] [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0 [ 5381.660520] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660524] [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50 [ 5381.660530] [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100 [ 5381.660536] [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230 [ 5381.660560] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660564] [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 5381.660569] [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5381.660586] [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs] [ 5381.660601] [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 5381.660615] [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs] [ 5381.660628] [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs] Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c (ino 259) | |-- d (ino 260) | |-- c2 (ino 261) And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is: . (ino 256) |-- a (ino 257) |-- b (ino 258) |-- c2 (ino 261) |-- d2 (ino 260) |-- cc (ino 259) Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child of 260. A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-22 03:00:53 -07:00
WARN_ON(sctx && !ret && !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sctx->pending_dir_moves));
while (sctx && !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sctx->pending_dir_moves)) {
struct rb_node *n;
struct pending_dir_move *pm;
n = rb_first(&sctx->pending_dir_moves);
pm = rb_entry(n, struct pending_dir_move, node);
while (!list_empty(&pm->list)) {
struct pending_dir_move *pm2;
pm2 = list_first_entry(&pm->list,
struct pending_dir_move, list);
free_pending_move(sctx, pm2);
}
free_pending_move(sctx, pm);
}
WARN_ON(sctx && !ret && !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sctx->waiting_dir_moves));
while (sctx && !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sctx->waiting_dir_moves)) {
struct rb_node *n;
struct waiting_dir_move *dm;
n = rb_first(&sctx->waiting_dir_moves);
dm = rb_entry(n, struct waiting_dir_move, node);
rb_erase(&dm->node, &sctx->waiting_dir_moves);
kfree(dm);
}
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation, because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit addressed: 9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22 (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send) This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail. Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send The second btrfs receive command failed with: ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-02-19 07:31:44 -07:00
WARN_ON(sctx && !ret && !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sctx->orphan_dirs));
while (sctx && !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&sctx->orphan_dirs)) {
struct rb_node *n;
struct orphan_dir_info *odi;
n = rb_first(&sctx->orphan_dirs);
odi = rb_entry(n, struct orphan_dir_info, node);
free_orphan_dir_info(sctx, odi);
}
if (sort_clone_roots) {
for (i = 0; i < sctx->clone_roots_cnt; i++)
btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress(
sctx->clone_roots[i].root);
} else {
for (i = 0; sctx && i < clone_sources_to_rollback; i++)
btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress(
sctx->clone_roots[i].root);
btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress(send_root);
}
if (sctx && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sctx->parent_root))
btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress(sctx->parent_root);
kvfree(clone_sources_tmp);
if (sctx) {
if (sctx->send_filp)
fput(sctx->send_filp);
kvfree(sctx->clone_roots);
kvfree(sctx->send_buf);
kvfree(sctx->read_buf);
name_cache_free(sctx);
kfree(sctx);
}
return ret;
}