Some functions like kmalloc/kzalloc return NULL on failure.
When NULL represents failure, !x is commonly used.
This was done using Coccinelle:
@@
expression *e;
identifier l1;
@@
e = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kzalloc\)(...);
...
- e == NULL
+ !e
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some functions like kmalloc/kzalloc return NULL on failure.
When NULL represents failure, !x is commonly used.
This was done using Coccinelle:
@@
expression *e;
identifier l1;
@@
e = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kzalloc\)(...);
...
- e == NULL
+ !e
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some functions like kzalloc return NULL on failure.
When NULL represents failure, !x is commonly used.
This was done using Coccinelle:
@@
expression *e;
identifier l1;
@@
e = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kzalloc\)(...);
...
- e == NULL
+ !e
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some functions like kmalloc/kzalloc return NULL on failure.
When NULL represents failure, !x is commonly used.
This was done using Coccinelle:
@@
expression *e;
identifier l1;
@@
e = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kzalloc\)(...);
...
- e == NULL
+ !e
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some functions like kzalloc return NULL on failure.
When NULL represents failure, !x is commonly used.
This was done using Coccinelle:
@@
expression *e;
identifier l1;
@@
e = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kzalloc\)(...);
...
- e == NULL
+ !e
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Using comparison to false and true is error prone. Fixed multiple warnings as
per checkpatch guidelines.
Signed-off-by: Parth Sane <laerdevstudios@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Lines with #define interlaced with comment lines making a mess.
Separate groups of #define-comment with blank lines.
Separate section title comments with blank lines.
Signed-off-by: Svetlana Orlik <sveta.orlik.code@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Lines with #define interlaced with comment lines making a mess.
Separate groups of #define-comment with blank lines.
Separate section title comments with blank lines.
Signed-off-by: Svetlana Orlik <sveta.orlik.code@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Lines with #define interlaced with comment lines making a mess.
Separate groups of #define-comment with blank lines.
Separate section title comments with blank lines.
Signed-off-by: Svetlana Orlik <sveta.orlik.code@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Many of the comments in the same lines with #define
caused checkpatch warning 'line over 80 characters'.
Move all such comments to line before #define.
This style is already used in some other .h files in accel:
Add blank lines after #define to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Svetlana Orlik <sveta.orlik.code@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Many of the comments in the same lines with #define
caused checkpatch warning 'line over 80 characters'.
Move all such comments to line before #define.
This style is already used in some other .h files in accel:
Add blank lines after #define to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Svetlana Orlik <sveta.orlik.code@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Many of the comments in the same lines with #define
caused checkpatch warning 'line over 80 characters'.
Move all such comments to line before #define.
This style is already used in some other .h files in accel:
Add blank lines after #define to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Svetlana Orlik <sveta.orlik.code@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Convert macro GAT_CONFIG to static inline function as static inline
functions are preferred over macros. This change is possible since the
arguments at all call sites have the same type.
This was done using Coccinelle:
@r@
expression e;
@@
- #define GAT_CONFIG(chan, src) e
+ static inline unsigned int pci230_gat_config(unsigned int chan,
+ unsigned int src)
+{
+ return ((chan & 3) << 3) | (src & 7);
+}
@r1@
expression dev,reg,chan,src;
@@
-GAT_CONFIG(chan, src)
+pci230_gat_config(chan, src)
Also, the comment describing the macro has been removed manually.
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch replaces struct semaphore hif_sema_deinit with struct mutex
hif_deinit_lock. It is better to use mutex because mutex gives better
performance than semaphore.
Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim <chaehyun.lim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch addresses line length errors reported by checkpatch.pl that
could be fixed with simple line breaks.
Signed-off-by: Kathryn Hampton <kh353dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Previously, speakup would see the hi-font bit in attributes.
Since this bit has nothing to do with attributes, we need to clear it.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch changes byVT3253InitTab_RFMD[] and byVT3253B0_RFMD[]
arrays in const arrays since these are not changed anywhere in the
code.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix checkpatch warning:
Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
in file comedi_fops.c
Signed-off-by: Leslie Klein <lesliebklein@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fix checkpatch warning:
Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
in file comedi_buf.c
Signed-off-by: Leslie Klein <lesliebklein@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Arnd Bergmann pointed out that gcc-6 warns about passing negative signed
integer into swab16() due to the macro expansion of 'outw'.
It appears that the register map constants are causing the warnings.
Actually, it might just be the (1 << 15) ones...
Convert all the constants as suggested by checkpatch.pl:
CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro
The BIT() macro will make all the constants explicitly 'unsigned', which
helps to avoid the warning.
Fix the, unsused, DT2821_CHANCSR_PRESLA() macro. The "Present List
Address" (PRESLA) bits in the CHANCSR register are read only. This
define was meant to extract the bits from the read value.
Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Tested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Use x instead of x != NULL.This issue is detected by checkpatch.pl script.
Signed-off-by: Sandhya Bankar <bankarsandhya512@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch defines oui_rfc1042[] and oui_8021h[] arrays from
p80211conv.c as const arrays since these are not changed
anywhere in code.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some functions like kmalloc/kzalloc return NULL on failure.
When NULL represents failure, !x is commonly used.
This was done using Coccinelle:
@@
expression *e;
identifier l1;
@@
e = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kzalloc\)(...);
...
- e == NULL
+ !e
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some functions like kmalloc/kzalloc return NULL on failure.
When NULL represents failure, !x is commonly used.
This was done using Coccinelle:
@@
expression *e;
identifier l1;
@@
e = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kzalloc\)(...);
...
- e == NULL
+ !e
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some functions like kmalloc/kzalloc return NULL on failure.
When NULL represents failure, !x is commonly used.
This was done using Coccinelle:
@@
expression *e;
identifier l1;
@@
e = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kzalloc\)(...);
...
- e == NULL
+ !e
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Some functions like kmalloc/kzalloc return NULL on failure.
When NULL represents failure, !x is commonly used.
This was done using Coccinelle:
@@
expression *e;
identifier l1;
@@
e = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\|devm_kzalloc\)(...);
...
- e == NULL
+ !e
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Change null comparisons of the form x == NULL to !x.
This was done using Coccinelle.
@@ expression e;
@@
- e == NULL
+ !e
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
Signed-off-by: Edward Lipinsky <ellipinsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This fixes a mis-spelled word in a few debug statements.
Signed-off-by: Nik Nyby <nikolas@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This patch removes blank lines in r8192U_wx.c that were flagged by
checkpatch.pl
Signed-off-by: Ben Marsh <bmarsh94@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Remove & from function name,when function name passed as an argument to another function.
Function name is used as pointer without &.
Signed-off-by: Sandhya Bankar <bankarsandhya512@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Use * on subsequent lines and trailing */ on a separate
line in block comments.
Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <amsfield22@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
