[ Upstream commit 3dfe8dde09 ]
We go to lengths to determine whether the PVID should be set
for this port or not, and then fail to take it into account.
Fix this oversight.
Fixes: d8652956cf ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7e1301ed18 ]
The VLANs and PVIDs on the RTL8366 utilizes a "member
configuration" (MC) which is largely unexplained in the
code.
This set-up requires a special ordering: rtl8366_set_pvid()
must be called first, followed by rtl8366_set_vlan(),
else the MC will not be properly allocated. Relax this
by factoring out the code obtaining an MC and reuse
the helper in both rtl8366_set_pvid() and
rtl8366_set_vlan() so we remove this strict ordering
requirement.
In the process, add some better comments and debug prints
so people who read the code understand what is going on.
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6641a2c42b ]
The rtl8366_set_vlan() and rtl8366_set_pvid() get invalid
VLANs tossed at it, especially VLAN0, something the hardware
and driver cannot handle. Check validity and bail out like
we do in the other callbacks.
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4ddcaf1ebb ]
When removing a port from a VLAN we are just erasing the
member config for the VLAN, which is wrong: other ports
can be using it.
Just mask off the port and only zero out the rest of the
member config once ports using of the VLAN are removed
from it.
Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Fixes: d8652956cf ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 788abc6d9d ]
Alter the rtl8366_vlan_add() to call rtl8366_set_vlan()
inside the loop that goes over all VIDs since we now
properly support calling that function more than once.
Augment the loop to postincrement as this is more
intuitive.
The loop moved past the last VID but called
rtl8366_set_vlan() with the port number instead of
the VID, assuming a 1-to-1 correspondence between
ports and VIDs. This was also a bug.
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Fixes: d8652956cf ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 15ab7906cc ]
The RTL8366 would not handle adding new members (ports) to
a VLAN: the code assumed that ->port_vlan_add() was only
called once for a single port. When intializing the
switch with .configure_vlan_while_not_filtering set to
true, the function is called numerous times for adding
all ports to VLAN1, which was something the code could
not handle.
Alter rtl8366_set_vlan() to just |= new members and
untagged flags to 4k and MC VLAN table entries alike.
This makes it possible to just add new ports to a
VLAN.
Put in some helpful debug code that can be used to find
any further bugs here.
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Fixes: d8652956cf ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
There has been some confusion between the port number and
the VLAN ID in this driver. What we need to check for
validity is the VLAN ID, nothing else.
The current confusion came from assigning a few default
VLANs for default routing and we need to rewrite that
properly.
Instead of checking if the port number is a valid VLAN
ID, check the actual VLAN IDs passed in to the callback
one by one as expected.
Fixes: d8652956cf ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We get this regression when using RTL8366RB as part of a bridge
with OpenWrt:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1347 at net/switchdev/switchdev.c:291
switchdev_port_attr_set_now+0x80/0xa4
lan0: Commit of attribute (id=7) failed.
(...)
realtek-smi switch lan0: failed to initialize vlan filtering on this port
This is because it is trying to disable VLAN filtering
on VLAN0, as we have forgot to add 1 to the port number
to get the right VLAN in rtl8366_vlan_filtering(): when
we initialize the VLAN we associate VLAN1 with port 0,
VLAN2 with port 1 etc, so we need to add 1 to the port
offset.
Fixes: d8652956cf ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When building with CONFIG_NET_DSA_REALTEK_SMI and CONFIG_REALTEK_PHY
enabled as loadable modules, we see the following warning:
warning: same module names found:
drivers/net/phy/realtek.ko
drivers/net/dsa/realtek.ko
Rework so the driver name is realtek-smi instead of realtek.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c: In function ‘rtl8366_reset_vlan’:
drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c:234:25: warning: unused variable ‘vlan4k’ [-Wunused-variable]
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This adds a driver core for the Realtek SMI chips and a
subdriver for the RTL8366RB. I just added this chip simply
because it is all I can test.
The code is a massaged variant of the code that has been
sitting out-of-tree in OpenWRT for years in the absence of
a proper switch subsystem. This creates a DSA driver for it.
I have tried to credit the original authors wherever
possible.
The main changes I've done from the OpenWRT code:
- Added an IRQ chip inside the RTL8366RB switch to demux and
handle the line state IRQs.
- Distributed the phy handling out to the PHY driver.
- Added some RTL8366RB code that was missing in the driver at
the time, such as setting up "green ethernet" with a funny
jam table and forcing MAC5 (the CPU port) into 1 GBit.
- Select jam table and add the default jam table from the
vendor driver, also for ASIC "version 0" if need be.
- Do not store jam tables in the device tree, store them
in the driver.
- Pick in the "initvals" jam tables from OpenWRT's driver
and make those get selected per compatible for the
whole system. It's apparently about electrical settings
for this system and whatnot, not really configuration
from device tree.
- Implemented LED control: beware of bugs because there are
no LEDs on the device I am using!
We do not implement custom DSA tags. This is explained in
a comment in the driver as well: this "tagging protocol" is
not simply a few extra bytes tagged on to the ethernet
frame as DSA is used to. Instead, enabling the CPU tags
will make the switch start talking Realtek RRCP internally.
For example a simple ping will make this kind of packets
appear inside the switch:
0000 ff ff ff ff ff ff bc ae c5 6b a8 3d 88 99 a2 00
0010 08 06 00 01 08 00 06 04 00 01 bc ae c5 6b a8 3d
0020 a9 fe 01 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 a9 fe 01 02 00 00
0030 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
As you can see a custom "8899" tagged packet using the
protocol 0xa2. Norm RRCP appears to always have this
protocol set to 0x01 according to OpenRRCP. You can also
see that this is not a ping packet at all, instead the
switch is starting to talk network management issues
with the CPU port.
So for now custom "tagging" is disabled.
This was tested on the D-Link DIR-685 with initramfs and
OpenWRT userspaces and works fine on all the LAN ports
(lan0 .. lan3). The WAN port is yet not working.
Cc: Antti Seppälä <a.seppala@gmail.com>
Cc: Roman Yeryomin <roman@advem.lv>
Cc: Colin Leitner <colin.leitner@googlemail.com>
Cc: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Linus Walleij