redonkable
/
remarkable-linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Releases Activity

procfs: fix /proc/softirqs formatting 

The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making i's value be printed too
far to the right.  This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit
neater.

Currently:
                CPU0
      HI:          0
   TIMER:     599792
  NET_TX:          2
  NET_RX:          6
   BLOCK:      80807
BLOCK_IOPOLL:          0
 TASKLET:      20012
   SCHED:          0
 HRTIMER:         63
     RCU:     619279

With patch:
                    CPU0
          HI:          0
       TIMER:     585582
      NET_TX:          2
      NET_RX:          6
       BLOCK:      80320
BLOCK_IOPOLL:          0
     TASKLET:      19287
       SCHED:          0
     HRTIMER:         62
         RCU:     604441

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
Acked-by: Keika Kobayashi <kobayashi.kk@ncos.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
wifi-calibration
Davidlohr Bueso 2010-10-27 15:34:12 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 03f890f8c2
commit 19cd56c48d
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
fs/proc/softirqs.c
View File

@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
{
int i, j;
seq_printf(p, " ");
seq_printf(p, " ");
for_each_possible_cpu(i)
seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i);
seq_printf(p, "\n");
for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
for_each_possible_cpu(j)
seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
seq_printf(p, "\n");