1
0
Fork 0
stockfish/src/tt.cpp

158 lines
5.3 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
/*
Stockfish, a UCI chess playing engine derived from Glaurung 2.1
Add NNUE evaluation This patch ports the efficiently updatable neural network (NNUE) evaluation to Stockfish. Both the NNUE and the classical evaluations are available, and can be used to assign a value to a position that is later used in alpha-beta (PVS) search to find the best move. The classical evaluation computes this value as a function of various chess concepts, handcrafted by experts, tested and tuned using fishtest. The NNUE evaluation computes this value with a neural network based on basic inputs. The network is optimized and trained on the evalutions of millions of positions at moderate search depth. The NNUE evaluation was first introduced in shogi, and ported to Stockfish afterward. It can be evaluated efficiently on CPUs, and exploits the fact that only parts of the neural network need to be updated after a typical chess move. [The nodchip repository](https://github.com/nodchip/Stockfish) provides additional tools to train and develop the NNUE networks. This patch is the result of contributions of various authors, from various communities, including: nodchip, ynasu87, yaneurao (initial port and NNUE authors), domschl, FireFather, rqs, xXH4CKST3RXx, tttak, zz4032, joergoster, mstembera, nguyenpham, erbsenzaehler, dorzechowski, and vondele. This new evaluation needed various changes to fishtest and the corresponding infrastructure, for which tomtor, ppigazzini, noobpwnftw, daylen, and vondele are gratefully acknowledged. The first networks have been provided by gekkehenker and sergiovieri, with the latter net (nn-97f742aaefcd.nnue) being the current default. The evaluation function can be selected at run time with the `Use NNUE` (true/false) UCI option, provided the `EvalFile` option points the the network file (depending on the GUI, with full path). The performance of the NNUE evaluation relative to the classical evaluation depends somewhat on the hardware, and is expected to improve quickly, but is currently on > 80 Elo on fishtest: 60000 @ 10+0.1 th 1 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f28fe6ea5abc164f05e4c4c ELO: 92.77 +-2.1 (95%) LOS: 100.0% Total: 60000 W: 24193 L: 8543 D: 27264 Ptnml(0-2): 609, 3850, 9708, 10948, 4885 40000 @ 20+0.2 th 8 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f290229a5abc164f05e4c58 ELO: 89.47 +-2.0 (95%) LOS: 100.0% Total: 40000 W: 12756 L: 2677 D: 24567 Ptnml(0-2): 74, 1583, 8550, 7776, 2017 At the same time, the impact on the classical evaluation remains minimal, causing no significant regression: sprt @ 10+0.1 th 1 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2906a2a5abc164f05e4c5b LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) {-6.00,-4.00} Total: 34936 W: 6502 L: 6825 D: 21609 Ptnml(0-2): 571, 4082, 8434, 3861, 520 sprt @ 60+0.6 th 1 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f2906cfa5abc164f05e4c5d LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) {-6.00,-4.00} Total: 10088 W: 1232 L: 1265 D: 7591 Ptnml(0-2): 49, 914, 3170, 843, 68 The needed networks can be found at https://tests.stockfishchess.org/nns It is recommended to use the default one as indicated by the `EvalFile` UCI option. Guidelines for testing new nets can be found at https://github.com/glinscott/fishtest/wiki/Creating-my-first-test#nnue-net-tests Integration has been discussed in various issues: https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/issues/2823 https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/issues/2728 The integration branch will be closed after the merge: https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2825 https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/tree/nnue-player-wip closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/2912 This will be an exciting time for computer chess, looking forward to seeing the evolution of this approach. Bench: 4746616
2020-08-05 09:11:15 -06:00
Copyright (C) 2004-2020 The Stockfish developers (see AUTHORS file)
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
Stockfish is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
Stockfish is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#include <cstring> // For std::memset
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
#include "bitboard.h"
#include "misc.h"
#include "thread.h"
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
#include "tt.h"
#include "uci.h"
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
TranspositionTable TT; // Our global transposition table
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
/// TTEntry::save() populates the TTEntry with a new node's data, possibly
/// overwriting an old position. Update is not atomic and can be racy.
void TTEntry::save(Key k, Value v, bool pv, Bound b, Depth d, Move m, Value ev) {
// Preserve any existing move for the same position
if (m || (uint16_t)k != key16)
move16 = (uint16_t)m;
Allow TT entries with key16==0 to be fetched Fix the issue where a TT entry with key16==0 would always be reported as a miss. Instead, we'll use depth8 to detect whether the TT entry is occupied. In order to do that, we'll change DEPTH_OFFSET to -7 (depth8==0) to distinguish between an unoccupied entry and the otherwise lowest possible depth, i.e., DEPTH_NONE (depth8==1). To prevent a performance regression, we'll reorder the TT entry fields by the access order of TranspositionTable::probe(). Memory in general works fastest when accessed in sequential order. We'll also match the store order in TTEntry::save() with the entry field order, and re-order the 'if-or' expressions in TTEntry::save() from the cheapest to the most expensive. Finally, as we now have a proper TT entry occupancy test, we'll fix a minor corner case with hashfull reporting. To reproduce: - Use a big hash - Either: a. Start 31 very quick searches (this wraparounds generation to 0); or b. Force generation of the first search to 0. - go depth infinite Before the fix, hashfull would incorrectly report nearly full hash immediately after the search start, since TranspositionTable::hashfull() used to consider only the entry generation and not whether the entry was actually occupied. STC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25} Total: 36848 W: 4091 L: 3898 D: 28859 Ptnml(0-2): 158, 2996, 11972, 3091, 207 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3f98d5dc02a01a0c2881f7 LTC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25} Total: 32280 W: 1828 L: 1653 D: 28799 Ptnml(0-2): 34, 1428, 13051, 1583, 44 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3fe77a87a5c3c63d8f5332 closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3048 Bench: 3760677
2020-08-21 03:12:39 -06:00
// Overwrite less valuable entries (cheapest checks first)
if (b == BOUND_EXACT
|| (uint16_t)k != key16
|| d - DEPTH_OFFSET > depth8 - 4)
{
Allow TT entries with key16==0 to be fetched Fix the issue where a TT entry with key16==0 would always be reported as a miss. Instead, we'll use depth8 to detect whether the TT entry is occupied. In order to do that, we'll change DEPTH_OFFSET to -7 (depth8==0) to distinguish between an unoccupied entry and the otherwise lowest possible depth, i.e., DEPTH_NONE (depth8==1). To prevent a performance regression, we'll reorder the TT entry fields by the access order of TranspositionTable::probe(). Memory in general works fastest when accessed in sequential order. We'll also match the store order in TTEntry::save() with the entry field order, and re-order the 'if-or' expressions in TTEntry::save() from the cheapest to the most expensive. Finally, as we now have a proper TT entry occupancy test, we'll fix a minor corner case with hashfull reporting. To reproduce: - Use a big hash - Either: a. Start 31 very quick searches (this wraparounds generation to 0); or b. Force generation of the first search to 0. - go depth infinite Before the fix, hashfull would incorrectly report nearly full hash immediately after the search start, since TranspositionTable::hashfull() used to consider only the entry generation and not whether the entry was actually occupied. STC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25} Total: 36848 W: 4091 L: 3898 D: 28859 Ptnml(0-2): 158, 2996, 11972, 3091, 207 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3f98d5dc02a01a0c2881f7 LTC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25} Total: 32280 W: 1828 L: 1653 D: 28799 Ptnml(0-2): 34, 1428, 13051, 1583, 44 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3fe77a87a5c3c63d8f5332 closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3048 Bench: 3760677
2020-08-21 03:12:39 -06:00
assert(d > DEPTH_OFFSET);
assert(d < 256 + DEPTH_OFFSET);
key16 = (uint16_t)k;
Allow TT entries with key16==0 to be fetched Fix the issue where a TT entry with key16==0 would always be reported as a miss. Instead, we'll use depth8 to detect whether the TT entry is occupied. In order to do that, we'll change DEPTH_OFFSET to -7 (depth8==0) to distinguish between an unoccupied entry and the otherwise lowest possible depth, i.e., DEPTH_NONE (depth8==1). To prevent a performance regression, we'll reorder the TT entry fields by the access order of TranspositionTable::probe(). Memory in general works fastest when accessed in sequential order. We'll also match the store order in TTEntry::save() with the entry field order, and re-order the 'if-or' expressions in TTEntry::save() from the cheapest to the most expensive. Finally, as we now have a proper TT entry occupancy test, we'll fix a minor corner case with hashfull reporting. To reproduce: - Use a big hash - Either: a. Start 31 very quick searches (this wraparounds generation to 0); or b. Force generation of the first search to 0. - go depth infinite Before the fix, hashfull would incorrectly report nearly full hash immediately after the search start, since TranspositionTable::hashfull() used to consider only the entry generation and not whether the entry was actually occupied. STC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25} Total: 36848 W: 4091 L: 3898 D: 28859 Ptnml(0-2): 158, 2996, 11972, 3091, 207 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3f98d5dc02a01a0c2881f7 LTC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25} Total: 32280 W: 1828 L: 1653 D: 28799 Ptnml(0-2): 34, 1428, 13051, 1583, 44 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3fe77a87a5c3c63d8f5332 closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3048 Bench: 3760677
2020-08-21 03:12:39 -06:00
depth8 = (uint8_t)(d - DEPTH_OFFSET);
genBound8 = (uint8_t)(TT.generation8 | uint8_t(pv) << 2 | b);
value16 = (int16_t)v;
eval16 = (int16_t)ev;
}
}
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
/// TranspositionTable::resize() sets the size of the transposition table,
/// measured in megabytes. Transposition table consists of a power of 2 number
/// of clusters and each cluster consists of ClusterSize number of TTEntry.
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
void TranspositionTable::resize(size_t mbSize) {
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
Threads.main()->wait_for_search_finished();
aligned_large_pages_free(table);
clusterCount = mbSize * 1024 * 1024 / sizeof(Cluster);
table = static_cast<Cluster*>(aligned_large_pages_alloc(clusterCount * sizeof(Cluster)));
if (!table)
{
std::cerr << "Failed to allocate " << mbSize
<< "MB for transposition table." << std::endl;
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
}
clear();
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
}
/// TranspositionTable::clear() initializes the entire transposition table to zero,
// in a multi-threaded way.
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
void TranspositionTable::clear() {
std::vector<std::thread> threads;
for (size_t idx = 0; idx < Options["Threads"]; ++idx)
{
threads.emplace_back([this, idx]() {
// Thread binding gives faster search on systems with a first-touch policy
if (Options["Threads"] > 8)
WinProcGroup::bindThisThread(idx);
// Each thread will zero its part of the hash table
const size_t stride = size_t(clusterCount / Options["Threads"]),
start = size_t(stride * idx),
len = idx != Options["Threads"] - 1 ?
stride : clusterCount - start;
std::memset(&table[start], 0, len * sizeof(Cluster));
});
}
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
for (std::thread& th : threads)
th.join();
}
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
/// TranspositionTable::probe() looks up the current position in the transposition
/// table. It returns true and a pointer to the TTEntry if the position is found.
/// Otherwise, it returns false and a pointer to an empty or least valuable TTEntry
/// to be replaced later. The replace value of an entry is calculated as its depth
/// minus 8 times its relative age. TTEntry t1 is considered more valuable than
/// TTEntry t2 if its replace value is greater than that of t2.
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
TTEntry* TranspositionTable::probe(const Key key, bool& found) const {
TTEntry* const tte = first_entry(key);
const uint16_t key16 = (uint16_t)key; // Use the low 16 bits as key inside the cluster
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
for (int i = 0; i < ClusterSize; ++i)
Allow TT entries with key16==0 to be fetched Fix the issue where a TT entry with key16==0 would always be reported as a miss. Instead, we'll use depth8 to detect whether the TT entry is occupied. In order to do that, we'll change DEPTH_OFFSET to -7 (depth8==0) to distinguish between an unoccupied entry and the otherwise lowest possible depth, i.e., DEPTH_NONE (depth8==1). To prevent a performance regression, we'll reorder the TT entry fields by the access order of TranspositionTable::probe(). Memory in general works fastest when accessed in sequential order. We'll also match the store order in TTEntry::save() with the entry field order, and re-order the 'if-or' expressions in TTEntry::save() from the cheapest to the most expensive. Finally, as we now have a proper TT entry occupancy test, we'll fix a minor corner case with hashfull reporting. To reproduce: - Use a big hash - Either: a. Start 31 very quick searches (this wraparounds generation to 0); or b. Force generation of the first search to 0. - go depth infinite Before the fix, hashfull would incorrectly report nearly full hash immediately after the search start, since TranspositionTable::hashfull() used to consider only the entry generation and not whether the entry was actually occupied. STC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25} Total: 36848 W: 4091 L: 3898 D: 28859 Ptnml(0-2): 158, 2996, 11972, 3091, 207 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3f98d5dc02a01a0c2881f7 LTC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25} Total: 32280 W: 1828 L: 1653 D: 28799 Ptnml(0-2): 34, 1428, 13051, 1583, 44 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3fe77a87a5c3c63d8f5332 closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3048 Bench: 3760677
2020-08-21 03:12:39 -06:00
if (tte[i].key16 == key16 || !tte[i].depth8)
{
tte[i].genBound8 = uint8_t(generation8 | (tte[i].genBound8 & 0x7)); // Refresh
Allow TT entries with key16==0 to be fetched Fix the issue where a TT entry with key16==0 would always be reported as a miss. Instead, we'll use depth8 to detect whether the TT entry is occupied. In order to do that, we'll change DEPTH_OFFSET to -7 (depth8==0) to distinguish between an unoccupied entry and the otherwise lowest possible depth, i.e., DEPTH_NONE (depth8==1). To prevent a performance regression, we'll reorder the TT entry fields by the access order of TranspositionTable::probe(). Memory in general works fastest when accessed in sequential order. We'll also match the store order in TTEntry::save() with the entry field order, and re-order the 'if-or' expressions in TTEntry::save() from the cheapest to the most expensive. Finally, as we now have a proper TT entry occupancy test, we'll fix a minor corner case with hashfull reporting. To reproduce: - Use a big hash - Either: a. Start 31 very quick searches (this wraparounds generation to 0); or b. Force generation of the first search to 0. - go depth infinite Before the fix, hashfull would incorrectly report nearly full hash immediately after the search start, since TranspositionTable::hashfull() used to consider only the entry generation and not whether the entry was actually occupied. STC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25} Total: 36848 W: 4091 L: 3898 D: 28859 Ptnml(0-2): 158, 2996, 11972, 3091, 207 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3f98d5dc02a01a0c2881f7 LTC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25} Total: 32280 W: 1828 L: 1653 D: 28799 Ptnml(0-2): 34, 1428, 13051, 1583, 44 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3fe77a87a5c3c63d8f5332 closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3048 Bench: 3760677
2020-08-21 03:12:39 -06:00
return found = (bool)tte[i].depth8, &tte[i];
}
// Find an entry to be replaced according to the replacement strategy
TTEntry* replace = tte;
for (int i = 1; i < ClusterSize; ++i)
// Due to our packed storage format for generation and its cyclic
// nature we add 263 (256 is the modulus plus 7 to keep the unrelated
// lowest three bits from affecting the result) to calculate the entry
// age correctly even after generation8 overflows into the next cycle.
if ( replace->depth8 - ((263 + generation8 - replace->genBound8) & 0xF8)
> tte[i].depth8 - ((263 + generation8 - tte[i].genBound8) & 0xF8))
replace = &tte[i];
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
return found = false, replace;
2008-08-31 23:59:13 -06:00
}
/// TranspositionTable::hashfull() returns an approximation of the hashtable
/// occupation during a search. The hash is x permill full, as per UCI protocol.
int TranspositionTable::hashfull() const {
int cnt = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
for (int j = 0; j < ClusterSize; ++j)
Allow TT entries with key16==0 to be fetched Fix the issue where a TT entry with key16==0 would always be reported as a miss. Instead, we'll use depth8 to detect whether the TT entry is occupied. In order to do that, we'll change DEPTH_OFFSET to -7 (depth8==0) to distinguish between an unoccupied entry and the otherwise lowest possible depth, i.e., DEPTH_NONE (depth8==1). To prevent a performance regression, we'll reorder the TT entry fields by the access order of TranspositionTable::probe(). Memory in general works fastest when accessed in sequential order. We'll also match the store order in TTEntry::save() with the entry field order, and re-order the 'if-or' expressions in TTEntry::save() from the cheapest to the most expensive. Finally, as we now have a proper TT entry occupancy test, we'll fix a minor corner case with hashfull reporting. To reproduce: - Use a big hash - Either: a. Start 31 very quick searches (this wraparounds generation to 0); or b. Force generation of the first search to 0. - go depth infinite Before the fix, hashfull would incorrectly report nearly full hash immediately after the search start, since TranspositionTable::hashfull() used to consider only the entry generation and not whether the entry was actually occupied. STC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {-0.25,1.25} Total: 36848 W: 4091 L: 3898 D: 28859 Ptnml(0-2): 158, 2996, 11972, 3091, 207 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3f98d5dc02a01a0c2881f7 LTC: LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) {0.25,1.25} Total: 32280 W: 1828 L: 1653 D: 28799 Ptnml(0-2): 34, 1428, 13051, 1583, 44 https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/5f3fe77a87a5c3c63d8f5332 closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/3048 Bench: 3760677
2020-08-21 03:12:39 -06:00
cnt += table[i].entry[j].depth8 && (table[i].entry[j].genBound8 & 0xF8) == generation8;
return cnt / ClusterSize;
}